Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-14 08:34 UTC

domenukk / md-tmpl

Fast and powerful templates. Valid markdown. Strongly typed and great for agents. Supports Rust, Python, Go, TypeScript

Rust · TypeScriptApache-2.0★ 2 stars⑂ 1 forksince Jun 2026View on GitHub ↗

domenukk/md-tmpl holds a health index of 57 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (78/100) and lowest on Security (33/100). It was last updated 5 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

57
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

57
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 55 is calibrated to 57 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Dominik MaierPersonal account
380 followers99 public repossince Jun 2010

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
Gogithub.com/domenukk/md-tmpl/go/md_tmplv0.10.0-125 days ago—
crates.iomd-tmpl0.10.0249145 days agoagentllmmarkdownprompttemplatetemplate-enginetext-processing
crates.iomd-tmpl-core0.10.0217115 days agoagentllmmarkdownprompttemplatetemplate-enginetext-processing
crates.iomd-tmpl-macros0.10.0197145 days agocompile-timellmproc-macroprompttemplate
PyPImd-tmpl0.10.01,169125 days agotemplatepromptllmaityped

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

77Good · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 5 days ago
6.9/36Commit cadence — 10/52 weeks with commits
15.8/18Commit volume — 57 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year57
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push5
active_weeks_last_year10
How it's scored
16.2/27Ships releases — 20 version tags (no GitHub releases)
36/36Release recency — latest release 5 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~7 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count20
latest_release_tag0.10.0
releases_from_tagsyes
days_since_latest_release5
mean_days_between_releases7
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

38Weak · 17% of overall
How it's scored
0/60Stars — 2 stars
0/25Forks — 1 forks
0/15Watchers — 0 watchers
Inputs used
forks1
stars2
watchers0
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (Apache-2.0)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
43.5/80Monthly downloads — 1,832 downloads/month across crates, go, pypi
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesgithub.com/domenukk/md-tmpl/go/md_tmpl, md-tmpl, md-tmpl-core, md-tmpl-macros, md-tmpl
dependents—
ecosystemscrates, go, pypi
total_downloads1,988
monthly_downloads1,832
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

43Weak · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 100% of commits
1.4/13.5Contributor breadth — 1 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 7 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled1
top_contributor_share1
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolution — no issues or no data
0/30PR acceptance — no decided pull requests or no data
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs0
open_issues0
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio—
closed_unmerged_prs0
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution, PR acceptance, Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
18.6/25Owner reach — 380 followers of domenukk
25/25Track record — 99 public repos, account ~16 yr old
Inputs used
followers380
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_logindomenukk
public_repos99
account_age_days5,944
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 5 package(s) on crates, go, pypi
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 5 days ago
20/20Version history — 14 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesgithub.com/domenukk/md-tmpl/go/md_tmpl, md-tmpl, md-tmpl-core, md-tmpl-macros, md-tmpl
ecosystemscrates, go, pypi
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish5

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

78Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 2 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — Cargo.toml ([workspace.lints]), crates/md-tmpl-compile-tests/Cargo.toml ([lints]), crates/md-tmpl-core/Cargo.toml ([lints]), crates/md-tmpl-ffi/Cargo.toml ([lints]), crates/md-tmpl-macros/Cargo.toml ([lints]), crates/md-tmpl-python/Cargo.toml ([lints]), crates/md-tmpl-python/pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff]), crates/md-tmpl-wasm/Cargo.toml ([lints]), crates/md-tmpl/Cargo.toml ([lints]), eslint.config.mjs, rustfmt.toml
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — no data
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://github.com/domenukk/md-tmpl/blob/main/crates/md-tmpl-python/README.md
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 2 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsllm, prompts
has_wikiyes
homepage—
docs_sitehttps://github.com/domenukk/md-tmpl/blob/main/crates/md-tmpl-python/README.md
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

33At Risk · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Tests — no data
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 7 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — no SAST tool detected
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 34 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated15
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive3
scorecard_aggregate3.3
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): CI-Tests, Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

61Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
8.4/40Legible commit history — 9 of 57 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.158
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — justfile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — Cargo.toml ([workspace.lints]), crates/md-tmpl-compile-tests/Cargo.toml ([lints]), crates/md-tmpl-core/Cargo.toml ([lints]), crates/md-tmpl-ffi/Cargo.toml ([lints]), crates/md-tmpl-macros/Cargo.toml ([lints]), crates/md-tmpl-python/Cargo.toml ([lints]), crates/md-tmpl-python/pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff]), crates/md-tmpl-wasm/Cargo.toml ([lints]), crates/md-tmpl/Cargo.toml ([lints]), eslint.config.mjs, rustfmt.toml
11/11Static type checking — crates/md-tmpl-python/python/md_tmpl/py.typed, crates/md-tmpl-typescript/tsconfig.json, crates/md-tmpl-wasm/benchmarks/tsconfig.json, crates/md-tmpl-wasm/tsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 57
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesCargo.lock, go.sum, package-lock.json
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_filesjustfile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configscrates/md-tmpl-python/python/md_tmpl/py.typed, crates/md-tmpl-typescript/tsconfig.json, crates/md-tmpl-wasm/benchmarks/tsconfig.json, crates/md-tmpl-wasm/tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsCargo.toml, benchmarks/Cargo.toml, crates/md-tmpl-compile-tests/Cargo.toml, crates/md-tmpl-core/Cargo.toml, crates/md-tmpl-ffi/Cargo.toml, crates/md-tmpl-macros/Cargo.toml, crates/md-tmpl-python/Cargo.toml, crates/md-tmpl-wasm/Cargo.toml, crates/md-tmpl/Cargo.toml, go/cmd/pt-gen-go/go.mod, go/md_tmpl/go.mod
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — Rust (statically typed)
53.5/55Manageable file sizes — 6/218 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageRust
largest_source_bytes353,557
source_files_sampled218
oversized_source_files6
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examples — examples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

2GitHub stars
1contributors
57commits, last 12 months
5days since last push
20releases
1bus factor
0open issues
crates.io, npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • Could not fetch crates package 'md-tmpl-ffi' from its registry
  • Could not fetch crates package 'md-tmpl-wasm' from its registry
  • Could not fetch crates package 'md-tmpl-python' from its registry
  • pypi download statistics for 'md-tmpl' unavailable this scan (stats endpoint failed after retries); adoption may be under-evidenced
  • pypi download figures for md-tmpl carried forward from the previous scan (stats endpoint unavailable this scan)
  • GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 3.3 / 10
3.3aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-14 08:34 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
n/aCI-Testsno pull request found
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 7 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTno SAST tool detected
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities34 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 29
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
npmtypescript^6.0.3package.json
crates.iothiserror2crates/md-tmpl-core/Cargo.toml
crates.iohashbrown0.17crates/md-tmpl-core/Cargo.toml
crates.ioitoa1crates/md-tmpl-core/Cargo.toml
crates.iotyped-builder—crates/md-tmpl-core/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde1crates/md-tmpl-core/Cargo.toml
crates.ioflexbuffers25.12crates/md-tmpl-core/Cargo.toml
crates.iospin0.12crates/md-tmpl-core/Cargo.toml
crates.iociborium0.2.2crates/md-tmpl-core/Cargo.toml
crates.iomd-tmpl0.10.0crates/md-tmpl-ffi/Cargo.toml
crates.iomd-tmpl-core0.10.0crates/md-tmpl-macros/Cargo.toml
crates.iohashbrown0.17crates/md-tmpl-macros/Cargo.toml
crates.iosyn2crates/md-tmpl-macros/Cargo.toml
crates.ioquote1crates/md-tmpl-macros/Cargo.toml
crates.ioproc-macro21crates/md-tmpl-macros/Cargo.toml
crates.iomd-tmpl0.10.0crates/md-tmpl-python/Cargo.toml
crates.iopyo30.29crates/md-tmpl-python/Cargo.toml
crates.iohashbrown0.17crates/md-tmpl-python/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_json1crates/md-tmpl-python/Cargo.toml
crates.iotyped-builder—crates/md-tmpl-python/Cargo.toml
PyPIflatbuffers>=25.12crates/md-tmpl-python/pyproject.toml
crates.iomd-tmpl0.10.0crates/md-tmpl-wasm/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_json1crates/md-tmpl-wasm/Cargo.toml
crates.iowasm-bindgen0.2crates/md-tmpl-wasm/Cargo.toml
crates.iojs-sys0.3crates/md-tmpl-wasm/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde-wasm-bindgen0.6crates/md-tmpl-wasm/Cargo.toml
crates.iomd-tmpl-core0.10.0crates/md-tmpl/Cargo.toml
crates.iomd-tmpl-macros0.10.0crates/md-tmpl/Cargo.toml
Gogithub.com/BurntSushi/tomlv1.6.0go/md_tmpl/go.mod
All dependencies not collected

The resolved dependency set could not be collected for this report: GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Go, crates.io, PyPI.