Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-01 04:47 UTC

electron / extract-zip

JavaScript · RustNo license detected★ 3 stars⑂ 1 forksince May 2026View on GitHub ↗

electron/extract-zip holds a health index of 69 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Security (78/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (41/100). It was last updated 34 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

69
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

69
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 62 is calibrated to 69 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

ElectronOrganization · verified domain
4,028 followers111 public repossince Jul 2015

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
npm@electron-internal/extract-zip1.0.510,412,496634 days agozipunzipextractnativefast

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

65Good · 21% of overall
How it's scored
18/36Push recencylast push 34 days ago
5.5/36Commit cadence8/52 weeks with commits
10/18Commit volume12 commits in the last year
9/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained10 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 9
Inputs used
commits_last_year12
human_commit_share
days_since_last_push34
active_weeks_last_year8

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases5 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 34 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~13.6 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count5
latest_release_tagv1.0.5
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release34
mean_days_between_releases13.6
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

41Weak · 17% of overall
How it's scored
4.9/60Stars3 stars
0/25Forks1 forks
0/15Watchers0 watchers
Inputs used
forks1
stars3
watchers0
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
0/22.5Licenseno license file detected
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseno
readme_badges0
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
80/80Monthly downloads10,412,496 downloads/month across npm
0/20Registry dependentsnot reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packages@electron-internal/extract-zip
dependents
ecosystemsnpm
total_downloads
monthly_downloads10,412,496
unverified_packages_excluded
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

71Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 100% of commits
1.4/13.5Contributor breadth1 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 8 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled1
top_contributor_share1
How it's scored
42/42Issue resolution100% of issues closed
25.4/30PR acceptance11/13 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance0/1 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
12/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 6/7 approved changesets -- score normalized to 8
Inputs used
merged_prs11
open_issues0
closed_issues1
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d1
issue_closed_ratio1
closed_unmerged_prs2
first_time_authors_30d1
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d1
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
20/20Verified domain
25/25Owner reach4,028 followers of electron
25/25Track record111 public repos, account ~11 yr old
Inputs used
followers4,028
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedyes
owner_loginelectron
public_repos111
account_age_days4,061

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on npm
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 34 days ago
20/20Version history6 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packages@electron-internal/extract-zip
ecosystemsnpm
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish34

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

53Moderate · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows3 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests11 out of 11 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

30At Risk
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
0/10Repository description
0/10Topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics
has_wikino
homepage
docs_site
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionno

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

78Good · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests11 out of 11 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
6/7.5Code-ReviewFound 6/7 approved changesets -- score normalized to 8
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 8 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
0/2.5Licenselicense file not detected
6.8/7.5Maintained10 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 9
0/5Packagingno data
5/5Pinned-Dependenciesall dependencies are pinned
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
5/5Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
7.5/7.5Token-PermissionsGitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
6/7.5Vulnerabilities2 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate7.2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories2
affected_packages2
assessed_packages173
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severityhigh 2
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 173 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

51Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
15/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)llms.txt served by the project website (https://semantic-release.gitbook.io/llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit historyno data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtyes
llms_txt_urlhttps://semantic-release.gitbook.io/llms.txt
legible_history_share
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrapCargo.toml (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environmentlockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno data
8/8Automated maintenance1 of the last 12 commits are automated dependency updates
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesall dependencies are pinned
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesCargo.lock, yarn.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share
toolchain_manifestsCargo.toml
dependency_bot_commit_share0.083
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable codeJavaScript without a type-check config
50.4/55Manageable file sizes1/12 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageJavaScript
largest_source_bytes2,990,158
source_files_sampled12
oversized_source_files1

Key facts

3GitHub stars
1contributors
12commits, last 12 months
34days since last push
5releases
1bus factor
0open issues
crates.io, npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • Could not fetch crates package 'extract-zip' from its registry

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 7.2 / 10
7.2aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-01 04:47 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
10CI-Tests11 out of 11 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
8Code-ReviewFound 6/7 approved changesets -- score normalized to 8
10Contributorsproject has 8 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
0Licenselicense file not detected
9Maintained10 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 9
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
10Pinned-Dependenciesall dependencies are pinned
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
10Token-PermissionsGitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
8Vulnerabilities2 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 5
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
crates.ionapi3Cargo.toml
crates.ionapi-derive3Cargo.toml
crates.iozip8Cargo.toml
crates.iofiletime0.2Cargo.toml
crates.iounicode-normalization0.1Cargo.toml
All dependencies 173

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 5 direct and 168 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
crates.iofiletime0.2.29direct
crates.ionapi3.9.0direct
crates.ionapi-derive3.5.6direct
crates.iounicode-normalization0.1.25direct
crates.iozip8.6.0direct
crates.ioadler22.0.1indirect
crates.iobitflags2.11.1indirect
crates.iocc1.2.62indirect
crates.iocfg-if1.0.4indirect
crates.iocmake0.1.58indirect
crates.ioconvert_case0.11.0indirect
crates.iocrc32fast1.5.0indirect
crates.ioctor1.0.6indirect
crates.ioequivalent1.0.2indirect
crates.iofind-msvc-tools0.1.9indirect
crates.ioflate21.1.9indirect
crates.iofutures0.3.32indirect
crates.iofutures-channel0.3.32indirect
crates.iofutures-core0.3.32indirect
crates.iofutures-executor0.3.32indirect
crates.iofutures-io0.3.32indirect
crates.iofutures-macro0.3.32indirect
crates.iofutures-sink0.3.32indirect
crates.iofutures-task0.3.32indirect
crates.iofutures-util0.3.32indirect
crates.iohashbrown0.17.1indirect
crates.ioindexmap2.14.0indirect
crates.iolibc0.2.186indirect
crates.iolibloading0.9.0indirect
crates.iolibz-ng-sys1.1.28indirect
crates.iomemchr2.8.1indirect
crates.iominiz_oxide0.8.9indirect
crates.ionapi-build2.3.2indirect
crates.ionapi-derive-backend5.0.4indirect
crates.ionapi-sys3.2.1indirect
crates.ionohash-hasher0.2.0indirect
crates.iopin-project-lite0.2.17indirect
crates.ioproc-macro21.0.106indirect
crates.ioquote1.0.45indirect
crates.iorustc-hash2.1.2indirect
crates.iosemver1.0.28indirect
crates.ioshlex1.3.0indirect
crates.iosimd-adler320.3.9indirect
crates.ioslab0.4.12indirect
crates.iosyn2.0.117indirect
crates.iotinyvec1.11.0indirect
crates.iotinyvec_macros0.1.1indirect
crates.iotyped-path0.12.3indirect
crates.iounicode-ident1.0.24indirect
crates.iounicode-segmentation1.13.2indirect
crates.iowindows-link0.2.1indirect
npm@inquirer/ansi2.0.5indirect
npm@inquirer/checkbox5.1.5indirect
npm@inquirer/confirm6.0.13indirect
npm@inquirer/core11.1.10indirect
npm@inquirer/editor5.1.2indirect
npm@inquirer/expand5.0.14indirect
npm@inquirer/external-editor3.0.0indirect
npm@inquirer/figures2.0.5indirect
npm@inquirer/input5.0.13indirect
npm@inquirer/number4.0.13indirect
npm@inquirer/password5.0.13indirect
npm@inquirer/prompts8.4.3indirect
npm@inquirer/rawlist5.2.9indirect
npm@inquirer/search4.1.9indirect
npm@inquirer/select5.1.5indirect
npm@inquirer/type4.0.5indirect
npm@napi-rs/cli3.6.2indirect
npm@napi-rs/cross-toolchain1.0.3indirect
npm@napi-rs/lzma1.4.5indirect
npm@napi-rs/lzma-android-arm-eabi1.4.5indirect
npm@napi-rs/lzma-android-arm641.4.5indirect
npm@napi-rs/lzma-darwin-arm641.4.5indirect
npm@napi-rs/lzma-darwin-x641.4.5indirect
npm@napi-rs/lzma-freebsd-x641.4.5indirect
npm@napi-rs/lzma-linux-arm-gnueabihf1.4.5indirect
npm@napi-rs/lzma-linux-arm64-gnu1.4.5indirect
npm@napi-rs/lzma-linux-arm64-musl1.4.5indirect
npm@napi-rs/lzma-linux-ppc64-gnu1.4.5indirect
npm@napi-rs/lzma-linux-riscv64-gnu1.4.5indirect
npm@napi-rs/lzma-linux-s390x-gnu1.4.5indirect
npm@napi-rs/lzma-linux-x64-gnu1.4.5indirect
npm@napi-rs/lzma-linux-x64-musl1.4.5indirect
npm@napi-rs/lzma-wasm32-wasi1.4.5indirect
npm@napi-rs/lzma-win32-arm64-msvc1.4.5indirect
npm@napi-rs/lzma-win32-ia32-msvc1.4.5indirect
npm@napi-rs/lzma-win32-x64-msvc1.4.5indirect
npm@napi-rs/tar1.1.0indirect
npm@napi-rs/tar-android-arm-eabi1.1.0indirect
npm@napi-rs/tar-android-arm641.1.0indirect
npm@napi-rs/tar-darwin-arm641.1.0indirect
npm@napi-rs/tar-darwin-x641.1.0indirect
npm@napi-rs/tar-freebsd-x641.1.0indirect
npm@napi-rs/tar-linux-arm-gnueabihf1.1.0indirect
npm@napi-rs/tar-linux-arm64-gnu1.1.0indirect
npm@napi-rs/tar-linux-arm64-musl1.1.0indirect
npm@napi-rs/tar-linux-ppc64-gnu1.1.0indirect
npm@napi-rs/tar-linux-s390x-gnu1.1.0indirect
npm@napi-rs/tar-linux-x64-gnu1.1.0indirect
npm@napi-rs/tar-linux-x64-musl1.1.0indirect
npm@napi-rs/tar-wasm32-wasi1.1.0indirect
npm@napi-rs/tar-win32-arm64-msvc1.1.0indirect
npm@napi-rs/tar-win32-ia32-msvc1.1.0indirect
npm@napi-rs/tar-win32-x64-msvc1.1.0indirect
npm@napi-rs/wasm-runtime1.1.4indirect
npm@napi-rs/wasm-tools1.0.1indirect
npm@napi-rs/wasm-tools-android-arm-eabi1.0.1indirect
npm@napi-rs/wasm-tools-android-arm641.0.1indirect
npm@napi-rs/wasm-tools-darwin-arm641.0.1indirect
npm@napi-rs/wasm-tools-darwin-x641.0.1indirect
npm@napi-rs/wasm-tools-freebsd-x641.0.1indirect
npm@napi-rs/wasm-tools-linux-arm64-gnu1.0.1indirect
npm@napi-rs/wasm-tools-linux-arm64-musl1.0.1indirect
npm@napi-rs/wasm-tools-linux-x64-gnu1.0.1indirect
npm@napi-rs/wasm-tools-linux-x64-musl1.0.1indirect
npm@napi-rs/wasm-tools-wasm32-wasi1.0.1indirect
npm@napi-rs/wasm-tools-win32-arm64-msvc1.0.1indirect
npm@napi-rs/wasm-tools-win32-ia32-msvc1.0.1indirect
npm@napi-rs/wasm-tools-win32-x64-msvc1.0.1indirect
npm@octokit/auth-token6.0.0indirect
npm@octokit/core7.0.6indirect
npm@octokit/endpoint11.0.3indirect
npm@octokit/graphql9.0.3indirect
npm@octokit/openapi-types27.0.0indirect
npm@octokit/plugin-paginate-rest14.0.0indirect
npm@octokit/plugin-request-log6.0.0indirect
npm@octokit/plugin-rest-endpoint-methods17.0.0indirect
npm@octokit/request10.0.9indirect
npm@octokit/request-error7.1.0indirect
npm@octokit/rest22.0.1indirect
npm@octokit/types16.0.0indirect
npm@tybys/wasm-util0.10.2indirect
npm@types/node25.8.0indirect
npm@types/yauzl2.10.3indirect
npmargparse2.0.1indirect
npmbefore-after-hook4.0.0indirect
npmbuffer-crc320.2.13indirect
npmbuffer-crc321.0.0indirect
npmchardet2.1.1indirect
npmcli-width4.1.0indirect
npmclipanion4.0.0-rc.4indirect
npmcolorette2.0.20indirect
npmcontent-type2.0.0indirect
npmdebug4.4.3indirect
npmemnapi1.10.0indirect
npmend-of-stream1.4.5indirect
npmes-toolkit1.46.1indirect
npmextract-zip2.0.1indirect
npmfast-content-type-parse3.0.0indirect
npmfast-string-truncated-width3.0.3indirect
npmfast-string-width3.0.2indirect
npmfast-wrap-ansi0.2.0indirect
npmfd-slicer1.1.0indirect
npmget-stream5.2.0indirect
npmiconv-lite0.7.2indirect
npmjs-yaml4.3.0indirect
npmjson-with-bigint3.5.8indirect
npmms2.1.3indirect
npmmute-stream3.0.0indirect
npmobug2.1.1indirect
npmonce1.4.0indirect
npmpend1.2.0indirect
npmpump3.0.4indirect
npmsafer-buffer2.1.2indirect
npmsemver7.8.0indirect
npmsignal-exit4.1.0indirect
npmtslib2.8.1indirect
npmtypanion3.14.0indirect
npmundici-types7.24.6indirect
npmuniversal-user-agent7.0.3indirect
npmwrappy1.0.2indirect
npmyauzl2.10.0indirect
npmyazl3.3.1indirect
Dependency advisories 2

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 173 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 2 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
extract-zip2.0.1indirecthigh1
js-yaml4.3.0indirecthigh14.3.1

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsnpm.