Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-19 09:23 UTC

erfanzar / EasyDeL

Accelerate, Optimize performance with streamlined training and serving options with JAX.

PythonApache-2.0★ 374 stars⑂ 51 forkssince Apr 2023View on GitHub ↗

KindNetwork serviceLibraryhow this is determined

erfanzar/EasyDeL holds a health index of 80 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (96/100) and lowest on Security (33/100). It was last updated 3 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 68 is calibrated to 80 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Erfan Zare ChavoshiPersonal account

185 followers25 public repossince Dec 2019@PrismML

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish	Tags
PyPI	easydel	0.3.0	2,044	87	53 days ago	deep-learning machine-learning jax cuda xla triton pallas

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

81Excellent · 21% of overall

Development activity

73Good

How it's scored

36/36	Push recency — last push 3 days ago
19.4/36	Commit cadence — 28/52 weeks with commits
18/18	Commit volume — 345 commits in the last year
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

commits_last_year	345
human_commit_share	1
days_since_last_push	3
active_weeks_last_year	28

Release discipline

92Excellent

How it's scored

27/27	Ships releases — 27 releases published
36/36	Release recency — latest release 53 days ago
19.8/27	Release cadence — a release every ~66.7 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data

Inputs used

releases_count	27
latest_release_tag	v0.3.0
releases_from_tags	no
days_since_latest_release	53
mean_days_between_releases	66.7

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

63Moderate · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

62Moderate

How it's scored

41.7/60	Stars — 374 stars
14.2/25	Forks — 51 forks
6.5/15	Watchers — 16 watchers

Inputs used

forks	51
stars	374
watchers	16
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

70Good

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (Apache-2.0)
18/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
0/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	0
has_contributing	yes
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	no
readme_badge_services	—
has_pull_request_template	no

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

55Moderate

How it's scored

44.1/80	Monthly downloads — 2,044 downloads/month across pypi
0/20	Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem

Inputs used

packages	easydel
dependents	—
ecosystems	pypi
total_downloads	—
monthly_downloads	2,044
unverified_packages_excluded	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

61Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

33At Risk

How it's scored

9/54	Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0.3/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 99% of commits
13.5/13.5	Contributor breadth — 10 contributors
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 4 contributing companies or organizations

Inputs used

bus_factor	1
contributors_sampled	10
top_contributor_share	0.988

Issue & PR responsiveness

64Moderate

How it's scored

40/42	Issue resolution — 95% of issues closed
23.7/30	PR acceptance — 105/133 decided PRs merged
0/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — 0/2 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
0/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/20 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

merged_prs	105
open_issues	6
closed_issues	119
prs_merged_7d	0
prs_decided_7d	0
prs_merged_30d	0
prs_decided_30d	2
issue_closed_ratio	0.952
closed_unmerged_prs	28
first_time_authors_30d	1
first_time_prs_merged_30d	0
first_time_prs_decided_30d	2

Ownership & stewardship

61Moderate

How it's scored

10/30	Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20	Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
16.3/25	Owner reach — 185 followers of erfanzar
22.3/25	Track record — 25 public repos, account ~6 yr old

Inputs used

followers	185
owner_type	User
is_verified	—
owner_login	erfanzar
public_repos	25
account_age_days	2,458

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on pypi
35/35	Publish recency — latest publish 53 days ago
20/20	Version history — 87 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	easydel
ecosystems	pypi
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	53

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

96Exceptional · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

94Exceptional

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 5 workflow(s)
24/24	Tests present
16/16	Linter config — pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff], [tool.black])
9.6/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4	.editorconfig
20/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 1 out of 1 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	yes
has_editorconfig	no
has_linter_config	yes
has_precommit_config	yes

Documentation

100Exceptional

How it's scored

30/30	README
25/25	Documentation directory
15/15	Documentation / homepage site — https://easydel.readthedocs.io/en/latest/
10/10	Repository description
10/10	Topics — 2 topics
10/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	jax, easydel
has_wiki	yes
homepage	https://easydel.readthedocs.io/en/latest/
docs_site	https://easydel.readthedocs.io/en/latest/
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	yes
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

33At Risk · 16% of overall

Security posture

31At Risk

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5	Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
2.5/2.5	CI-Tests — 1 out of 1 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5	Code-Review — Found 0/20 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5	Contributors — project has 4 contributing companies or organizations
10/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5	License — license file detected
0/7.5	Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
5/5	Packaging — packaging workflow detected
0/5	Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5	SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5	Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5	Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 157 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	17
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	1
scorecard_aggregate	3.1

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

43Weak

How it's scored

5.1/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — 4 affected: cryptography 46.0.5 (critical 9.8), ray 2.54.0 (high 8.8), transformers 5.5.0 (high 7.1), +1 more
0/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
27.3/40	No advisories left outstanding — 2 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 175 days ago

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	301
affected_packages	24
assessed_packages	258
unassessed_packages	14
affected_by_severity	critical 6, high 13, moderate 3, low 1, unknown 1
direct_affected_packages	4

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 258 resolved dependencies against OSV. 14 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

59Moderate · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

40Weak

How it's scored

0/45	Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40	Legible commit history — 99 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	no
llms_txt_url	—
legible_history_share	0.99
agent_instruction_files	—
agent_instruction_max_bytes	—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

72Good

How it's scored

18/18	One-command bootstrap — docs/Makefile
22/22	Automated tests
11/11	Lint / format config — pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff], [tool.black])
11/11	Static type checking — easydel/py.typed
10/10	Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile
0/10	Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8	Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	yes
lockfiles	uv.lock
has_dockerfile	yes
typed_language	no
bootstrap_files	docs/Makefile
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	yes
typecheck_configs	easydel/py.typed
agent_commit_share	0
toolchain_manifests	—
dependency_bot_commit_share	0

Code legibility for models

80Excellent

How it's scored

27/45	Type-checkable code — Python with type-check config (easydel/py.typed)
52.5/55	Manageable file sizes — 43/960 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	Python
largest_source_bytes	245,350
source_files_sampled	960
oversized_source_files	43

Machine-readable interfaces

40Weak

How it's scored

0/40	API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)
0/20	MCP server
40/40	Runnable examples — examples

Inputs used

example_dirs	examples
has_mcp_signal	no
api_schema_files	—
interfaces_expected_of	network-service

Key facts

374GitHub stars

10contributors

345commits, last 12 months

3days since last push

27releases

1bus factor

6open issues

PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 51 ⇿

0Stars

51Forks

26Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Major 0Minor 3Patch 21

Each point covers 3 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 3.1 / 10

3.1aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-19 09:23 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
0	Branch-Protection	branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
10	CI-Tests	1 out of 1 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0	Code-Review	Found 0/20 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10	Contributors	project has 4 contributing companies or organizations
10	Dangerous-Workflow	no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0	Dependency-Update-Tool	no update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
10	License	license file detected
0	Maintained	0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
10	Packaging	packaging workflow detected
0	Pinned-Dependencies	dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0	SAST	SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0	Security-Policy	security policy file not detected
n/a	Signed-Releases	no releases found
0	Token-Permissions	detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0	Vulnerabilities	157 existing vulnerabilities detected

Direct dependencies 25

Registry	Package	Version constraint	Manifest
PyPI	jax	`>=0.9.2`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	jaxlib	`>=0.9.2`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	ray	`==2.54.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	eformer	`==0.0.99.12`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	ejkernel	`==0.0.78`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	einops	`~=0.8.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	transformers	`~=5.5.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	sentencepiece	`>=0.2.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	flax	`==0.12.3`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	fastapi	`>=0.115.2`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	wandb	`>=0.22.2`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	uvloop	`==0.21.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	uvicorn	`>=0.32.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	jinja2	`>=3.1.5`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	grain	`~=0.2.11`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	datasets	`>=3.6.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	gcsfs	`>=2024.2,<2026`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	zstandard	`>=0.23.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	pyyaml	`>=6.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	msgspec	`~=0.19.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	partial-json-parser	`>=0.2.1.1.post6`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	google-api-python-client	`>=2.179.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	cryptography	`>=45.0.6`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	pyzmq	`>=27.1.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	grafanalib	`>=0.7.1`	pyproject.toml

All dependencies 272

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 27 direct and 245 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
PyPI	cryptography	`46.0.5`	direct
PyPI	datasets	`—`	direct
PyPI	datasets	`4.7.0`	direct
PyPI	eformer	`0.0.99.12`	direct
PyPI	einops	`0.8.2`	direct
PyPI	ejkernel	`0.0.78`	direct
PyPI	fastapi	`0.135.1`	direct
PyPI	flax	`0.12.3`	direct
PyPI	gcsfs	`2025.12.0`	direct
PyPI	google-api-python-client	`2.192.0`	direct
PyPI	grafanalib	`0.7.1`	direct
PyPI	grain	`0.2.16`	direct
PyPI	jax	`0.9.2`	direct
PyPI	jaxlib	`0.9.2`	direct
PyPI	jinja2	`3.1.6`	direct
PyPI	msgspec	`0.19.0`	direct
PyPI	partial-json-parser	`0.2.1.1.post7`	direct
PyPI	pyyaml	`6.0.3`	direct
PyPI	pyzmq	`27.1.0`	direct
PyPI	ray	`2.54.0`	direct
PyPI	sentencepiece	`—`	direct
PyPI	sentencepiece	`0.2.1`	direct
PyPI	transformers	`5.5.0`	direct
PyPI	uvicorn	`0.41.0`	direct
PyPI	uvloop	`0.21.0`	direct
PyPI	wandb	`0.25.1`	direct
PyPI	zstandard	`0.25.0`	direct
PyPI	absl-py	`2.4.0`	indirect
PyPI	accelerate	`—`	indirect
PyPI	aiofiles	`25.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	aiohappyeyeballs	`2.6.1`	indirect
PyPI	aiohttp	`3.13.3`	indirect
PyPI	aiohttp-cors	`0.8.1`	indirect
PyPI	aiosignal	`1.4.0`	indirect
PyPI	annotated-doc	`0.0.4`	indirect
PyPI	annotated-types	`0.7.0`	indirect
PyPI	anyio	`4.12.1`	indirect
PyPI	apache-tvm-ffi	`0.1.9`	indirect
PyPI	array-record	`0.8.3`	indirect
PyPI	astunparse	`1.6.3`	indirect
PyPI	attrs	`25.4.0`	indirect
PyPI	beartype	`0.22.9`	indirect
PyPI	braceexpand	`0.1.7`	indirect
PyPI	certifi	`2026.2.25`	indirect
PyPI	cffi	`2.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	chardet	`5.2.0`	indirect
PyPI	charset-normalizer	`3.4.5`	indirect
PyPI	cheroot	`11.1.2`	indirect
PyPI	chex	`0.1.91`	indirect
PyPI	click	`8.3.1`	indirect
PyPI	cloudpickle	`3.1.2`	indirect
PyPI	colorama	`0.4.6`	indirect
PyPI	colorful	`0.5.8`	indirect
PyPI	contextlib2	`21.6.0`	indirect
PyPI	cuda-bindings	`13.2.0`	indirect
PyPI	cuda-pathfinder	`1.4.2`	indirect
PyPI	cuda-python	`13.2.0`	indirect
PyPI	dataclasses-json	`0.6.7`	indirect
PyPI	dataproperty	`1.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	decorator	`5.2.1`	indirect
PyPI	dill	`0.4.0`	indirect
PyPI	distlib	`0.4.0`	indirect
PyPI	dm-tree	`0.1.9`	indirect
PyPI	docstring-parser	`0.17.0`	indirect
PyPI	docutils	`0.16`	indirect
PyPI	eopod	`0.0.36`	indirect
PyPI	etils	`1.14.0`	indirect
PyPI	evaluate	`0.4.6`	indirect
PyPI	filelock	`3.25.2`	indirect
PyPI	flatbuffers	`25.12.19`	indirect
PyPI	frozenlist	`1.8.0`	indirect
PyPI	fsspec	`2025.12.0`	indirect
PyPI	gast	`0.7.0`	indirect
PyPI	gitdb	`4.0.12`	indirect
PyPI	gitpython	`3.1.46`	indirect
PyPI	google-api-core	`2.30.0`	indirect
PyPI	google-auth	`2.49.0`	indirect
PyPI	google-auth-httplib2	`0.3.0`	indirect
PyPI	google-auth-oauthlib	`1.3.0`	indirect
PyPI	google-cloud-core	`2.5.0`	indirect
PyPI	google-cloud-storage	`3.9.0`	indirect
PyPI	google-cloud-storage-control	`1.10.0`	indirect
PyPI	google-crc32c	`1.8.0`	indirect
PyPI	google-pasta	`0.2.0`	indirect
PyPI	google-resumable-media	`2.8.0`	indirect
PyPI	googleapis-common-protos	`1.73.0`	indirect
PyPI	grpc-google-iam-v1	`0.14.3`	indirect
PyPI	grpcio	`1.78.0`	indirect
PyPI	grpcio-status	`1.71.2`	indirect
PyPI	gviz-api	`1.10.0`	indirect
PyPI	h11	`0.16.0`	indirect
