Public recordExcellent
Software health reportschema 0.31.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-04 22:13 UTC
farion1231 / cc-switch
A cross-platform desktop All-in-One assistant for Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode, OpenClaw, Grok Build & Hermes Agent. Only official website: ccswitch.io
farion1231/cc-switch holds a health index of 90 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Vitality (99/100) and lowest on Sustainability & Governance (52/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.
90
overall / 100Software health index
Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.
90
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
Score profile
Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.
The weighted overall 76 is calibrated to 90 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).
Ownership
Jason YoungPersonal account
2,098 followers40 public repossince Nov 2018
This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.
Package ecosystems
| Registry | Package | Version | Downloads / mo | Versions | Last publish | Tags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| crates.io | cc-switchpoints to another repo — not scored | 0.3.1 | 376 | 72 | 5 days ago | apiclaudeclicodexconfigurationcommand-line-utilities |
Metrics by category
Vitality
Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?
99
Development activity
100Exceptional
How it's scored
| 36/36 | Push recency — last push 0 days ago |
| 36/36 | Commit cadence — 52/52 weeks with commits |
| 18/18 | Commit volume — 2,241 commits in the last year |
| 10/10 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 16 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10 |
Inputs used
| commits_last_year | 2,241 |
| human_commit_share | 1 |
| days_since_last_push | 0 |
| active_weeks_last_year | 52 |
Release discipline
98Exceptional
How it's scored
| 27/27 | Ships releases — 49 releases published |
| 36/36 | Release recency — latest release 4 days ago |
| 27/27 | Release cadence — a release every ~7 days |
| 8/10 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — 5 out of the last 5 releases have a total of 5 signed artifacts. |
Inputs used
| releases_count | 49 |
| latest_release_tag | v3.19.1 |
| releases_from_tags | no |
| days_since_latest_release | 4 |
| mean_days_between_releases | 7 |
Community & Adoption
Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?
95
Popularity & adoption
98Exceptional
How it's scored
| 60/60 | Stars — 124,335 stars |
| 25/25 | Forks — 8,439 forks |
| 13/15 | Watchers — 223 watchers |
Inputs used
| forks | 8,439 |
| stars | 124,335 |
| watchers | 223 |
| growth_state | unverified |
| growth_factor_pct | 100 |
| growth_unverified_reason | no_history |
Community health
92Excellent
How it's scored
| 22.5/22.5 | README |
| 22.5/22.5 | License — recognized license (MIT) |
| 18/18 | CONTRIBUTING guide |
| 13.5/13.5 | Code of conduct |
| 0/7.2 | Issue template |
| 6.3/6.3 | PR template |
Inputs used
| has_readme | yes |
| has_license | yes |
| readme_badges | 4 |
| has_contributing | yes |
| has_issue_template | no |
| has_code_of_conduct | yes |
| readme_badge_services | shields.io |
| has_pull_request_template | yes |
Sustainability & Governance
Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?
52
How it's scored
| 9/54 | Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits |
| 3.1/22.5 | Commit distribution — top contributor authored 86% of commits |
| 13.5/13.5 | Contributor breadth — 99 contributors |
| 10/10 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 8 contributing companies or organizations |
Inputs used
| bus_factor | 1 |
| contributors_sampled | 99 |
| top_contributor_share | 0.863 |
Issue & PR responsiveness
51Moderate
How it's scored
| 27.8/42 | Issue resolution — 66% of issues closed |
| 15.6/30 | PR acceptance — 418/805 decided PRs merged |
| 1.2/13 | Newcomer PR acceptance — 1/11 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d |
| 6/15 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 12/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 4 |
Inputs used
| merged_prs | 418 |
| open_issues | 1,499 |
| closed_issues | 2,933 |
| prs_merged_7d | 19 |
| prs_decided_7d | 43 |
| prs_merged_30d | 21 |
| prs_decided_30d | 55 |
| issue_closed_ratio | 0.662 |
| closed_unmerged_prs | 387 |
| first_time_authors_30d | 11 |
| first_time_prs_merged_30d | 1 |
| first_time_prs_decided_30d | 11 |
Ownership & stewardship
72Good
How it's scored
| 10/30 | Ownership backing — personal (user) account |
| 0/20 | Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts |
| 23.9/25 | Owner reach — 2,098 followers of farion1231 |
| 23.7/25 | Track record — 40 public repos, account ~7 yr old |
Inputs used
| followers | 2,098 |
| owner_type | User |
| is_verified | — |
| owner_login | farion1231 |
| public_repos | 40 |
| account_age_days | 2,823 |
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.
Engineering Quality
Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?
81
Engineering practices
68Good
How it's scored
| 24/24 | CI workflows — 6 workflow(s) |
| 24/24 | Tests present |
| 0/16 | Linter config |
| 0/9.6 | Pre-commit hooks |
| 0/6.4 | .editorconfig |
| 20/20 | OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 12 out of 12 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10 |
Inputs used
| has_ci | yes |
| has_tests | yes |
| has_editorconfig | no |
| has_linter_config | no |
| has_precommit_config | no |
Documentation
100Exceptional
How it's scored
| 30/30 | README |
| 25/25 | Documentation directory |
| 15/15 | Documentation / homepage site — https://ccswitch.io |
| 10/10 | Repository description |
| 10/10 | Topics — 20 topics |
| 10/10 | Wiki |
Inputs used
| topics | ai-tools, claude-code, desktop-app, open-source, rust, tauri, typescript, codex, mcp, provider-management, wsl-support, opencode, skills, skills-management, openclaw, openclaw-ui, hermes, hermes-agent, grok, grokbuild |
| has_wiki | yes |
| homepage | https://ccswitch.io |
| docs_site | https://ccswitch.io |
| has_readme | yes |
| has_docs_dir | yes |
| has_description | yes |
Security
Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?
58
Security posture
58Moderate
How it's scored
| 7.5/7.5 | Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo |
| 4.5/7.5 | Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches |
| 2.5/2.5 | CI-Tests — 12 out of 12 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10 |
| 0/2.5 | CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected |
| 3/7.5 | Code-Review — Found 12/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 4 |
| 2.5/2.5 | Contributors — project has 8 contributing companies or organizations |
| 10/10 | Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected |
| 7.5/7.5 | Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected |
| 0/5 | Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed |
| 2.5/2.5 | License — license file detected |
| 7.5/7.5 | Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 16 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10 |
| 0/5 | Packaging — no data |
| 0/5 | Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0 |
| 0/5 | SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0 |
| 5/5 | Security-Policy — security policy file detected |
| 6/7.5 | Signed-Releases — 5 out of the last 5 releases have a total of 5 signed artifacts. |
| 0/7.5 | Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions |
| 0/7.5 | Vulnerabilities — 70 existing vulnerabilities detected |
Inputs used
| source | openssf_scorecard |
| checks_evaluated | 17 |
| scorecard_version | v5.5.0 |
| checks_inconclusive | 1 |
| scorecard_aggregate | 5.8 |
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging. Remaining weights renormalized.
AI Readiness
How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.
65
Agent context & guidance
40Weak
How it's scored
| 0/45 | Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules |
| 0/15 | Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) |
| 40/40 | Legible commit history — 100 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body) |
Inputs used
| has_llms_txt | no |
| llms_txt_url | — |
| legible_history_share | 1 |
| agent_instruction_files | — |
| agent_instruction_max_bytes | — |
How it's scored
| 12.6/18 | One-command bootstrap — src-tauri/Cargo.toml (toolchain convention, no task runner) |
| 22/22 | Automated tests |
| 0/11 | Lint / format config |
| 11/11 | Static type checking — tsconfig.json |
| 10/10 | Reproducible environment — lockfile |
| 10/10 | Demonstrated agent practice — 5 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited |
| 5/8 | Automated maintenance — dependency automation configured, none observed in the sampled commits |
| 0/10 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0 |
Inputs used
| has_nix | no |
| has_tests | yes |
| lockfiles | Cargo.lock, pnpm-lock.yaml |
| has_dockerfile | no |
| typed_language | yes |
| bootstrap_files | — |
| has_devcontainer | no |
| has_linter_config | no |
| typecheck_configs | tsconfig.json |
| agent_commit_share | 0.05 |
| toolchain_manifests | src-tauri/Cargo.toml |
| dependency_bot_commit_share | 0 |
Code legibility for models
97Exceptional
How it's scored
| 45/45 | Type-checkable code — Rust (statically typed) |
| 52/55 | Manageable file sizes — 36/660 source files over 60KB |
Inputs used
| primary_language | Rust |
| largest_source_bytes | 282,133 |
| source_files_sampled | 660 |
| oversized_source_files | 36 |
Key facts
124,335GitHub stars
99contributors
2,241commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
49releases
1bus factor
1,499open issues
crates.io, npmpackage ecosystems
Data collection warnings
- Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
- First-time contributor figures cover 12 of 42 authors (cap 12)
- Could not fetch npm package 'cc-switch' from its registry
- crates package 'cc-switch' points at a different repository (https://github.com/Linuxdazhao/cc_auto_switch); excluded from ecosystem scoring
- GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository
More detail
Star and fork history 0 ★ / 8,439 ⇿
0Stars
8,439Forks
4Releases
When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.
Only the most recent history is shown — this repository exceeds the collection window, so the earliest history is not captured.
Major 0Minor 3Patch 1
OpenSSF Scorecard 5.8 / 10
5.8aggregate
Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).
| 10 | Binary-Artifacts | no binaries found in the repo |
| 6 | Branch-Protection | branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches |
| 10 | CI-Tests | 12 out of 12 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10 |
| 0 | CII-Best-Practices | no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected |
| 4 | Code-Review | Found 12/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 4 |
| 10 | Contributors | project has 8 contributing companies or organizations |
| 10 | Dangerous-Workflow | no dangerous workflow patterns detected |
| 10 | Dependency-Update-Tool | update tool detected |
| 0 | Fuzzing | project is not fuzzed |
| 10 | License | license file detected |
| 10 | Maintained | 30 commit(s) and 16 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10 |
| n/a | Packaging | packaging workflow not detected |
| 0 | Pinned-Dependencies | dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0 |
| 0 | SAST | SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0 |
| 10 | Security-Policy | security policy file detected |
| 8 | Signed-Releases | 5 out of the last 5 releases have a total of 5 signed artifacts. |
| 0 | Token-Permissions | detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions |
| 0 | Vulnerabilities | 70 existing vulnerabilities detected |
Direct dependencies 107
| Registry | Package | Version constraint | Manifest |
|---|---|---|---|
| npm | @codemirror/lang-javascript | ^6.2.4 | package.json |
| npm | @codemirror/lang-json | ^6.0.2 | package.json |
| npm | @codemirror/lang-markdown | ^6.5.0 | package.json |
| npm | @codemirror/lint | ^6.8.5 | package.json |
| npm | @codemirror/state | ^6.5.2 | package.json |
| npm | @codemirror/theme-one-dark | ^6.1.3 | package.json |
| npm | @codemirror/view | ^6.38.2 | package.json |
| npm | @dnd-kit/core | ^6.3.1 | package.json |
| npm | @dnd-kit/sortable | ^10.0.0 | package.json |
| npm | @dnd-kit/utilities | ^3.2.2 | package.json |
| npm | @hookform/resolvers | ^5.2.2 | package.json |
| npm | @radix-ui/react-accordion | ^1.2.12 | package.json |
| npm | @radix-ui/react-checkbox | ^1.3.3 | package.json |
| npm | @radix-ui/react-collapsible | ^1.1.12 | package.json |
| npm | @radix-ui/react-dialog | ^1.1.15 | package.json |
| npm | @radix-ui/react-dropdown-menu | ^2.1.16 | package.json |
| npm | @radix-ui/react-label | ^2.1.7 | package.json |
| npm | @radix-ui/react-popover | ^1.1.15 | package.json |
| npm | @radix-ui/react-scroll-area | ^1.2.10 | package.json |
| npm | @radix-ui/react-select | ^2.2.6 | package.json |
| npm | @radix-ui/react-slot | ^1.2.3 | package.json |
| npm | @radix-ui/react-switch | ^1.2.6 | package.json |
| npm | @radix-ui/react-tabs | ^1.1.13 | package.json |
| npm | @radix-ui/react-tooltip | ^1.2.8 | package.json |
| npm | @tanstack/react-query | ^5.90.3 | package.json |
| npm | @tanstack/react-virtual | ^3.13.23 | package.json |
| npm | @tauri-apps/api | ^2.8.0 | package.json |
| npm | @tauri-apps/plugin-dialog | ^2.4.0 | package.json |
| npm | @tauri-apps/plugin-log | 2.8.0 | package.json |
| npm | @tauri-apps/plugin-process | ^2.0.0 | package.json |
| npm | @tauri-apps/plugin-updater | ^2.0.0 | package.json |
| npm | class-variance-authority | ^0.7.1 | package.json |
| npm | clsx | ^2.1.1 | package.json |
| npm | cmdk | ^1.1.1 | package.json |
| npm | codemirror | ^6.0.2 | package.json |
| npm | flexsearch | ^0.8.212 | package.json |
| npm | framer-motion | ^12.23.25 | package.json |
| npm | i18next | ^25.5.2 | package.json |
| npm | lucide-react | ^0.542.0 | package.json |
| npm | react | ^18.2.0 | package.json |
| npm | react-dom | ^18.2.0 | package.json |
| npm | react-hook-form | ^7.65.0 | package.json |
| npm | react-i18next | ^16.0.0 | package.json |
| npm | recharts | ^3.5.1 | package.json |
| npm | smol-toml | ^1.4.2 | package.json |
| npm | sonner | ^2.0.7 | package.json |
| npm | tailwind-merge | ^3.3.1 | package.json |
| npm | zod | ^4.1.12 | package.json |
| crates.io | serde_json | 1.0 | src-tauri/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | serde | 1.0 | src-tauri/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | log | 0.4 | src-tauri/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | chrono | 0.4 | src-tauri/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | tauri | 2.8.2 | src-tauri/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | tauri-plugin-log | 2 | src-tauri/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | tauri-plugin-opener | 2 | src-tauri/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | tauri-plugin-process | 2 | src-tauri/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | tauri-plugin-updater | 2 | src-tauri/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | tauri-plugin-dialog | 2 | src-tauri/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | tauri-plugin-store | 2 | src-tauri/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | tauri-plugin-deep-link | 2 | src-tauri/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | tauri-plugin-window-state | 2 | src-tauri/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | dirs | 5.0 | src-tauri/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | toml | 0.8 | src-tauri/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | toml_edit | 0.22 | src-tauri/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | reqwest | 0.12 | src-tauri/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | arboard | 3.6 | src-tauri/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | flate2 | 1 | src-tauri/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | brotli | 7 | src-tauri/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | zstd | 0.13 | src-tauri/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | tokio | 1 | src-tauri/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | futures | 0.3 | src-tauri/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | async-stream | 0.3 | src-tauri/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | bytes | 1.5 | src-tauri/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | axum | 0.7 | src-tauri/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | tower | 0.4 | src-tauri/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | tower-http | 0.5 | src-tauri/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | hyper | 1.0 | src-tauri/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | hyper-util | 0.1 | src-tauri/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | hyper-rustls | 0.27 | src-tauri/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | http | 1 | src-tauri/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | http-body | 1 | src-tauri/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | http-body-util | 0.1 | src-tauri/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | httparse | 1 | src-tauri/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | tokio-rustls | 0.26 | src-tauri/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | rustls | 0.23 | src-tauri/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | webpki-roots | 0.26 | src-tauri/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | rustls-native-certs | 0.8 | src-tauri/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | regex | 1.10 | src-tauri/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | rquickjs | 0.8 | src-tauri/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | thiserror | 2.0 | src-tauri/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | anyhow | 1.0 | src-tauri/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | zip | 2.2 | src-tauri/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | serde_yaml | 0.9 | src-tauri/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | tempfile | 3 | src-tauri/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | url | 2.5 | src-tauri/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | auto-launch | 0.5 | src-tauri/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | once_cell | 1.21.3 | src-tauri/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | base64 | 0.22 | src-tauri/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | rusqlite | 0.31 | src-tauri/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | indexmap | 2 | src-tauri/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | rust_decimal | 1.33 | src-tauri/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | uuid | 1.11 | src-tauri/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | sha2 | 0.10 | src-tauri/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | hmac | 0.12 | src-tauri/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | json5 | 0.4 | src-tauri/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | json-five | 0.3.1 | src-tauri/Cargo.toml |
| crates.io | sys-locale | 0.3 | src-tauri/Cargo.toml |
All dependencies not collected
The resolved dependency set could not be collected for this report: GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository
Raw JSON report machine-readable
Feedback
Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.
Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.
Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.31.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.
How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — crates.io.