Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-09 06:16 UTC

front-matter / commonmeta-py

Documentation

PythonMIT★ 19 stars⑂ 8 forkssince Nov 2022View on GitHub ↗

KindCommand-line toolLibraryhow this is determined

#bibtex #citeproc #doi #metadata #python

front-matter/commonmeta-py holds a health index of 67 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (84/100) and lowest on Security (41/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 61 is calibrated to 67 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Front MatterOrganization

11 followers137 public repossince Feb 2021

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish	Tags
PyPI	commonmeta-py	0.305	-	338	0 days ago	bibtex commonmeta crossref csl datacite inveniordm metadata openalex schemaorg science

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

72Good · 21% of overall

Development activity

86Excellent

How it's scored

36/36	Push recency — last push 0 days ago
21.5/36	Commit cadence — 31/52 weeks with commits
18/18	Commit volume — 250 commits in the last year
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

commits_last_year	250
human_commit_share	1
days_since_last_push	0
active_weeks_last_year	31

Release discipline

52Moderate

How it's scored

27/27	Ships releases — 6 releases published
7.2/36	Release recency — latest release 469 days ago
12.6/27	Release cadence — a release every ~124.4 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data

Inputs used

releases_count	6
latest_release_tag	0.113
releases_from_tags	no
days_since_latest_release	469
mean_days_between_releases	124.4

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

52Moderate · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

27At Risk

How it's scored

20.4/60	Stars — 19 stars
7/25	Forks — 8 forks
0/15	Watchers — 2 watchers

Inputs used

forks	8
stars	19
watchers	2
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

80Excellent

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5	Code of conduct
7.2/7.2	Issue template
6.3/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	6
has_contributing	no
has_issue_template	yes
has_code_of_conduct	yes
readme_badge_services	github.com, shields.io, sonarcloud.io
has_pull_request_template	yes

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

53Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

24At Risk

How it's scored

9/54	Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0.1/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 100% of commits
5.4/13.5	Contributor breadth — 4 contributors
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 6 contributing companies or organizations

Inputs used

bus_factor	1
contributors_sampled	4
top_contributor_share	0.997

Issue & PR responsiveness

42Weak

How it's scored

26.9/42	Issue resolution — 64% of issues closed
10/30	PR acceptance — 31/93 decided PRs merged
0/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

merged_prs	31
open_issues	9
closed_issues	16
prs_merged_7d	0
prs_decided_7d	0
prs_merged_30d	0
prs_decided_30d	0
issue_closed_ratio	0.64
closed_unmerged_prs	62
first_time_authors_30d	0
first_time_prs_merged_30d	0
first_time_prs_decided_30d	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

62Moderate

How it's scored

30/30	Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20	Verified domain
7.8/25	Owner reach — 11 followers of front-matter
24.2/25	Track record — 137 public repos, account ~5 yr old

Inputs used

followers	11
owner_type	Organization
is_verified	no
owner_login	front-matter
public_repos	137
account_age_days	2,043

Package maintenance

100Exceptional

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on pypi
35/35	Publish recency — latest publish 0 days ago
20/20	Version history — 338 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	commonmeta-py
ecosystems	pypi
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	0

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

84Excellent · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

80Excellent

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 2 workflow(s)
24/24	Tests present
16/16	Linter config — .pylintrc, pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff])
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4	.editorconfig
0/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — no data

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	yes
has_editorconfig	no
has_linter_config	yes
has_precommit_config	no

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.

Documentation

90Excellent

How it's scored

30/30	README
25/25	Documentation directory
15/15	Documentation / homepage site — https://python.commonmeta.org
10/10	Repository description
10/10	Topics — 5 topics
0/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	bibtex, citeproc, doi, metadata, python
has_wiki	no
homepage	https://python.commonmeta.org
docs_site	https://python.commonmeta.org
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	yes
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

41Weak · 16% of overall

Security posture

42Weak

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5	Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5	CI-Tests — no data
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5	Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5	Contributors — project has 6 contributing companies or organizations
10/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5	License — license file detected
7.5/7.5	Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5	Packaging — no data
0/5	Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5	SAST — no SAST tool detected
0/5	Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5	Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 34 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	15
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	3
scorecard_aggregate	4.2

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): CI-Tests, Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

39Weak

How it's scored

6.3/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — 4 affected: pillow 11.3.0 (critical 9.1), click 8.1.8 (high 7.2), orjson 3.11.5 (high 7.5), +1 more
0/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
23.1/40	No advisories left outstanding — 4 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 229 days ago

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	62
affected_packages	11
assessed_packages	271
unassessed_packages	0
affected_by_severity	critical 2, high 4, moderate 5
direct_affected_packages	4