PyPI	h5py	`3.16.0`	indirect
PyPI	hf-xet	`1.4.0`	indirect
PyPI	httpcore	`1.0.9`	indirect
PyPI	httplib2	`0.31.2`	indirect
PyPI	httptools	`0.7.1`	indirect
PyPI	httpx	`0.28.1`	indirect
PyPI	huggingface-hub	`1.6.0`	indirect
PyPI	humanize	`4.15.0`	indirect
PyPI	idna	`3.11`	indirect
PyPI	immutabledict	`4.3.1`	indirect
PyPI	importlib-metadata	`8.7.1`	indirect
PyPI	ipykernel	`—`	indirect
PyPI	ipython-genutils	`—`	indirect
PyPI	jaraco-functools	`4.4.0`	indirect
PyPI	jax-cuda13-pjrt	`0.9.2`	indirect
PyPI	jax-cuda13-plugin	`0.9.2`	indirect
PyPI	jax-tvm-ffi	`0.1.2`	indirect
PyPI	jaxtyping	`0.3.9`	indirect
PyPI	joblib	`1.5.3`	indirect
PyPI	jsonlines	`4.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	jsonschema	`4.26.0`	indirect
PyPI	jsonschema-specifications	`2025.9.1`	indirect
PyPI	keras	`3.13.2`	indirect
PyPI	libclang	`18.1.1`	indirect
PyPI	libtpu	`0.0.37`	indirect
PyPI	lm-eval	`0.4.11`	indirect
PyPI	lxml	`6.0.2`	indirect
PyPI	markdown	`3.10.2`	indirect
PyPI	markdown-it-py	`4.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	markupsafe	`3.0.3`	indirect
PyPI	marshmallow	`3.26.2`	indirect
PyPI	mbstrdecoder	`1.1.4`	indirect
PyPI	mdurl	`0.1.2`	indirect
PyPI	mergedeep	`1.3.4`	indirect
PyPI	ml-collections	`1.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	ml-dtypes	`0.5.4`	indirect
PyPI	more-itertools	`10.8.0`	indirect
PyPI	mpmath	`1.3.0`	indirect
PyPI	msgpack	`1.1.2`	indirect
PyPI	multidict	`6.7.1`	indirect
PyPI	multiprocess	`0.70.18`	indirect
PyPI	mypy-extensions	`1.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	myst-nb	`—`	indirect
PyPI	namex	`0.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	networkx	`3.6.1`	indirect
PyPI	nltk	`3.9.3`	indirect
PyPI	numpy	`—`	indirect
PyPI	numpy	`2.1.3`	indirect
PyPI	nvidia-cublas	`13.3.0.5`	indirect
PyPI	nvidia-cuda-cccl	`13.2.27`	indirect
PyPI	nvidia-cuda-crt	`13.2.51`	indirect
PyPI	nvidia-cuda-cupti	`13.2.23`	indirect
PyPI	nvidia-cuda-nvcc	`13.2.51`	indirect
PyPI	nvidia-cuda-nvrtc	`13.2.51`	indirect
PyPI	nvidia-cuda-runtime	`13.2.51`	indirect
PyPI	nvidia-cudnn-cu13	`9.20.0.48`	indirect
PyPI	nvidia-cufft	`12.2.0.37`	indirect
PyPI	nvidia-cusolver	`12.1.0.51`	indirect
PyPI	nvidia-cusparse	`12.7.9.17`	indirect
PyPI	nvidia-cutlass-dsl	`4.4.1`	indirect
PyPI	nvidia-cutlass-dsl-libs-base	`4.4.1`	indirect
PyPI	nvidia-cutlass-dsl-libs-cu13	`4.4.1`	indirect
PyPI	nvidia-nccl-cu13	`2.29.7`	indirect
PyPI	nvidia-nvjitlink	`13.2.51`	indirect
PyPI	nvidia-nvshmem-cu13	`3.5.21`	indirect
PyPI	nvidia-nvvm	`13.2.51`	indirect
PyPI	oauthlib	`3.3.1`	indirect
PyPI	opencensus	`0.11.4`	indirect
PyPI	opencensus-context	`0.1.3`	indirect
PyPI	opentelemetry-api	`1.40.0`	indirect
PyPI	opentelemetry-exporter-prometheus	`0.61b0`	indirect
PyPI	opentelemetry-proto	`1.40.0`	indirect
PyPI	opentelemetry-sdk	`1.40.0`	indirect
PyPI	opentelemetry-semantic-conventions	`0.61b0`	indirect
PyPI	opt-einsum	`3.4.0`	indirect
PyPI	optax	`0.2.7`	indirect
PyPI	optree	`0.19.0`	indirect
PyPI	orbax-checkpoint	`0.11.33`	indirect
PyPI	orbax-export	`0.0.8`	indirect
PyPI	packaging	`26.0`	indirect
PyPI	pandas	`3.0.1`	indirect
PyPI	pathvalidate	`3.3.1`	indirect
PyPI	pillow	`12.1.1`	indirect
PyPI	platformdirs	`4.9.4`	indirect
PyPI	plum-dispatch	`2.3.2`	indirect
PyPI	portalocker	`3.2.0`	indirect
PyPI	prometheus-client	`0.24.1`	indirect
