Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-19 01:36 UTC

dotnet-websharper / core

WebSharper - Full-stack, functional, reactive web apps and microservices in F# and C#

F#Apache-2.0★ 632 stars⑂ 54 forkssince Mar 2013View on GitHub ↗

dotnet-websharper/core holds a health index of 77 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Vitality (87/100) and lowest on Security (50/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

77
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

77
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 66 is calibrated to 77 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

45 followers158 public repossince Dec 2017

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

87Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 0 days ago
18.7/36Commit cadence27/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume196 commits in the last year
5/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained5 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 5
Inputs used
commits_last_year196
human_commit_share0.98
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year27

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases100 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 84 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~31.3 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count100
latest_release_tag10.1.6.676
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release84
mean_days_between_releases31.3
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

69Good · 17% of overall
How it's scored
45.4/60Stars632 stars
14.4/25Forks54 forks
8/15Watchers29 watchers
Inputs used
forks54
stars632
watchers29
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (Apache-2.0)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

58Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
9.6/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 57% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth22 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 14 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled22
top_contributor_share0.572
How it's scored
34.1/42Issue resolution81% of issues closed
26.2/30PR acceptance119/136 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 1/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs119
open_issues272
closed_issues1,170
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio0.811
closed_unmerged_prs17
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domain
12/25Owner reach45 followers of dotnet-websharper
25/25Track record158 public repos, account ~8 yr old
Inputs used
followers45
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_logindotnet-websharper
public_repos158
account_age_days3,204

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

65Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows1 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests0 out of 1 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

90Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://websharper.com
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics9 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicswebsharper, fsharp, csharp, frp, mvu, functional, fullstack, microservices, static-site-generator
has_wikino
homepagehttps://websharper.com
docs_sitehttps://websharper.com
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

50Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Tests0 out of 1 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 1/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 14 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
3.8/7.5Maintained5 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 5
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities14 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate3.6
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories14
affected_packages5
assessed_packages147
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severityhigh 4, moderate 1
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 147 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

67Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions.github/copilot-instructions.md, AGENTS.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
27.8/40Legible commit history51 of 98 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.52
agent_instruction_files.github/copilot-instructions.md, AGENTS.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes16,802
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrapsrc/compiler/WebSharper.DllBrowser/WebSharper.DllBrowser.csproj, src/compiler/WebSharper.MSBuild.CSharp/WebSharper.MSBuild.CSharp.csproj, src/compiler/WebSharper.MSBuild.FSharp/WebSharper.MSBuild.FSharp.csproj (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checkingsrc/compiler/WebSharper.TypeScriptParser/tsconfig.json, tests/Web/tsconfig.json, tests/WebSharper.Library.Tests/consumer/tsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environmentlockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8Automated maintenance2 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespackage-lock.json
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configssrc/compiler/WebSharper.TypeScriptParser/tsconfig.json, tests/Web/tsconfig.json, tests/WebSharper.Library.Tests/consumer/tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestssrc/compiler/WebSharper.DllBrowser/WebSharper.DllBrowser.csproj, src/compiler/WebSharper.MSBuild.CSharp/WebSharper.MSBuild.CSharp.csproj, src/compiler/WebSharper.MSBuild.FSharp/WebSharper.MSBuild.FSharp.csproj, tests/Web.TypeScript/Web.TypeScript.csproj, tests/Web/Web.csproj, tests/WebSharper.CSharp.Interop.Tests/WebSharper.CSharp.Interop.Tests.csproj, tests/WebSharper.CSharp.Sitelets.Tests/WebSharper.CSharp.Sitelets.Tests.csproj, tests/WebSharper.CSharp.StaticHtml.Tests/WebSharper.CSharp.StaticHtml.Tests.csproj, tests/WebSharper.CSharp.Tests/WebSharper.CSharp.Tests.csproj
dependency_bot_commit_share0.02
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeF# (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes0/55 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageF#
largest_source_bytes31,918
source_files_sampled55
oversized_source_files0
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)not applicable to this kind of software
20/20MCP server
0/40Runnable examples
Inputs used
example_dirs
has_mcp_signalyes
api_schema_files
interfaces_expected_of
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto). Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

632GitHub stars
22contributors
196commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
100releases
1bus factor
272open issues
npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 54 ⇿
0Stars
54Forks
100Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

01020304050605432014-122020-102026-08
Major 0Minor 0Patch 0

Each point covers 11 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 3.6 / 10
3.6aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-19 01:35 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0CI-Tests0 out of 1 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 1/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 14 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
5Maintained5 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 5
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities14 existing vulnerabilities detected
All dependencies 147

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 0 direct and 147 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npm@babel/code-frame7.27.1indirect
npm@babel/helper-validator-identifier7.27.1indirect
npm@esbuild/aix-ppc640.25.0indirect
npm@esbuild/android-arm0.25.0indirect
npm@esbuild/android-arm640.25.0indirect
npm@esbuild/android-x640.25.0indirect
npm@esbuild/darwin-arm640.25.0indirect
npm@esbuild/darwin-x640.25.0indirect
npm@esbuild/freebsd-arm640.25.0indirect
npm@esbuild/freebsd-x640.25.0indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-arm0.25.0indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-arm640.25.0indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-ia320.25.0indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-loong640.25.0indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-mips64el0.25.0indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-ppc640.25.0indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-riscv640.25.0indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-s390x0.25.0indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-x640.25.0indirect
npm@esbuild/netbsd-arm640.25.0indirect
npm@esbuild/netbsd-x640.25.0indirect
npm@esbuild/openbsd-arm640.25.0indirect
npm@esbuild/openbsd-x640.25.0indirect
npm@esbuild/sunos-x640.25.0indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-arm640.25.0indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-ia320.25.0indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-x640.25.0indirect
npm@puppeteer/browsers2.10.6indirect
npm@tootallnate/quickjs-emscripten0.23.0indirect
npm@types/node10.17.60indirect
npm@types/node24.2.0indirect
npm@types/yauzl2.10.3indirect
npmagent-base7.1.4indirect
npmansi-regex5.0.1indirect
npmansi-styles4.3.0indirect
npmargparse2.0.1indirect
npmast-types0.13.4indirect
npmb4a1.6.7indirect
npmbare-events2.6.0indirect
npmbare-fs4.1.6indirect
npmbare-os3.6.1indirect
npmbare-path3.0.0indirect
npmbare-stream2.6.5indirect
npmbasic-ftp5.2.0indirect
npmbuffer-crc320.2.13indirect
npmcallsites3.1.0indirect
npmchromium-bidi7.2.0indirect
npmcliui8.0.1indirect
npmcolor-convert2.0.1indirect
npmcolor-name1.1.4indirect
npmcolors1.4.0indirect
npmcosmiconfig9.0.0indirect
npmdata-uri-to-buffer6.0.2indirect
npmdebug4.4.1indirect
npmdegenerator5.0.1indirect
npmdetect-libc2.1.2indirect
npmdevtools-protocol0.0.1475386indirect
npmemoji-regex8.0.0indirect
npmend-of-stream1.4.5indirect
npmenv-paths2.2.1indirect
npmerror-ex1.3.2indirect
npmesbuild0.25.0indirect
npmesbuild-css-modules-plugin3.1.5indirect
npmescalade3.2.0indirect
npmescodegen2.1.0indirect
npmesprima4.0.1indirect
npmestraverse5.3.0indirect
npmesutils2.0.3indirect
npmextract-zip2.0.1indirect
npmfast-fifo1.3.2indirect
npmfd-slicer1.1.0indirect
npmget-caller-file2.0.5indirect
npmget-stream5.2.0indirect
npmget-uri6.0.5indirect
npmhttp-proxy-agent7.0.2indirect
npmhttps-proxy-agent7.0.6indirect
npmimport-fresh3.3.1indirect
npmip-address9.0.5indirect
npmis-arrayish0.2.1indirect
npmis-fullwidth-code-point3.0.0indirect
npmis-sorted1.0.5indirect
npmjs-tokens4.0.0indirect
npmjs-yaml4.1.1indirect
npmjsbn1.1.0indirect
npmjson-parse-even-better-errors2.3.1indirect
npmlightningcss1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-android-arm641.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-darwin-arm641.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-darwin-x641.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-freebsd-x641.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm-gnueabihf1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm64-gnu1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm64-musl1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-x64-gnu1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-x64-musl1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-win32-arm64-msvc1.32.0indirect
npmlightningcss-win32-x64-msvc1.32.0indirect
npmlines-and-columns1.2.4indirect
npmlodash-es4.18.1indirect
npmlru-cache7.18.3indirect
npmmitt3.0.1indirect
npmms2.1.3indirect
npmnetmask2.0.2indirect
npmnode-qunit-puppeteer2.2.1indirect
npmonce1.4.0indirect
npmpac-proxy-agent7.2.0indirect
npmpac-resolver7.0.1indirect
npmparent-module1.0.1indirect
npmparse-json5.2.0indirect
npmpend1.2.0indirect
npmpicocolors1.1.1indirect
npmprogress2.0.3indirect
npmproxy-agent6.5.0indirect
npmproxy-from-env1.1.0indirect
npmpump3.0.3indirect
npmpuppeteer24.16.0indirect
npmpuppeteer-core24.16.0indirect
npmrequire-directory2.1.1indirect
npmresolve-from4.0.0indirect
npmsemver7.7.2indirect
npmsmart-buffer4.2.0indirect
npmsocks2.8.6indirect
npmsocks-proxy-agent8.0.5indirect
npmsource-map0.6.1indirect
npmsprintf-js1.1.3indirect
npmstreamx2.22.1indirect
npmstring-width4.2.3indirect
npmstrip-ansi6.0.1indirect
npmtar-fs3.1.1indirect
npmtar-stream3.1.7indirect
npmtext-decoder1.2.3indirect
npmtslib2.8.1indirect
npmtyped-query-selector2.12.0indirect
npmtypescript4.9.4indirect
npmundici-types7.10.0indirect
npmwebsharper-library-tests1.0.0indirect
npmwrap-ansi7.0.0indirect
npmwrappy1.0.2indirect
npmws8.18.3indirect
npmy18n5.0.8indirect
npmyargs17.7.2indirect
npmyargs-parser21.1.1indirect
npmyauzl2.10.0indirect
npmzod3.25.76indirect
NuGetNBomber2.0.2indirect
NuGetNBomber.Http2.0.0indirect
NuGetNewtonsoft.Json13.0.4indirect
Dependency advisories 5

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 147 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 5 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
basic-ftp5.2.0indirecthigh45.3.1
extract-zip2.0.1indirecthigh2
js-yaml4.1.1indirecthigh44.3.2
ws8.18.3indirecthigh28.21.0
ip-address9.0.5indirectmoderate210.3.1

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics.