Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-28 22:23 UTC

dotnet / dotNext

Next generation API for .NET

C#MIT★ 1,957 stars⑂ 157 forkssince Dec 2018View on GitHub ↗
KindCommand-line toolhow this is determined

dotnet/dotNext holds a health index of 84 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Vitality (94/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (46/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

84
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

84
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 71 is calibrated to 84 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

.NET PlatformOrganization · verified domain
23,272 followers278 public repossince Oct 2014

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

94Exceptional · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 0 days ago
33.9/36Commit cadence49/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume1,071 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained30 commit(s) and 5 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year1,071
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year49
How it's scored
16.2/27Ships releases15 version tags (no GitHub releases)
36/36Release recencylatest release 0 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~9.7 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count15
latest_release_tag6.6.5
releases_from_tagsyes
days_since_latest_release0
mean_days_between_releases9.7
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

79Good · 17% of overall
How it's scored
53.4/60Stars1,957 stars
18.3/25Forks157 forks
9.4/15Watchers50 watchers
Inputs used
forks157
stars1,957
watchers50
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges4
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesdev.azure.com, github.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
72.1/80Total downloads8,738,871 downloads all-time across nuget
0/20Registry dependentsnot reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesDotNext.IO, DotNext.MaintenanceServices, DotNext.Metaprogramming, DotNext.Threading
dependents
ecosystemsnuget
total_downloads8,738,871
monthly_downloads
unverified_packages_excluded
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

72Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0.1/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 100% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth24 contributors
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled24
top_contributor_share0.997
How it's scored
42/42Issue resolution100% of issues closed
20.6/30PR acceptance35/51 decided PRs merged
13/13Newcomer PR acceptance2/2 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 1/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs35
open_issues0
closed_issues155
prs_merged_7d1
prs_decided_7d1
prs_merged_30d2
prs_decided_30d2
issue_closed_ratio1
closed_unmerged_prs16
first_time_authors_30d2
first_time_prs_merged_30d2
first_time_prs_decided_30d2
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
20/20Verified domain
25/25Owner reach23,272 followers of dotnet
25/25Track record278 public repos, account ~11 yr old
Inputs used
followers23,272
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedyes
owner_logindotnet
public_repos278
account_age_days4,340

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable4 package(s) on nuget
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 0 days ago
20/20Version history124 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesDotNext.IO, DotNext.MaintenanceServices, DotNext.Metaprogramming, DotNext.Threading
ecosystemsnuget
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish0

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

56Moderate · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows1 workflow(s)
0/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests1 out of 1 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsno
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://dotnet.github.io/dotNext/
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics20 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsreflection, raft, raft-consensus, raft-consensus-algorithm, delegate, csharp, dotnet, dotnext, async, write-ahead-log, async-lock, atomic-operation, fast-reflection, metaprogramming, cluster, dotnetcore, raft-server, hyparview, concurrency, sieve
has_wikino
homepagehttps://dotnet.github.io/dotNext/
docs_sitehttps://dotnet.github.io/dotNext/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

57Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionno data
2.5/2.5CI-Tests1 out of 1 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 1/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0.8/2.5Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained30 commit(s) and 5 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
3.5/5SASTSAST tool detected but not run on all commits
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
6.8/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated15
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive3
scorecard_aggregate5.7
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

46Weak · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
3.7/40Legible commit history7 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.07
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrapsrc/DotNext.Aot.Tests/DotNext.Aot.Tests.csproj, src/DotNext.Benchmarks.WAL/DotNext.Benchmarks.WAL.csproj, src/DotNext.Benchmarks/DotNext.Benchmarks.csproj (toolchain convention, no task runner)
0/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checkingC# (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environmentdevcontainer
2/10Demonstrated agent practice1 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
0/8Automated maintenanceno automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsno
lockfiles
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files
has_devcontaineryes
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0.01
toolchain_manifestssrc/DotNext.Aot.Tests/DotNext.Aot.Tests.csproj, src/DotNext.Benchmarks.WAL/DotNext.Benchmarks.WAL.csproj, src/DotNext.Benchmarks/DotNext.Benchmarks.csproj, src/DotNext.IO/DotNext.IO.csproj, src/DotNext.MaintenanceServices/DotNext.MaintenanceServices.csproj, src/DotNext.Metaprogramming/DotNext.Metaprogramming.csproj, src/DotNext.Tests/DotNext.Tests.csproj, src/DotNext.Threading/DotNext.Threading.csproj, src/DotNext.Unsafe/DotNext.Unsafe.csproj, src/DotNext/DotNext.csproj, src/cluster/DotNext.AspNetCore.Cluster/DotNext.AspNetCore.Cluster.csproj, src/cluster/DotNext.Net.Cluster/DotNext.Net.Cluster.csproj, src/examples/CommandLineAMI/CommandLineAMI.csproj, src/examples/HyParViewPeer/HyParViewPeer.csproj, src/examples/RaftNode/RaftNode.csproj, src/examples/RandomAccessCacheBenchmark/RandomAccessCacheBenchmark.csproj
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeC# (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes0/1,112 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageC#
largest_source_bytes59,392
source_files_sampled1,112
oversized_source_files0
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP servernot applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examplesexamples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files
interfaces_expected_of
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

1,957GitHub stars
24contributors
1,071commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
15releases
1bus factor
0open issues
package ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • No resolved dependencies carried a version and a supported ecosystem

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 157 ⇿
0Stars
157Forks
12Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

0408012016015432019-072023-012026-08
Major 0Minor 6Patch 6

Each point covers 7 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.7 / 10
5.7aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-28 22:23 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
10CI-Tests1 out of 1 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 1/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
3Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 5 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
7SASTSAST tool detected but not run on all commits
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
9Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 16
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
NuGetxunit.v3.aot.mtp-v2src/DotNext.Aot.Tests/DotNext.Aot.Tests.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Testing.Extensions.TrxReportsrc/DotNext.Aot.Tests/DotNext.Aot.Tests.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Testing.Extensions.CodeCoveragesrc/DotNext.Aot.Tests/DotNext.Aot.Tests.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.FASTER.Coresrc/DotNext.Benchmarks.WAL/DotNext.Benchmarks.WAL.csproj
NuGetBenchmarkDotNetsrc/DotNext.Benchmarks/DotNext.Benchmarks.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.IO.RecyclableMemoryStreamsrc/DotNext.Benchmarks/DotNext.Benchmarks.csproj
NuGetSystem.CommandLinesrc/DotNext.MaintenanceServices/DotNext.MaintenanceServices.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Hosting.Abstractionssrc/DotNext.MaintenanceServices/DotNext.MaintenanceServices.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Logging.Abstractionssrc/DotNext.MaintenanceServices/DotNext.MaintenanceServices.csproj
NuGetxunit.v3.mtp-v2src/DotNext.Tests/DotNext.Tests.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Testing.Extensions.TrxReportsrc/DotNext.Tests/DotNext.Tests.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Testing.Extensions.CodeCoveragesrc/DotNext.Tests/DotNext.Tests.csproj
NuGetSystem.Resources.Extensionssrc/DotNext.Tests/DotNext.Tests.csproj
NuGetFodysrc/DotNext/DotNext.csproj
NuGetInlineIL.Fodysrc/DotNext/DotNext.csproj
NuGetSystem.IO.Hashingsrc/DotNext/DotNext.csproj
All dependencies 16

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 13 direct and 3 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
NuGetBenchmarkDotNetdirect
NuGetFodydirect
NuGetInlineIL.Fodydirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Hosting.Abstractionsdirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Logging.Abstractionsdirect
NuGetMicrosoft.FASTER.Coredirect
NuGetMicrosoft.IO.RecyclableMemoryStreamdirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Testing.Extensions.CodeCoveragedirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Testing.Extensions.TrxReportdirect
NuGetSystem.CommandLinedirect
NuGetSystem.IO.Hashingdirect
NuGetSystem.Resources.Extensionsdirect
NuGetxunit.v3.mtp-v2direct
NuGetFastMember.Signedindirect
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.Connections.Abstractionsindirect
NuGetSystem.Runtime.Cachingindirect
Dependency advisories not assessed

Advisory matching could not run for this report: No resolved dependencies carried a version and a supported ecosystem

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsNuGet.