Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-24 16:31 UTC

fgilde / MudBlazor.Extensions

MudBlazor.Extensions from https://www.mudex.org is a small extension for MudBlazor from https://mudblazor.com

C# · JavaScript · HTMLMIT★ 328 stars⑂ 32 forkssince Oct 2021View on GitHub ↗

fgilde/MudBlazor.Extensions holds a health index of 78 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Vitality (90/100) and lowest on Sustainability & Governance (55/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

78
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

78
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 67 is calibrated to 78 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Florian GildePersonal account
31 followers58 public repossince Feb 2015

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
NuGetMudExObjectEdit.CodeGatorAdapter8.11.0-5359 days agomudblazorextensionsformgenerationobjectedit

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

90Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
20.1/36Commit cadence — 29/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 170 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year170
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year29

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 73 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 0 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~19.5 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count73
latest_release_tag9.9.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release0
mean_days_between_releases19.5
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

58Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
40.8/60Stars — 328 stars
12.4/25Forks — 32 forks
6/15Watchers — 13 watchers
Inputs used
forks32
stars328
watchers13
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges14
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_servicesgithub.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
36.7/80Total downloads — 3,388 downloads all-time across nuget
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesMudExObjectEdit.CodeGatorAdapter
dependents—
ecosystemsnuget
total_downloads3,388
monthly_downloads—
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

55Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0.1/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 100% of commits
6.8/13.5Contributor breadth — 5 contributors
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled5
top_contributor_share0.996
How it's scored
37.6/42Issue resolution — 90% of issues closed
24.9/30PR acceptance — 29/35 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs29
open_issues14
closed_issues121
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio0.896
closed_unmerged_prs6
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
10.8/25Owner reach — 31 followers of fgilde
24.9/25Track record — 58 public repos, account ~11 yr old
Inputs used
followers31
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_loginfgilde
public_repos58
account_age_days4,204
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on nuget
26/35Publish recency — latest publish 359 days ago
20/20Version history — 5 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesMudExObjectEdit.CodeGatorAdapter
ecosystemsnuget
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish359

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

72Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 4 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — no data
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.

Documentation

90Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — http://www.mudex.org
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikiyes
homepagehttp://www.mudex.org
docs_sitehttp://www.mudex.org
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

57Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
0/2.5CI-Tests — no data
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — no SAST tool detected
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated15
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive3
scorecard_aggregate4.6
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, CI-Tests, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages5
unassessed_packages56
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 5 resolved dependencies against OSV. 56 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

60Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
18.1/40Legible commit history — 34 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.34
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrap — MudBlazor.Extensions.CodeGator.Adapter/MudBlazor.Extensions.CodeGator.Adapter.csproj, MudBlazor.Extensions.Tests/MudBlazor.Extensions.Tests.csproj, MudBlazor.Extensions/MudBlazor.Extensions.csproj (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — C# (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile
6/10Demonstrated agent practice — 3 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles—
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0.03
toolchain_manifestsMudBlazor.Extensions.CodeGator.Adapter/MudBlazor.Extensions.CodeGator.Adapter.csproj, MudBlazor.Extensions.Tests/MudBlazor.Extensions.Tests.csproj, MudBlazor.Extensions/MudBlazor.Extensions.csproj, Samples/MainSample.MAUI.Moana/MainSample.MAUI.Moana.csproj, Samples/MainSample.ServerSide/MainSample.ServerSide.csproj, Samples/MainSample.WebAssembly/MainSample.WebAssembly.csproj, TryMudEx/MudBlazor.Examples.Data/MudBlazor.Examples.Data.csproj, TryMudEx/Try.Tests/Try.Tests.csproj, TryMudEx/TryMudEx.Client/TryMudEx.Client.csproj, TryMudEx/TryMudEx.Server/TryMudEx.Server.csproj
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — C# (statically typed)
52.1/55Manageable file sizes — 38/731 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageC#
largest_source_bytes4,602,226
source_files_sampled731
oversized_source_files38
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examples — examples, samples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples, samples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

328GitHub stars
5contributors
170commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
73releases
1bus factor
14open issues
NuGet, PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 32 ⇿
0Stars
32Forks
69Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

01325383222022-032024-042026-05
Major 3Minor 16Patch 49

Each point covers 4 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.6 / 10
4.6aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-24 16:31 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
n/aCI-Testsno pull request found
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTno SAST tool detected
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 32
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
NuGetMudBlazor.Extensions—MudBlazor.Extensions.CodeGator.Adapter/MudBlazor.Extensions.CodeGator.Adapter.csproj
NuGetCG.Blazor.Forms._MudBlazor—MudBlazor.Extensions.CodeGator.Adapter/MudBlazor.Extensions.CodeGator.Adapter.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.Testing—MudBlazor.Extensions.Tests/MudBlazor.Extensions.Tests.csproj
NuGetFluentAssertions—MudBlazor.Extensions.Tests/MudBlazor.Extensions.Tests.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Playwright—MudBlazor.Extensions.Tests/MudBlazor.Extensions.Tests.csproj
NuGetMoq—MudBlazor.Extensions.Tests/MudBlazor.Extensions.Tests.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk—MudBlazor.Extensions.Tests/MudBlazor.Extensions.Tests.csproj
NuGetxunit—MudBlazor.Extensions.Tests/MudBlazor.Extensions.Tests.csproj
NuGetMudBlazor.Extensions—MudBlazor.Extensions.Tests/MudBlazor.Extensions.Tests.csproj
NuGetbunit—MudBlazor.Extensions.Tests/MudBlazor.Extensions.Tests.csproj
NuGetxunit.runner.visualstudio—MudBlazor.Extensions.Tests/MudBlazor.Extensions.Tests.csproj
NuGetcoverlet.collector—MudBlazor.Extensions.Tests/MudBlazor.Extensions.Tests.csproj
NuGetMudBlazor—MudBlazor.Extensions/MudBlazor.Extensions.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Hosting.Abstractions—MudBlazor.Extensions/MudBlazor.Extensions.csproj
NuGetExcelDataReader—MudBlazor.Extensions/MudBlazor.Extensions.csproj
NuGetExcelDataReader.DataSet—MudBlazor.Extensions/MudBlazor.Extensions.csproj
NuGetAuralizeBlazor—MudBlazor.Extensions/MudBlazor.Extensions.csproj
NuGetMudBlazor.Markdown—MudBlazor.Extensions/MudBlazor.Extensions.csproj
NuGetNextended.Blazor—MudBlazor.Extensions/MudBlazor.Extensions.csproj
NuGetNextended.Core—MudBlazor.Extensions/MudBlazor.Extensions.csproj
NuGetBlazorJS—MudBlazor.Extensions/MudBlazor.Extensions.csproj
NuGetOneOf—MudBlazor.Extensions/MudBlazor.Extensions.csproj
NuGetFluentValidation—MudBlazor.Extensions/MudBlazor.Extensions.csproj
NuGetNUglify—MudBlazor.Extensions/MudBlazor.Extensions.csproj
NuGetBlazorParameterCastingMagic—MudBlazor.Extensions/MudBlazor.Extensions.csproj
NuGetSharpCompress—MudBlazor.Extensions/MudBlazor.Extensions.csproj
NuGetSixLabors.ImageSharp—MudBlazor.Extensions/MudBlazor.Extensions.csproj
NuGetMetadataExtractor—MudBlazor.Extensions/MudBlazor.Extensions.csproj
NuGetGotho.BlazorPdf—MudBlazor.Extensions/MudBlazor.Extensions.csproj
NuGetGotho.BlazorPdf.MudBlazor—MudBlazor.Extensions/MudBlazor.Extensions.csproj
NuGetRtfPipe—MudBlazor.Extensions/MudBlazor.Extensions.csproj
NuGetMsgReader—MudBlazor.Extensions/MudBlazor.Extensions.csproj
All dependencies 61

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 31 direct and 30 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
NuGetAuralizeBlazor—direct
NuGetBlazorJS—direct
NuGetBlazorParameterCastingMagic—direct
NuGetbunit—direct
NuGetCG.Blazor.Forms._MudBlazor—direct
NuGetcoverlet.collector—direct
NuGetExcelDataReader—direct
NuGetExcelDataReader.DataSet—direct
NuGetFluentAssertions—direct
NuGetFluentValidation—direct
NuGetGotho.BlazorPdf—direct
NuGetGotho.BlazorPdf.MudBlazor—direct
NuGetMetadataExtractor—direct
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.Testing—direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Hosting.Abstractions—direct
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk—direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Playwright—direct
NuGetMoq—direct
NuGetMsgReader—direct
NuGetMudBlazor—direct
NuGetMudBlazor.Extensions—direct
NuGetMudBlazor.Markdown—direct
NuGetNextended.Blazor—direct
NuGetNextended.Core—direct
NuGetNUglify—direct
NuGetOneOf—direct
NuGetRtfPipe—direct
NuGetSharpCompress—direct
NuGetSixLabors.ImageSharp—direct
NuGetxunit—direct
NuGetxunit.runner.visualstudio—direct
NuGetAKSoftware.Localization.MultiLanguages.Blazor—indirect
NuGetAzure.Identity—indirect
NuGetAzure.Storage.Blobs—indirect
NuGetBlazored.LocalStorage—indirect
NuGetBlazorMonaco—indirect
NuGetBromix.MudBlazor.MaterialDesignIcons—indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.Authentication.JwtBearer—indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.Authentication.OpenIdConnect—indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.Components.WebAssembly—indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.Components.WebAssembly.DevServer—indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.Components.WebAssembly.Server—indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.Components.WebView.Maui10.0.20indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.WebUtilities—indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Localization—indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Logging.Abstractions10.0.9indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Logging.Debug10.0.9indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Maui.Controls10.0.20indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Maui.Controls.Compatibility10.0.20indirect
NuGetNextended.CodeGen—indirect
NuGetNUnit—indirect
NuGetNUnit3TestAdapter—indirect
NuGetPlayzor.Blazor—indirect
NuGetPlayzor.Blazor.Editor—indirect
NuGetPlayzor.Core—indirect
NuGetPlayzor.Server—indirect
NuGetPlayzor.UserComponents—indirect
PyPImkdocs—indirect
PyPImkdocs-material—indirect
PyPImkdocs-material-extensions—indirect
PyPIpymdown-extensions—indirect
Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 5 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 56 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — NuGet.