Public record
Software health reportschema 0.31.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-19 11:54 UTC

froala / wysiwyg-editor-dotnet-sdk

.NET SDK to ease the integration of Froala WYSIWYG Editor on server side.

JavaScript · CSSMIT★ 1 star⑂ 0 forkssince Nov 2016View on GitHub ↗
KindNetwork servicehow this is determined

froala/wysiwyg-editor-dotnet-sdk holds a health index of 54 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Vitality (74/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (24/100). It was last updated today. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

54
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

54
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 53 is calibrated to 54 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

FroalaOrganization
143 followers61 public repossince Jun 2014

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

74Good · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 0 days ago
6.9/36Commit cadence10/52 weeks with commits
10/18Commit volume12 commits in the last year
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained4 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
commits_last_year12
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year10

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases45 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 0 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~38.8 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count45
latest_release_tagv5.4.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release0
mean_days_between_releases38.8
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

24At Risk · 17% of overall
How it's scored
0/60Stars1 stars
0/25Forks0 forks
0/15Watchers2 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars1
watchers2
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

67Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
25.2/54Bus factor2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
11.6/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 48% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth11 contributors
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
bus_factor2
contributors_sampled11
top_contributor_share0.483
How it's scored
35.5/42Issue resolution85% of issues closed
18.9/30PR acceptance22/35 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
1.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 5/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
Inputs used
merged_prs22
open_issues2
closed_issues11
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio0.846
closed_unmerged_prs13
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domainverified-domain status not read for this organization
15.5/25Owner reach143 followers of froala
25/25Track record61 public repos, account ~12 yr old
Inputs used
followers143
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified
owner_loginfroala
public_repos61
account_age_days4,439
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

61Moderate · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows2 workflow(s)
0/24Tests present
16/16Linter config.eslintrc.json
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
12/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests3 out of 5 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsno
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://www.froala.com/wysiwyg-editor
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics6 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsfroala-editor, wysiwyg, wysiwyg-dotnet, wysiwyg-editor, wysiwyg-html-editor, rich-text-editor
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://www.froala.com/wysiwyg-editor
docs_sitehttps://www.froala.com/wysiwyg-editor
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

35Weak · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
4.5/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
1.5/2.5CI-Tests3 out of 5 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 6
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0.8/7.5Code-ReviewFound 5/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
0.8/2.5Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
2.2/7.5Maintained4 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 3
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities164 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate3.2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
8/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories4 affected: Magick.NET-Q16-AnyCPU 7.10.2 (high 8.6), Magick.NET-Q16-AnyCPU 7.11.0 (high 8.6), Newtonsoft.Json 12.0.1 (unknown), +1 more
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
28/40No advisories left outstanding2 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 358 days ago
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories328
affected_packages4
assessed_packages49
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severityhigh 2, unknown 2
direct_affected_packages4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 49 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

29At Risk · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
11.3/40Legible commit history19 of 90 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.211
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrapdemo-core/demo-core.csproj, demo/demo.csproj, src/src.csproj (toolchain convention, no task runner)
0/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config.eslintrc.json
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environmentDockerfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 90
0/8Automated maintenanceno automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsno
lockfiles
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsdemo-core/demo-core.csproj, demo/demo.csproj, src/src.csproj
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable codeJavaScript without a type-check config
53.6/55Manageable file sizes8/320 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageJavaScript
largest_source_bytes533,149
source_files_sampled320
oversized_source_files8

Key facts

1GitHub stars
11contributors
12commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
45releases
2bus factor
2open issues
NuGetpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • Could not fetch nuget package 'src' from its registry
  • Could not fetch nuget package 'demo-core' from its registry
  • Advisory severity resolved for 120 of 164 advisories (lookup cap); the remainder are reported as unknown severity

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 3.2 / 10
3.2aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-19 11:53 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
6Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
6CI-Tests3 out of 5 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 6
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
1Code-ReviewFound 5/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
3Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
3Maintained4 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 3
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities164 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 23
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.Diagnostics2.2.0demo-core/demo-core.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.Mvc2.2.0demo-core/demo-core.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.Routing2.2.0demo-core/demo-core.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.Server.IISIntegration2.2.1demo-core/demo-core.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.Server.Kestrel2.2.0demo-core/demo-core.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.StaticFiles2.2.0demo-core/demo-core.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Configuration.EnvironmentVariables3.0.0-preview.19074.2demo-core/demo-core.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Configuration.Json3.0.0-preview.19074.2demo-core/demo-core.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Configuration.CommandLine3.0.0-preview.19074.2demo-core/demo-core.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Logging3.0.0-preview.19074.2demo-core/demo-core.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Logging.Console3.0.0-preview.19074.2demo-core/demo-core.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Logging.Debug3.0.0-preview.19074.2demo-core/demo-core.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Options.ConfigurationExtensions3.0.0-preview.19074.2demo-core/demo-core.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.VisualStudio.Web.BrowserLink2.2.0demo-core/demo-core.csproj
NuGetSystem.Web.Http4.0.0demo-core/demo-core.csproj
NuGetMagick.NET-Q16-AnyCPU7.10.2src/src.csproj
NuGetMagick.NET.Core-Q167.0.3.502src/src.csproj
NuGetNewtonsoft.Json9.0.1src/src.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.WebUtilities2.2.0src/src.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.Http2.2.0src/src.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.StaticFiles2.2.0src/src.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.Hosting2.2.0src/src.csproj
NuGetNewtonsoft.Json12.0.1src/src.csproj
All dependencies 49

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 24 direct and 25 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
NuGetMagick.NET-Q16-AnyCPU7.10.2direct
NuGetMagick.NET-Q16-AnyCPU7.11.0direct
NuGetMagick.NET.Core-Q167.0.3.502direct
NuGetMagick.NET.Core-Q167.10.2direct
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.Diagnostics2.2.0direct
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.Hosting2.2.0direct
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.Http2.2.0direct
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.Mvc2.2.0direct
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.Routing2.2.0direct
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.Server.IISIntegration2.2.1direct
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.Server.Kestrel2.2.0direct
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.StaticFiles2.2.0direct
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.WebUtilities2.2.0direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Configuration.CommandLine3.0.0-preview.19074.2direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Configuration.EnvironmentVariables3.0.0-preview.19074.2direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Configuration.Json3.0.0-preview.19074.2direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Logging3.0.0-preview.19074.2direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Logging.Console3.0.0-preview.19074.2direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Logging.Debug3.0.0-preview.19074.2direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.Options.ConfigurationExtensions3.0.0-preview.19074.2direct
NuGetMicrosoft.VisualStudio.Web.BrowserLink2.2.0direct
NuGetNewtonsoft.Json12.0.1direct
NuGetNewtonsoft.Json9.0.1direct
NuGetSystem.Web.Http4.0.0direct
NuGetAntlr3.5.0.2indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNet.Mvc5.2.7indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNet.Razor3.2.7indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNet.Web.Optimization1.1.3indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNet.WebApi5.2.7indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNet.WebApi.Client5.2.7indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNet.WebApi.Core5.2.7indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNet.WebApi.HelpPage5.2.7indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNet.WebApi.WebHost5.2.7indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNet.WebPages3.2.7indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeDom.Providers.DotNetCompilerPlatform2.0.1indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeDom.Providers.DotNetCompilerPlatform.BinFix1.0.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Web.Infrastructure1.0.0.0indirect
NuGetModernizr2.8.3indirect
NuGetNETStandard.Library2.2.0indirect
NuGetRespond1.4.2indirect
NuGetRouteMagic1.1.0indirect
NuGetSystem.IO4.3.0indirect
NuGetSystem.Net.Http4.3.4indirect
NuGetSystem.Runtime4.3.0indirect
NuGetSystem.Security.Cryptography.Algorithms4.3.0indirect
NuGetSystem.Security.Cryptography.Encoding4.3.0indirect
NuGetSystem.Security.Cryptography.Primitives4.3.0indirect
NuGetSystem.Security.Cryptography.X509Certificates4.3.0indirect
NuGetWebGrease1.6.0indirect
Dependency advisories 4

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 49 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 4 carry known advisories, of which 4 are direct.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
Magick.NET-Q16-AnyCPU7.10.2directhigh16314.15.0
Magick.NET-Q16-AnyCPU7.11.0directhigh16314.15.0
Newtonsoft.Json12.0.1directunknown1
Newtonsoft.Json9.0.1directunknown1

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.31.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics.