Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-18 07:14 UTC

educationwarehouse / edwh

Education Warehouse environment management - swiss army knife

PythonNo license detected★ 4 stars⑂ 0 forkssince Apr 2023View on GitHub ↗
KindCommand-line toolLibraryhow this is determined
#edwh#invoke#hatch#python

educationwarehouse/edwh holds a health index of 56 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Vitality (81/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (16/100). It was last updated 8 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

56
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

56
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 54 is calibrated to 56 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

stichting EducationWarehouseOrganization
11 followers79 public repossince Apr 2019

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
PyPIedwh1.17.3-2988 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

81Excellent · 21% of overall

Development activity

77Good
How it's scored
28.8/36Push recency — last push 8 days ago
20.1/36Commit cadence — 29/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 159 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year159
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push8
active_weeks_last_year29

Release discipline

88Excellent
How it's scored
16.2/27Ships releases — 97 version tags (no GitHub releases)
36/36Release recency — latest release 8 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~2.9 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count97
latest_release_tagv1.17.3
releases_from_tagsyes
days_since_latest_release8
mean_days_between_releases2.9
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

16Critical · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

8Critical
How it's scored
7.7/60Stars — 4 stars
0/25Forks — 0 forks
0/15Watchers — 2 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars4
watchers2
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

25At Risk
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
0/22.5License — no license file detected
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseno
readme_badges2
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesshields.io
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

65Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

33At Risk
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
3.2/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 86% of commits
10.8/13.5Contributor breadth — 8 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled8
top_contributor_share0.856

Issue & PR responsiveness

77Good
How it's scored
42/42Issue resolution — 100% of issues closed
24.7/30PR acceptance — 14/17 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/12 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs14
open_issues0
closed_issues1
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d1
prs_decided_30d2
issue_closed_ratio1
closed_unmerged_prs3
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

63Moderate
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
7.8/25Owner reach — 11 followers of educationwarehouse
25/25Track record — 79 public repos, account ~7 yr old
Inputs used
followers11
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_logineducationwarehouse
public_repos79
account_age_days2,704

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on pypi
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 8 days ago
20/20Version history — 298 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesedwh
ecosystemspypi
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish8

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

50Moderate · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

40Weak
How it's scored
0/24CI workflows
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff], [tool.black], [tool.isort])
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 0 out of 1 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_cino
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

65Good
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://pypi.org/project/edwh/
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 4 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsedwh, invoke, hatch, python
has_wikino
homepagehttps://pypi.org/project/edwh/
docs_sitehttps://pypi.org/project/edwh/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

49Weak · 16% of overall

Security posture

36Weak
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Tests — 0 out of 1 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/12 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
0/10Dangerous-Workflow — no data
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
0/2.5License — license file not detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — no data
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — no data
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated13
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive5
scorecard_aggregate3.6
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — no indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages54
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the pypi:edwh@1.17.3 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 54 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

48Weak · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

32At Risk
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
32.5/40Legible commit history — 61 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.61
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

49Weak
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff], [tool.black], [tool.isort])
11/11Static type checking — src/edwh/py.typed
0/10Reproducible environment
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles—
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configssrc/edwh/py.typed
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.

Code legibility for models

80Excellent
How it's scored
27/45Type-checkable code — Python with type-check config (src/edwh/py.typed)
52.9/55Manageable file sizes — 1/26 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePython
largest_source_bytes93,212
source_files_sampled26
oversized_source_files1

Key facts

4GitHub stars
8contributors
159commits, last 12 months
8days since last push
97releases
1bus factor
0open issues
PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • pypi download statistics for 'edwh' unavailable this scan (stats endpoint failed after retries); adoption may be under-evidenced

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 3.6 / 10
3.6aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-18 07:14 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0CI-Tests0 out of 1 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/12 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
0Licenselicense file not detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
n/aPinned-Dependenciesno dependencies found
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 27
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
PyPIanyio< 5pyproject.toml
PyPIclick< 9pyproject.toml
PyPIdiceware< 2pyproject.toml
PyPIewok>= 0.5.3, < 1pyproject.toml
PyPIhumanize< 5pyproject.toml
PyPImore-itertools—pyproject.toml
PyPIdocstring_parser< 1pyproject.toml
PyPIkeyring< 26pyproject.toml
PyPIpackaging—pyproject.toml
PyPIplumbum< 2pyproject.toml
PyPIpython-dateutil< 3pyproject.toml
PyPIpython-dotenv< 2pyproject.toml
PyPIpyyaml< 7pyproject.toml
PyPIrapidfuzz< 4pyproject.toml
PyPIrequests< 3pyproject.toml
PyPIrich< 16pyproject.toml
PyPIruff==0.16.3pyproject.toml
PyPIssh-agent-keyring>= 0.2, < 1pyproject.toml
PyPItabulate>= 0.9, < 0.10pyproject.toml
PyPItermcolor< 3pyproject.toml
PyPIty==0.0.73pyproject.toml
PyPIthreadful>= 0.5, < 1pyproject.toml
PyPItomlkit< 1pyproject.toml
PyPItqdm< 5pyproject.toml
PyPItyping-extensions< 5pyproject.toml
PyPIuv< 1pyproject.toml
PyPIyayarl< 3pyproject.toml
All dependencies 162

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 50 direct and 112 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
PyPIanyio—direct
PyPIanyio4.14.2direct
PyPIclick—direct
PyPIclick8.4.2direct
PyPIdiceware—direct
PyPIdiceware1.0.1direct
PyPIdocstring-parser—direct
PyPIdocstring-parser0.18.0direct
PyPIewok—direct
PyPIewok0.5.3direct
PyPIhumanize—direct
PyPIhumanize4.16.0direct
PyPIkeyring—direct
PyPIkeyring25.7.0direct
PyPImore-itertools11.1.0direct
PyPIpackaging26.3direct
PyPIplumbum—direct
PyPIplumbum1.10.0direct
PyPIpython-dateutil—direct
PyPIpython-dateutil2.9.0.post0direct
PyPIpython-dotenv—direct
PyPIpython-dotenv1.2.3direct
PyPIpyyaml—direct
PyPIpyyaml6.0.3direct
PyPIrapidfuzz—direct
PyPIrapidfuzz3.14.5direct
PyPIrequests—direct
PyPIrequests2.34.2direct
PyPIrich—direct
PyPIrich15.0.0direct
PyPIruff0.16.3direct
PyPIssh-agent-keyring—direct
PyPIssh-agent-keyring0.5.0direct
PyPItabulate—direct
PyPItabulate0.9.0direct
PyPItermcolor—direct
PyPItermcolor2.5.0direct
PyPIthreadful—direct
PyPIthreadful0.5.1direct
PyPItomlkit—direct
PyPItomlkit0.15.1direct
PyPItqdm—direct
PyPItqdm4.70.0direct
PyPIty0.0.73direct
PyPItyping-extensions—direct
PyPItyping-extensions4.16.0direct
PyPIuv—direct
PyPIuv0.12.5direct
PyPIyayarl—direct
PyPIyayarl2.3.1direct
PyPIannotated-types0.8.0indirect
PyPIargcomplete3.7.2indirect
PyPIarrow1.4.0indirect
PyPIb24.7.1indirect
PyPIb2sdk2.12.0indirect
PyPIbackports-zstd1.7.0indirect
PyPIbcrypt5.0.0indirect
PyPIcertifi2026.7.22indirect
PyPIcffi2.1.1indirect
PyPIcharset-normalizer3.5.1indirect
PyPIcolorama0.4.6indirect
PyPIconfiguraptor2.5.4indirect
PyPIcoverage7.15.4indirect
PyPIcryptography50.0.0indirect
PyPIdecorator5.3.1indirect
PyPIdeprecated1.3.1indirect
PyPIdistlib0.4.3indirect
PyPIdistro1.9.0indirect
PyPIdocutils0.21.2indirect
PyPIedwarp0.2.0indirect
PyPIedwh1.15.0indirect
PyPIedwh-b2-plugin—indirect
PyPIedwh-b2-plugin0.2.7indirect
PyPIedwh-bundler-plugin6.1.0indirect
PyPIedwh-demo-plugin0.1.2indirect
PyPIedwh-devdb-plugin0.7.3indirect
PyPIedwh-files-plugin1.2.0indirect
PyPIedwh-git-plugin0.1.0indirect
PyPIedwh-locust-plugin0.1.2indirect
PyPIedwh-multipass-plugin1.3.1indirect
PyPIedwh-passbolt-plugin0.4.0indirect
PyPIedwh-pipcompile-plugin0.6.1indirect
PyPIedwh-quickjs-ng0.14.0.3indirect
PyPIedwh-restic-plugin1.0.0indirect
PyPIedwh-server-provisioning-plugin0.11.0indirect
PyPIedwh-sshfs-plugin0.2.2indirect
PyPIedwh-sshkey-plugin0.1.8indirect
PyPIedwh-uptime-plugin0.5.4indirect
PyPIedwh-whitelabel-plugin0.1.2indirect
PyPIexpandvars1.1.2indirect
PyPIfabric3.2.3indirect
PyPIfilelock3.32.3indirect
PyPIh110.16.0indirect
PyPIhatch1.18.0indirect
PyPIhatchling1.32.0indirect
PyPIhttpcore22.12.0indirect
PyPIhttpx22.12.0indirect
PyPIhttpx2-jsfetch1.0indirect
PyPIhyperlink21.0.0indirect
PyPIidna3.19indirect
PyPIiniconfig2.3.0indirect
PyPIinvoke2.2.1indirect
PyPIjaraco-classes3.4.0indirect
PyPIjaraco-context6.1.2indirect
PyPIjaraco-functools4.6.0indirect
PyPIjeepney0.9.0indirect
PyPIlogfury1.0.1indirect
PyPImarkdown-it-py4.2.0indirect
PyPImdurl0.1.2indirect
PyPImultidict6.7.1indirect
PyPIparamiko5.0.0indirect
PyPIpathspec1.1.1indirect
PyPIpexpect4.9.0indirect
PyPIplatformdirs4.11.3indirect
PyPIpluggy1.6.0indirect
PyPIprogress1.6.1indirect
PyPIprompt-toolkit3.0.53indirect
PyPIpropcache0.5.2indirect
PyPIptyprocess0.7.0indirect
PyPIpycparser3.0indirect
PyPIpygments2.21.0indirect
PyPIpyjson52.0.1indirect
PyPIpynacl1.6.2indirect
PyPIpyotp2.10.0indirect
PyPIpyproject-hooks1.2.0indirect
PyPIpytest9.1.1indirect
PyPIpytest-cov7.1.0indirect
PyPIpython-discovery1.5.2indirect
PyPIpywin32312indirect
PyPIpywin32-ctypes0.2.3indirect
PyPIquestionary2.1.1indirect
PyPIrequests-toolbelt1.0.0indirect
PyPIrestic-reaper0.1.2indirect
PyPIresult0.17.0indirect
PyPIrjsmin1.2.5indirect
PyPIrst2ansi0.1.5indirect
PyPIsassquatch1.0.1indirect
PyPIsecretstorage3.5.0indirect
PyPIshellingham1.5.4indirect
PyPIsix1.17.0indirect
PyPIsleazy0.2.0indirect
PyPItomli2.4.1indirect
PyPItomli-w1.2.0indirect
PyPItrove-classifiers2026.6.1.19indirect
PyPItruststore0.10.4indirect
PyPItypeguard4.6.0indirect
PyPItypes-cffi2.0.0.20260518indirect
PyPItypes-pyopenssl24.1.0.20240722indirect
PyPItypes-python-dateutil2.9.0.20260807indirect
PyPItypes-redis4.6.0.20241004indirect
PyPItypes-requests2.33.0.20260712indirect
PyPItypes-setuptools84.0.0.20260812indirect
PyPItypes-tabulate0.10.0.20260508indirect
PyPItzdata2026.3indirect
PyPIurllib32.7.0indirect
PyPIuserpath1.9.2indirect
PyPIuv-build—indirect
PyPIvirtualenv21.7.4indirect
PyPIvommit—indirect
PyPIvommit0.5.0indirect
PyPIwcwidth0.8.2indirect
PyPIwrapt2.3.0indirect
Dependency advisories 0

Installing pypi:edwh@1.17.3 pulls in 54 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with educationwarehouse/edwh. Read them side by side →

100open-telemetry/opentelemetry-pythonOpenTelemetry Python API and SDK Exceptional100PrefectHQ/prefectPrefect is a workflow orchestration framework for building resilient data pipelines in Python.Exceptional100deepset-ai/haystackOpen-source AI orchestration framework for building context-engineered, production-ready LLM applications. Design modular pipelines and agent workflows with explicit control over retrieval, routing, memory, and generation. Built for scalable agents, RAG, multimodal applications, semantic search, and conversational systems.Exceptional100matplotlib/matplotlibmatplotlib: plotting with PythonExceptional100psf/blackThe uncompromising Python code formatterExceptional100astropy/astropyAstronomy and astrophysics core libraryExceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — PyPI.