Public recordModerate
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-11 12:47 UTC
enumind / modonome
THE MODONOME Project - Governed engineering autonomy
enumind/modonome holds a health index of 59 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (84/100) and lowest on Sustainability & Governance (33/100). It was last updated 6 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.
59
overall / 100Software health index
Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.
59
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
Score profile
Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.
The weighted overall 56 is calibrated to 59 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).
Ownership
EnuMindOrganization
0 followers3 public repossince Jun 2026
This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.
Package ecosystems
| Registry | Package | Version | Downloads / mo | Versions | Last publish | Tags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| npm | modonomepoints to another repo — not scored | 0.1.0-alpha | 184 | 67 | 75 days ago | autonomousagentcigovernancecode-reviewmodernizationtech-debtai-safetyagenticautonomyratchetagentproof |
Metrics by category
Vitality
Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?
64
Development activity
58Moderate
How it's scored
| 36/36 | Push recency — last push 6 days ago |
| 3.5/36 | Commit cadence — 5/52 weeks with commits |
| 18/18 | Commit volume — 141 commits in the last year |
| 0/10 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — project was created within the last 90 days. Please review its contents carefully |
Inputs used
| commits_last_year | 141 |
| human_commit_share | 0.96 |
| days_since_last_push | 6 |
| active_weeks_last_year | 5 |
Release discipline
72Good
How it's scored
| 16.2/27 | Ships releases — 1 version tags (no GitHub releases) |
| 36/36 | Release recency — latest release 75 days ago |
| 12.6/27 | Release cadence — cadence unknown (single release) |
| 0/10 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data |
Inputs used
| releases_count | 1 |
| latest_release_tag | v0.1.0-alpha |
| releases_from_tags | yes |
| days_since_latest_release | 75 |
| mean_days_between_releases | — |
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.
Community & Adoption
Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?
41
Popularity & adoption
1Critical
How it's scored
| 0/60 | Stars — 1 stars |
| 0/25 | Forks — 0 forks |
| 0/15 | Watchers — 0 watchers |
Inputs used
| forks | 0 |
| stars | 1 |
| watchers | 0 |
| growth_state | unverified |
| growth_factor_pct | 100 |
| growth_unverified_reason | no_history |
Community health
86Excellent
How it's scored
| 22.5/22.5 | README |
| 16.9/22.5 | License — license file present, not a recognized license |
| 18/18 | CONTRIBUTING guide |
| 13.5/13.5 | Code of conduct |
| 0/7.2 | Issue template |
| 6.3/6.3 | PR template |
Inputs used
| has_readme | yes |
| has_license | yes |
| readme_badges | 5 |
| has_contributing | yes |
| has_issue_template | no |
| has_code_of_conduct | yes |
| readme_badge_services | api.securityscorecards.dev, github.com, shields.io |
| has_pull_request_template | yes |
Sustainability & Governance
Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?
33
Maintainer resilience (bus factor)
16Critical
How it's scored
| 9/54 | Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits |
| 3.9/22.5 | Commit distribution — top contributor authored 82% of commits |
| 2.7/13.5 | Contributor breadth — 2 contributors |
| 0/10 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0 |
Inputs used
| bus_factor | 1 |
| contributors_sampled | 2 |
| top_contributor_share | 0.825 |
Issue & PR responsiveness
50Moderate
How it's scored
| 0/42 | Issue resolution — no issues or no data |
| 22.6/30 | PR acceptance — 109/145 decided PRs merged |
| 0/13 | Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d |
| 0/15 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0 |
Inputs used
| merged_prs | 109 |
| open_issues | 0 |
| closed_issues | 0 |
| prs_merged_7d | 0 |
| prs_decided_7d | 0 |
| prs_merged_30d | 0 |
| prs_decided_30d | 0 |
| issue_closed_ratio | — |
| closed_unmerged_prs | 36 |
| first_time_authors_30d | 0 |
| first_time_prs_merged_30d | 0 |
| first_time_prs_decided_30d | 0 |
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution, Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
Ownership & stewardship
35Weak
How it's scored
| 30/30 | Ownership backing — organization-owned |
| 0/20 | Verified domain |
| 0/25 | Owner reach — 0 followers of enumind |
| 4.8/25 | Track record — 3 public repos, account ~0 yr old |
Inputs used
| followers | 0 |
| owner_type | Organization |
| is_verified | no |
| owner_login | enumind |
| public_repos | 3 |
| account_age_days | 73 |
Engineering Quality
Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?
84
Engineering practices
80Excellent
How it's scored
| 24/24 | CI workflows — 11 workflow(s) |
| 24/24 | Tests present |
| 16/16 | Linter config — eslint.config.js |
| 0/9.6 | Pre-commit hooks |
| 0/6.4 | .editorconfig |
| 0/20 | OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — no data |
Inputs used
| has_ci | yes |
| has_tests | yes |
| has_editorconfig | no |
| has_linter_config | yes |
| has_precommit_config | no |
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.
Documentation
90Excellent
How it's scored
| 30/30 | README |
| 25/25 | Documentation directory |
| 15/15 | Documentation / homepage site — https://www.modonome.com/ |
| 10/10 | Repository description |
| 10/10 | Topics — 10 topics |
| 0/10 | Wiki |
Inputs used
| topics | agentic-ai, automation, secure-coding, autonomous-engineering, ci-cd, developer-tools, devops, governance, modernization, software-engineering |
| has_wiki | no |
| homepage | https://www.modonome.com/ |
| docs_site | https://www.modonome.com/ |
| has_readme | yes |
| has_docs_dir | yes |
| has_description | yes |
Security
Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?
53
Security posture
48Weak
How it's scored
| 7.5/7.5 | Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo |
| 2.2/7.5 | Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches |
| 0/2.5 | CI-Tests — no data |
| 0.5/2.5 | CII-Best-Practices — badge detected: InProgress |
| 0/7.5 | Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0 |
| 0/2.5 | Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0 |
| 10/10 | Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected |
| 7.5/7.5 | Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected |
| 0/5 | Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed |
| 2.2/2.5 | License — license file detected |
| 0/7.5 | Maintained — project was created within the last 90 days. Please review its contents carefully |
| 5/5 | Packaging — packaging workflow detected |
| 1/5 | Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 2 |
| 5/5 | SAST — SAST tool detected: CodeQL |
| 5/5 | Security-Policy — security policy file detected |
| 0/7.5 | Signed-Releases — no data |
| 0/7.5 | Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions |
| 0/7.5 | Vulnerabilities — 13 existing vulnerabilities detected |
Inputs used
| source | openssf_scorecard |
| checks_evaluated | 16 |
| scorecard_version | v5.5.0 |
| checks_inconclusive | 2 |
| scorecard_aggregate | 4.8 |
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): CI-Tests, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.
Dependency advisories
72Good
How it's scored
| 14/35 | Direct dependencies free of known advisories — 1 affected: js-yaml 4.3.0 (high 7.5) |
| 0/25 | Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope |
| 40/40 | No advisories left outstanding — no advisory has been public longer than 90 days |
Inputs used
| source | osv |
| advisories | 16 |
| affected_packages | 9 |
| assessed_packages | 150 |
| unassessed_packages | 2 |
| affected_by_severity | critical 1, high 6, moderate 2 |
| direct_affected_packages | 1 |
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 150 resolved dependencies against OSV. 2 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.
AI Readiness
How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.
83
Agent context & guidance
100Exceptional
How it's scored
| 45/45 | Agent instructions — AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, docs/agents.md |
| 15/15 | Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) — llms.txt present |
| 40/40 | Legible commit history — 81 of 96 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body) |
Inputs used
| has_llms_txt | yes |
| llms_txt_url | — |
| legible_history_share | 0.844 |
| agent_instruction_files | AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, docs/agents.md |
| agent_instruction_max_bytes | 25,283 |
Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)
64Moderate
How it's scored
| 0/18 | One-command bootstrap |
| 22/22 | Automated tests |
| 11/11 | Lint / format config — eslint.config.js |
| 11/11 | Static type checking — apps/control-panel/tsconfig.json, design-system/tsconfig.json, examples/node-typescript/tsconfig.json |
| 10/10 | Reproducible environment — lockfile |
| 0/10 | Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100 |
| 8/8 | Automated maintenance — 4 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates |
| 2/10 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 2 |
Inputs used
| has_nix | no |
| has_tests | yes |
| lockfiles | package-lock.json |
| has_dockerfile | no |
| typed_language | no |
| bootstrap_files | — |
| has_devcontainer | no |
| has_linter_config | yes |
| typecheck_configs | apps/control-panel/tsconfig.json, design-system/tsconfig.json, examples/node-typescript/tsconfig.json |
| agent_commit_share | 0 |
| toolchain_manifests | — |
| dependency_bot_commit_share | 0.04 |
Code legibility for models
82Excellent
How it's scored
| 27/45 | Type-checkable code — JavaScript with type-check config (apps/control-panel/tsconfig.json, design-system/tsconfig.json, examples/node-typescript/tsconfig.json) |
| 54.9/55 | Manageable file sizes — 1/541 source files over 60KB |
Inputs used
| primary_language | JavaScript |
| largest_source_bytes | 65,462 |
| source_files_sampled | 541 |
| oversized_source_files | 1 |
Machine-readable interfaces
100Exceptional
How it's scored
| 0/40 | API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software |
| 20/20 | MCP server |
| 40/40 | Runnable examples — examples |
Inputs used
| example_dirs | examples |
| has_mcp_signal | yes |
| api_schema_files | — |
| interfaces_expected_of | — |
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto). Remaining weights renormalized.
Key facts
1GitHub stars
2contributors
141commits, last 12 months
6days since last push
1releases
1bus factor
0open issues
npmpackage ecosystems
Data collection warnings
- Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
- npm package 'modonome' points at a different repository (https://github.com/nateshpp/modonome); excluded from ecosystem scoring
More detail
OpenSSF Scorecard 4.8 / 10
4.8aggregate
Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).
| 10 | Binary-Artifacts | no binaries found in the repo |
| 3 | Branch-Protection | branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches |
| n/a | CI-Tests | no pull request found |
| 2 | CII-Best-Practices | badge detected: InProgress |
| 0 | Code-Review | Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0 |
| 0 | Contributors | project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0 |
| 10 | Dangerous-Workflow | no dangerous workflow patterns detected |
| 10 | Dependency-Update-Tool | update tool detected |
| 0 | Fuzzing | project is not fuzzed |
| 9 | License | license file detected |
| 0 | Maintained | project was created within the last 90 days. Please review its contents carefully |
| 10 | Packaging | packaging workflow detected |
| 2 | Pinned-Dependencies | dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 2 |
| 10 | SAST | SAST tool detected: CodeQL |
| 10 | Security-Policy | security policy file detected |
| n/a | Signed-Releases | no releases found |
| 0 | Token-Permissions | detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions |
| 0 | Vulnerabilities | 13 existing vulnerabilities detected |
Direct dependencies 3
| Registry | Package | Version constraint | Manifest |
|---|---|---|---|
| npm | js-yaml | ^4.3.0 | apps/control-panel/package.json |
| npm | react | ^18.3.1 | apps/control-panel/package.json |
| npm | react-dom | ^18.3.1 | apps/control-panel/package.json |
All dependencies 152
Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 3 direct and 149 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.
| Registry | Package | Version | Relation |
|---|---|---|---|
| npm | js-yaml | 4.3.0 | direct |
| npm | react | 18.3.1 | direct |
| npm | react-dom | 18.3.1 | direct |
| npm | @babel/code-frame | 7.29.7 | indirect |
| npm | @babel/compat-data | 7.29.7 | indirect |
| npm | @babel/core | 7.29.7 | indirect |
| npm | @babel/generator | 7.29.7 | indirect |
| npm | @babel/helper-compilation-targets | 7.29.7 | indirect |
| npm | @babel/helper-globals | 7.29.7 | indirect |
| npm | @babel/helper-module-imports | 7.29.7 | indirect |
| npm | @babel/helper-module-transforms | 7.29.7 | indirect |
| npm | @babel/helper-plugin-utils | 7.29.7 | indirect |
| npm | @babel/helper-string-parser | 7.29.7 | indirect |
| npm | @babel/helper-validator-identifier | 7.29.7 | indirect |
| npm | @babel/helper-validator-option | 7.29.7 | indirect |
| npm | @babel/helpers | 7.29.7 | indirect |
| npm | @babel/parser | 7.29.7 | indirect |
| npm | @babel/plugin-transform-react-jsx-self | 7.29.7 | indirect |
| npm | @babel/plugin-transform-react-jsx-source | 7.29.7 | indirect |
| npm | @babel/template | 7.29.7 | indirect |
| npm | @babel/traverse | 7.29.7 | indirect |
| npm | @babel/types | 7.29.7 | indirect |
| npm | @esbuild/aix-ppc64 | 0.21.5 | indirect |
| npm | @esbuild/aix-ppc64 | 0.24.2 | indirect |
| npm | @esbuild/android-arm | 0.21.5 | indirect |
| npm | @esbuild/android-arm | 0.24.2 | indirect |
| npm | @esbuild/android-arm64 | 0.21.5 | indirect |
| npm | @esbuild/android-arm64 | 0.24.2 | indirect |
| npm | @esbuild/android-x64 | 0.21.5 | indirect |
| npm | @esbuild/android-x64 | 0.24.2 | indirect |
| npm | @esbuild/darwin-arm64 | 0.21.5 | indirect |
| npm | @esbuild/darwin-arm64 | 0.24.2 | indirect |
| npm | @esbuild/darwin-x64 | 0.21.5 | indirect |
| npm | @esbuild/darwin-x64 | 0.24.2 | indirect |
| npm | @esbuild/freebsd-arm64 | 0.21.5 | indirect |
| npm | @esbuild/freebsd-arm64 | 0.24.2 | indirect |
| npm | @esbuild/freebsd-x64 | 0.21.5 | indirect |
| npm | @esbuild/freebsd-x64 | 0.24.2 | indirect |
| npm | @esbuild/linux-arm | 0.21.5 | indirect |
| npm | @esbuild/linux-arm | 0.24.2 | indirect |
| npm | @esbuild/linux-arm64 | 0.21.5 | indirect |
| npm | @esbuild/linux-arm64 | 0.24.2 | indirect |
| npm | @esbuild/linux-ia32 | 0.21.5 | indirect |
| npm | @esbuild/linux-ia32 | 0.24.2 | indirect |
| npm | @esbuild/linux-loong64 | 0.21.5 | indirect |
| npm | @esbuild/linux-loong64 | 0.24.2 | indirect |
| npm | @esbuild/linux-mips64el | 0.21.5 | indirect |
| npm | @esbuild/linux-mips64el | 0.24.2 | indirect |
| npm | @esbuild/linux-ppc64 | 0.21.5 | indirect |
| npm | @esbuild/linux-ppc64 | 0.24.2 | indirect |
| npm | @esbuild/linux-riscv64 | 0.21.5 | indirect |
| npm | @esbuild/linux-riscv64 | 0.24.2 | indirect |
| npm | @esbuild/linux-s390x | 0.21.5 | indirect |
| npm | @esbuild/linux-s390x | 0.24.2 | indirect |
| npm | @esbuild/linux-x64 | 0.21.5 | indirect |
| npm | @esbuild/linux-x64 | 0.24.2 | indirect |
| npm | @esbuild/netbsd-arm64 | 0.24.2 | indirect |
| npm | @esbuild/netbsd-x64 | 0.21.5 | indirect |
| npm | @esbuild/netbsd-x64 | 0.24.2 | indirect |
| npm | @esbuild/openbsd-arm64 | 0.24.2 | indirect |
| npm | @esbuild/openbsd-x64 | 0.21.5 | indirect |
| npm | @esbuild/openbsd-x64 | 0.24.2 | indirect |
| npm | @esbuild/sunos-x64 | 0.21.5 | indirect |
| npm | @esbuild/sunos-x64 | 0.24.2 | indirect |
| npm | @esbuild/win32-arm64 | 0.21.5 | indirect |
| npm | @esbuild/win32-arm64 | 0.24.2 | indirect |
| npm | @esbuild/win32-ia32 | 0.21.5 | indirect |
| npm | @esbuild/win32-ia32 | 0.24.2 | indirect |
| npm | @esbuild/win32-x64 | 0.21.5 | indirect |
| npm | @esbuild/win32-x64 | 0.24.2 | indirect |
| npm | @jridgewell/gen-mapping | 0.3.13 | indirect |
| npm | @jridgewell/remapping | 2.3.5 | indirect |
| npm | @jridgewell/resolve-uri | 3.1.2 | indirect |
| npm | @jridgewell/sourcemap-codec | 1.5.5 | indirect |
| npm | @jridgewell/trace-mapping | 0.3.31 | indirect |
| npm | @rolldown/pluginutils | 1.0.0-beta.27 | indirect |
| npm | @rollup/rollup-android-arm-eabi | 4.62.2 | indirect |
| npm | @rollup/rollup-android-arm64 | 4.62.2 | indirect |
| npm | @rollup/rollup-darwin-arm64 | 4.62.2 | indirect |
| npm | @rollup/rollup-darwin-x64 | 4.62.2 | indirect |
| npm | @rollup/rollup-freebsd-arm64 | 4.62.2 | indirect |
| npm | @rollup/rollup-freebsd-x64 | 4.62.2 | indirect |
| npm | @rollup/rollup-linux-arm-gnueabihf | 4.62.2 | indirect |
| npm | @rollup/rollup-linux-arm-musleabihf | 4.62.2 | indirect |
| npm | @rollup/rollup-linux-arm64-gnu | 4.62.2 | indirect |
| npm | @rollup/rollup-linux-arm64-musl | 4.62.2 | indirect |
| npm | @rollup/rollup-linux-loong64-gnu | 4.62.2 | indirect |
| npm | @rollup/rollup-linux-loong64-musl | 4.62.2 | indirect |
| npm | @rollup/rollup-linux-ppc64-gnu | 4.62.2 | indirect |
| npm | @rollup/rollup-linux-ppc64-musl | 4.62.2 | indirect |
| npm | @rollup/rollup-linux-riscv64-gnu | 4.62.2 | indirect |
| npm | @rollup/rollup-linux-riscv64-musl | 4.62.2 | indirect |
| npm | @rollup/rollup-linux-s390x-gnu | 4.62.2 | indirect |
| npm | @rollup/rollup-linux-x64-gnu | 4.62.2 | indirect |
| npm | @rollup/rollup-linux-x64-musl | 4.62.2 | indirect |
| npm | @rollup/rollup-openbsd-x64 | 4.62.2 | indirect |
| npm | @rollup/rollup-openharmony-arm64 | 4.62.2 | indirect |
| npm | @rollup/rollup-win32-arm64-msvc | 4.62.2 | indirect |
| npm | @rollup/rollup-win32-ia32-msvc | 4.62.2 | indirect |
| npm | @rollup/rollup-win32-x64-gnu | 4.62.2 | indirect |
| npm | @rollup/rollup-win32-x64-msvc | 4.62.2 | indirect |
| npm | @types/babel__core | 7.20.5 | indirect |
| npm | @types/babel__generator | 7.27.0 | indirect |
| npm | @types/babel__template | 7.4.4 | indirect |
| npm | @types/babel__traverse | 7.28.0 | indirect |
| npm | @types/estree | 1.0.9 | indirect |
| npm | @types/node | 20.10.6 | indirect |
| npm | @types/node | 20.19.43 | indirect |
| npm | @types/prop-types | 15.7.15 | indirect |
| npm | @types/react | 18.3.31 | indirect |
| npm | @types/react-dom | 18.3.7 | indirect |
| npm | @typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin | 6.17.0 | indirect |
| npm | @typescript-eslint/parser | 6.17.0 | indirect |
| npm | @vitejs/plugin-react | 4.7.0 | indirect |
| npm | argparse | 2.0.1 | indirect |
| npm | baseline-browser-mapping | 2.10.40 | indirect |
| npm | browserslist | 4.28.4 | indirect |
| npm | caniuse-lite | 1.0.30001800 | indirect |
| npm | convert-source-map | 2.0.0 | indirect |
| npm | csstype | 3.2.3 | indirect |
| npm | debug | 4.4.3 | indirect |
| npm | electron-to-chromium | 1.5.383 | indirect |
| npm | esbuild | 0.21.5 | indirect |
| npm | esbuild | 0.24.2 | indirect |
| npm | escalade | 3.2.0 | indirect |
| npm | eslint | 8.56.0 | indirect |
| npm | fsevents | 2.3.3 | indirect |
| npm | gensync | 1.0.0-beta.2 | indirect |
| npm | js-tokens | 4.0.0 | indirect |
| npm | jsesc | 3.1.0 | indirect |
| npm | json5 | 2.2.3 | indirect |
| npm | loose-envify | 1.4.0 | indirect |
| npm | lru-cache | 5.1.1 | indirect |
| npm | ms | 2.1.3 | indirect |
| npm | nanoid | 3.3.15 | indirect |
| npm | node-releases | 2.0.50 | indirect |
| npm | picocolors | 1.1.1 | indirect |
| npm | postcss | 8.5.16 | indirect |
| npm | react-refresh | 0.17.0 | indirect |
| npm | rollup | 4.62.2 | indirect |
| npm | scheduler | 0.23.2 | indirect |
| npm | semver | 6.3.1 | indirect |
| npm | source-map-js | 1.2.1 | indirect |
| npm | typescript | 5.3.3 | indirect |
| npm | typescript | 5.9.3 | indirect |
| npm | undici-types | 6.21.0 | indirect |
| npm | update-browserslist-db | 1.2.3 | indirect |
| npm | vite | 5.4.21 | indirect |
| npm | vitest | 1.1.0 | indirect |
| npm | yallist | 3.1.1 | indirect |
| PyPI | pytest | — | indirect |
| PyPI | ruff | — | indirect |
Dependency advisories 9
This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 150 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 9 carry known advisories, of which 1 are direct. 2 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.
| Package | Version | Relation | Severity | Advisories | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| vitest | 1.1.0 | indirect | critical | 2 | 4.1.0 |
| js-yaml | 4.3.0 | direct | high | 2 | 4.3.2 |
| baseline-browser-mapping | 2.10.40 | indirect | high | 1 | 2.11.0 |
| browserslist | 4.28.4 | indirect | high | 2 | 4.28.7 |
| nanoid | 3.3.15 | indirect | high | 2 | 5.1.16 |
| postcss | 8.5.16 | indirect | high | 2 | 8.5.23 |
| vite | 5.4.21 | indirect | high | 3 | 8.0.16 |
| esbuild | 0.21.5 | indirect | moderate | 1 | 0.25.0 |
| esbuild | 0.24.2 | indirect | moderate | 1 | 0.25.0 |
An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.
Raw JSON report machine-readable
Feedback
Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.
Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.
Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.
How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — npm.