Public record
Software health reportschema 0.12.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-17 20:31 UTC

egeominotti / bunqueue

⚡ High-performance job queue for Bun. SQLite persistence, DLQ, cron jobs, S3 backups. Built for AI agents and automation

TypeScriptMIT★ 506 stars⑂ 15 forkssince Jan 2026View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryWeb interfacehow this is determined

egeominotti/bunqueue holds a health index of 80 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (88/100) and lowest on Security (46/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

80
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

80
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 68 is calibrated to 80 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Egeo MinottiPersonal account
48 followers39 public repossince Oct 2012viperblock

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

84Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 0 days ago
15.9/36Commit cadence23/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume746 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained30 commit(s) and 21 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year746
human_commit_share
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year23
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases100 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 0 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~2 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count100
latest_release_tagv2.8.36
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release0
mean_days_between_releases2

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

57Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
43.9/60Stars506 stars
9.6/25Forks15 forks
0/15Watchers2 watchers
Inputs used
forks15
stars506
watchers2
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
56.2/80Monthly downloads16,322 downloads/month across npm
0/20Registry dependentsnot reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesbunqueue
dependents
ecosystemsnpm
total_downloads
monthly_downloads16,322
unverified_packages_excluded
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

56Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0.2/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 99% of commits
4.1/13.5Contributor breadth3 contributors
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled3
top_contributor_share0.992
How it's scored
42/42Issue resolution100% of issues closed
18/30PR acceptance6/10 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs6
open_issues0
closed_issues75
prs_merged_7d
prs_decided_7d
prs_merged_30d
prs_decided_30d
issue_closed_ratio1
closed_unmerged_prs4
first_time_authors_30d
first_time_prs_merged_30d
first_time_prs_decided_30d
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backingpersonal (user) account
0/20Verified domainnot applicable to user accounts
12.2/25Owner reach48 followers of egeominotti
23.7/25Track record39 public repos, account ~13 yr old
Inputs used
followers48
owner_typeUser
is_verified
owner_loginegeominotti
public_repos39
account_age_days5,020
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on npm
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 0 days ago
20/20Version history254 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesbunqueue
ecosystemsnpm
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish0

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

88Excellent · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows3 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter configbiome.json
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Testsno data
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.

Documentation

100Exceptional
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://bunqueue.dev
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics17 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsbun, queue, background-jobs, s3, cron-scheduler, job-queue, message-queue, redis-alternative, bullmq-alternative, bun-queue, task-queue-typescript, sqlite3, ai, ai-agents, ai-scheduler, deno, nodejs
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://bunqueue.dev
docs_sitehttps://bunqueue.dev
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

46Weak · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
2.2/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
0/2.5CI-Testsno data
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0.8/2.5Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
5/5Fuzzingproject is fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained30 commit(s) and 21 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SASTno SAST tool detected
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
6.8/7.5Vulnerabilities1 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate4.6
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

86Excellent · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructionsAGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, sdk/CLAUDE.md, sdk/elixir/CLAUDE.md, sdk/go/CLAUDE.md, sdk/php/CLAUDE.md, sdk/python/CLAUDE.md, sdk/typescript/CLAUDE.md
15/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)llms.txt present
0/40Legible commit historyno data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtyes
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share
agent_instruction_filesAGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, sdk/CLAUDE.md, sdk/elixir/CLAUDE.md, sdk/go/CLAUDE.md, sdk/php/CLAUDE.md, sdk/python/CLAUDE.md, sdk/typescript/CLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes28,854
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format configbiome.json
11/11Static type checkingdocs/tsconfig.json, sdk/python/bunqueue/py.typed, sdk/typescript/tsconfig.json, tsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environmentDockerfile, lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno data
0/8Automated maintenanceno data
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesCargo.lock, go.sum, mix.lock
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configsdocs/tsconfig.json, sdk/python/bunqueue/py.typed, sdk/typescript/tsconfig.json, tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice, Automated maintenance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeTypeScript (statically typed)
54.8/55Manageable file sizes3/1,086 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageTypeScript
largest_source_bytes70,857
source_files_sampled1,086
oversized_source_files3
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)not applicable to this kind of software
20/20MCP server
40/40Runnable examplesexamples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalyes
api_schema_files
interfaces_expected_of
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto). Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

506GitHub stars
3contributors
746commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
100releases
1bus factor
0open issues
npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Could not fetch npm package 'bunqueue-docs' from its registry

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.6 / 10
4.6aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-17 20:31 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
3Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
n/aCI-Testsno pull request found
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
3Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
10Fuzzingproject is fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 21 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTno SAST tool detected
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
9Vulnerabilities1 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 16
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
npm@astrojs/react^5.0.1docs/package.json
npm@astrojs/sitemap^3.7.1docs/package.json
npm@astrojs/starlight^0.38.2docs/package.json
npm@fontsource-variable/bricolage-grotesque^5.2.10docs/package.json
npm@fontsource/ibm-plex-mono^5.2.7docs/package.json
npm@fontsource/inter^5.2.8docs/package.json
npm@resvg/resvg-js^2.6.2docs/package.json
npm@types/react^19.0.0docs/package.json
npm@types/react-dom^19.0.0docs/package.json
npmastro^6.0.8docs/package.json
npmreact^19.0.0docs/package.json
npmreact-dom^19.0.0docs/package.json
npmsatori^0.26.0docs/package.json
npmsharp^0.33.0docs/package.json
npmcroner10.0.1package.json
npmmsgpackr^1.11.8package.json
All dependencies 97

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 16 direct and 81 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npm@astrojs/react^5.0.1direct
npm@astrojs/sitemap^3.7.1direct
npm@astrojs/starlight^0.38.2direct
npm@fontsource-variable/bricolage-grotesque^5.2.10direct
npm@fontsource/ibm-plex-mono^5.2.7direct
npm@fontsource/inter^5.2.8direct
npm@resvg/resvg-js^2.6.2direct
npm@types/react^19.0.0direct
npm@types/react-dom^19.0.0direct
npmastro^6.0.8direct
npmcroner10.0.1direct
npmmsgpackr^1.11.8direct
npmreact^19.0.0direct
npmreact-dom^19.0.0direct
npmsatori^0.26.0direct
npmsharp^0.33.0direct
crates.ioautocfg1.5.1indirect
crates.ioaws-lc-rs1.17.1indirect
crates.ioaws-lc-sys0.42.0indirect
crates.iobitflags2.13.1indirect
crates.iocc1.2.67indirect
crates.iocfg-if1.0.4indirect
crates.iocmake0.1.58indirect
crates.iocore-foundation0.10.1indirect
crates.iocore-foundation-sys0.8.7indirect
crates.iodunce1.0.5indirect
crates.iofind-msvc-tools0.1.9indirect
crates.iofs_extra1.3.0indirect
crates.iogetrandom0.2.17indirect
crates.iogetrandom0.4.3indirect
crates.ioitoa1.0.18indirect
crates.iojobserver0.1.35indirect
crates.iolibc0.2.186indirect
crates.iolog0.4.33indirect
crates.iomemchr2.8.3indirect
crates.ionum-traits0.2.19indirect
crates.ioonce_cell1.21.4indirect
crates.ioopenssl-probe0.2.1indirect
crates.iopkg-config0.3.33indirect
crates.ioproc-macro21.0.106indirect
crates.ioquote1.0.46indirect
crates.ior-efi6.0.0indirect
crates.ioring0.17.14indirect
crates.iormp0.8.15indirect
crates.iormpv1.3.1indirect
crates.iorustls0.23.42indirect
crates.iorustls-native-certs0.8.4indirect
crates.iorustls-pemfile2.2.0indirect
crates.iorustls-pki-types1.15.0indirect
crates.iorustls-webpki0.103.13indirect
crates.ioschannel0.1.29indirect
crates.iosecurity-framework3.7.0indirect
crates.iosecurity-framework-sys2.17.0indirect
crates.ioserde1.0.228indirect
crates.ioserde_core1.0.228indirect
crates.ioserde_derive1.0.228indirect
crates.ioserde_json1.0.150indirect
crates.ioshlex2.0.1indirect
crates.iosubtle2.6.1indirect
crates.iosyn2.0.119indirect
crates.iothiserror2.0.18indirect
crates.iothiserror-impl2.0.18indirect
crates.iounicode-ident1.0.24indirect
crates.iountrusted0.9.0indirect
crates.iowasi0.11.1+wasi-snapshot-preview1indirect
crates.iowindows-link0.2.1indirect
crates.iowindows-sys0.52.0indirect
crates.iowindows-sys0.61.2indirect
crates.iowindows-targets0.52.6indirect
crates.iowindows_aarch64_gnullvm0.52.6indirect
crates.iowindows_aarch64_msvc0.52.6indirect
crates.iowindows_i686_gnu0.52.6indirect
crates.iowindows_i686_gnullvm0.52.6indirect
crates.iowindows_i686_msvc0.52.6indirect
crates.iowindows_x86_64_gnu0.52.6indirect
crates.iowindows_x86_64_gnullvm0.52.6indirect
crates.iowindows_x86_64_msvc0.52.6indirect
crates.iozeroize1.9.0indirect
crates.iozmij1.0.23indirect
Gogithub.com/vmihailenco/msgpack/v5v5.4.1indirect
Gogithub.com/vmihailenco/tagparser/v2v2.0.0indirect
npm@biomejs/biome2.5.1indirect
npm@modelcontextprotocol/sdk^1.26.0indirect
npm@types/bun^1.3.9indirect
npm@types/node^22.0.0indirect
npmbullmq^5.79.3indirect
npmelysia^1.4.25indirect
npmfast-check^4.9.0indirect
npmioredis^5.11.1indirect
npmtypescript^5.7.0indirect
npmtypescript^5.9.3indirect
npmwrangler^4indirect
npmzod^4.3.6indirect
Packagistphpindirect
Packagistrybakit/msgpackindirect
PyPIhatchlingindirect
PyPImsgpackindirect
Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.12.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsnpm.