Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-13 11:08 UTC

durable-workflow / sdk-php

PHP client and worker SDK for Durable Workflow Cloud and self-hosted Server.

PHP · PythonMIT★ 4 stars⑂ 1 forksince Jul 2026View on GitHub ↗

durable-workflow/sdk-php holds a health index of 78 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (90/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (40/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

78
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

78
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 67 is calibrated to 78 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Durable WorkflowOrganization
54 followers11 public repossince Feb 2022

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
Packagistdurable-workflow/sdk2.0.104,087751 day agosymfonyphpworkflowsdkcloudlaravelworkerorchestrationdurable

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

76Good · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
6.2/36Commit cadence — 9/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 213 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — project was created within the last 90 days. Please review its contents carefully
Inputs used
commits_last_year213
human_commit_share0.98
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year9

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 75 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 1 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~0.9 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count75
latest_release_tag2.0.10
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release1
mean_days_between_releases0.9
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

40Weak · 17% of overall
How it's scored
7.7/60Stars — 4 stars
0/25Forks — 1 forks
0/15Watchers — 0 watchers
Inputs used
forks1
stars4
watchers0
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges4
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesgithub.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
48.2/80Monthly downloads — 4,087 downloads/month across packagist
3.2/20Registry dependents — 2 packages depend on it
Inputs used
packagesdurable-workflow/sdk
dependents2
ecosystemspackagist
total_downloads13,792
monthly_downloads4,087
unverified_packages_excluded—

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

61Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
1.9/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 92% of commits
2.7/13.5Contributor breadth — 2 contributors
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled2
top_contributor_share0.915
How it's scored
41.2/42Issue resolution — 98% of issues closed
30/30PR acceptance — 20/20 decided PRs merged
13/13Newcomer PR acceptance — 18/18 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/20 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs20
open_issues1
closed_issues48
prs_merged_7d6
prs_decided_7d6
prs_merged_30d18
prs_decided_30d18
issue_closed_ratio0.98
closed_unmerged_prs0
first_time_authors_30d1
first_time_prs_merged_30d18
first_time_prs_decided_30d18
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
12.5/25Owner reach — 54 followers of durable-workflow
17/25Track record — 11 public repos, account ~4 yr old
Inputs used
followers54
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_logindurable-workflow
public_repos11
account_age_days1,662

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on packagist
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 1 days ago
20/20Version history — 75 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesdurable-workflow/sdk
ecosystemspackagist
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish1

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

90Excellent · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 4 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — phpstan.neon
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 20 out of 20 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

100Exceptional
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://php.durable-workflow.com/
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 7 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsphp, sdk, workflow-engine, client-library, durable-execution, durable-workflow, workflow-automation
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://php.durable-workflow.com/
docs_sitehttps://php.durable-workflow.com/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

65Good · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
2.2/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 20 out of 20 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/20 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0.8/2.5Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
0/7.5Maintained — project was created within the last 90 days. Please review its contents carefully
0/5Packaging — no data
4.5/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 9
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
7.5/7.5Token-Permissions — GitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
6.8/7.5Vulnerabilities — 1 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate5.6
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories1
affected_packages1
assessed_packages137
unassessed_packages13
affected_by_severitymoderate 1
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 137 resolved dependencies against OSV. 13 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

63Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — AGENTS.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
9.8/40Legible commit history — 18 of 98 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.184
agent_instruction_filesAGENTS.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes363
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — phpstan.neon
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8Automated maintenance — 2 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
9/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 9
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespackage-lock.json
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0.02
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable code — PHP without a type-check config
53/55Manageable file sizes — 7/192 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePHP
largest_source_bytes117,036
source_files_sampled192
oversized_source_files7
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examples — examples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

4GitHub stars
2contributors
213commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
75releases
1bus factor
1open issues
npm, Packagistpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.6 / 10
5.6aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-13 11:08 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
3Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10CI-Tests20 out of 20 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/20 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
3Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
0Maintainedproject was created within the last 90 days. Please review its contents carefully
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
9Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 9
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
10Token-PermissionsGitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
9Vulnerabilities1 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 7
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Packagistapache/avro^1.12composer.json
Packagistguzzlehttp/guzzle^7.8|^8.0composer.json
Packagistpsr/container^1.1|^2.0composer.json
Packagistpsr/http-client^1.0composer.json
Packagistpsr/http-factory^1.0composer.json
Packagistpsr/http-message^1.1|^2.0composer.json
Packagistpsr/log^1.1|^2.0|^3.0composer.json
All dependencies 150

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 7 direct and 143 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Packagistapache/avro—direct
Packagistguzzlehttp/guzzle—direct
Packagistpsr/container—direct
Packagistpsr/http-client—direct
Packagistpsr/http-factory—direct
Packagistpsr/http-message—direct
Packagistpsr/log—direct
npm@11ty/dependency-tree4.0.2indirect
npm@11ty/dependency-tree-esm2.0.4indirect
npm@11ty/eleventy3.1.6indirect
npm@11ty/eleventy-dev-server2.0.8indirect
npm@11ty/eleventy-plugin-bundle3.0.7indirect
npm@11ty/eleventy-utils2.0.7indirect
npm@11ty/lodash-custom4.17.21indirect
npm@11ty/posthtml-urls1.0.3indirect
npm@11ty/recursive-copy4.0.4indirect
npm@sindresorhus/slugify2.2.1indirect
npm@sindresorhus/transliterate1.6.0indirect
npma-sync-waterfall1.0.1indirect
npmacorn8.18.0indirect
npmacorn-walk8.3.5indirect
npmajv8.17.1indirect
npmajv-formats3.0.1indirect
npmanymatch3.1.3indirect
npmargparse1.0.10indirect
npmargparse2.0.1indirect
npmasap2.0.6indirect
npmbalanced-match1.0.2indirect
npmbcp-472.1.1indirect
npmbcp-47-match2.0.3indirect
npmbcp-47-normalize2.3.0indirect
npmbinary-extensions2.3.0indirect
npmbrace-expansion1.1.18indirect
npmbraces3.0.3indirect
npmchokidar3.6.0indirect
npmcommander10.0.1indirect
npmcommander5.1.0indirect
npmconcat-map0.0.1indirect
npmdebug2.6.9indirect
npmdebug4.4.3indirect
npmdepd2.0.0indirect
npmdependency-graph1.0.0indirect
npmdom-serializer1.4.1indirect
npmdomelementtype2.3.0indirect
npmdomhandler4.3.1indirect
npmdomutils2.8.0indirect
npmee-first1.1.1indirect
npmencodeurl2.0.0indirect
npmentities2.2.0indirect
npmentities3.0.1indirect
npmentities4.5.0indirect
npmentities6.0.1indirect
npmerrno1.0.0indirect
npmescape-html1.0.3indirect
npmescape-string-regexp5.0.0indirect
npmesm-import-transformer3.0.5indirect
npmesprima4.0.1indirect
npmetag1.8.1indirect
npmevaluate-value2.0.0indirect
npmextend-shallow2.0.1indirect
npmfast-deep-equal3.1.3indirect
npmfast-uri3.1.7indirect
npmfdir6.5.0indirect
npmfilesize10.1.6indirect
npmfill-range7.1.1indirect
npmfinalhandler1.3.2indirect
npmfresh2.0.0indirect
npmfsevents2.3.2indirect
npmglob-parent5.1.2indirect
npmgray-matter4.0.3indirect
npmhtmlparser27.2.0indirect
npmhttp-equiv-refresh2.0.1indirect
npmhttp-errors2.0.1indirect
npminherits2.0.4indirect
npmis-alphabetical2.0.1indirect
npmis-alphanumerical2.0.1indirect
npmis-binary-path2.1.0indirect
npmis-decimal2.0.1indirect
npmis-extendable0.1.1indirect
npmis-extglob2.1.1indirect
npmis-glob4.0.3indirect
npmis-json2.0.1indirect
npmis-number7.0.0indirect
npmiso-639-13.1.6indirect
npmjs-yaml3.15.2indirect
npmjs-yaml4.3.2indirect
npmjson-schema-traverse1.0.0indirect
npmjunk3.1.0indirect
npmkind-of6.0.3indirect
npmkleur4.1.5indirect
npmlinkify-it5.0.2indirect
npmliquidjs10.28.0indirect
npmlist-to-array1.1.0indirect
npmluxon3.7.2indirect
npmmarkdown-it14.3.0indirect
npmmdurl2.1.0indirect
npmmime3.0.0indirect
npmmime-db1.54.0indirect
npmmime-types3.0.2indirect
npmminimatch3.1.5indirect
npmminimist1.2.8indirect
npmminipass7.1.3indirect
npmmoo0.5.2indirect
npmmorphdom2.7.8indirect
npmms2.0.0indirect
npmms2.1.3indirect
npmnode-retrieve-globals6.0.1indirect
npmnormalize-path3.0.0indirect
npmnunjucks3.2.4indirect
npmon-finished2.4.1indirect
npmparse-srcset1.0.2indirect
npmparseurl1.3.3indirect
npmpicomatch2.3.2indirect
npmpicomatch4.0.5indirect
npmplaywright1.62.1indirect
npmplaywright-core1.62.1indirect
npmplease-upgrade-node3.2.0indirect
npmposthtml0.16.7indirect
npmposthtml-match-helper2.0.3indirect
npmposthtml-parser0.11.0indirect
npmposthtml-render3.0.0indirect
npmprr1.0.1indirect
npmpunycode.js2.3.1indirect
npmrange-parser1.3.0indirect
npmreaddirp3.6.0indirect
npmrequire-from-string2.0.2indirect
npmsection-matter1.0.0indirect
npmsemver7.8.5indirect
npmsemver-compare1.0.0indirect
npmsend1.2.1indirect
npmsetprototypeof1.2.0indirect
npmslash3.0.0indirect
npmslugify1.6.9indirect
npmsprintf-js1.0.3indirect
npmssri11.0.0indirect
npmstatuses2.0.2indirect
npmstrip-bom-string1.0.0indirect
npmtinyglobby0.2.17indirect
npmto-regex-range5.0.1indirect
npmtoidentifier1.0.1indirect
npmuc.micro2.1.0indirect
npmunpipe1.0.0indirect
npmurlpattern-polyfill10.1.0indirect
npmws8.21.1indirect
Packagistcomposer-runtime-api—indirect
Packagistext-json—indirect
Packagistphp—indirect
Packagistphpdocumentor/phpdocumentor—indirect
Packagistphpstan/phpstan—indirect
Packagistphpunit/phpunit—indirect
Dependency advisories 1

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 137 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 1 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 13 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
ajv8.17.1indirectmoderate18.18.0

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Packagist.