Public record
Software health reportschema 0.26.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-22 01:59 UTC

elastic / elasticsearch-net

This strongly-typed, client library enables working with Elasticsearch. It is the official client maintained and supported by Elastic.

C#Apache-2.0★ 3,644 stars⑂ 1,135 forkssince Sep 2010View on GitHub ↗

elastic/elasticsearch-net holds a health index of 96 out of 100, placing it in the Exceptional band. It scores highest on Community & Adoption (96/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (63/100). It was last updated today. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

96
overall / 100
Exceptional

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

96
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 84 is calibrated to 96 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

elasticOrganization
5,435 followers938 public repossince Feb 2014

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
NuGetElastic.Clients.Elasticsearch9.4.2-13350 days agoelasticsearchelasticclientsearch

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

91Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 0 days ago
22.2/36Commit cadence32/52 weeks with commits
17.1/18Commit volume79 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained14 commit(s) and 6 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year79
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year32

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases100 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 50 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~4.4 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count100
latest_release_tag9.4.2
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release50
mean_days_between_releases4.4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

96Exceptional · 17% of overall
How it's scored
57.8/60Stars3,644 stars
25/25Forks1,135 forks
14.9/15Watchers473 watchers
Inputs used
forks1,135
stars3,644
watchers473
growth_stateorganic
growth_factor_pct100

Community health

93Exceptional
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (Apache-2.0)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
7.2/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateyes
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
77.4/80Total downloads28,125,185 downloads all-time across nuget
0/20Registry dependentsnot reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesElastic.Clients.Elasticsearch
dependents
ecosystemsnuget
total_downloads28,125,185
monthly_downloads
unverified_packages_excluded
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

83Excellent · 23% of overall
How it's scored
25.2/54Bus factor2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
11.8/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 47% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth98 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 37 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor2
contributors_sampled98
top_contributor_share0.474
How it's scored
41.2/42Issue resolution98% of issues closed
28.2/30PR acceptance5,234/5,559 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
1.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 3/28 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
Inputs used
merged_prs5,234
open_issues66
closed_issues3,265
prs_merged_7d
prs_decided_7d
prs_merged_30d
prs_decided_30d
issue_closed_ratio0.98
closed_unmerged_prs325
first_time_authors_30d
first_time_prs_merged_30d
first_time_prs_decided_30d
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domainverified-domain status not read for this organization
25/25Owner reach5,435 followers of elastic
25/25Track record938 public repos, account ~12 yr old
Inputs used
followers5,435
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified
owner_loginelastic
public_repos938
account_age_days4,531
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on nuget
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 50 days ago
20/20Version history133 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesElastic.Clients.Elasticsearch
ecosystemsnuget
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish50

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

80Excellent · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows20 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

90Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://www.elastic.co/guide/en/elasticsearch/client/net-api/current/index.html
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics7 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicselasticsearch, nest, c-sharp, dot-net, dot-net-client, elasticsearch-net, client
has_wikino
homepagehttps://www.elastic.co/guide/en/elasticsearch/client/net-api/current/index.html
docs_sitehttps://www.elastic.co/guide/en/elasticsearch/client/net-api/current/index.html
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

71Good · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
3.8/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0.8/7.5Code-ReviewFound 3/28 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 37 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained14 commit(s) and 6 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0.5/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 1
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
5/5Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate6.4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories3
affected_packages2
assessed_packages55
unassessed_packages4
affected_by_severityhigh 2
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 55 resolved dependencies against OSV. 4 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

63Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history86 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.86
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrapbenchmarks/Benchmarks/Benchmarks.csproj, benchmarks/Profiling/Profiling.csproj, examples/aot/aot.csproj (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checkingC# (statically typed)
0/10Reproducible environment
6/10Demonstrated agent practice3 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
0/8Automated maintenanceno automated dependency updates observed
1/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 1
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0.03
toolchain_manifestsbenchmarks/Benchmarks/Benchmarks.csproj, benchmarks/Profiling/Profiling.csproj, examples/aot/aot.csproj, src/Elastic.Clients.Elasticsearch/Elastic.Clients.Elasticsearch.csproj, src/Playground/Playground.csproj, src/RequestConverter.Console/RequestConverter.Console.csproj, src/RequestConverter.Wasm/RequestConverter.Wasm.csproj, src/RequestConverter/RequestConverter.csproj, tests/RequestConverter.Tests/RequestConverter.Tests.csproj, tests/Tests.ClusterLauncher/Tests.ClusterLauncher.csproj, tests/Tests.Configuration/Tests.Configuration.csproj, tests/Tests.Core/Tests.Core.csproj, tests/Tests.Domain/Tests.Domain.csproj, tests/Tests/Tests.csproj
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeC# (statically typed)
54.8/55Manageable file sizes30/9,298 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageC#
largest_source_bytes714,217
source_files_sampled9,298
oversized_source_files30
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP servernot applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examplesexamples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files
interfaces_expected_of
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

3,644GitHub stars
98contributors
79commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
100releases
2bus factor
66open issues
package ecosystems

More detail

Star and fork history 3,644 ★ / 1,135 ⇿
3,644Stars
1,135Forks
100Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Only the most recent history is shown — this repository exceeds the collection window, so the earliest history is not captured.

01,2502,5003,7503,6441,135192014-052020-062026-07
Major 1Minor 8Patch 73

Each point covers 12 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.4 / 10
6.4aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-22 01:58 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
5Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10CI-Tests30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
1Code-ReviewFound 3/28 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
10Contributorsproject has 37 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained14 commit(s) and 6 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
1Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 1
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 5
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
NuGetElastic.Esql0.11.0src/Elastic.Clients.Elasticsearch/Elastic.Clients.Elasticsearch.csproj
NuGetElastic.Transport0.17.1src/Elastic.Clients.Elasticsearch/Elastic.Clients.Elasticsearch.csproj
NuGetPolySharp1.15.0src/Elastic.Clients.Elasticsearch/Elastic.Clients.Elasticsearch.csproj
NuGetElastic.Esql0.11.0src/RequestConverter/RequestConverter.csproj
NuGetElastic.Transport0.17.1src/RequestConverter/RequestConverter.csproj
All dependencies 59

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 3 direct and 56 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
NuGetElastic.Esql0.11.0direct
NuGetElastic.Transport0.17.1direct
NuGetPolySharp1.15.0direct
NuGetBen.Demystifier0.1.4indirect
NuGetBenchmarkDotNet0.12.0indirect
NuGetBenchmarkDotNet0.13.1indirect
NuGetBogus22.1.2indirect
NuGetBullseye3.3.0indirect
NuGetDiffPlex1.4.1indirect
NuGetElastic.BenchmarkDotNetExporter0.1.0-ci20191209T135928indirect
NuGetElastic.Clients.Elasticsearchindirect
NuGetElastic.Elasticsearch.Managed0.4.3indirect
NuGetElastic.Elasticsearch.Xunit0.4.3indirect
NuGetElastic.Managed0.1.0-ci20191209T135928indirect
NuGetElastic.Transport.VirtualizedCluster0.5.2indirect
NuGetElastic.Xunit0.1.0-ci20191209T135928indirect
NuGetElasticsearch.Net.VirtualizedClusterindirect
NuGetFake.Core.Environment5.15.0indirect
NuGetFake.Core.SemVer5.15.0indirect
NuGetFake.IO.FileSystem5.15.0indirect
NuGetFake.IO.Zip5.15.0indirect
NuGetFake.Tools.Git5.15.0indirect
NuGetFluentAssertions5.10.3indirect
NuGetFluentAssertions5.7.0indirect
NuGetFSharp.Core4.7.0indirect
NuGetFSharp.Core6.0.3indirect
NuGetJetBrains.Profiler.Api1.1.8indirect
NuGetJunitXml.TestLogger3.0.110indirect
NuGetLibGit2Sharp0.26.0-preview-0062indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Bcl.HashCode6.0.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp4.11.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk16.1.1indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk17.2.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk17.3.1indirect
NuGetNESTindirect
NuGetNEST7.16.0indirect
NuGetNEST.JsonNetSerializerindirect
NuGetNEST.v88.1.0-ci20191112T041057indirect
NuGetNewtonsoft.Json12.0.1indirect
NuGetNewtonsoft.Json13.0.1indirect
NuGetNullean.VsTest.Pretty.TestLogger0.3.0indirect
NuGetOctokit0.32.0indirect
NuGetProc0.6.1indirect
NuGetSemanticVersioning0.8.0indirect
NuGetSharpZipLib1.0.0-alpha2indirect
NuGetSharpZipLib1.3.3indirect
NuGetSystem.Buffers4.5.0indirect
NuGetSystem.Diagnostics.DiagnosticSource4.5.1indirect
NuGetSystem.Diagnostics.FileVersionInfo4.3.0indirect
NuGetSystem.Reactive3.1.1indirect
NuGetSystem.Threading.Tasks.Extensions4.5.2indirect
NuGetSystem.ValueTuple4.5.0indirect
NuGetVerify.Xunit17.10.2indirect
NuGetxunit2.3.1indirect
NuGetxunit2.4.2indirect
NuGetxunit.extensibility.execution2.3.1indirect
NuGetxunit.extensibility.execution2.4.2indirect
NuGetxunit.runner.visualstudio2.3.1indirect
NuGetxunit.runner.visualstudio2.4.5indirect
Dependency advisories 2

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 55 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 2 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 4 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
Newtonsoft.Json12.0.1indirecthigh113.0.1
SharpZipLib1.0.0-alpha2indirecthigh21.3.3

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.26.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsNuGet.