Public record
Software health reportschema 0.15.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-19 13:34 UTC

enumind / modonome

THE MODONOME Project - Governed engineering autonomy

JavaScript · TypeScriptCustom license★ 1 star⑂ 0 forkssince Jun 2026View on GitHub ↗

enumind/modonome holds a health index of 60 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (86/100) and lowest on Sustainability & Governance (37/100). It was last updated 1 day ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

60
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

60
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 57 is calibrated to 60 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

EnuMindOrganization
0 followers3 public repossince Jun 2026

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
npmmodonomepoints to another repo — not scored0.1.0-alpha9,1036121 days agoautonomousagentcigovernancecode-reviewmodernizationtech-debtai-safetyagenticautonomyratchetagentproof

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

63Moderate · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 1 days ago
2.8/36Commit cadence4/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume136 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintainedproject was created within the last 90 days. Please review its contents carefully
Inputs used
commits_last_year136
human_commit_share
days_since_last_push1
active_weeks_last_year4
How it's scored
16.2/27Ships releases1 version tags (no GitHub releases)
36/36Release recencylatest release 21 days ago
12.6/27Release cadencecadence unknown (single release)
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count1
latest_release_tagv0.1.0-alpha
releases_from_tagsyes
days_since_latest_release21
mean_days_between_releases
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

41Weak · 17% of overall
How it's scored
0/60Stars1 stars
0/25Forks0 forks
0/15Watchers0 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars1
watchers0
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

86Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
16.9/22.5Licenselicense file present, not a recognized license
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateyes

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

37Weak · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
4.6/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 79% of commits
4.1/13.5Contributor breadth3 contributors
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled3
top_contributor_share0.794
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolutionno issues or no data
23.8/30PR acceptance104/131 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs104
open_issues0
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d
prs_decided_7d
prs_merged_30d
prs_decided_30d
issue_closed_ratio
closed_unmerged_prs27
first_time_authors_30d
first_time_prs_merged_30d
first_time_prs_decided_30d
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution, Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domainverified-domain status not read for this organization
0/25Owner reach0 followers of enumind
4.5/25Track record3 public repos, account ~0 yr old
Inputs used
followers0
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified
owner_loginenumind
public_repos3
account_age_days19
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

86Excellent · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows11 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter configeslint.config.js
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

90Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://www.modonome.com/
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics10 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsagentic-ai, automation, secure-coding, autonomous-engineering, ci-cd, developer-tools, devops, governance, modernization, software-engineering
has_wikino
homepagehttps://www.modonome.com/
docs_sitehttps://www.modonome.com/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

54Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
2.2/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0.5/2.5CII-Best-Practicesbadge detected: InProgress
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.2/2.5Licenselicense file detected
0/7.5Maintainedproject was created within the last 90 days. Please review its contents carefully
5/5Packagingpackaging workflow detected
1/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 2
5/5SASTSAST tool is run on all commits
5/5Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
4.5/7.5Vulnerabilities4 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate5.4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

84Excellent · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructionsAGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, docs/agents.md
15/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)llms.txt present
0/40Legible commit historyno data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtyes
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share
agent_instruction_filesAGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, docs/agents.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes25,283
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format configeslint.config.js
11/11Static type checkingapps/control-panel/tsconfig.json, design-system/tsconfig.json, examples/node-typescript/tsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environmentlockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno data
5/8Automated maintenancedependency automation configured, none observed in the sampled commits
2/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 2
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespackage-lock.json
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configsapps/control-panel/tsconfig.json, design-system/tsconfig.json, examples/node-typescript/tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
27/45Type-checkable codeJavaScript with type-check config (apps/control-panel/tsconfig.json, design-system/tsconfig.json, examples/node-typescript/tsconfig.json)
54.9/55Manageable file sizes1/533 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageJavaScript
largest_source_bytes65,462
source_files_sampled533
oversized_source_files1
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)not applicable to this kind of software
20/20MCP server
40/40Runnable examplesexamples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalyes
api_schema_files
interfaces_expected_of
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto). Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

1GitHub stars
3contributors
136commits, last 12 months
1days since last push
1releases
1bus factor
0open issues
npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • npm package 'modonome' points at a different repository (https://github.com/nateshpp/modonome); excluded from ecosystem scoring

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.4 / 10
5.4aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-19 13:34 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
3Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10CI-Tests30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
2CII-Best-Practicesbadge detected: InProgress
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
9Licenselicense file detected
0Maintainedproject was created within the last 90 days. Please review its contents carefully
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
2Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 2
10SASTSAST tool is run on all commits
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
6Vulnerabilities4 existing vulnerabilities detected
All dependencies 152

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 0 direct and 152 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npm@babel/code-frame7.29.7indirect
npm@babel/compat-data7.29.7indirect
npm@babel/core7.29.7indirect
npm@babel/generator7.29.7indirect
npm@babel/helper-compilation-targets7.29.7indirect
npm@babel/helper-globals7.29.7indirect
npm@babel/helper-module-imports7.29.7indirect
npm@babel/helper-module-transforms7.29.7indirect
npm@babel/helper-plugin-utils7.29.7indirect
npm@babel/helper-string-parser7.29.7indirect
npm@babel/helper-validator-identifier7.29.7indirect
npm@babel/helper-validator-option7.29.7indirect
npm@babel/helpers7.29.7indirect
npm@babel/parser7.29.7indirect
npm@babel/plugin-transform-react-jsx-self7.29.7indirect
npm@babel/plugin-transform-react-jsx-source7.29.7indirect
npm@babel/template7.29.7indirect
npm@babel/traverse7.29.7indirect
npm@babel/types7.29.7indirect
npm@esbuild/aix-ppc640.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/aix-ppc640.24.2indirect
npm@esbuild/android-arm0.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/android-arm0.24.2indirect
npm@esbuild/android-arm640.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/android-arm640.24.2indirect
npm@esbuild/android-x640.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/android-x640.24.2indirect
npm@esbuild/darwin-arm640.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/darwin-arm640.24.2indirect
npm@esbuild/darwin-x640.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/darwin-x640.24.2indirect
npm@esbuild/freebsd-arm640.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/freebsd-arm640.24.2indirect
npm@esbuild/freebsd-x640.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/freebsd-x640.24.2indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-arm0.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-arm0.24.2indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-arm640.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-arm640.24.2indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-ia320.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-ia320.24.2indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-loong640.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-loong640.24.2indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-mips64el0.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-mips64el0.24.2indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-ppc640.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-ppc640.24.2indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-riscv640.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-riscv640.24.2indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-s390x0.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-s390x0.24.2indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-x640.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-x640.24.2indirect
npm@esbuild/netbsd-arm640.24.2indirect
npm@esbuild/netbsd-x640.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/netbsd-x640.24.2indirect
npm@esbuild/openbsd-arm640.24.2indirect
npm@esbuild/openbsd-x640.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/openbsd-x640.24.2indirect
npm@esbuild/sunos-x640.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/sunos-x640.24.2indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-arm640.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-arm640.24.2indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-ia320.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-ia320.24.2indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-x640.21.5indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-x640.24.2indirect
npm@jridgewell/gen-mapping0.3.13indirect
npm@jridgewell/remapping2.3.5indirect
npm@jridgewell/resolve-uri3.1.2indirect
npm@jridgewell/sourcemap-codec1.5.5indirect
npm@jridgewell/trace-mapping0.3.31indirect
npm@rolldown/pluginutils1.0.0-beta.27indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-android-arm-eabi4.62.2indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-android-arm644.62.2indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-darwin-arm644.62.2indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-darwin-x644.62.2indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-freebsd-arm644.62.2indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-freebsd-x644.62.2indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-arm-gnueabihf4.62.2indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-arm-musleabihf4.62.2indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-arm64-gnu4.62.2indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-arm64-musl4.62.2indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-loong64-gnu4.62.2indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-loong64-musl4.62.2indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-ppc64-gnu4.62.2indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-ppc64-musl4.62.2indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-riscv64-gnu4.62.2indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-riscv64-musl4.62.2indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-s390x-gnu4.62.2indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-x64-gnu4.62.2indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-x64-musl4.62.2indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-openbsd-x644.62.2indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-openharmony-arm644.62.2indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-win32-arm64-msvc4.62.2indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-win32-ia32-msvc4.62.2indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-win32-x64-gnu4.62.2indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-win32-x64-msvc4.62.2indirect
npm@types/babel__core7.20.5indirect
npm@types/babel__generator7.27.0indirect
npm@types/babel__template7.4.4indirect
npm@types/babel__traverse7.28.0indirect
npm@types/estree1.0.9indirect
npm@types/node20.10.6indirect
npm@types/node20.19.43indirect
npm@types/prop-types15.7.15indirect
npm@types/react18.3.31indirect
npm@types/react-dom18.3.7indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin6.17.0indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/parser6.17.0indirect
npm@vitejs/plugin-react4.7.0indirect
npmargparse2.0.1indirect
npmbaseline-browser-mapping2.10.40indirect
npmbrowserslist4.28.4indirect
npmcaniuse-lite1.0.30001800indirect
npmconvert-source-map2.0.0indirect
npmcsstype3.2.3indirect
npmdebug4.4.3indirect
npmelectron-to-chromium1.5.383indirect
npmesbuild0.21.5indirect
npmesbuild0.24.2indirect
npmescalade3.2.0indirect
npmeslint8.56.0indirect
npmfsevents2.3.3indirect
npmgensync1.0.0-beta.2indirect
npmjs-tokens4.0.0indirect
npmjs-yaml4.3.0indirect
npmjsesc3.1.0indirect
npmjson52.2.3indirect
npmloose-envify1.4.0indirect
npmlru-cache5.1.1indirect
npmms2.1.3indirect
npmnanoid3.3.15indirect
npmnode-releases2.0.50indirect
npmpicocolors1.1.1indirect
npmpostcss8.5.16indirect
npmreact18.3.1indirect
npmreact-dom18.3.1indirect
npmreact-refresh0.17.0indirect
npmrollup4.62.2indirect
npmscheduler0.23.2indirect
npmsemver6.3.1indirect
npmsource-map-js1.2.1indirect
npmtypescript5.3.3indirect
npmtypescript5.9.3indirect
npmundici-types6.21.0indirect
npmupdate-browserslist-db1.2.3indirect
npmvite5.4.21indirect
npmvitest1.1.0indirect
npmyallist3.1.1indirect
PyPIpytestindirect
PyPIruffindirect
Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.15.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsnpm.