Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-22 13:47 UTC

ec-europa / toolkit

Toolkit packaged for Drupal projects based on Robo.

PHPEUPL-1.2★ 38 stars⑂ 44 forkssince Jun 2017View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryCommand-line toolhow this is determined

ec-europa/toolkit holds a health index of 88 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Vitality (88/100) and lowest on Security (54/100). It was last updated today. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

88
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

88
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 74 is calibrated to 88 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

181 followers98 public repossince Feb 2015

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
Packagistec-europa/toolkit10.30.02,7802820 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

88Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 0 days ago
17.3/36Commit cadence25/52 weeks with commits
16.2/18Commit volume62 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained17 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year62
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year25

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases100 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 0 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~22.7 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count100
latest_release_tag10.30.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release0
mean_days_between_releases22.7
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

57Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
25.4/60Stars38 stars
13.6/25Forks44 forks
8/15Watchers28 watchers
Inputs used
forks44
stars38
watchers28
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (EUPL-1.2)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges3
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesgithub.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
45.9/80Monthly downloads2,780 downloads/month across packagist
8.2/20Registry dependents16 packages depend on it
Inputs used
packagesec-europa/toolkit
dependents16
ecosystemspackagist
total_downloads257,467
monthly_downloads2,780
unverified_packages_excluded

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

79Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
25.2/54Bus factor2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
13.5/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 40% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth21 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 13 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor2
contributors_sampled21
top_contributor_share0.402
How it's scored
42/42Issue resolution100% of issues closed
26.3/30PR acceptance756/861 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
12/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 24/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 8
Inputs used
merged_prs756
open_issues0
closed_issues25
prs_merged_7d3
prs_decided_7d3
prs_merged_30d4
prs_decided_30d4
issue_closed_ratio1
closed_unmerged_prs105
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domain
16.2/25Owner reach181 followers of ec-europa
25/25Track record98 public repos, account ~11 yr old
Inputs used
followers181
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginec-europa
public_repos98
account_age_days4,214

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on packagist
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 0 days ago
20/20Version history282 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesec-europa/toolkit
ecosystemspackagist
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish0

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

88Excellent · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows2 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config.eslintrc.json, phpcs.xml, phpstan.neon
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
16/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests21 out of 24 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

90Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://ec-europa.github.io/toolkit/
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics1 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsdigit
has_wikino
homepagehttps://ec-europa.github.io/toolkit/
docs_sitehttps://ec-europa.github.io/toolkit/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

54Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionno data
2/2.5CI-Tests21 out of 24 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
6/7.5Code-ReviewFound 24/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 8
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 13 contributing companies or organizations
0/10Dangerous-Workflowno data
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained17 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesno data
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsno data
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated12
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive6
scorecard_aggregate5.7
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
6.8/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories6 affected: guzzlehttp/guzzle 6.3.0 (high 8.0), guzzlehttp/guzzle 6.3.3 (high 8.0), guzzlehttp/guzzle 6.5.2 (high 8.0), +3 more
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
25/40No advisories left outstanding3 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 1,549 days ago
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories74
affected_packages14
assessed_packages115
unassessed_packages31
affected_by_severityhigh 7, moderate 7
direct_affected_packages6
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 115 resolved dependencies against OSV. 31 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

58Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
15/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)llms.txt served by the project website (https://docs.docker.com/llms.txt)
35.7/40Legible commit history67 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtyes
llms_txt_urlhttps://docs.docker.com/llms.txt
legible_history_share0.67
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config.eslintrc.json, phpcs.xml, phpstan.neon
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environmentDockerfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenanceno automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesno data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable codePHP without a type-check config
54.4/55Manageable file sizes1/98 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePHP
largest_source_bytes60,438
source_files_sampled98
oversized_source_files1
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP servernot applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examplessamples
Inputs used
example_dirssamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files
interfaces_expected_of
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

38GitHub stars
21contributors
62commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
100releases
2bus factor
0open issues
Packagistpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 44 ⇿
0Stars
44Forks
95Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

010203040504422017-122022-032026-06
Major 2Minor 47Patch 36

Each point covers 8 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.7 / 10
5.7aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-22 13:47 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
8CI-Tests21 out of 24 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
8Code-ReviewFound 24/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 8
10Contributorsproject has 13 contributing companies or organizations
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained17 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
n/aPinned-Dependenciesno dependencies found
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 16
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Packagistbehat/behat^3.7composer.json
Packagistconsolidation/annotated-command^4.7.0composer.json
Packagistconsolidation/robo^3.0 || ^4.0 || ^5.0composer.json
Packagistcweagans/composer-patches^1.7.3 || ^2.0composer.json
Packagistdantleech/gherkin-lint^0.2.3composer.json
Packagistdrupal/coder^8.3.30 || ^9.0composer.json
Packagistdrush/drush^11.0.4 || ^12.0 || ^13.0composer.json
Packagistec-europa/toolkit-composer-plugin^0.0.1composer.json
Packagistguzzlehttp/guzzle^6.3 || ^7.0composer.json
Packagistjakeasmith/http_build_url^1.0composer.json
Packagistleague/container^4.1.1composer.json
Packagistmglaman/phpstan-drupal^1.3 || ^2.0composer.json
Packagistpear/archive_tar^1.4composer.json
Packagistsquizlabs/php_codesniffer^3.7 || ^4.0composer.json
Packagistsymfony/yaml^5.0 || ^6.0 || ^7.0composer.json
Packagistvlucas/phpdotenv^5.6composer.json
All dependencies 146

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 27 direct and 119 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Packagistbehat/behatdirect
Packagistbehat/behat3.5.0direct
Packagistconsolidation/annotated-commanddirect
Packagistconsolidation/annotated-command2.12.0direct
Packagistconsolidation/robodirect
Packagistcweagans/composer-patchesdirect
Packagistdantleech/gherkin-lintdirect
Packagistdrupal/coderdirect
Packagistdrupal/coder8.2.12direct
Packagistdrush/drushdirect
Packagistdrush/drush8.2.3direct
Packagistec-europa/toolkit-composer-plugindirect
Packagistguzzlehttp/guzzledirect
Packagistguzzlehttp/guzzle6.3.0direct
Packagistguzzlehttp/guzzle6.3.3direct
Packagistguzzlehttp/guzzle6.5.2direct
Packagistjakeasmith/http_build_urldirect
Packagistleague/containerdirect
Packagistmglaman/phpstan-drupaldirect
Packagistpear/archive_tardirect
Packagistpear/archive_tar1.4.14direct
Packagistsquizlabs/php_codesnifferdirect
Packagistsquizlabs/php_codesniffer2.9.2direct
Packagistsymfony/yamldirect
Packagistsymfony/yaml3.4.28direct
Packagistsymfony/yaml3.4.36direct
Packagistvlucas/phpdotenvdirect
Packagistbehat/gherkin4.6.0indirect
Packagistbehat/mink1.7.1indirect
Packagistbehat/mink-browserkit-driver1.3.3indirect
Packagistbehat/mink-extension2.2indirect
Packagistbehat/mink-goutte-driver1.2.1indirect
Packagistbehat/mink-selenium2-driver1.3.1indirect
Packagistbehat/transliterator1.2.0indirect
Packagistbex/behat-extension-driver-locator1.0.2indirect
Packagistbex/behat-screenshot1.2.8indirect
Packagistbex/behat-screenshot-image-driver-img421.0.0indirect
Packagistbovigo/assert1.7.1indirect
Packagistcomposer/composerindirect
Packagistconsolidation/output-formatters3.5.0indirect
Packagistcontainer-interop/container-interop1.2.0indirect
Packagistcpliakas/git-wrapper1.7.0indirect
Packagistdflydev/dot-access-data1.1.0indirect
Packagistdnoegel/php-xdg-base-dir0.1indirect
Packagistdoctrine/instantiator1.0.5indirect
Packagistdrupal/core-render8.7.11indirect
Packagistdrupal/core-utility8.7.11indirect
Packagistdrupal/drupal-driver2.0.0indirect
Packagistdrupal/drupal-extension4.0.1indirect
Packagistdrupal/phingdrushtask1.1.1indirect
Packagistdrupol/phingbehattask1.2.0indirect
Packagistec-europa/qa-automation3.2.0indirect
Packagistec-europa/toolkitindirect
Packagistext-curlindirect
Packagistext-domindirect
Packagistext-jsonindirect
Packagistext-simplexmlindirect
Packagistfabpot/goutte3.2.3indirect
Packagistguzzle/guzzle3.8.1indirect
Packagistguzzlehttp/promises1.3.1indirect
Packagistguzzlehttp/psr71.4.2indirect
Packagistguzzlehttp/psr71.5.2indirect
Packagistguzzlehttp/psr71.6.1indirect
Packagistinstaclick/php-webdriver1.4.6indirect
Packagistjakub-onderka/php-console-color0.2indirect
Packagistjakub-onderka/php-console-highlighter0.4indirect
Packagistkasperg/phing-githubindirect
Packagistknplabs/github-api1.3.1indirect
Packagistkriswallsmith/buzz0.15.2indirect
Packagistlstrojny/hmmmath0.5.0indirect
Packagistmyclabs/deep-copy1.7.0indirect
Packagistnikic/php-parser4.2.2indirect
Packagistparagonie/random_compat2.0.18indirect
Packagistpear/console_getopt1.4.2indirect
Packagistpear/console_table1.3.1indirect
Packagistpear/pear-core-minimal1.10.9indirect
Packagistpear/pear_exception1.0.0indirect
Packagistpear/versioncontrol_gitindirect
Packagistpfrenssen/phpcs-pre-push1.0indirect
Packagistphing/phing2.16.1indirect
Packagistphing/phing2.16.2indirect
Packagistphpindirect
Packagistphp-parallel-lint/php-parallel-lintindirect
Packagistphpcompatibility/php-compatibilityindirect
Packagistphpcompatibility/php-compatibility9.1.1indirect
Packagistphpdocumentor/reflection-common1.0.1indirect
Packagistphpdocumentor/reflection-docblock3.3.2indirect
Packagistphpdocumentor/type-resolver0.4.0indirect
Packagistphpmd/phpmdindirect
Packagistphpspec/prophecy1.10.1indirect
Packagistphpstan/phpstanindirect
Packagistphpstan/phpstan-deprecation-rulesindirect
Packagistphpunit/php-code-coverage4.0.8indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-file-iterator1.4.5indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-text-template1.2.1indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-timer1.0.9indirect
Packagistphpunit/php-token-stream1.4.12indirect
Packagistphpunit/phpunitindirect
Packagistphpunit/phpunit5.6.4indirect
Packagistphpunit/phpunit-mock-objects3.4.4indirect
Packagistpsr/container1.0.0indirect
Packagistpsr/http-message1.0.1indirect
Packagistpsr/log1.1.0indirect
Packagistpsr/log1.1.2indirect
Packagistpsy/psysh0.9.9indirect
Packagistralouphie/getallheaders2.0.5indirect
Packagistralouphie/getallheaders3.0.3indirect
Packagistrych/random0.1.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/code-unit-reverse-lookup1.0.1indirect
Packagistsebastian/comparator1.2.4indirect
Packagistsebastian/diff1.4.3indirect
Packagistsebastian/environment2.0.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/exporter1.2.2indirect
Packagistsebastian/global-state1.1.1indirect
Packagistsebastian/object-enumerator1.0.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/recursion-context1.0.5indirect
Packagistsebastian/resource-operations1.0.0indirect
Packagistsebastian/version2.0.1indirect
Packagistsymfony/browser-kit3.4.36indirect
Packagistsymfony/class-loader3.4.36indirect
Packagistsymfony/config3.4.36indirect
Packagistsymfony/console3.4.28indirect
Packagistsymfony/console3.4.36indirect
Packagistsymfony/css-selector3.4.36indirect
Packagistsymfony/debug3.4.36indirect
Packagistsymfony/debug4.3.1indirect
Packagistsymfony/dependency-injection3.4.36indirect
Packagistsymfony/dom-crawler3.4.36indirect
Packagistsymfony/event-dispatcher3.4.28indirect
Packagistsymfony/event-dispatcher3.4.36indirect
Packagistsymfony/filesystem3.4.36indirect
Packagistsymfony/finder3.4.28indirect
Packagistsymfony/finder3.4.36indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-ctype1.11.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-ctype1.13.1indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-iconv1.13.1indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-mbstring1.11.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-mbstring1.13.1indirect
Packagistsymfony/process3.4.28indirect
Packagistsymfony/process3.4.36indirect
Packagistsymfony/translation3.4.36indirect
Packagistsymfony/var-dumper3.4.28indirect
Packagistwebflo/drupal-finder1.1.0indirect
Packagistwebmozart/assert1.4.0indirect
Packagistwebmozart/assert1.6.0indirect
Packagistwebmozart/path-util2.3.0indirect
Dependency advisories 14

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 115 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 14 carry known advisories, of which 6 are direct. 31 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
guzzlehttp/guzzle6.3.0directhigh148.0.1
guzzlehttp/guzzle6.3.3directhigh148.0.1
guzzlehttp/guzzle6.5.2directhigh148.0.1
squizlabs/php_codesniffer2.9.2directhigh14.0.2
phpunit/phpunit5.6.4indirecthigh112.5.8
symfony/process3.4.28indirecthigh28.0.5
symfony/process3.4.36indirecthigh28.0.5
symfony/yaml3.4.28directmoderate38.0.12
symfony/yaml3.4.36directmoderate38.0.12
guzzlehttp/psr71.4.2indirectmoderate62.12.3
guzzlehttp/psr71.5.2indirectmoderate62.12.3
guzzlehttp/psr71.6.1indirectmoderate62.12.3
psy/psysh0.9.9indirectmoderate10.12.19
symfony/dom-crawler3.4.36indirectmoderate18.0.12

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsPackagist.