Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-12 01:38 UTC

electerm / electerm-locales

Multi language files for electerm

JavaScriptMIT★ 27 stars⑂ 90 forkssince Jan 2018View on GitHub ↗

electerm/electerm-locales holds a health index of 56 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Sustainability & Governance (68/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (34/100). It was last updated 1 day ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 54 is calibrated to 56 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

electermOrganization

177 followers62 public repossince Oct 2017

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish	Tags
npm	@electerm/electerm-locales	2.3.17	3,767	212	1 day ago	electerm locale language

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

49Weak · 21% of overall

Development activity

81Excellent

How it's scored

36/36	Push recency — last push 1 days ago
19.4/36	Commit cadence — 28/52 weeks with commits
15.6/18	Commit volume — 54 commits in the last year
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 20 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

commits_last_year	54
human_commit_share	1
days_since_last_push	1
active_weeks_last_year	28

Release discipline

1Critical

How it's scored

0/27	Ships releases — no releases published
0/36	Release recency — no releases
0/27	Release cadence — no releases
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data

Inputs used

releases_count

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

48Weak · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

39Weak

How it's scored

23/60	Stars — 27 stars
16.2/25	Forks — 90 forks
0/15	Watchers — 2 watchers

Inputs used

forks	90
stars	27
watchers	2
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

50Moderate

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
0/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	1
has_contributing	no
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	no
readme_badge_services	github.com
has_pull_request_template	no

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

60Moderate

How it's scored

47.7/80	Monthly downloads — 3,767 downloads/month across npm
0/20	Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem

Inputs used

packages	@electerm/electerm-locales
dependents	—
ecosystems	npm
total_downloads	—
monthly_downloads	3,767
unverified_packages_excluded	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

68Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

34At Risk

How it's scored

9/54	Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
1.2/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 94% of commits
13.5/13.5	Contributor breadth — 18 contributors
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 4 contributing companies or organizations

Inputs used

bus_factor	1
contributors_sampled	18
top_contributor_share	0.945

Issue & PR responsiveness

80Excellent

How it's scored

42/42	Issue resolution — 100% of issues closed
27.7/30	PR acceptance — 24/26 decided PRs merged
0/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 1/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

merged_prs	24
open_issues	0
closed_issues	6
prs_merged_7d	0
prs_decided_7d	0
prs_merged_30d	0
prs_decided_30d	0
issue_closed_ratio	1
closed_unmerged_prs	2
first_time_authors_30d	0
first_time_prs_merged_30d	0
first_time_prs_decided_30d	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

71Good

How it's scored

30/30	Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20	Verified domain
16.2/25	Owner reach — 177 followers of electerm
25/25	Track record — 62 public repos, account ~8 yr old

Inputs used

followers	177
owner_type	Organization
is_verified	no
owner_login	electerm
public_repos	62
account_age_days	3,261

Package maintenance

100Exceptional

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on npm
35/35	Publish recency — latest publish 1 days ago
20/20	Version history — 212 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	@electerm/electerm-locales
ecosystems	npm
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	1

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

59Moderate · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

48Weak

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 1 workflow(s)
24/24	Tests present
0/16	Linter config
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4	.editorconfig
0/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 0 out of 1 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	yes
has_editorconfig	no
has_linter_config	no
has_precommit_config	no

Documentation

75Good

How it's scored

30/30	README
0/25	Documentation directory
15/15	Documentation / homepage site — https://electerm.org
10/10	Repository description
10/10	Topics — 2 topics
10/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	electerm, language
has_wiki	yes
homepage	https://electerm.org
docs_site	https://electerm.org
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	no
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

47Weak · 16% of overall

Security posture

34At Risk

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5	Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5	CI-Tests — 0 out of 1 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5	Code-Review — Found 1/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5	Contributors — project has 4 contributing companies or organizations
10/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5	License — license file detected
7.5/7.5	Maintained — 20 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5	Packaging — no data
1.5/5	Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 3
0/5	SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5	Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5	Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 24 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	16
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	2
scorecard_aggregate	3.4

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional

How it's scored

35/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40	No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	27
affected_packages	13
assessed_packages	201
unassessed_packages	0
affected_by_severity	critical 1, high 10, moderate 2
direct_affected_packages	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 201 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

34At Risk · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

20At Risk

How it's scored

0/45	Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
15/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) — llms.txt served by the project website (https://electerm.org/llms.txt)
4.8/40	Legible commit history — 9 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	yes
llms_txt_url	https://electerm.org/llms.txt
legible_history_share	0.09
agent_instruction_files	—
agent_instruction_max_bytes	—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

37Weak

How it's scored

0/18	One-command bootstrap
22/22	Automated tests
0/11	Lint / format config
0/11	Static type checking
10/10	Reproducible environment — lockfile
2/10	Demonstrated agent practice — 1 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
0/8	Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
3/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 3

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	yes
lockfiles	package-lock.json
has_dockerfile	no
typed_language	no
bootstrap_files	—
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	no
typecheck_configs	—
agent_commit_share	0.01
toolchain_manifests	—
dependency_bot_commit_share	0

Code legibility for models

55Moderate

How it's scored

0/45	Type-checkable code — JavaScript without a type-check config
55/55	Manageable file sizes — 0/23 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	JavaScript
largest_source_bytes	25,578
source_files_sampled	23
oversized_source_files	0

Key facts

27GitHub stars

18contributors

54commits, last 12 months

1days since last push

0releases

1bus factor

0open issues

npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 90 ⇿

0Stars

90Forks

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Each point covers 8 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 3.4 / 10

3.4aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-12 01:37 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
0	Branch-Protection	branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0	CI-Tests	0 out of 1 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0	Code-Review	Found 1/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10	Contributors	project has 4 contributing companies or organizations
10	Dangerous-Workflow	no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0	Dependency-Update-Tool	no update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
10	License	license file detected
10	Maintained	20 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/a	Packaging	packaging workflow not detected
3	Pinned-Dependencies	dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 3
0	SAST	SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0	Security-Policy	security policy file not detected
n/a	Signed-Releases	no releases found
0	Token-Permissions	detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0	Vulnerabilities	24 existing vulnerabilities detected

All dependencies 201

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 0 direct and 201 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
npm	@eslint/eslintrc	`1.3.0`	indirect
npm	@humanwhocodes/config-array	`0.9.5`	indirect
npm	@humanwhocodes/object-schema	`1.2.1`	indirect
npm	@types/json5	`0.0.29`	indirect
npm	acorn	`8.8.0`	indirect
npm	acorn-jsx	`5.3.2`	indirect
npm	agent-base	`6.0.2`	indirect
npm	ajv	`6.12.6`	indirect
npm	ansi-regex	`5.0.1`	indirect
npm	ansi-styles	`4.3.0`	indirect
npm	argparse	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	array-includes	`3.1.5`	indirect
npm	array.prototype.flat	`1.3.0`	indirect
npm	array.prototype.flatmap	`1.3.0`	indirect
npm	balanced-match	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	brace-expansion	`1.1.11`	indirect
npm	builtins	`5.0.1`	indirect
npm	call-bind	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	callsites	`3.1.0`	indirect
npm	chalk	`4.1.2`	indirect
npm	color-convert	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	color-name	`1.1.4`	indirect
npm	concat-map	`0.0.1`	indirect
npm	country-flag-emoji	`1.0.3`	indirect
npm	cross-spawn	`7.0.3`	indirect
npm	debug	`2.6.9`	indirect
npm	debug	`3.2.7`	indirect
npm	debug	`4.3.4`	indirect
npm	deep-is	`0.1.4`	indirect
npm	define-properties	`1.1.4`	indirect
npm	doctrine	`2.1.0`	indirect
npm	doctrine	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	dotenv	`16.0.3`	indirect
npm	error-ex	`1.3.2`	indirect
npm	es-abstract	`1.20.1`	indirect
npm	es-shim-unscopables	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	es-to-primitive	`1.2.1`	indirect
npm	escape-string-regexp	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	eslint	`8.20.0`	indirect
npm	eslint-config-standard	`17.0.0`	indirect
npm	eslint-config-standard-jsx	`11.0.0`	indirect
npm	eslint-import-resolver-node	`0.3.6`	indirect
npm	eslint-module-utils	`2.7.3`	indirect
npm	eslint-plugin-es	`4.1.0`	indirect
npm	eslint-plugin-import	`2.26.0`	indirect
npm	eslint-plugin-n	`15.2.4`	indirect
npm	eslint-plugin-promise	`6.0.0`	indirect
npm	eslint-plugin-react	`7.30.1`	indirect
npm	eslint-scope	`7.1.1`	indirect
npm	eslint-utils	`2.1.0`	indirect
npm	eslint-utils	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	eslint-visitor-keys	`1.3.0`	indirect
npm	eslint-visitor-keys	`2.1.0`	indirect
npm	eslint-visitor-keys	`3.3.0`	indirect
npm	espree	`9.3.2`	indirect
npm	esquery	`1.4.0`	indirect
npm	esrecurse	`4.3.0`	indirect
npm	estraverse	`5.3.0`	indirect
npm	esutils	`2.0.3`	indirect
npm	fast-deep-equal	`3.1.3`	indirect
npm	fast-json-stable-stringify	`2.1.0`	indirect
npm	fast-levenshtein	`2.0.6`	indirect
npm	file-entry-cache	`6.0.1`	indirect
npm	find-up	`2.1.0`	indirect
npm	find-up	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	flat-cache	`3.0.4`	indirect
npm	flatted	`3.2.6`	indirect
npm	fs.realpath	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	function-bind	`1.1.1`	indirect
npm	function.prototype.name	`1.1.5`	indirect
npm	functional-red-black-tree	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	functions-have-names	`1.2.3`	indirect
npm	get-intrinsic	`1.1.2`	indirect
npm	get-stdin	`8.0.0`	indirect
npm	get-symbol-description	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	glob	`7.2.3`	indirect
npm	glob-parent	`6.0.2`	indirect
npm	globals	`13.17.0`	indirect
npm	graceful-fs	`4.2.10`	indirect
npm	has	`1.0.3`	indirect
npm	has-bigints	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	has-flag	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	has-property-descriptors	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	has-symbols	`1.0.3`	indirect
npm	has-tostringtag	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	ignore	`5.2.0`	indirect
npm	import-fresh	`3.3.0`	indirect
npm	imurmurhash	`0.1.4`	indirect
npm	inflight	`1.0.6`	indirect
npm	inherits	`2.0.4`	indirect
npm	internal-slot	`1.0.3`	indirect
npm	interpret	`1.4.0`	indirect
npm	ip	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	is-arrayish	`0.2.1`	indirect
npm	is-bigint	`1.0.4`	indirect
npm	is-boolean-object	`1.1.2`	indirect
npm	is-callable	`1.2.4`	indirect
npm	is-core-module	`2.9.0`	indirect
npm	is-date-object	`1.0.5`	indirect
npm	is-extglob	`2.1.1`	indirect
npm	is-glob	`4.0.3`	indirect
npm	is-negative-zero	`2.0.2`	indirect
npm	is-number-object	`1.0.7`	indirect
npm	is-regex	`1.1.4`	indirect
npm	is-shared-array-buffer	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	is-string	`1.0.7`	indirect
npm	is-symbol	`1.0.4`	indirect
npm	is-weakref	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	isexe	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	js-tokens	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	js-yaml	`4.1.0`	indirect
npm	json-parse-better-errors	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	json-schema-traverse	`0.4.1`	indirect
npm	json-stable-stringify-without-jsonify	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	json5	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	json5	`2.2.1`	indirect
npm	jsx-ast-utils	`3.3.2`	indirect
npm	levn	`0.4.1`	indirect
npm	load-json-file	`5.3.0`	indirect
npm	locate-path	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	locate-path	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	lodash	`4.17.21`	indirect
npm	lodash.merge	`4.6.2`	indirect
npm	loose-envify	`1.4.0`	indirect
npm	lru-cache	`6.0.0`	indirect
npm	minimatch	`3.1.2`	indirect
npm	minimist	`1.2.6`	indirect
npm	mkdirp	`1.0.4`	indirect
npm	ms	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	ms	`2.1.2`	indirect
npm	ms	`2.1.3`	indirect
npm	natural-compare	`1.4.0`	indirect
npm	object-assign	`4.1.1`	indirect
npm	object-inspect	`1.12.2`	indirect
npm	object-keys	`1.1.1`	indirect
npm	object.assign	`4.1.2`	indirect
npm	object.entries	`1.1.5`	indirect
npm	object.fromentries	`2.0.5`	indirect
npm	object.hasown	`1.1.1`	indirect
npm	object.values	`1.1.5`	indirect
npm	once	`1.4.0`	indirect
npm	optionator	`0.9.1`	indirect
npm	p-limit	`1.3.0`	indirect
npm	p-limit	`2.3.0`	indirect
npm	p-locate	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	p-locate	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	p-try	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	p-try	`2.2.0`	indirect
npm	parent-module	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	parse-json	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	path-exists	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	path-is-absolute	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	path-key	`3.1.1`	indirect
npm	path-parse	`1.0.7`	indirect
npm	pify	`4.0.1`	indirect
npm	pkg-conf	`3.1.0`	indirect
npm	prelude-ls	`1.2.1`	indirect
npm	prop-types	`15.8.1`	indirect
npm	punycode	`2.1.1`	indirect
npm	react-is	`16.13.1`	indirect
npm	rechoir	`0.6.2`	indirect
npm	recursive-assign	`0.2.0`	indirect
npm	regexp.prototype.flags	`1.4.3`	indirect
npm	regexpp	`3.2.0`	indirect
npm	resolve	`1.22.1`	indirect
npm	resolve	`2.0.0-next.4`	indirect
npm	resolve-from	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	rimraf	`3.0.2`	indirect
npm	semver	`6.3.0`	indirect
npm	semver	`7.3.7`	indirect
npm	shebang-command	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	shebang-regex	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	shelljs	`0.8.5`	indirect
npm	side-channel	`1.0.4`	indirect
npm	smart-buffer	`4.2.0`	indirect
npm	socks	`2.7.0`	indirect
npm	socks-proxy-agent	`7.0.0`	indirect
npm	standard	`17.0.0`	indirect
npm	standard-engine	`15.0.0`	indirect
npm	string.prototype.matchall	`4.0.7`	indirect
npm	string.prototype.trimend	`1.0.5`	indirect
npm	string.prototype.trimstart	`1.0.5`	indirect
npm	strip-ansi	`6.0.1`	indirect
npm	strip-bom	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	strip-json-comments	`3.1.1`	indirect
npm	supports-color	`7.2.0`	indirect
npm	supports-preserve-symlinks-flag	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	text-table	`0.2.0`	indirect
npm	tsconfig-paths	`3.14.1`	indirect
npm	type-check	`0.4.0`	indirect
npm	type-fest	`0.20.2`	indirect
npm	type-fest	`0.3.1`	indirect
npm	unbox-primitive	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	uri-js	`4.4.1`	indirect
npm	v8-compile-cache	`2.3.0`	indirect
npm	which	`2.0.2`	indirect
npm	which-boxed-primitive	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	word-wrap	`1.2.3`	indirect
npm	wrappy	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	xdg-basedir	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	yallist	`4.0.0`	indirect

Dependency advisories 13

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 201 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 13 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

Package	Version	Relation	Severity	Advisories	Fixed in
flatted	`3.2.6`	indirect	critical	2	`3.4.2`
brace-expansion	`1.1.11`	indirect	high	5	`5.0.9`
cross-spawn	`7.0.3`	indirect	high	1	`7.0.5`
ip	`2.0.0`	indirect	high	2	`2.0.1`
js-yaml	`4.1.0`	indirect	high	5	`4.3.2`
json5	`1.0.1`	indirect	high	1	`2.2.2`
json5	`2.2.1`	indirect	high	1	`2.2.2`
lodash	`4.17.21`	indirect	high	3	`4.18.0`
minimatch	`3.1.2`	indirect	high	3	`10.2.3`
semver	`6.3.0`	indirect	high	1	`7.5.2`
semver	`7.3.7`	indirect	high	1	`7.5.2`
ajv	`6.12.6`	indirect	moderate	1	`8.18.0`
word-wrap	`1.2.3`	indirect	moderate	1	`1.2.4`

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — npm.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records