Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-05 10:45 UTC

docusign / docusign-esign-csharp-client

The Official Docusign C# Client Library used to interact with the eSignature REST API. Send, sign, and approve documents using this client.

C#MIT★ 137 stars⑂ 163 forkssince Dec 2014View on GitHub ↗

docusign/docusign-esign-csharp-client holds a health index of 63 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Sustainability & Governance (72/100) and lowest on Engineering Quality (47/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

63
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

63
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 59 is calibrated to 63 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Docusign Inc.Organization · verified domain
281 followers186 public repossince May 2010

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

66Good · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
4.8/36Commit cadence — 7/52 weeks with commits
8.1/18Commit volume — 7 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 1 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
commits_last_year7
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year7
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 100 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 0 days ago
19.8/27Release cadence — a release every ~49.8 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count100
latest_release_tagv11.1.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release0
mean_days_between_releases49.8
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

56Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
34.6/60Stars — 137 stars
18.4/25Forks — 163 forks
9.1/15Watchers — 45 watchers
Inputs used
forks163
stars137
watchers45
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

72Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
10.3/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 54% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 37 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 4 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled37
top_contributor_share0.541
How it's scored
37.4/42Issue resolution — 89% of issues closed
22/30PR acceptance — 155/211 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
15/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — all changesets reviewed
Inputs used
merged_prs155
open_issues29
closed_issues236
prs_merged_7d1
prs_decided_7d1
prs_merged_30d1
prs_decided_30d1
issue_closed_ratio0.891
closed_unmerged_prs56
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
20/20Verified domain
17.6/25Owner reach — 281 followers of docusign
25/25Track record — 186 public repos, account ~16 yr old
Inputs used
followers281
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedyes
owner_logindocusign
public_repos186
account_age_days5,994

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

47Weak · 19% of overall
How it's scored
0/24CI workflows
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
4/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 7 out of 29 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 2
Inputs used
has_cino
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://developers.docusign.com/docs/esign-rest-api/sdks/csharp/
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 6 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsdocusign, docusign-api, esign, esignature, rest, electronic-signatures
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://developers.docusign.com/docs/esign-rest-api/sdks/csharp/
docs_sitehttps://developers.docusign.com/docs/esign-rest-api/sdks/csharp/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

52Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
0.5/2.5CI-Tests — 7 out of 29 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 2
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
7.5/7.5Code-Review — all changesets reviewed
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 4 contributing companies or organizations
0/10Dangerous-Workflow — no data
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
0/7.5Maintained — 1 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — no data
1/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 2
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — no data
3.8/7.5Vulnerabilities — 5 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated12
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive6
scorecard_aggregate4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories5
affected_packages3
assessed_packages75
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severityhigh 1, moderate 2
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 75 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

55Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 76 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.76
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrap — sdk/src/DocuSign.eSign/DocuSign.eSign.csproj, test/SdkNetCoreTests/SdkNetCoreTests.csproj, test/SdkTests/SdkTests.csproj (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — C# (statically typed)
0/10Reproducible environment
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles—
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestssdk/src/DocuSign.eSign/DocuSign.eSign.csproj, test/SdkNetCoreTests/SdkNetCoreTests.csproj, test/SdkTests/SdkTests.csproj, test/SdkTests462/SdkTests462.csproj
dependency_bot_commit_share0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — C# (statically typed)
48.3/55Manageable file sizes — 84/691 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageC#
largest_source_bytes2,523,030
source_files_sampled691
oversized_source_files84

Key facts

137GitHub stars
37contributors
7commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
100releases
1bus factor
29open issues
—package ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 163 ⇿
0Stars
163Forks
95Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

0408012016015942015-012020-082026-04
Major 6Minor 39Patch 23

Each point covers 11 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.0 / 10
4.0aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-10-05 10:44 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
2CI-Tests7 out of 29 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 2
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
10Code-Reviewall changesets reviewed
10Contributorsproject has 4 contributing companies or organizations
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
0Maintained1 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
n/aPinned-Dependenciesno dependencies found
2SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 2
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
5Vulnerabilities5 existing vulnerabilities detected
All dependencies 75

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 0 direct and 75 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
NuGetBouncyCastle.Cryptography2.2.1indirect
NuGetBouncyCastle.Cryptography2.4.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Bcl.AsyncInterfaces8.0.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Bcl.TimeProvider8.0.1indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.IdentityModel.Abstractions8.2.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.IdentityModel.JsonWebTokens8.2.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.IdentityModel.Logging1.1.4indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.IdentityModel.Logging8.2.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.IdentityModel.Tokens5.1.4indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.IdentityModel.Tokens8.2.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk17.9.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.NETCore.Platforms1.1.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Win32.Primitives4.3.0indirect
NuGetMSTest.TestAdapter1.3.2indirect
NuGetMSTest.TestAdapter3.3.1indirect
NuGetMSTest.TestFramework1.3.2indirect
NuGetMSTest.TestFramework3.3.1indirect
NuGetNETStandard.Library1.6.1indirect
NuGetNewtonsoft.Json13.0.1indirect
NuGetNewtonsoft.Json13.0.3indirect
NuGetRestSharpSigned105.2.3indirect
NuGetSprache2.3.1indirect
NuGetSystem.AppContext4.3.0indirect
NuGetSystem.Buffers4.5.1indirect
NuGetSystem.Collections4.3.0indirect
NuGetSystem.Collections.Concurrent4.3.0indirect
NuGetSystem.ComponentModel.Annotations5.0.0indirect
NuGetSystem.Console4.3.0indirect
NuGetSystem.Diagnostics.Debug4.3.0indirect
NuGetSystem.Diagnostics.DiagnosticSource4.3.0indirect
NuGetSystem.Diagnostics.Tools4.3.0indirect
NuGetSystem.Diagnostics.Tracing4.3.0indirect
NuGetSystem.Globalization4.3.0indirect
NuGetSystem.Globalization.Calendars4.3.0indirect
NuGetSystem.IdentityModel.Tokens.Jwt5.1.4indirect
NuGetSystem.IO4.3.0indirect
NuGetSystem.IO.Compression4.3.0indirect
NuGetSystem.IO.Compression.ZipFile4.3.0indirect
NuGetSystem.IO.FileSystem4.3.0indirect
NuGetSystem.IO.FileSystem.Primitives4.3.0indirect
NuGetSystem.Linq4.3.0indirect
NuGetSystem.Linq.Expressions4.3.0indirect
NuGetSystem.Memory4.5.5indirect
NuGetSystem.Net.Http4.3.0indirect
NuGetSystem.Net.Primitives4.3.0indirect
NuGetSystem.Net.Sockets4.3.0indirect
NuGetSystem.Numerics.Vectors4.5.0indirect
NuGetSystem.ObjectModel4.3.0indirect
NuGetSystem.Reflection4.3.0indirect
NuGetSystem.Reflection.Extensions4.3.0indirect
NuGetSystem.Reflection.Primitives4.3.0indirect
NuGetSystem.Resources.ResourceManager4.3.0indirect
NuGetSystem.Runtime4.3.0indirect
NuGetSystem.Runtime.CompilerServices.Unsafe6.0.0indirect
NuGetSystem.Runtime.Extensions4.3.0indirect
NuGetSystem.Runtime.Handles4.3.0indirect
NuGetSystem.Runtime.InteropServices4.3.0indirect
NuGetSystem.Runtime.InteropServices.RuntimeInformation4.3.0indirect
NuGetSystem.Runtime.Numerics4.3.0indirect
NuGetSystem.Security.Cryptography.Algorithms4.3.0indirect
NuGetSystem.Security.Cryptography.Encoding4.3.0indirect
NuGetSystem.Security.Cryptography.Primitives4.3.0indirect
NuGetSystem.Security.Cryptography.X509Certificates4.3.0indirect
NuGetSystem.Text.Encoding4.3.0indirect
NuGetSystem.Text.Encoding.Extensions4.3.0indirect
NuGetSystem.Text.Encodings.Web8.0.0indirect
NuGetSystem.Text.Json8.0.5indirect
NuGetSystem.Text.RegularExpressions4.3.1indirect
NuGetSystem.Threading4.3.0indirect
NuGetSystem.Threading.Tasks4.3.0indirect
NuGetSystem.Threading.Tasks.Extensions4.5.4indirect
NuGetSystem.Threading.Timer4.3.0indirect
NuGetSystem.ValueTuple4.5.0indirect
NuGetSystem.Xml.ReaderWriter4.3.0indirect
NuGetSystem.Xml.XDocument4.3.0indirect
Dependency advisories 3

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 75 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 3 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
System.Net.Http4.3.0indirecthigh14.3.4
BouncyCastle.Cryptography2.2.1indirectmoderate32.3.1
System.IdentityModel.Tokens.Jwt5.1.4indirectmoderate17.1.2

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics.