Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-06 15:03 UTC

fido-alliance / iot-fdo-conformance-tools

FIDO Alliances Reference FDO Implementation and Conformance Testing

Go · CSSCustom license★ 8 stars⑂ 8 forkssince Aug 2022View on GitHub ↗

KindCommand-line toolhow this is determined

fido-alliance/iot-fdo-conformance-tools holds a health index of 26 out of 100, placing it in the At Risk band. It scores highest on Sustainability & Governance (58/100) and lowest on Vitality (19/100). It was last updated 412 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

At Risk

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 36 is calibrated to 30 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

FIDO AllianceOrganization

213 followers17 public repossince Mar 2014

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish
Go	github.com/fido-alliance/iot-fdo-conformance-tools	v0.6.0	-	8	1037 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

19Critical · 21% of overall

Development activity

1Critical

Abandonment alert

Work has arrived and nobody has attended to it

no human commit in 412 daysautomated commits excludedreleases stalledOpenSSF Scorecard reports it unmaintained

Silence alone is never the finding — a small, finished library may need no commits for years. This alert requires both: no human commit for a long time, and obligations the project is visibly not discharging. Automated commits do not count as maintenance.

How abandonment is assessed

How it's scored

0/36	Push recency — last push 412 days ago
0/36	Commit cadence — 0/52 weeks with commits
0/18	Commit volume — 0 commits in the last year
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

commits_last_year	0
human_commit_share	1
days_since_last_push	412
active_weeks_last_year	0

Release discipline

47Weak

How it's scored

27/27	Ships releases — 4 releases published
0/36	Release recency — latest release 1,037 days ago
19.8/27	Release cadence — a release every ~83.9 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.

Inputs used

releases_count	4
latest_release_tag	v0.6.0
releases_from_tags	no
days_since_latest_release	1,037
mean_days_between_releases	83.9

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

33At Risk · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

24At Risk

How it's scored

13.7/60	Stars — 8 stars
7/25	Forks — 8 forks
3.3/15	Watchers — 5 watchers

Inputs used

forks	8
stars	8
watchers	5
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

44Weak

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
16.9/22.5	License — license file present, not a recognized license
0/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
0/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	0
has_contributing	no
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	no
readme_badge_services	—
has_pull_request_template	no

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

58Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

22At Risk

How it's scored

9/54	Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
4.7/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 79% of commits
5.4/13.5	Contributor breadth — 4 contributors
3/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3

Inputs used

bus_factor	1
contributors_sampled	4
top_contributor_share	0.789

Issue & PR responsiveness

82Excellent

How it's scored

39.8/42	Issue resolution — 95% of issues closed
30/30	PR acceptance — 2/2 decided PRs merged
0/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
1.5/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 2/13 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1

Inputs used

merged_prs	2
open_issues	4
closed_issues	72
prs_merged_7d	0
prs_decided_7d	0
prs_merged_30d	0
prs_decided_30d	0
issue_closed_ratio	0.947
closed_unmerged_prs	0
first_time_authors_30d	0
first_time_prs_merged_30d	0
first_time_prs_decided_30d	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

68Good

How it's scored

30/30	Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20	Verified domain
16.8/25	Owner reach — 213 followers of fido-alliance
21.1/25	Track record — 17 public repos, account ~12 yr old

Inputs used

followers	213
owner_type	Organization
is_verified	no
owner_login	fido-alliance
public_repos	17
account_age_days	4,592

Package maintenance

69Good

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on go
4/35	Publish recency — latest publish 1,037 days ago
20/20	Version history — 8 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	github.com/fido-alliance/iot-fdo-conformance-tools
ecosystems	go
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	1,037

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

40Weak · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

24At Risk

How it's scored

0/24	CI workflows
24/24	Tests present
0/16	Linter config
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4	.editorconfig
0/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 0 out of 2 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

has_ci	no
has_tests	yes
has_editorconfig	no
has_linter_config	no
has_precommit_config	no

Documentation

65Good

How it's scored

30/30	README
0/25	Documentation directory
15/15	Documentation / homepage site — https://fidoalliance.org/intro-to-fido-device-onboard/
10/10	Repository description
10/10	Topics — 2 topics
0/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	certification, conformance
has_wiki	no
homepage	https://fidoalliance.org/intro-to-fido-device-onboard/
docs_site	https://fidoalliance.org/intro-to-fido-device-onboard/
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	no
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

22At Risk · 16% of overall

Security posture

15Critical

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5	Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5	CI-Tests — 0 out of 2 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0.8/7.5	Code-Review — Found 2/13 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
0.8/2.5	Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
0/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no data
0/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.2/2.5	License — license file detected
0/7.5	Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
0/5	Packaging — no data
0/5	Pinned-Dependencies — no data
0/5	SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5	Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5	Token-Permissions — no data
0/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 88 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	14
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	4
scorecard_aggregate	1.5

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

52Moderate

How it's scored

7/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — 1 affected: golang.org/x/crypto 0.39.0 (critical 10.0)
0/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
32/40	No advisories left outstanding — 1 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 326 days ago

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	106
affected_packages	19
assessed_packages	151
unassessed_packages	0
affected_by_severity	critical 3, high 10, moderate 4, unknown 2
direct_affected_packages	1

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 151 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

56Moderate · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

17Critical

How it's scored

0/45	Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
15/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) — llms.txt served by the project website (https://fidoalliance.org/llms.txt)
2.1/40	Legible commit history — 4 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	yes
llms_txt_url	https://fidoalliance.org/llms.txt
legible_history_share	0.04
agent_instruction_files	—
agent_instruction_max_bytes	—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

68Good

How it's scored

18/18	One-command bootstrap — Makefile
22/22	Automated tests
0/11	Lint / format config
11/11	Static type checking — frontend/tsconfig.json
10/10	Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10	Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8	Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	yes
lockfiles	go.sum, package-lock.json
has_dockerfile	no
typed_language	yes
bootstrap_files	Makefile
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	no
typecheck_configs	frontend/tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share	0
toolchain_manifests	go.mod
dependency_bot_commit_share	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.

Code legibility for models

100Exceptional

How it's scored

45/45	Type-checkable code — Go (statically typed)
54.6/55	Manageable file sizes — 1/125 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	Go
largest_source_bytes	89,501
source_files_sampled	125
oversized_source_files	1

Key facts

8GitHub stars

4contributors

0commits, last 12 months

412days since last push

4releases

1bus factor

4open issues

Go, npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 8 ⇿

0Stars

8Forks

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Each point covers 3 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 1.5 / 10

1.5aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-10-06 15:03 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
0	Branch-Protection	branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0	CI-Tests	0 out of 2 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
1	Code-Review	Found 2/13 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
3	Contributors	project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
n/a	Dangerous-Workflow	no workflows found
0	Dependency-Update-Tool	no update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
9	License	license file detected
0	Maintained	0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
n/a	Packaging	packaging workflow not detected
n/a	Pinned-Dependencies	no dependencies found
0	SAST	SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0	Security-Policy	security policy file not detected
0	Signed-Releases	Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
n/a	Token-Permissions	No tokens found
0	Vulnerabilities	88 existing vulnerabilities detected

Direct dependencies 10

Registry	Package	Version constraint	Manifest
npm	svelte-spa-router	`^3.3.0`	frontend/package.json
Go	github.com/fxamacker/cbor/v2	`v2.8.0`	go.mod
Go	github.com/google/uuid	`v1.6.0`	go.mod
Go	github.com/gorilla/mux	`v1.8.1`	go.mod
Go	github.com/urfave/cli/v2	`v2.27.7`	go.mod
Go	golang.org/x/crypto	`v0.39.0`	go.mod
Go	github.com/dgraph-io/badger/v4	`v4.7.0`	go.mod
Go	github.com/drhodes/golorem	`v0.0.0-20220328165741-da82e5b29246`	go.mod
Go	github.com/fido-alliance/dhkx	`v0.3.4`	go.mod
Go	github.com/joho/godotenv	`v1.5.1`	go.mod

All dependencies 151

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 10 direct and 141 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
Go	github.com/dgraph-io/badger/v4	`4.7.0`	direct
Go	github.com/drhodes/golorem	`0.0.0-20220328165741-da82e5b29246`	direct
Go	github.com/fido-alliance/dhkx	`0.3.4`	direct
Go	github.com/fxamacker/cbor/v2	`2.8.0`	direct
Go	github.com/google/uuid	`1.6.0`	direct
Go	github.com/gorilla/mux	`1.8.1`	direct
Go	github.com/joho/godotenv	`1.5.1`	direct
Go	github.com/urfave/cli/v2	`2.27.7`	direct
Go	golang.org/x/crypto	`0.39.0`	direct
npm	svelte-spa-router	`3.3.0`	direct
Go	github.com/cespare/xxhash	`1.1.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/cespare/xxhash/v2	`2.3.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/cpuguy83/go-md2man/v2	`2.0.7`	indirect
Go	github.com/dgraph-io/ristretto	`0.2.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/dgraph-io/ristretto/v2	`2.2.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/dustin/go-humanize	`1.0.1`	indirect
Go	github.com/go-logr/logr	`1.4.3`	indirect
Go	github.com/go-logr/stdr	`1.2.2`	indirect
Go	github.com/gogo/protobuf	`1.3.2`	indirect
Go	github.com/golang/glog	`1.2.5`	indirect
Go	github.com/golang/groupcache	`0.0.0-20241129210726-2c02b8208cf8`	indirect
Go	github.com/golang/protobuf	`1.5.4`	indirect
Go	github.com/golang/snappy	`1.0.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/google/flatbuffers	`25.2.10+incompatible`	indirect
Go	github.com/klauspost/compress	`1.18.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/pkg/errors	`0.9.1`	indirect
Go	github.com/russross/blackfriday/v2	`2.1.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/x448/float16	`0.8.4`	indirect
Go	github.com/xrash/smetrics	`0.0.0-20240521201337-686a1a2994c1`	indirect
Go	go.opencensus.io	`0.24.0`	indirect
Go	go.opentelemetry.io/auto/sdk	`1.1.0`	indirect
Go	go.opentelemetry.io/otel	`1.36.0`	indirect
Go	go.opentelemetry.io/otel/metric	`1.36.0`	indirect
Go	go.opentelemetry.io/otel/trace	`1.36.0`	indirect
Go	golang.org/x/net	`0.41.0`	indirect
Go	golang.org/x/oauth2	`0.3.0`	indirect
Go	golang.org/x/sys	`0.33.0`	indirect
Go	google.golang.org/appengine	`1.6.7`	indirect
Go	google.golang.org/protobuf	`1.36.6`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/android-arm	`0.15.18`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-loong64	`0.15.18`	indirect
npm	@jridgewell/resolve-uri	`3.1.2`	indirect
npm	@jridgewell/sourcemap-codec	`1.4.15`	indirect
npm	@jridgewell/trace-mapping	`0.3.22`	indirect
npm	@nodelib/fs.scandir	`2.1.5`	indirect
npm	@nodelib/fs.stat	`2.0.5`	indirect
npm	@nodelib/fs.walk	`1.2.8`	indirect
npm	@sveltejs/vite-plugin-svelte	`1.4.0`	indirect
npm	@tsconfig/svelte	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	@types/pug	`2.0.10`	indirect
npm	@types/sass	`1.45.0`	indirect
npm	anymatch	`3.1.3`	indirect
npm	balanced-match	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	binary-extensions	`2.2.0`	indirect
npm	brace-expansion	`1.1.11`	indirect
npm	braces	`3.0.2`	indirect
npm	buffer-crc32	`0.2.13`	indirect
npm	callsites	`3.1.0`	indirect
npm	chokidar	`3.6.0`	indirect
npm	concat-map	`0.0.1`	indirect
npm	debug	`4.3.4`	indirect
npm	deepmerge	`4.3.1`	indirect
npm	detect-indent	`6.1.0`	indirect
npm	es6-promise	`3.3.1`	indirect
npm	esbuild	`0.15.18`	indirect
npm	esbuild-android-64	`0.15.18`	indirect
npm	esbuild-android-arm64	`0.15.18`	indirect
npm	esbuild-darwin-64	`0.15.18`	indirect
npm	esbuild-darwin-arm64	`0.15.18`	indirect
npm	esbuild-freebsd-64	`0.15.18`	indirect
npm	esbuild-freebsd-arm64	`0.15.18`	indirect
npm	esbuild-linux-32	`0.15.18`	indirect
npm	esbuild-linux-64	`0.15.18`	indirect
npm	esbuild-linux-arm	`0.15.18`	indirect
npm	esbuild-linux-arm64	`0.15.18`	indirect
npm	esbuild-linux-mips64le	`0.15.18`	indirect
npm	esbuild-linux-ppc64le	`0.15.18`	indirect
npm	esbuild-linux-riscv64	`0.15.18`	indirect
npm	esbuild-linux-s390x	`0.15.18`	indirect
npm	esbuild-netbsd-64	`0.15.18`	indirect
npm	esbuild-openbsd-64	`0.15.18`	indirect
npm	esbuild-sunos-64	`0.15.18`	indirect
npm	esbuild-windows-32	`0.15.18`	indirect
npm	esbuild-windows-64	`0.15.18`	indirect
npm	esbuild-windows-arm64	`0.15.18`	indirect
npm	fast-glob	`3.3.2`	indirect
npm	fastq	`1.17.1`	indirect
npm	fill-range	`7.0.1`	indirect
npm	fs.realpath	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	fsevents	`2.3.3`	indirect
npm	function-bind	`1.1.2`	indirect
npm	glob	`7.2.3`	indirect
npm	glob-parent	`5.1.2`	indirect
npm	graceful-fs	`4.2.11`	indirect
npm	hasown	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	immutable	`4.3.5`	indirect
npm	import-fresh	`3.3.0`	indirect
npm	inflight	`1.0.6`	indirect
npm	inherits	`2.0.4`	indirect
npm	is-binary-path	`2.1.0`	indirect
npm	is-core-module	`2.13.1`	indirect
npm	is-extglob	`2.1.1`	indirect
npm	is-glob	`4.0.3`	indirect
npm	is-number	`7.0.0`	indirect
npm	kleur	`4.1.5`	indirect
npm	magic-string	`0.25.9`	indirect
npm	magic-string	`0.26.7`	indirect
npm	merge2	`1.4.1`	indirect
npm	micromatch	`4.0.5`	indirect
npm	min-indent	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	minimatch	`3.1.2`	indirect
npm	minimist	`1.2.8`	indirect
npm	mkdirp	`0.5.6`	indirect
npm	mri	`1.2.0`	indirect
npm	ms	`2.1.2`	indirect
npm	nanoid	`3.3.7`	indirect
npm	normalize-path	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	once	`1.4.0`	indirect
npm	parent-module	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	path-is-absolute	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	path-parse	`1.0.7`	indirect
npm	picocolors	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	picomatch	`2.3.1`	indirect
npm	postcss	`8.4.35`	indirect
npm	queue-microtask	`1.2.3`	indirect
npm	readdirp	`3.6.0`	indirect
npm	regexparam	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	resolve	`1.22.8`	indirect
npm	resolve-from	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	reusify	`1.0.4`	indirect
npm	rimraf	`2.7.1`	indirect
npm	rollup	`2.79.1`	indirect
npm	run-parallel	`1.2.0`	indirect
npm	sade	`1.8.1`	indirect
npm	sander	`0.5.1`	indirect
npm	sass	`1.71.0`	indirect
npm	sorcery	`0.10.0`	indirect
npm	source-map-js	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	sourcemap-codec	`1.4.8`	indirect
npm	strip-indent	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	supports-preserve-symlinks-flag	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	svelte	`3.59.2`	indirect
npm	svelte-check	`2.10.3`	indirect
npm	svelte-hmr	`0.15.3`	indirect
npm	svelte-preprocess	`4.10.7`	indirect
npm	to-regex-range	`5.0.1`	indirect
npm	tslib	`2.6.2`	indirect
npm	typescript	`4.9.5`	indirect
npm	vite	`3.2.8`	indirect
npm	vitefu	`0.2.5`	indirect
npm	wrappy	`1.0.2`	indirect

Dependency advisories 19

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 151 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 19 carry known advisories, of which 1 are direct.

Package	Version	Relation	Severity	Advisories	Fixed in
golang.org/x/crypto	`0.39.0`	direct	critical	35	`0.56.0`
immutable	`4.3.5`	indirect	critical	3	`5.1.8`
rollup	`2.79.1`	indirect	critical	2	`4.59.0`
brace-expansion	`1.1.11`	indirect	high	8	`5.0.12`
braces	`3.0.2`	indirect	high	2	`3.0.3`
go.opentelemetry.io/otel	`1.36.0`	indirect	high	2	`1.41.0`
golang.org/x/oauth2	`0.3.0`	indirect	high	2	`0.27.0`
minimatch	`3.1.2`	indirect	high	3	`10.2.3`
nanoid	`3.3.7`	indirect	high	4	`5.1.16`
picomatch	`2.3.1`	indirect	high	2	`4.0.4`
postcss	`8.4.35`	indirect	high	4	`8.5.23`
source-map-js	`1.0.2`	indirect	high	1	`1.2.2`
vite	`3.2.8`	indirect	high	16	`8.0.16`
esbuild	`0.15.18`	indirect	moderate	1	`0.25.0`
golang.org/x/net	`0.41.0`	indirect	moderate	11	`1.27.0-rc.3`
micromatch	`4.0.5`	indirect	moderate	1	`4.0.8`
svelte	`3.59.2`	indirect	moderate	7	`5.55.7`
github.com/klauspost/compress	`1.18.0`	indirect	unknown	1	`1.18.7`
golang.org/x/sys	`0.33.0`	indirect	unknown	1	`0.44.0`

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Go.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records