Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-20 07:07 UTC

duneanalytics / dune-client

A framework for interacting with Dune Analytics' officially supported API service

PythonApache-2.0★ 138 stars⑂ 44 forkssince Sep 2022View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryhow this is determined
#api-client#dune-analytics#web3

duneanalytics/dune-client holds a health index of 86 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Security (82/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (60/100). It was last updated 14 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

86
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

86
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 72 is calibrated to 86 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

DuneOrganization
1,122 followers65 public repossince Sep 2018

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
PyPIdune_client1.12.1123,3705814 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

77Good · 21% of overall

Development activity

62Moderate
How it's scored
28.8/36Push recency — last push 14 days ago
8.3/36Commit cadence — 12/52 weeks with commits
14.8/18Commit volume — 43 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 17 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year43
human_commit_share0.76
days_since_last_push14
active_weeks_last_year12

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 57 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 14 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~37.1 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count57
latest_release_tagv1.12.1
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release14
mean_days_between_releases37.1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

60Moderate · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

54Moderate
How it's scored
34.7/60Stars — 138 stars
13.6/25Forks — 44 forks
6.2/15Watchers — 14 watchers
Inputs used
forks44
stars138
watchers14
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

50Moderate
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (Apache-2.0)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges4
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesgithub.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateno

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

85Excellent
How it's scored
67.9/80Monthly downloads — 123,370 downloads/month across pypi
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesdune_client
dependents—
ecosystemspypi
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads123,370
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

76Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

43Weak
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
10.5/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 53% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 22 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 5 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled22
top_contributor_share0.532

Issue & PR responsiveness

97Exceptional
How it's scored
42/42Issue resolution — 100% of issues closed
27.5/30PR acceptance — 155/169 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
15/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — all changesets reviewed
Inputs used
merged_prs155
open_issues0
closed_issues52
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d1
prs_decided_30d1
issue_closed_ratio1
closed_unmerged_prs14
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

77Good
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
21.9/25Owner reach — 1,122 followers of duneanalytics
25/25Track record — 65 public repos, account ~8 yr old
Inputs used
followers1,122
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginduneanalytics
public_repos65
account_age_days2,963

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on pypi
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 14 days ago
20/20Version history — 58 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesdune_client
ecosystemspypi
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish14

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

61Moderate · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

68Good
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 3 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff]), tox.ini
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
4/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 8 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 2
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

50Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 3 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsapi-client, dune-analytics, web3
has_wikino
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

82Excellent · 16% of overall

Security posture

77Good
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
3.8/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
0.5/2.5CI-Tests — 8 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 2
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
7.5/7.5Code-Review — all changesets reviewed
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 5 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 17 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
5/5Pinned-Dependencies — all dependencies are pinned
3.5/5SAST — SAST tool detected but not run on all commits
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
6.8/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
5.2/7.5Vulnerabilities — 3 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate7.7
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — no indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages24
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the pypi:dune_client@1.12.1 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 24 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

79Good · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

55Moderate
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
15/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) — llms.txt served by the project website (https://docs.dune.com/llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 57 of 76 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtyes
llms_txt_urlhttps://docs.dune.com/llms.txt
legible_history_share0.75
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

96Exceptional
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — Makefile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff]), tox.ini
11/11Static type checking — dune_client/py.typed
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
6/10Demonstrated agent practice — 3 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8Automated maintenance — 24 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — all dependencies are pinned
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesuv.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_filesMakefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configsdune_client/py.typed
agent_commit_share0.03
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0.24

Code legibility for models

82Excellent
How it's scored
27/45Type-checkable code — Python with type-check config (dune_client/py.typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/38 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePython
largest_source_bytes26,203
source_files_sampled38
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

138GitHub stars
22contributors
43commits, last 12 months
14days since last push
57releases
1bus factor
0open issues
PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 44 ⇿
0Stars
44Forks
51Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

010203040504322022-092024-092026-09
Major 1Minor 13Patch 32

Each point covers 4 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 7.7 / 10
7.7aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-10-20 07:07 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
5Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2CI-Tests8 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 2
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
10Code-Reviewall changesets reviewed
10Contributorsproject has 5 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained17 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
10Pinned-Dependenciesall dependencies are pinned
7SASTSAST tool detected but not run on all commits
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
9Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7Vulnerabilities3 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 6
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
PyPIaiohttp~=3.14.0pyproject.toml
PyPIdataclasses-json~=0.6.4pyproject.toml
PyPIpython-dateutil~=2.9.0pyproject.toml
PyPIrequests>=2.33,<2.35pyproject.toml
PyPIndjson~=0.3.1pyproject.toml
PyPIDeprecated~=1.2.18pyproject.toml
All dependencies 54

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 6 direct and 48 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
PyPIaiohttp3.14.3direct
PyPIdataclasses-json0.6.7direct
PyPIdeprecated1.2.18direct
PyPIndjson0.3.1direct
PyPIpython-dateutil2.9.0.post0direct
PyPIrequests2.34.2direct
PyPIaiohappyeyeballs2.6.1indirect
PyPIaiosignal1.4.0indirect
PyPIaiounittest1.5.0indirect
PyPIast-serialize0.6.0indirect
PyPIattrs25.3.0indirect
PyPIcachetools7.1.4indirect
PyPIcertifi2025.8.3indirect
PyPIcharset-normalizer3.4.3indirect
PyPIcolorama0.4.6indirect
PyPIdistlib0.4.0indirect
PyPIfilelock3.29.0indirect
PyPIfrozenlist1.7.0indirect
PyPIidna3.17indirect
PyPIiniconfig2.1.0indirect
PyPIlibrt0.13.0indirect
PyPImarshmallow3.26.2indirect
PyPImultidict6.6.4indirect
PyPImypy2.3.1indirect
PyPImypy-extensions1.1.0indirect
PyPInumpy2.3.3indirect
PyPIpackaging26.2indirect
PyPIpandas3.0.6indirect
PyPIpandas-stubs3.0.5.260914indirect
PyPIpathspec1.1.1indirect
PyPIplatformdirs4.10.0indirect
PyPIpluggy1.6.0indirect
PyPIpropcache0.3.2indirect
PyPIpygments2.20.0indirect
PyPIpyproject-api1.10.1indirect
PyPIpytest9.1.1indirect
PyPIpython-discovery1.6.1indirect
PyPIruff0.16.8indirect
PyPIsix1.17.0indirect
PyPItomli-w1.2.0indirect
PyPItox4.64.1indirect
PyPItox-uv1.36.0indirect
PyPItox-uv-bare1.36.0indirect
PyPItypes-deprecated1.3.1.20260728indirect
PyPItypes-python-dateutil2.9.0.20260807indirect
PyPItypes-requests2.33.0.20260906indirect
PyPItyping-extensions4.15.0indirect
PyPItyping-inspect0.9.0indirect
PyPItzdata2025.2indirect
PyPIurllib32.8.0indirect
PyPIuv0.11.17indirect
PyPIvirtualenv21.14.3indirect
PyPIwrapt1.17.3indirect
PyPIyarl1.20.1indirect
Dependency advisories 0

Installing pypi:dune_client@1.12.1 pulls in 24 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with duneanalytics/dune-client. Read them side by side →

97apify/apify-client-pythonApify API client for Python—Programmatically run Actors, manage and stream data from storages (datasets, key-value stores, request queues), schedule and monitor runs, and access the full Apify platform API. Sync and async interfaces with automatic retries and pagination.Exceptional95php-curl-class/php-curl-classPHP Curl Class makes it easy to send HTTP requests and integrate with web APIsExceptional94ramnes/notion-sdk-pyNotion API client SDK, rewritten in Python! (sync + async)Exceptional94onflow/cadenceCadence: the resource-oriented smart contract programming language of the Flow network. Capability-based security, type safety, and move semanticsExceptional93MISP/PyMISPPython library using the MISP Rest APIExceptional92hey-api/hey-api👨‍🚀 Turn API specifications into production-ready SDKs, validators, mocks, and more. 20+ plugins. Millions of weekly npm downloads. Used by Vercel, OpenCode, PayPal, AWS, Autodesk, and many more.Excellent

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — PyPI.