Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-20 22:16 UTC

dotnet / dotNext

Next generation API for .NET

C#MIT★ 1,968 stars⑂ 157 forkssince Dec 2018View on GitHub ↗
KindCommand-line toolhow this is determined

dotnet/dotNext holds a health index of 83 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Vitality (95/100) and lowest on Engineering Quality (49/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

83
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

83
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 70 is calibrated to 83 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

.NET PlatformOrganization · verified domain
23,565 followers280 public repossince Oct 2014

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

95Exceptional · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
34.6/36Commit cadence — 50/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 1,195 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 7 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year1,195
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year50
How it's scored
16.2/27Ships releases — 16 version tags (no GitHub releases)
36/36Release recency — latest release 45 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~8.4 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count16
latest_release_tag6.7.1
releases_from_tagsyes
days_since_latest_release45
mean_days_between_releases8.4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

79Good · 17% of overall
How it's scored
53.4/60Stars — 1,968 stars
18.3/25Forks — 157 forks
9.6/15Watchers — 54 watchers
Inputs used
forks157
stars1,968
watchers54
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges4
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesdev.azure.com, github.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
72.3/80Total downloads — 9,153,778 downloads all-time across nuget
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesDotNext.IO, DotNext.MaintenanceServices, DotNext.Metaprogramming, DotNext.Threading
dependents—
ecosystemsnuget
total_downloads9,153,778
monthly_downloads—
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

68Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0.1/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 100% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 24 contributors
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled24
top_contributor_share0.997
How it's scored
41.5/42Issue resolution — 99% of issues closed
20.4/30PR acceptance — 36/53 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — 0/1 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs36
open_issues2
closed_issues159
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d1
issue_closed_ratio0.988
closed_unmerged_prs17
first_time_authors_30d1
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d1
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
20/20Verified domain
25/25Owner reach — 23,565 followers of dotnet
25/25Track record — 280 public repos, account ~12 yr old
Inputs used
followers23,565
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedyes
owner_logindotnet
public_repos280
account_age_days4,393

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 4 package(s) on nuget
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 7 days ago
20/20Version history — 130 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesDotNext.IO, DotNext.MaintenanceServices, DotNext.Metaprogramming, DotNext.Threading
ecosystemsnuget
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish7

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

49Weak · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 1 workflow(s)
0/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — no data
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsno
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://dotnet.github.io/dotNext/
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 20 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsreflection, raft, raft-consensus, raft-consensus-algorithm, delegate, csharp, dotnet, dotnext, async, write-ahead-log, async-lock, atomic-operation, fast-reflection, metaprogramming, cluster, dotnetcore, raft-server, hyparview, concurrency, sieve
has_wikino
homepagehttps://dotnet.github.io/dotNext/
docs_sitehttps://dotnet.github.io/dotNext/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

58Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
0/2.5CI-Tests — no data
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0.8/2.5Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 7 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
5/5SAST — SAST tool detected: CodeQL
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
6.8/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated14
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive4
scorecard_aggregate5.8
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, CI-Tests, Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

62Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — AGENTS.md
15/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) — llms.txt served by the project website (https://dotnet.github.io/dotNext/llms.txt)
1.6/40Legible commit history — 3 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtyes
llms_txt_urlhttps://dotnet.github.io/dotNext/llms.txt
legible_history_share0.03
agent_instruction_filesAGENTS.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes3,749
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrap — src/DotNext.Aot.Tests/DotNext.Aot.Tests.csproj, src/DotNext.Benchmarks.WAL/DotNext.Benchmarks.WAL.csproj, src/DotNext.Benchmarks/DotNext.Benchmarks.csproj (toolchain convention, no task runner)
0/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — C# (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environment — devcontainer
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsno
lockfiles—
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontaineryes
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestssrc/DotNext.Aot.Tests/DotNext.Aot.Tests.csproj, src/DotNext.Benchmarks.WAL/DotNext.Benchmarks.WAL.csproj, src/DotNext.Benchmarks/DotNext.Benchmarks.csproj, src/DotNext.IO/DotNext.IO.csproj, src/DotNext.MaintenanceServices/DotNext.MaintenanceServices.csproj, src/DotNext.Metaprogramming/DotNext.Metaprogramming.csproj, src/DotNext.Tests/DotNext.Tests.csproj, src/DotNext.Threading/DotNext.Threading.csproj, src/DotNext.Unsafe/DotNext.Unsafe.csproj, src/DotNext/DotNext.csproj, src/cluster/DotNext.AspNetCore.Cluster/DotNext.AspNetCore.Cluster.csproj, src/cluster/DotNext.Net.Cluster/DotNext.Net.Cluster.csproj, src/examples/CommandLineAMI/CommandLineAMI.csproj, src/examples/HyParViewPeer/HyParViewPeer.csproj, src/examples/RaftNode/RaftNode.csproj, src/examples/RandomAccessCacheBenchmark/RandomAccessCacheBenchmark.csproj
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — C# (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes — 1/1,139 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageC#
largest_source_bytes60,226
source_files_sampled1,139
oversized_source_files1
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examples — examples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

1,968GitHub stars
24contributors
1,195commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
16releases
1bus factor
2open issues
—package ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • No resolved dependencies carried a version and a supported ecosystem

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 157 ⇿
0Stars
157Forks
16Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

0408012016015432019-072023-022026-09
Major 0Minor 6Patch 10

Each point covers 7 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.8 / 10
5.8aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-10-20 22:16 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
n/aCI-Testsno pull request found
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
3Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 7 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
10SASTSAST tool detected: CodeQL
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
9Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 16
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
NuGetxunit.v3.aot.mtp-v2—src/DotNext.Aot.Tests/DotNext.Aot.Tests.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Testing.Extensions.TrxReport—src/DotNext.Aot.Tests/DotNext.Aot.Tests.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Testing.Extensions.CodeCoverage—src/DotNext.Aot.Tests/DotNext.Aot.Tests.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.FASTER.Core—src/DotNext.Benchmarks.WAL/DotNext.Benchmarks.WAL.csproj
NuGetBenchmarkDotNet—src/DotNext.Benchmarks/DotNext.Benchmarks.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.IO.RecyclableMemoryStream—src/DotNext.Benchmarks/DotNext.Benchmarks.csproj
NuGetSystem.CommandLine—src/DotNext.MaintenanceServices/DotNext.MaintenanceServices.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Hosting.Abstractions—src/DotNext.MaintenanceServices/DotNext.MaintenanceServices.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Logging.Abstractions—src/DotNext.MaintenanceServices/DotNext.MaintenanceServices.csproj
NuGetxunit.v3.mtp-v2—src/DotNext.Tests/DotNext.Tests.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Testing.Extensions.TrxReport—src/DotNext.Tests/DotNext.Tests.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Testing.Extensions.CodeCoverage—src/DotNext.Tests/DotNext.Tests.csproj
NuGetSystem.Resources.Extensions—src/DotNext.Tests/DotNext.Tests.csproj
NuGetFody—src/DotNext/DotNext.csproj
NuGetInlineIL.Fody—src/DotNext/DotNext.csproj
NuGetSystem.IO.Hashing—src/DotNext/DotNext.csproj
All dependencies 17

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 14 direct and 3 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
NuGetBenchmarkDotNet—direct
NuGetFody—direct
NuGetInlineIL.Fody—direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Hosting.Abstractions—direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Logging.Abstractions—direct
NuGetMicrosoft.FASTER.Core—direct
NuGetMicrosoft.IO.RecyclableMemoryStream—direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Testing.Extensions.CodeCoverage—direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Testing.Extensions.TrxReport—direct
NuGetSystem.CommandLine—direct
NuGetSystem.IO.Hashing—direct
NuGetSystem.Resources.Extensions—direct
NuGetxunit.v3.aot.mtp-v2—direct
NuGetxunit.v3.mtp-v2—direct
NuGetFastMember.Signed—indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.Connections.Abstractions—indirect
NuGetSystem.Runtime.Caching—indirect
Dependency advisories not assessed

Advisory matching could not run for this report: No resolved dependencies carried a version and a supported ecosystem

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — NuGet.