Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-28 10:55 UTC

fa0311 / twitter_openapi_python

Implementation of Twitter internal API (Twitter graphql API) in Python with data validation by pydantic

PythonCustom license★ 95 stars⑂ 21 forkssince Jul 2023View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryhow this is determined
#openapi#python#scraper#twitter#undocumented#unofficial#pydantic#graphql#twitter-bot

fa0311/twitter_openapi_python holds a health index of 50 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Sustainability & Governance (61/100) and lowest on Vitality (32/100). It was last updated 99 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

50
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

50
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 50 is calibrated to 50 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

ふぁPersonal account
405 followers283 public repossince Dec 2017

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
PyPItwitter_openapi_python0.0.441,3534199 days agoopenapiopenapi-generatortwitter-openapi
PyPItwitter_openapi_python_generated0.0.341,3453499 days agoopenapiopenapi-generatortwitter-openapi

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

32At Risk · 21% of overall

Development activity

24At Risk
How it's scored
9.9/36Push recency — last push 99 days ago
2.1/36Commit cadence — 3/52 weeks with commits
10/18Commit volume — 12 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — no data
Inputs used
commits_last_year12
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push99
active_weeks_last_year3

Release discipline

44Weak
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 2 releases published
0/36Release recency — latest release 927 days ago
12.6/27Release cadence — a release every ~187.2 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count2
latest_release_tagv0.0.14
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release927
mean_days_between_releases187.2

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

47Weak · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

44Weak
How it's scored
32/60Stars — 95 stars
10.8/25Forks — 21 forks
1.7/15Watchers — 3 watchers
Inputs used
forks21
stars95
watchers3
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

44Weak
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
16.9/22.5License — license file present, not a recognized license
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

57Moderate
How it's scored
45.7/80Monthly downloads — 2,698 downloads/month across pypi
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagestwitter_openapi_python, twitter_openapi_python_generated
dependents—
ecosystemspypi
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads2,698
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

61Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

16Critical
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0.3/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 99% of commits
5.4/13.5Contributor breadth — 4 contributors
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — no data
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled4
top_contributor_share0.987

Issue & PR responsiveness

76Good
How it's scored
28/42Issue resolution — 67% of issues closed
26.6/30PR acceptance — 31/35 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — no data
Inputs used
merged_prs31
open_issues6
closed_issues12
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio0.667
closed_unmerged_prs4
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

67Good
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
18.8/25Owner reach — 405 followers of fa0311
25/25Track record — 283 public repos, account ~8 yr old
Inputs used
followers405
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_loginfa0311
public_repos283
account_age_days3,165
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 2 package(s) on pypi
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 99 days ago
20/20Version history — 41 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagestwitter_openapi_python, twitter_openapi_python_generated
ecosystemspypi
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish99

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

60Moderate · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

50Moderate
How it's scored
0/24CI workflows
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — tox.ini, twitter_openapi_python/pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff], [tool.pylint]), twitter_openapi_python_generated/pyproject.toml ([tool.pylint]), twitter_openapi_python_generated/setup.cfg ([flake8])
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — no data
Inputs used
has_cino
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

75Good
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://pypi.org/project/twitter-openapi-python/
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 9 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsopenapi, python, scraper, twitter, undocumented, unofficial, pydantic, graphql, twitter-bot
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://pypi.org/project/twitter-openapi-python/
docs_sitehttps://pypi.org/project/twitter-openapi-python/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

46Weak · 16% of overall

Security posture

33At Risk
How it's scored
0/30Security policy (SECURITY.md)
25/25Dependabot config
0/25Dependency lockfiles — published library — lockfiles are an application concern, not expected
0/20CodeQL workflow
Inputs used
sourcefile_signals
lockfiles—
manifestsexample/pyproject.toml, example/requirements.txt, twitter_openapi_python/pyproject.toml, twitter_openapi_python/requirements.txt, twitter_openapi_python/setup.py, twitter_openapi_python_generated/pyproject.toml, twitter_openapi_python_generated/requirements.txt, twitter_openapi_python_generated/setup.cfg, twitter_openapi_python_generated/setup.py
has_codeql_workflowno
has_security_policyno
has_dependabot_configyes
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Dependency lockfiles. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — no indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages16
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the pypi:twitter_openapi_python@0.0.44 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 16 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

53Moderate · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

14Critical
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
13.9/40Legible commit history — 26 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.26
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

54Moderate
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — tox.ini, twitter_openapi_python/pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff], [tool.pylint]), twitter_openapi_python_generated/pyproject.toml ([tool.pylint]), twitter_openapi_python_generated/setup.cfg ([flake8])
11/11Static type checking — twitter_openapi_python/twitter_openapi_python/py.typed, twitter_openapi_python_generated/twitter_openapi_python_generated/py.typed
0/10Reproducible environment
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
5/8Automated maintenance — dependency automation configured, none observed in the sampled commits
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles—
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configstwitter_openapi_python/twitter_openapi_python/py.typed, twitter_openapi_python_generated/twitter_openapi_python_generated/py.typed
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0

Code legibility for models

81Excellent
How it's scored
27/45Type-checkable code — Python with type-check config (twitter_openapi_python/twitter_openapi_python/py.typed, twitter_openapi_python_generated/twitter_openapi_python_generated/py.typed)
54.2/55Manageable file sizes — 11/767 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePython
largest_source_bytes179,910
source_files_sampled767
oversized_source_files11

Machine-readable interfaces

100Exceptional
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examples — example, sample
Inputs used
example_dirsexample, sample
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

95GitHub stars
4contributors
12commits, last 12 months
99days since last push
2releases
1bus factor
6open issues
PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • OpenSSF Scorecard timed out after 240s; skipping Scorecard checks

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 21 ⇿
0Stars
21Forks
1Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

048121620242112023-092025-022026-07
Major 0Minor 0Patch 1

Each point covers 3 days.

Direct dependencies 9
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
PyPIpydantic>=2.6twitter_openapi_python/pyproject.toml
PyPIrequests>=2.31.0,<3.0.0twitter_openapi_python/pyproject.toml
PyPIurllib3>= 2.1.0 < 3.0.0twitter_openapi_python/pyproject.toml
PyPIxclienttransaction>= 1.0.0 < 2.0.0twitter_openapi_python/pyproject.toml
PyPItwitter-openapi-python-generated0.0.34twitter_openapi_python/pyproject.toml
PyPIurllib3(>=2.1.0,<3.0.0)twitter_openapi_python_generated/pyproject.toml
PyPIpython-dateutil(>=2.8.2)twitter_openapi_python_generated/pyproject.toml
PyPIpydantic(>=2.11)twitter_openapi_python_generated/pyproject.toml
PyPItyping-extensions(>=4.7.1)twitter_openapi_python_generated/pyproject.toml
All dependencies 55

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 11 direct and 44 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
PyPIpydantic—direct
PyPIpydantic2.13.4direct
PyPIpython-dateutil—direct
PyPIpython-dateutil2.9.0.post0direct
PyPIrequests—direct
PyPItwitter-openapi-python-generated0.0.34direct
PyPItyping-extensions—direct
PyPItyping-extensions4.15.0direct
PyPIurllib3—direct
PyPIurllib32.6.3direct
PyPIxclienttransaction—direct
PyPIaenum—indirect
PyPIannotated-types0.7.0indirect
PyPIast-serialize0.5.0indirect
PyPIcachetools6.2.6indirect
PyPIchardet5.2.0indirect
PyPIcolorama0.4.6indirect
PyPIcoverage7.10.7indirect
PyPIdistlib0.4.0indirect
PyPIexceptiongroup1.3.1indirect
PyPIfilelock3.19.1indirect
PyPIflake8—indirect
PyPIflake87.3.0indirect
PyPIiniconfig2.1.0indirect
PyPIlibrt0.11.0indirect
PyPImccabe0.7.0indirect
PyPImypy—indirect
PyPImypy1.19.1indirect
PyPImypy-extensions1.1.0indirect
PyPIpackaging26.2indirect
PyPIpathspec1.1.1indirect
PyPIplatformdirs4.4.0indirect
PyPIpluggy1.6.0indirect
PyPIpycodestyle2.14.0indirect
PyPIpydantic-core2.46.4indirect
PyPIpyflakes3.4.0indirect
PyPIpygments2.20.0indirect
PyPIpyproject-api1.9.1indirect
PyPIpytest—indirect
PyPIpytest8.4.2indirect
PyPIpytest-cov—indirect
PyPIpytest-cov7.1.0indirect
PyPIpython-discovery1.3.1indirect
PyPIpyyaml—indirect
PyPIrich—indirect
PyPIsix1.17.0indirect
PyPItomli2.4.1indirect
PyPItomli-w1.2.0indirect
PyPItox—indirect
PyPItox4.30.3indirect
PyPItqdm—indirect
PyPItypes-python-dateutil—indirect
PyPItypes-python-dateutil2.9.0.20260124indirect
PyPItyping-inspection0.4.2indirect
PyPIvirtualenv21.3.3indirect
Dependency advisories 0

Installing pypi:twitter_openapi_python@0.0.44 pulls in 16 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with fa0311/twitter_openapi_python. Read them side by side →

99litestar-org/litestarLight, flexible and extensible ASGI framework | Built to scaleExceptional98fastapi/fastapiFastAPI framework, high performance, easy to learn, fast to code, ready for productionExceptional99pydantic/pydantic-aiAI Agent Framework, the Pydantic wayExceptional99pydantic/logfireAI observability platform for production LLM and agent systems.Exceptional99langchain-ai/langgraphBuild resilient agents.Exceptional98langchain-ai/langchainThe agent engineering platform.Exceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — PyPI.