Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-17 19:42 UTC

explorerhq / sql-explorer

SQL reporting that Just Works. Fast, simple, and confusion-free. Write and share queries in a delightful SQL editor, with AI assistance.

Python · JavaScript · HTMLCustom license★ 2,874 stars⑂ 373 forkssince Dec 2013View on GitHub ↗

KindLibraryhow this is determined

#sql #analytics #ai #django-application #reporting

explorerhq/sql-explorer holds a health index of 34 out of 100, placing it in the At Risk band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (88/100) and lowest on Vitality (28/100). It was last updated 512 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

At Risk

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 58 is calibrated to 62 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

SQL Explorer, IncOrganization

10 followers2 public repossince May 2024

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish	Tags
PyPI	django-sql-explorer	5.3	233,969	68	722 days ago	django sql explorer reports reporting csv json database query

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

28At Risk · 21% of overall

Development activity

1Critical

Abandonment alert

Work has arrived and nobody has attended to it

no human commit in 512 daysautomated commits excludedpull requests left unansweredissues left unansweredreleases stalledOpenSSF Scorecard reports it unmaintainedOverall rating: At Risk ceiling

Silence alone is never the finding — a small, finished library may need no commits for years. This alert requires both: no human commit for a long time, and obligations the project is visibly not discharging. Automated commits do not count as maintenance.

How abandonment is assessed

How it's scored

0/36	Push recency — last push 512 days ago
0/36	Commit cadence — 0/52 weeks with commits
0/18	Commit volume — 0 commits in the last year
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

commits_last_year	0
human_commit_share	0.96
days_since_last_push	512
active_weeks_last_year	0

Release discipline

68Good

How it's scored

27/27	Ships releases — 42 releases published
7.2/36	Release recency — latest release 722 days ago
27/27	Release cadence — a release every ~10.1 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data

Inputs used

releases_count	42
latest_release_tag	5.3.0
releases_from_tags	no
days_since_latest_release	722
mean_days_between_releases	10.1

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

72Good · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

87Excellent

How it's scored

56.1/60	Stars — 2,874 stars
21.4/25	Forks — 373 forks
9.9/15	Watchers — 62 watchers

Inputs used

forks	373
stars	2,874
watchers	62
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

44Weak

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
16.9/22.5	License — license file present, not a recognized license
0/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
0/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	4
has_contributing	no
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	no
readme_badge_services	readthedocs.org, shields.io
has_pull_request_template	no

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

89Excellent

How it's scored

71.6/80	Monthly downloads — 233,969 downloads/month across pypi
0/20	Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem

Inputs used

packages	django-sql-explorer
dependents	—
ecosystems	pypi
total_downloads	—
monthly_downloads	233,969
unverified_packages_excluded	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

57Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

39Weak

How it's scored

9/54	Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
6.3/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 72% of commits
13.5/13.5	Contributor breadth — 88 contributors
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 20 contributing companies or organizations

Inputs used

bus_factor	1
contributors_sampled	88
top_contributor_share	0.719

Issue & PR responsiveness

73Good

How it's scored

37.3/42	Issue resolution — 89% of issues closed
24.8/30	PR acceptance — 304/368 decided PRs merged
0/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
1.5/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 3/28 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1

Inputs used

merged_prs	304
open_issues	37
closed_issues	292
prs_merged_7d	0
prs_decided_7d	0
prs_merged_30d	0
prs_decided_30d	0
issue_closed_ratio	0.888
closed_unmerged_prs	64
first_time_authors_30d	0
first_time_prs_merged_30d	0
first_time_prs_decided_30d	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

46Weak

How it's scored

30/30	Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20	Verified domain
7.5/25	Owner reach — 10 followers of explorerhq
8.1/25	Track record — 2 public repos, account ~2 yr old

Inputs used

followers	10
owner_type	Organization
is_verified	no
owner_login	explorerhq
public_repos	2
account_age_days	848

Package maintenance

79Good

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on pypi
14/35	Publish recency — latest publish 722 days ago
20/20	Version history — 68 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	django-sql-explorer
ecosystems	pypi
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	722

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

88Excellent · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

80Excellent

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 6 workflow(s)
24/24	Tests present
16/16	Linter config — ruff.toml, setup.cfg ([flake8], [isort]), tox.ini
9.6/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4	.editorconfig
0/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 0 out of 22 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	yes
has_editorconfig	yes
has_linter_config	yes
has_precommit_config	yes

Documentation

100Exceptional

How it's scored

30/30	README
25/25	Documentation directory
15/15	Documentation / homepage site — https://www.sqlexplorer.io
10/10	Repository description
10/10	Topics — 5 topics
10/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	sql, analytics, ai, django-application, reporting
has_wiki	yes
homepage	https://www.sqlexplorer.io
docs_site	https://www.sqlexplorer.io
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	yes
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

52Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

40Weak

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5	Branch-Protection — no data
0/2.5	CI-Tests — 0 out of 22 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0.8/7.5	Code-Review — Found 3/28 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
2.5/2.5	Contributors — project has 20 contributing companies or organizations
10/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.2/2.5	License — license file detected
0/7.5	Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
0/5	Packaging — no data
0/5	Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
3.5/5	SAST — SAST tool detected but not run on all commits
0/5	Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5	Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 52 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	15
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	3
scorecard_aggregate	4

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional

How it's scored

35/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — no indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40	No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	0
affected_packages	0
assessed_packages	13
unassessed_packages	0
affected_by_severity	none
direct_affected_packages	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the pypi:django-sql-explorer@5.3 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 13 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

53Moderate · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

31At Risk

How it's scored

0/45	Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
31.1/40	Legible commit history — 56 of 96 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	no
llms_txt_url	—
legible_history_share	0.583
agent_instruction_files	—
agent_instruction_max_bytes	—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

69Good

How it's scored

18/18	One-command bootstrap — docs/Makefile
22/22	Automated tests
11/11	Lint / format config — ruff.toml, setup.cfg ([flake8], [isort]), tox.ini
0/11	Static type checking
10/10	Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile
0/10	Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8	Automated maintenance — 4 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	yes
lockfiles	package-lock.json
has_dockerfile	yes
typed_language	no
bootstrap_files	docs/Makefile
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	yes
typecheck_configs	—
agent_commit_share	0
toolchain_manifests	—
dependency_bot_commit_share	0.04

Code legibility for models

54Moderate

How it's scored

0/45	Type-checkable code — Python without a type-check config
54.5/55	Manageable file sizes — 1/121 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	Python
largest_source_bytes	77,235
source_files_sampled	121
oversized_source_files	1

Key facts

2,874GitHub stars

88contributors

0commits, last 12 months

512days since last push

42releases

1bus factor

37open issues

npm, PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
Could not fetch npm package 'django-sql-explorer' from its registry

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 373 ⇿

0Stars

373Forks

42Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Major 1Minor 10Patch 10

Each point covers 12 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.0 / 10

4.0aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-17 19:41 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
n/a	Branch-Protection	internal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
0	CI-Tests	0 out of 22 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
1	Code-Review	Found 3/28 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
10	Contributors	project has 20 contributing companies or organizations
10	Dangerous-Workflow	no dangerous workflow patterns detected
10	Dependency-Update-Tool	update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
9	License	license file detected
0	Maintained	0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
n/a	Packaging	packaging workflow not detected
0	Pinned-Dependencies	dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
7	SAST	SAST tool detected but not run on all commits
0	Security-Policy	security policy file not detected
n/a	Signed-Releases	no releases found
0	Token-Permissions	detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0	Vulnerabilities	52 existing vulnerabilities detected

Direct dependencies 12

Registry	Package	Version constraint	Manifest
npm	@codemirror/lang-sql	`^6.5.4`	package.json
npm	@codemirror/language-data	`^6.3.1`	package.json
npm	bootstrap	`^5.0.1`	package.json
npm	bootstrap-icons	`^1.11.2`	package.json
npm	choices.js	`^10.2.0`	package.json
npm	codemirror	`^6.0.1`	package.json
npm	cookiejs	`^2.1.3`	package.json
npm	dompurify	`^3.1.3`	package.json
npm	jquery	`^3.7.1`	package.json
npm	list.js	`^2.3.1`	package.json
npm	marked	`^11.1.1`	package.json
npm	sortablejs	`^1.15.2`	package.json

All dependencies 162

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 12 direct and 150 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
npm	@codemirror/lang-sql	`6.5.4`	direct
npm	@codemirror/language-data	`6.3.1`	direct
npm	bootstrap	`5.3.2`	direct
npm	bootstrap-icons	`1.11.2`	direct
npm	choices.js	`10.2.0`	direct
npm	codemirror	`6.0.1`	direct
npm	cookiejs	`2.1.3`	direct
npm	dompurify	`3.1.3`	direct
npm	jquery	`3.7.1`	direct
npm	list.js	`2.3.1`	direct
npm	marked	`11.1.1`	direct
npm	sortablejs	`1.15.2`	direct
npm	@babel/runtime	`7.25.0`	indirect
npm	@codemirror/autocomplete	`6.11.1`	indirect
npm	@codemirror/commands	`6.3.2`	indirect
npm	@codemirror/lang-angular	`0.1.2`	indirect
npm	@codemirror/lang-cpp	`6.0.2`	indirect
npm	@codemirror/lang-css	`6.2.1`	indirect
npm	@codemirror/lang-html	`6.4.7`	indirect
npm	@codemirror/lang-java	`6.0.1`	indirect
npm	@codemirror/lang-javascript	`6.2.1`	indirect
npm	@codemirror/lang-json	`6.0.1`	indirect
npm	@codemirror/lang-less	`6.0.1`	indirect
npm	@codemirror/lang-markdown	`6.2.3`	indirect
npm	@codemirror/lang-php	`6.0.1`	indirect
npm	@codemirror/lang-python	`6.1.3`	indirect
npm	@codemirror/lang-rust	`6.0.1`	indirect
npm	@codemirror/lang-sass	`6.0.2`	indirect
npm	@codemirror/lang-vue	`0.1.2`	indirect
npm	@codemirror/lang-wast	`6.0.1`	indirect
npm	@codemirror/lang-xml	`6.0.2`	indirect
npm	@codemirror/language	`6.9.3`	indirect
npm	@codemirror/legacy-modes	`6.3.3`	indirect
npm	@codemirror/lint	`6.4.2`	indirect
npm	@codemirror/search	`6.5.5`	indirect
npm	@codemirror/state	`6.3.3`	indirect
npm	@codemirror/view	`6.22.3`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/aix-ppc64	`0.21.5`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/android-arm	`0.21.5`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/android-arm64	`0.21.5`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/android-x64	`0.21.5`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/darwin-arm64	`0.21.5`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/darwin-x64	`0.21.5`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/freebsd-arm64	`0.21.5`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/freebsd-x64	`0.21.5`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-arm	`0.21.5`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-arm64	`0.21.5`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-ia32	`0.21.5`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-loong64	`0.21.5`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-mips64el	`0.21.5`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-ppc64	`0.21.5`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-riscv64	`0.21.5`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-s390x	`0.21.5`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-x64	`0.21.5`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/netbsd-x64	`0.21.5`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/openbsd-x64	`0.21.5`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/sunos-x64	`0.21.5`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/win32-arm64	`0.21.5`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/win32-ia32	`0.21.5`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/win32-x64	`0.21.5`	indirect
npm	@lezer/common	`1.1.2`	indirect
npm	@lezer/cpp	`1.1.1`	indirect
npm	@lezer/css	`1.1.4`	indirect
npm	@lezer/highlight	`1.2.0`	indirect
npm	@lezer/html	`1.3.7`	indirect
npm	@lezer/java	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	@lezer/javascript	`1.4.11`	indirect
npm	@lezer/json	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	@lezer/lr	`1.3.14`	indirect
npm	@lezer/markdown	`1.2.0`	indirect
npm	@lezer/php	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	@lezer/python	`1.1.9`	indirect
npm	@lezer/rust	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	@lezer/sass	`1.0.3`	indirect
npm	@lezer/xml	`1.0.3`	indirect
npm	@nodelib/fs.scandir	`2.1.5`	indirect
npm	@nodelib/fs.stat	`2.0.5`	indirect
npm	@nodelib/fs.walk	`1.2.8`	indirect
npm	@popperjs/core	`2.11.8`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-android-arm-eabi	`4.21.3`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-android-arm64	`4.21.3`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-darwin-arm64	`4.21.3`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-darwin-x64	`4.21.3`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-arm-gnueabihf	`4.21.3`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-arm-musleabihf	`4.21.3`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-arm64-gnu	`4.21.3`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-arm64-musl	`4.21.3`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-powerpc64le-gnu	`4.21.3`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-riscv64-gnu	`4.21.3`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-s390x-gnu	`4.21.3`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-x64-gnu	`4.21.3`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-x64-musl	`4.21.3`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-win32-arm64-msvc	`4.21.3`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-win32-ia32-msvc	`4.21.3`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-win32-x64-msvc	`4.21.3`	indirect
npm	@types/estree	`1.0.5`	indirect
npm	anymatch	`3.1.3`	indirect
npm	binary-extensions	`2.2.0`	indirect
npm	braces	`3.0.3`	indirect
npm	chokidar	`3.5.3`	indirect
npm	crelt	`1.0.6`	indirect
npm	deepmerge	`4.3.1`	indirect
npm	esbuild	`0.21.5`	indirect
npm	fast-glob	`3.3.2`	indirect
npm	fastq	`1.17.1`	indirect
npm	fill-range	`7.1.1`	indirect
npm	fs-extra	`11.2.0`	indirect
npm	fsevents	`2.3.3`	indirect
npm	fuse.js	`6.6.2`	indirect
npm	glob-parent	`5.1.2`	indirect
npm	graceful-fs	`4.2.11`	indirect
npm	immutable	`4.3.4`	indirect
npm	is-binary-path	`2.1.0`	indirect
npm	is-extglob	`2.1.1`	indirect
npm	is-glob	`4.0.3`	indirect
npm	is-number	`7.0.0`	indirect
npm	jsonfile	`6.1.0`	indirect
npm	merge2	`1.4.1`	indirect
npm	micromatch	`4.0.7`	indirect
npm	nanoid	`3.3.7`	indirect
npm	normalize-path	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	picocolors	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	picomatch	`2.3.1`	indirect
npm	postcss	`8.4.47`	indirect
npm	queue-microtask	`1.2.3`	indirect
npm	readdirp	`3.6.0`	indirect
npm	redux	`4.2.1`	indirect
npm	regenerator-runtime	`0.14.1`	indirect
npm	reusify	`1.0.4`	indirect
npm	rollup	`4.21.3`	indirect
npm	run-parallel	`1.2.0`	indirect
npm	sass	`1.69.5`	indirect
npm	source-map-js	`1.2.1`	indirect
npm	string-natural-compare	`2.0.3`	indirect
npm	style-mod	`4.1.0`	indirect
npm	to-regex-range	`5.0.1`	indirect
npm	universalify	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	vite	`5.4.6`	indirect
npm	vite-plugin-copy	`0.1.6`	indirect
npm	vite-plugin-static-copy	`1.0.5`	indirect
npm	w3c-keyname	`2.2.8`	indirect
PyPI	boto3	`—`	indirect
PyPI	celery	`—`	indirect
PyPI	coverage	`—`	indirect
PyPI	cryptography	`—`	indirect
PyPI	django	`—`	indirect
PyPI	django-cryptography-django5	`2.2`	indirect
PyPI	django-sql-explorer	`—`	indirect
PyPI	factory-boy	`—`	indirect
PyPI	furo	`—`	indirect
PyPI	importlib-metadata	`—`	indirect
PyPI	matplotlib	`—`	indirect
PyPI	openai	`—`	indirect
PyPI	pandas	`—`	indirect
PyPI	python-dateutil	`—`	indirect
PyPI	redis	`—`	indirect
PyPI	requests	`—`	indirect
PyPI	sphinx	`—`	indirect
PyPI	sphinx-copybutton	`—`	indirect
PyPI	sphinxext-opengraph	`—`	indirect
PyPI	sqlparse	`—`	indirect
PyPI	xlsxwriter	`—`	indirect

Dependency advisories 0

Installing pypi:django-sql-explorer@5.3 pulls in 13 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — PyPI.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records