Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-19 07:58 UTC

eclipse-tractusx / tractusx-edc

JavaApache-2.0★ 91 stars⑂ 104 forkssince Dec 2022View on GitHub ↗
KindNetwork servicehow this is determined

eclipse-tractusx/tractusx-edc holds a health index of 91 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Vitality (97/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (66/100). It was last updated 2 days ago. 3 contributors account for most of its recent work.

91
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

91
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 77 is calibrated to 91 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Eclipse Tractus-XOrganization
287 followers80 public repossince Mar 2022

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

97Exceptional · 21% of overall

Development activity

100Exceptional
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 2 days ago
36/36Commit cadence — 52/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 578 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year578
human_commit_share0.24
days_since_last_push2
active_weeks_last_year52
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 51 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 52 days ago
19.8/27Release cadence — a release every ~49.9 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count51
latest_release_tag0.13.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release52
mean_days_between_releases49.9
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

72Good · 17% of overall
How it's scored
31.7/60Stars — 91 stars
16.8/25Forks — 104 forks
5.8/15Watchers — 12 watchers
Inputs used
forks104
stars91
watchers12
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

92Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (Apache-2.0)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges1
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_servicessonarcloud.io
has_pull_request_templateyes

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

77Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
36/54Bus factor — 3 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
16.5/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 26% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 63 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 23 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor3
contributors_sampled63
top_contributor_share0.265
How it's scored
40.2/42Issue resolution — 96% of issues closed
25.5/30PR acceptance — 1,940/2,281 decided PRs merged
6.5/13Newcomer PR acceptance — 2/4 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
12/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 4/5 approved changesets -- score normalized to 8
Inputs used
merged_prs1,940
open_issues31
closed_issues673
prs_merged_7d1
prs_decided_7d1
prs_merged_30d5
prs_decided_30d7
issue_closed_ratio0.956
closed_unmerged_prs341
first_time_authors_30d3
first_time_prs_merged_30d2
first_time_prs_decided_30d4
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
17.7/25Owner reach — 287 followers of eclipse-tractusx
22.1/25Track record — 80 public repos, account ~4 yr old
Inputs used
followers287
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_logineclipse-tractusx
public_repos80
account_age_days1,664

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

67Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 22 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
0/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikiyes
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionno

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

72Good · 16% of overall
How it's scored
6.8/7.5Binary-Artifacts — binaries present in source code
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
6/7.5Code-Review — Found 4/5 approved changesets -- score normalized to 8
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 23 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
4/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 8
5/5SAST — SAST tool is run on all commits
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate7.2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

66Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 23 of 24 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.958
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrap — build.gradle.kts, core/core-utils/build.gradle.kts, core/edr-core/build.gradle.kts (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — Java (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8Automated maintenance — 76 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
8/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 8
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles—
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsbuild.gradle.kts, core/core-utils/build.gradle.kts, core/edr-core/build.gradle.kts, core/json-ld-core/build.gradle.kts, core/json-ld-cx/build.gradle.kts, edc-controlplane/build.gradle.kts, edc-controlplane/edc-controlplane-base/build.gradle.kts, edc-controlplane/edc-controlplane-postgresql-hashicorp-vault/build.gradle.kts, edc-controlplane/edc-runtime-memory/build.gradle.kts, edc-dataplane/build.gradle.kts, edc-dataplane/edc-dataplane-base/build.gradle.kts, edc-dataplane/edc-dataplane-hashicorp-vault/build.gradle.kts, edc-extensions/agreements-bpns/bpns-evaluation-core/build.gradle.kts, edc-extensions/agreements-bpns/bpns-evaluation-spi/build.gradle.kts, edc-extensions/agreements-bpns/bpns-evaluation-store-sql/build.gradle.kts, edc-extensions/agreements-bpns/build.gradle.kts, edc-extensions/agreements/build.gradle.kts, edc-extensions/agreements/retirement-evaluation-api/build.gradle.kts, edc-extensions/agreements/retirement-evaluation-core/build.gradle.kts, edc-extensions/agreements/retirement-evaluation-spi/build.gradle.kts, edc-extensions/agreements/retirement-evaluation-store-sql/build.gradle.kts, edc-extensions/bdrs-client/build.gradle.kts, edc-extensions/bpn-validation/bpn-validation-api/build.gradle.kts, edc-extensions/bpn-validation/bpn-validation-core/build.gradle.kts, edc-extensions/bpn-validation/bpn-validation-spi/build.gradle.kts, edc-extensions/bpn-validation/build.gradle.kts, edc-extensions/bpn-validation/business-partner-store-sql/build.gradle.kts, edc-extensions/connector-discovery/connector-discovery-api/build.gradle.kts, edc-extensions/connector-discovery/cx-connector-discovery/build.gradle.kts, edc-extensions/cx-policy-legacy/build.gradle.kts, edc-extensions/cx-policy/build.gradle.kts, edc-extensions/data-flow-properties-provider/build.gradle.kts, edc-extensions/dataplane/dataflow/dataflow-api/build.gradle.kts, edc-extensions/dataplane/dataflow/dataflow-service/build.gradle.kts, edc-extensions/dataplane/dataplane-proxy/dataplane-proxy-http/build.gradle.kts, edc-extensions/dataplane/dataplane-proxy/dataplane-public-api-v2/build.gradle.kts, edc-extensions/dataplane/dataplane-proxy/edc-dataplane-proxy-consumer-api/build.gradle.kts, edc-extensions/dataplane/dataplane-token-refresh/token-refresh-api/build.gradle.kts, edc-extensions/dataplane/dataplane-token-refresh/token-refresh-core/build.gradle.kts, edc-extensions/dataplane/dataplane-util/build.gradle.kts, edc-extensions/dataplane/kafka/data-address-kafka/build.gradle.kts, edc-extensions/dataplane/kafka/kafka-broker-extension/build.gradle.kts, edc-extensions/dataplane/kafka/validator-data-address-kafka/build.gradle.kts, edc-extensions/dataspace-protocol/build.gradle.kts, edc-extensions/dataspace-protocol/cx-dataspace-protocol/build.gradle.kts, edc-extensions/dataspace-protocol/dataspace-protocol-core/build.gradle.kts, edc-extensions/dcp/cx-dcp/build.gradle.kts, edc-extensions/dcp/tx-dcp-sts-div/build.gradle.kts, edc-extensions/dcp/tx-dcp/build.gradle.kts, edc-extensions/dcp/verifiable-presentation-cache/build.gradle.kts, edc-extensions/did-document/did-document-service-div/build.gradle.kts, edc-extensions/did-document/did-document-service-self-registration/build.gradle.kts, edc-extensions/dsp/dsp-catalog-08/build.gradle.kts, edc-extensions/dsp/dsp-catalog-08/dsp-catalog-http-api-08/build.gradle.kts, edc-extensions/dsp/dsp-catalog-08/dsp-catalog-transform-08/build.gradle.kts, edc-extensions/dsp/dsp-http-api-configuration-08/build.gradle.kts, edc-extensions/dsp/dsp-http-dispatcher-08/build.gradle.kts, edc-extensions/dsp/dsp-negotiation-08/build.gradle.kts, edc-extensions/dsp/dsp-negotiation-08/dsp-negotiation-http-api-08/build.gradle.kts, edc-extensions/dsp/dsp-negotiation-08/dsp-negotiation-transform-08/build.gradle.kts, edc-extensions/dsp/dsp-transfer-process-08/build.gradle.kts, edc-extensions/dsp/dsp-transfer-process-08/dsp-transfer-process-http-api-08/build.gradle.kts, edc-extensions/dsp/dsp-transfer-process-08/dsp-transfer-process-transform-08/build.gradle.kts, edc-extensions/edr/edr-api-v2/build.gradle.kts, edc-extensions/edr/edr-callback/build.gradle.kts, edc-extensions/edr/edr-index-lock-sql/build.gradle.kts, edc-extensions/event-subscriber/build.gradle.kts, edc-extensions/log4j2-monitor/build.gradle.kts, edc-extensions/migrations/connector-migration/build.gradle.kts, edc-extensions/migrations/control-plane-migration/build.gradle.kts, edc-extensions/migrations/data-plane-migration/build.gradle.kts, edc-extensions/migrations/postgresql-migration-lib/build.gradle.kts, edc-extensions/non-finite-provider-push/non-finite-provider-push-core/build.gradle.kts, edc-extensions/non-finite-provider-push/non-finite-provider-push-spi/build.gradle.kts, edc-extensions/single-participant-vault/build.gradle.kts, edc-extensions/token-interceptor/build.gradle.kts, edc-extensions/tokenrefresh-handler/build.gradle.kts, edc-extensions/validators/contract-definition-policies/build.gradle.kts, edc-extensions/validators/empty-asset-selector/build.gradle.kts, edc-tests/compatibility-tests/build.gradle.kts, edc-tests/e2e-fixtures/build.gradle.kts, edc-tests/e2e/bpn-event-tests/build.gradle.kts, edc-tests/e2e/catalog-tests/build.gradle.kts, edc-tests/e2e/cloud-transfer-tests/build.gradle.kts, edc-tests/e2e/dcp-tck-tests/build.gradle.kts, edc-tests/e2e/dcp-tests/build.gradle.kts, edc-tests/e2e/discovery-tests/build.gradle.kts, edc-tests/e2e/dsp-tck-tests/build.gradle.kts, edc-tests/e2e/edc-dataplane-tokenrefresh-tests/build.gradle.kts, edc-tests/e2e/edr-api-tests/build.gradle.kts, edc-tests/e2e/end2end-transfer-cloud/build.gradle.kts, edc-tests/e2e/kafka-transfer-tests/build.gradle.kts, edc-tests/e2e/management-tests/build.gradle.kts, edc-tests/e2e/policy-tests/build.gradle.kts, edc-tests/e2e/transfer-tests/build.gradle.kts, edc-tests/runtime/dataplane-cloud/build.gradle.kts, edc-tests/runtime/dcp/dcp-extensions/build.gradle.kts, edc-tests/runtime/dcp/runtime-memory-dcp-div-ih/build.gradle.kts, edc-tests/runtime/dcp/runtime-memory-dcp-ih/build.gradle.kts, edc-tests/runtime/dcp/runtime-memory-sts/build.gradle.kts, edc-tests/runtime/runtime-compatibility/snapshot/connector-snapshot/build.gradle.kts, edc-tests/runtime/runtime-compatibility/stable/connector-stable/build.gradle.kts, edc-tests/runtime/runtime-compatibility/stable/extensions/build.gradle.kts, edc-tests/runtime/runtime-dcp-tck/build.gradle.kts, edc-tests/runtime/runtime-discovery/runtime-discovery-base/build.gradle.kts, edc-tests/runtime/runtime-discovery/runtime-discovery-no-protocols/build.gradle.kts, edc-tests/runtime/runtime-discovery/runtime-discovery-with-dsp-v08/build.gradle.kts, edc-tests/runtime/runtime-dsp/build.gradle.kts, edc-tests/runtime/runtime-postgresql/build.gradle.kts, spi/bdrs-client-spi/build.gradle.kts, spi/callback-spi/build.gradle.kts, spi/core-spi/build.gradle.kts, spi/dataflow-spi/build.gradle.kts, spi/dcp-spi/build.gradle.kts, spi/did-document-service-spi/build.gradle.kts, spi/dsp-spi-08/build.gradle.kts, spi/edr-spi/build.gradle.kts, spi/tokenrefresh-spi/build.gradle.kts
dependency_bot_commit_share0.76
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — Java (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/611 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageJava
largest_source_bytes28,684
source_files_sampled611
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

91GitHub stars
63contributors
578commits, last 12 months
2days since last push
51releases
3bus factor
31open issues
Mavenpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 104 ⇿
0Stars
104Forks
48Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

02040608010010042023-022024-112026-09
Major 0Minor 9Patch 23

Each point covers 4 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 7.2 / 10
7.2aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-10-19 07:58 UTC

9Binary-Artifactsbinaries present in source code
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
10CI-Tests30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
8Code-ReviewFound 4/5 approved changesets -- score normalized to 8
10Contributorsproject has 23 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
8Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 8
10SASTSAST tool is run on all commits
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
All dependencies 0

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 0 direct and 0 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Dependency advisories not assessed

Advisory matching could not run for this report: No resolved dependencies to assess

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics.