Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-17 13:28 UTC

dustin10 / VichUploaderBundle

A simple Symfony bundle to ease file uploads with ORM entities and ODM documents.

PHPMIT★ 1,902 stars⑂ 522 forkssince Dec 2011View on GitHub ↗
KindPluginLibraryCommand-line toolhow this is determined

dustin10/VichUploaderBundle holds a health index of 89 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Vitality (89/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (51/100). It was last updated today. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

89
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

89
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 75 is calibrated to 89 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Dustin DobervichPersonal account
101 followers29 public repossince Jan 2011SailPoint Technologies

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
Packagistvich/uploader-bundlev3.0.0592,30411310 days agouploadfile-uploads

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

89Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
18/36Commit cadence — 26/52 weeks with commits
17.7/18Commit volume — 93 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 29 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year93
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year26

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 66 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 8 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~28.2 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count66
latest_release_tagv2.10.1
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release8
mean_days_between_releases28.2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

81Excellent · 17% of overall
How it's scored
53.2/60Stars — 1,902 stars
22.6/25Forks — 522 forks
8.7/15Watchers — 37 watchers
Inputs used
forks522
stars1,902
watchers37
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges4
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesgithub.com, poser.pugx.org
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
77/80Monthly downloads — 592,304 downloads/month across packagist
14.7/20Registry dependents — 159 packages depend on it
Inputs used
packagesvich/uploader-bundle
dependents159
ecosystemspackagist
total_downloads29,025,343
monthly_downloads592,304
unverified_packages_excluded—

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

74Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
25.2/54Bus factor — 2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
13.9/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 38% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 99 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 42 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor2
contributors_sampled99
top_contributor_share0.383
How it's scored
40.2/42Issue resolution — 96% of issues closed
24.1/30PR acceptance — 494/615 decided PRs merged
13/13Newcomer PR acceptance — 2/2 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
6/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 7/16 approved changesets -- score normalized to 4
Inputs used
merged_prs494
open_issues43
closed_issues952
prs_merged_7d3
prs_decided_7d4
prs_merged_30d8
prs_decided_30d9
issue_closed_ratio0.957
closed_unmerged_prs121
first_time_authors_30d1
first_time_prs_merged_30d2
first_time_prs_decided_30d2
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
14.4/25Owner reach — 101 followers of dustin10
22.8/25Track record — 29 public repos, account ~15 yr old
Inputs used
followers101
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_logindustin10
public_repos29
account_age_days5,735
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on packagist
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 10 days ago
20/20Version history — 113 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesvich/uploader-bundle
ecosystemspackagist
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish10

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

79Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 1 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — .php-cs-fixer.php
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
18/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 13 out of 14 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 4 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsphp, symfony, symfony-bundle, bundle
has_wikino
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

52Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
2.2/2.5CI-Tests — 13 out of 14 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
3/7.5Code-Review — Found 7/16 approved changesets -- score normalized to 4
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 42 contributing companies or organizations
0/10Dangerous-Workflow — no data
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 29 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — no data
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — no data
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated12
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive6
scorecard_aggregate5.2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

51Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
34.7/40Legible commit history — 65 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.65
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — Makefile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — .php-cs-fixer.php
0/11Static type checking
0/10Reproducible environment
4/10Demonstrated agent practice — 2 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles—
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_filesMakefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0.02
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable code — PHP without a type-check config
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/201 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePHP
largest_source_bytes28,215
source_files_sampled201
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

1,902GitHub stars
99contributors
93commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
66releases
2bus factor
43open issues
Packagistpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • No resolved dependencies carried a version and a supported ecosystem

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 522 ⇿
0Stars
522Forks
64Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

010020030040050060051182012-012019-052026-09
Major 2Minor 32Patch 20

Each point covers 14 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.2 / 10
5.2aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-17 13:27 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
9CI-Tests13 out of 14 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
4Code-ReviewFound 7/16 approved changesets -- score normalized to 4
10Contributorsproject has 42 contributing companies or organizations
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained29 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
n/aPinned-Dependenciesno dependencies found
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 12
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Packagistdoctrine/persistence^3.0 || ^4.0composer.json
Packagistjms/metadata^2.4composer.json
Packagistsymfony/config^6.4 || ^7.4 || ^8.0composer.json
Packagistsymfony/console^6.4 || ^7.4 || ^8.0composer.json
Packagistsymfony/dependency-injection^6.4 || ^7.4 || ^8.0composer.json
Packagistsymfony/deprecation-contracts^3.0composer.json
Packagistsymfony/event-dispatcher-contracts^3.1composer.json
Packagistsymfony/http-foundation^6.4 || ^7.4 || ^8.0composer.json
Packagistsymfony/http-kernel^6.4 || ^7.4 || ^8.0composer.json
Packagistsymfony/mime^6.4 || ^7.4 || ^8.0composer.json
Packagistsymfony/property-access^6.4 || ^7.4 || ^8.0composer.json
Packagistsymfony/string^6.4 || ^7.4 || ^8.0composer.json
All dependencies 40

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 12 direct and 28 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Packagistdoctrine/persistence—direct
Packagistjms/metadata—direct
Packagistsymfony/config—direct
Packagistsymfony/console—direct
Packagistsymfony/dependency-injection—direct
Packagistsymfony/deprecation-contracts—direct
Packagistsymfony/event-dispatcher-contracts—direct
Packagistsymfony/http-foundation—direct
Packagistsymfony/http-kernel—direct
Packagistsymfony/mime—direct
Packagistsymfony/property-access—direct
Packagistsymfony/string—direct
Packagistdoctrine/common—indirect
Packagistdoctrine/doctrine-bundle—indirect
Packagistdoctrine/mongodb-odm—indirect
Packagistdoctrine/orm—indirect
Packagistext-simplexml—indirect
Packagistext-sqlite3—indirect
Packagistknplabs/knp-gaufrette-bundle—indirect
Packagistleague/flysystem-bundle—indirect
Packagistleague/flysystem-memory—indirect
Packagistmatthiasnoback/symfony-dependency-injection-test—indirect
Packagistmikey179/vfsstream—indirect
Packagistphp—indirect
Packagistphpunit/phpunit—indirect
Packagistsymfony/asset—indirect
Packagistsymfony/browser-kit—indirect
Packagistsymfony/css-selector—indirect
Packagistsymfony/doctrine-bridge—indirect
Packagistsymfony/dom-crawler—indirect
Packagistsymfony/form—indirect
Packagistsymfony/framework-bundle—indirect
Packagistsymfony/phpunit-bridge—indirect
Packagistsymfony/security-csrf—indirect
Packagistsymfony/translation—indirect
Packagistsymfony/twig-bridge—indirect
Packagistsymfony/twig-bundle—indirect
Packagistsymfony/validator—indirect
Packagistsymfony/var-dumper—indirect
Packagistsymfony/yaml—indirect
Dependency advisories not assessed

Advisory matching could not run for this report: No resolved dependencies carried a version and a supported ecosystem

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Packagist.