PyPI	promise	`2.3`	indirect
PyPI	propcache	`0.4.1`	indirect
PyPI	proto-plus	`1.27.1`	indirect
PyPI	protobuf	`5.29.6`	indirect
PyPI	psutil	`7.2.2`	indirect
PyPI	py-spy	`0.4.1`	indirect
PyPI	pyarrow	`23.0.1`	indirect
PyPI	pyasn1	`0.6.2`	indirect
PyPI	pyasn1-modules	`0.4.2`	indirect
PyPI	pycparser	`3.0`	indirect
PyPI	pydantic	`2.12.5`	indirect
PyPI	pydantic-core	`2.41.5`	indirect
PyPI	pygments	`2.19.2`	indirect
PyPI	pyparsing	`3.3.2`	indirect
PyPI	pytablewriter	`1.2.1`	indirect
PyPI	python-dateutil	`2.9.0.post0`	indirect
PyPI	python-discovery	`1.1.3`	indirect
PyPI	python-dotenv	`1.2.2`	indirect
PyPI	pytz	`2026.1.post1`	indirect
PyPI	pywin32	`311`	indirect
PyPI	recommonmark	`—`	indirect
PyPI	referencing	`0.37.0`	indirect
PyPI	regex	`2026.2.28`	indirect
PyPI	requests	`2.32.5`	indirect
PyPI	requests-oauthlib	`2.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	rich	`14.3.3`	indirect
PyPI	rouge-score	`0.1.2`	indirect
PyPI	rpds-py	`0.30.0`	indirect
PyPI	rsa	`4.9.1`	indirect
PyPI	sacrebleu	`2.6.0`	indirect
PyPI	safetensors	`0.7.0`	indirect
PyPI	scikit-learn	`1.8.0`	indirect
PyPI	scipy	`1.17.1`	indirect
PyPI	sentry-sdk	`2.54.0`	indirect
PyPI	setuptools	`82.0.1`	indirect
PyPI	shellingham	`1.5.4`	indirect
PyPI	simple-parsing	`0.1.8`	indirect
PyPI	simplejson	`3.20.2`	indirect
PyPI	six	`1.17.0`	indirect
PyPI	smart-open	`7.5.1`	indirect
PyPI	smmap	`5.0.3`	indirect
PyPI	sphinx	`—`	indirect
PyPI	sphinx-autobuild	`—`	indirect
PyPI	sphinx-autodoc-typehints	`—`	indirect
PyPI	sphinx-book-theme	`—`	indirect
PyPI	sphinx-design	`—`	indirect
PyPI	sqlitedict	`2.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	starlette	`0.52.1`	indirect
PyPI	sympy	`1.14.0`	indirect
PyPI	tabledata	`1.3.4`	indirect
PyPI	tabulate	`0.10.0`	indirect
PyPI	tb-nightly	`2.21.0a20251023`	indirect
PyPI	tblib	`3.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	tcolorpy	`0.1.7`	indirect
PyPI	tensorboard	`2.19.0`	indirect
PyPI	tensorboard-data-server	`0.7.2`	indirect
PyPI	tensorflow	`2.19.1`	indirect
PyPI	tensorflow-datasets	`4.9.9`	indirect
PyPI	tensorflow-io-gcs-filesystem	`0.37.1`	indirect
PyPI	tensorflow-metadata	`1.17.3`	indirect
PyPI	tensorstore	`0.1.81`	indirect
PyPI	termcolor	`3.3.0`	indirect
PyPI	threadpoolctl	`3.6.0`	indirect
PyPI	tokenizers	`0.22.2`	indirect
PyPI	toml	`0.10.2`	indirect
PyPI	toolz	`1.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	torch	`—`	indirect
PyPI	torch	`2.8.0`	indirect
PyPI	torch	`2.8.0+cpu`	indirect
PyPI	tpu-info	`0.9.0`	indirect
PyPI	tqdm	`4.67.3`	indirect
PyPI	treescope	`0.1.10`	indirect
PyPI	triton	`3.6.0`	indirect
PyPI	typepy	`1.3.4`	indirect
PyPI	typer	`0.24.1`	indirect
PyPI	typing-extensions	`4.15.0`	indirect
PyPI	typing-inspect	`0.9.0`	indirect
PyPI	typing-inspection	`0.4.2`	indirect
PyPI	tzdata	`2025.3`	indirect
PyPI	uritemplate	`4.2.0`	indirect
PyPI	urllib3	`2.6.3`	indirect
PyPI	virtualenv	`21.2.0`	indirect
PyPI	wadler-lindig	`0.1.7`	indirect
PyPI	watchfiles	`1.1.1`	indirect
PyPI	websockets	`16.0`	indirect
PyPI	werkzeug	`3.1.6`	indirect
PyPI	wheel	`0.46.3`	indirect
PyPI	word2number	`1.1`	indirect
PyPI	wrapt	`2.1.2`	indirect
PyPI	xprof	`2.22.0`	indirect
PyPI	xprof-nightly	`2.23.2a20260421`	indirect
PyPI	xxhash	`3.6.0`	indirect
PyPI	yarl	`1.23.0`	indirect
PyPI	zipp	`3.23.0`	indirect

Dependency advisories 24

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 258 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 24 carry known advisories, of which 4 are direct. 14 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

Package	Version	Relation	Severity	Advisories	Fixed in
cryptography	`46.0.5`	direct	critical	11	`50.0.0`
aiohttp	`3.13.3`	indirect	critical	48	`3.14.3`
anyio	`4.12.1`	indirect	critical	2	`4.14.2`
gitpython	`3.1.46`	indirect	critical	56	`3.1.60`
nltk	`3.9.3`	indirect	critical	70	`3.10.3`
pillow	`12.1.1`	indirect	critical	36	`12.3.0`
ray	`2.54.0`	direct	high	4	`2.56.0`
transformers	`5.5.0`	direct	high	2	`5.10.0`
click	`8.3.1`	indirect	high	1	`8.3.3`
httplib2	`0.31.2`	indirect	high	2	`0.32.0`
keras	`3.13.2`	indirect	high	16	`3.15.0`
lxml	`6.0.2`	indirect	high	2	`6.1.0`
msgpack	`1.1.2`	indirect	high	2	`1.2.1`
pyasn1	`0.6.2`	indirect	high	8	`0.6.4`
sqlitedict	`2.1.0`	indirect	high	2	—
starlette	`0.52.1`	indirect	high	10	`1.3.1`
torch	`2.8.0`	indirect	high	8	`2.13.0`
torch	`2.8.0+cpu`	indirect	high	8	`2.13.0`
urllib3	`2.6.3`	indirect	high	4	`2.7.0`
idna	`3.11`	indirect	moderate	2	`3.15`
requests	`2.32.5`	indirect	moderate	2	`2.33.0`
setuptools	`82.0.1`	indirect	moderate	2	`83.0.0`
pygments	`2.19.2`	indirect	low	2	`2.20.0`
datasets	`4.7.0`	direct	unknown	1	`5.0.1`

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — PyPI.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records