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 271 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

54Moderate · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

40Weak

How it's scored

0/45	Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40	Legible commit history — 98 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	no
llms_txt_url	—
legible_history_share	0.98
agent_instruction_files	—
agent_instruction_max_bytes	—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

48Weak

How it's scored

0/18	One-command bootstrap
22/22	Automated tests
11/11	Lint / format config — .pylintrc, pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff])
0/11	Static type checking
10/10	Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10	Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
5/8	Automated maintenance — dependency automation configured, none observed in the sampled commits
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	yes
lockfiles	uv.lock
has_dockerfile	no
typed_language	no
bootstrap_files	—
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	yes
typecheck_configs	—
agent_commit_share	0
toolchain_manifests	—
dependency_bot_commit_share	0

Code legibility for models

51Moderate

How it's scored

0/45	Type-checkable code — Python without a type-check config
50.6/55	Manageable file sizes — 8/100 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	Python
largest_source_bytes	374,484
source_files_sampled	100
oversized_source_files	8

Machine-readable interfaces

100Exceptional

How it's scored

0/40	API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20	MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40	Runnable examples — notebooks

Inputs used

example_dirs	notebooks
has_mcp_signal	no
api_schema_files	—
interfaces_expected_of	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

19GitHub stars

4contributors

250commits, last 12 months

0days since last push

6releases

1bus factor

9open issues

PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
pypi download statistics for 'commonmeta-py' unavailable this scan (stats endpoint failed after retries); adoption may be under-evidenced
deps.dev does not index pypi:commonmeta-py@0.305; advisories assessed against the repository dependency graph instead

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 8 ⇿

0Stars

8Forks

6Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Major 0Minor 1Patch 1

Each point covers 4 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.2 / 10

4.2aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-09 06:15 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
0	Branch-Protection	branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
n/a	CI-Tests	no pull request found
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0	Code-Review	Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10	Contributors	project has 6 contributing companies or organizations
10	Dangerous-Workflow	no dangerous workflow patterns detected
10	Dependency-Update-Tool	update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
10	License	license file detected
10	Maintained	30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/a	Packaging	packaging workflow not detected
0	Pinned-Dependencies	dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0	SAST	no SAST tool detected
0	Security-Policy	security policy file not detected
n/a	Signed-Releases	no releases found
0	Token-Permissions	detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0	Vulnerabilities	34 existing vulnerabilities detected

Direct dependencies 35

Registry	Package	Version constraint	Manifest
PyPI	commonmeta-schema	`==1.0rc31`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	dateparser	`>=1.1.7,<2`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	PyYAML	`>=5.4`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	babel	`>=2.12,<3`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	beautifulsoup4	`>=4.11,<5`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	pikepdf	`>=9,<11`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	bibtexparser	`~=1.4`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	citeproc-py-styles	`>=0.1.2,<1`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	citeproc-py	`>=0.10.7,<1`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	jsonschema	`~=4.21`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	base32_lib	`~=1.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	datacite	`>=1.1.1,<2`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	xmltodict	`>=0.12,<0.20`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	nameparser	`>=1.1.1,<2`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	pycountry	`>=22.3.5`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	click	`>=8.1.7,<9`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	furl	`>=2.1.3,<3`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	lxml	`>=4.8`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	python-dateutil	`>=2.8.2,<3`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	nh3	`>=0.2.14,<0.3`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	pyjwt	`>=2.8.0,<3`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	orjson	`>=3.9.14,<4`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	orjsonl	`>=1.0.0,<2`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	edtf	`>=5.0.0,<6`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	requests	`>=2.32.3`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	requests-toolbelt	`>=1.0.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	psycopg	`>=3.2,<4`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	marshmallow-utils	`>=0.10.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	xmlschema	`>=2.5.1`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	isbnlib	`>=3.10.14`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	pillow	`>=11.0.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	zstandard	`>=0.22.0,<1`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	typing-extensions	`>=4.7.1,<5`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	jsonschema-rs	`>=0.47`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	weasyprint	`>=69,<70`	pyproject.toml

All dependencies 271

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 47 direct and 224 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
PyPI	babel	`2.18.0`	direct
PyPI	base32-lib	`1.1.1`	direct
PyPI	beautifulsoup4	`4.15.0`	direct
PyPI	bibtexparser	`1.4.4`	direct
PyPI	citeproc-py	`0.11.1`	direct
PyPI	citeproc-py-styles	`0.1.6`	direct
PyPI	click	`8.1.8`	direct
PyPI	click	`8.5.0`	direct
PyPI	commonmeta-schema	`1.0rc31`	direct
PyPI	datacite	`1.4.1`	direct
PyPI	dateparser	`1.2.2`	direct
PyPI	dateparser	`1.4.3`	direct
PyPI	edtf	`5.0.0`	direct
PyPI	edtf	`5.0.1`	direct
PyPI	furl	`2.1.4`	direct
PyPI	isbnlib	`3.10.14`	direct
PyPI	jsonschema	`4.25.1`	direct
PyPI	jsonschema	`4.26.0`	direct
PyPI	jsonschema-rs	`0.55.1`	direct
PyPI	lxml	`6.1.3`	direct
PyPI	marshmallow-utils	`0.15.3`	direct
PyPI	nameparser	`1.1.3`	direct
PyPI	nameparser	`1.4.0`	direct
PyPI	nh3	`0.2.22`	direct
PyPI	orjson	`3.11.5`	direct
PyPI	orjson	`3.12.0`	direct
PyPI	orjsonl	`1.0.0`	direct
PyPI	pikepdf	`10.13.0.post1`	direct
PyPI	pikepdf	`9.11.0`	direct
PyPI	pillow	`11.3.0`	direct
PyPI	pillow	`12.3.0`	direct
PyPI	psycopg	`3.2.13`	direct
PyPI	psycopg	`3.3.5`	direct
PyPI	pycountry	`24.6.1`	direct
PyPI	pycountry	`26.2.16`	direct
PyPI	pyjwt	`2.13.0`	direct
PyPI	python-dateutil	`2.9.0.post0`	direct
PyPI	pyyaml	`6.0.3`	direct
PyPI	requests	`2.32.5`	direct
PyPI	requests	`2.34.2`	direct
PyPI	requests-toolbelt	`1.0.0`	direct
PyPI	typing-extensions	`4.16.0`	direct
PyPI	weasyprint	`69.0`	direct
PyPI	xmlschema	`4.2.0`	direct
PyPI	xmlschema	`4.3.2`	direct
PyPI	xmltodict	`0.15.1`	direct
PyPI	zstandard	`0.25.0`	direct
PyPI	annotated-types	`0.7.0`	indirect
PyPI	annotated-types	`0.8.0`	indirect
PyPI	anyio	`4.12.1`	indirect
PyPI	anyio	`4.15.1`	indirect
PyPI	appnope	`1.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	argon2-cffi	`25.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	argon2-cffi-bindings	`25.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	argon2-cffi-bindings	`26.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	arrow	`1.4.0`	indirect
PyPI	asttokens	`3.0.2`	indirect
PyPI	async-lru	`2.0.5`	indirect
PyPI	async-lru	`2.3.0`	indirect
PyPI	attrs	`26.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	babel-edtf	`1.2.2`	indirect
PyPI	backports-zstd	`1.7.0`	indirect
PyPI	beartype	`0.22.9`	indirect
PyPI	black	`25.11.0`	indirect
PyPI	black	`26.5.1`	indirect
PyPI	bleach	`6.2.0`	indirect
PyPI	bleach	`6.4.0`	indirect
PyPI	brotli	`1.2.0`	indirect
PyPI	brotlicffi	`1.2.0.2`	indirect
PyPI	certifi	`2026.7.22`	indirect
PyPI	cffi	`2.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	cffi	`2.1.1`	indirect
PyPI	charset-normalizer	`3.5.1`	indirect
PyPI	colorama	`0.4.6`	indirect
PyPI	comm	`0.2.3`	indirect
PyPI	commonmeta-rs	`0.9.82`	indirect
PyPI	coverage	`7.10.7`	indirect
PyPI	coverage	`7.16.0`	indirect
PyPI	cssselect2	`0.10.1`	indirect
PyPI	debugpy	`1.8.21`	indirect
PyPI	decorator	`5.3.1`	indirect
PyPI	defusedxml	`0.7.1`	indirect
PyPI	deprecated	`1.3.1`	indirect
PyPI	elementpath	`5.0.4`	indirect
PyPI	elementpath	`5.1.4`	indirect
PyPI	exceptiongroup	`1.3.1`	indirect
PyPI	executing	`2.2.1`	indirect
PyPI	fastjsonschema	`2.21.2`	indirect
PyPI	fastjsonschema	`2.22.2`	indirect
PyPI	fonttools	`4.64.0`	indirect
PyPI	fqdn	`1.5.1`	indirect
PyPI	ftfy	`6.3.1`	indirect
PyPI	geojson	`3.2.0`	indirect
PyPI	geojson	`3.3.0`	indirect
PyPI	griffe	`1.14.0`	indirect
PyPI	griffe	`2.3.0`	indirect
PyPI	griffecli	`2.3.0`	indirect
PyPI	griffelib	`2.3.0`	indirect
PyPI	h11	`0.16.0`	indirect
PyPI	httpcore	`1.0.9`	indirect
PyPI	httpx	`0.28.1`	indirect
PyPI	idna	`3.19`	indirect
PyPI	idutils	`1.7.0`	indirect
PyPI	importlib-metadata	`8.7.1`	indirect
PyPI	importlib-metadata	`9.0.1`	indirect
PyPI	importlib-resources	`6.5.2`	indirect
PyPI	importlib-resources	`7.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	iniconfig	`2.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	iniconfig	`2.3.0`	indirect
PyPI	ipykernel	`6.31.0`	indirect
PyPI	ipykernel	`7.3.0`	indirect
PyPI	ipython	`8.18.1`	indirect
PyPI	ipython	`8.39.0`	indirect
PyPI	ipython	`9.17.1`	indirect
PyPI	ipython-pygments-lexers	`1.1.1`	indirect
PyPI	isal	`1.8.0`	indirect
PyPI	isbnlib2	`3.11.22`	indirect
PyPI	isbnlib2	`3.11.7`	indirect
PyPI	isoduration	`20.11.0`	indirect
PyPI	jedi	`0.19.2`	indirect
PyPI	jedi	`0.20.0`	indirect
PyPI	jinja2	`3.1.6`	indirect
PyPI	json5	`0.15.0`	indirect
PyPI	jsonpointer	`3.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	jsonpointer	`3.1.1`	indirect
PyPI	jsonresolver	`0.5.2`	indirect
PyPI	jsonschema-specifications	`2025.9.1`	indirect
PyPI	jupyter-builder	`1.2.3`	indirect
PyPI	jupyter-client	`8.10.0`	indirect
PyPI	jupyter-client	`8.6.3`	indirect
PyPI	jupyter-core	`5.8.1`	indirect
PyPI	jupyter-core	`5.9.1`	indirect
PyPI	jupyter-events	`0.12.1`	indirect
PyPI	jupyter-lsp	`2.3.1`	indirect
PyPI	jupyter-server	`2.18.2`	indirect
PyPI	jupyter-server	`2.21.0`	indirect
PyPI	jupyter-server-terminals	`0.5.4`	indirect
PyPI	jupyterlab	`4.5.10`	indirect
PyPI	jupyterlab	`4.6.3`	indirect
PyPI	jupyterlab-pygments	`0.3.0`	indirect
PyPI	jupyterlab-quarto	`0.2.8`	indirect
PyPI	jupyterlab-server	`2.28.0`	indirect
PyPI	lark	`1.3.1`	indirect
PyPI	markdown-it-py	`4.2.0`	indirect
PyPI	markupsafe	`3.0.3`	indirect
PyPI	marshmallow	`3.26.2`	indirect
PyPI	marshmallow-oneofschema	`3.2.0`	indirect
PyPI	matplotlib-inline	`0.2.2`	indirect
PyPI	mdurl	`0.1.2`	indirect
PyPI	mistune	`3.3.4`	indirect
PyPI	multidict	`6.7.1`	indirect
PyPI	mypy-extensions	`1.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	nbclient	`0.10.2`	indirect
PyPI	nbclient	`0.11.0`	indirect
PyPI	nbconvert	`7.17.1`	indirect
PyPI	nbformat	`5.10.4`	indirect
PyPI	nbformat	`5.11.1`	indirect
PyPI	nest-asyncio	`1.6.0`	indirect
PyPI	nest-asyncio2	`1.7.2`	indirect
PyPI	notebook-shim	`0.2.4`	indirect
PyPI	orderedmultidict	`1.0.2`	indirect
PyPI	overrides	`7.7.0`	indirect
PyPI	packaging	`26.3`	indirect
PyPI	pandocfilters	`1.5.1`	indirect
PyPI	parso	`0.8.7`	indirect
PyPI	pathspec	`1.1.1`	indirect
PyPI	pexpect	`4.9.0`	indirect
PyPI	platformdirs	`4.11.7`	indirect
PyPI	platformdirs	`4.4.0`	indirect
PyPI	pluggy	`1.6.0`	indirect
PyPI	plum-dispatch	`1.7.4`	indirect
PyPI	plum-dispatch	`2.10.1`	indirect
PyPI	prometheus-client	`0.26.0`	indirect
PyPI	prompt-toolkit	`3.0.52`	indirect
PyPI	prompt-toolkit	`3.0.53`	indirect
PyPI	propcache	`0.4.1`	indirect
PyPI	psutil	`7.2.2`	indirect
PyPI	psycopg-binary	`3.2.13`	indirect
PyPI	psycopg-binary	`3.3.5`	indirect
PyPI	ptyprocess	`0.7.0`	indirect
PyPI	pure-eval	`0.2.3`	indirect
PyPI	pycparser	`2.23`	indirect
PyPI	pycparser	`3.0`	indirect
PyPI	pydantic	`2.13.5`	indirect
PyPI	pydantic-core	`2.46.5`	indirect
PyPI	pydyf	`0.12.1`	indirect
PyPI	pygments	`2.21.0`	indirect
PyPI	pyparsing	`3.3.2`	indirect
PyPI	pyphen	`0.18.1`	indirect
PyPI	pytest	`8.4.2`	indirect
PyPI	pytest-black	`0.6.0`	indirect
PyPI	pytest-cov	`4.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	pytest-recording	`0.13.4`	indirect
PyPI	python-json-logger	`4.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	python-json-logger	`4.2.0`	indirect
PyPI	pytokens	`0.4.1`	indirect
PyPI	pytz	`2026.3.post1`	indirect
PyPI	pywin32	`312`	indirect
PyPI	pywinpty	`3.0.3`	indirect
PyPI	pywinpty	`3.0.5`	indirect
PyPI	pyzmq	`27.2.0`	indirect
PyPI	quartodoc	`0.11.1`	indirect
PyPI	referencing	`0.36.2`	indirect
PyPI	referencing	`0.37.0`	indirect
PyPI	regex	`2026.1.15`	indirect
PyPI	regex	`2026.9.3`	indirect
PyPI	rfc3339-validator	`0.1.4`	indirect
PyPI	rfc3986-validator	`0.1.1`	indirect
PyPI	rfc3987-syntax	`1.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	rich	`15.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	rpds-py	`0.27.1`	indirect
PyPI	rpds-py	`0.30.0`	indirect
PyPI	rpds-py	`2026.6.3`	indirect
PyPI	ruff	`0.16.6`	indirect
PyPI	send2trash	`2.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	setuptools	`82.0.1`	indirect
PyPI	six	`1.17.0`	indirect
PyPI	soupsieve	`2.8.4`	indirect
PyPI	soupsieve	`2.9.2`	indirect
PyPI	sphobjinv	`2.3.1.3`	indirect
PyPI	sphobjinv	`2.4`	indirect
PyPI	stack-data	`0.6.3`	indirect
PyPI	tabulate	`0.10.0`	indirect
PyPI	tabulate	`0.9.0`	indirect
PyPI	terminado	`0.18.1`	indirect
PyPI	tinycss2	`1.4.0`	indirect
PyPI	tinycss2	`1.5.1`	indirect
PyPI	tinyhtml5	`2.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	toml	`0.10.2`	indirect
PyPI	tomli	`2.4.1`	indirect
PyPI	tornado	`6.5.8`	indirect
PyPI	traitlets	`5.15.1`	indirect
PyPI	traitlets	`5.16.1`	indirect
PyPI	types-beautifulsoup4	`4.12.0.20250516`	indirect
PyPI	types-dateparser	`1.3.0.20260206`	indirect
PyPI	types-dateparser	`1.4.3.20260907`	indirect
PyPI	types-html5lib	`1.1.11.20251117`	indirect
PyPI	types-html5lib	`1.1.11.20260518`	indirect
PyPI	types-pyyaml	`6.0.12.20250915`	indirect
PyPI	types-pyyaml	`6.0.12.20260906`	indirect
PyPI	types-webencodings	`0.5.0.20251108`	indirect
PyPI	types-webencodings	`0.6.0.20260907`	indirect
PyPI	types-xmltodict	`0.15.0.20250907`	indirect
PyPI	typing-inspection	`0.4.2`	indirect
PyPI	typing-inspection	`0.4.4`	indirect
PyPI	tzdata	`2026.3`	indirect
PyPI	tzlocal	`5.3.1`	indirect
PyPI	tzlocal	`5.4.4`	indirect
PyPI	uri-template	`1.3.0`	indirect
PyPI	uritemplate	`4.2.0`	indirect
PyPI	urllib3	`1.26.20`	indirect
PyPI	urllib3	`2.7.0`	indirect
PyPI	vcrpy	`7.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	vcrpy	`8.3.0`	indirect
PyPI	watchdog	`6.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	wcwidth	`0.8.3`	indirect
PyPI	webcolors	`24.11.1`	indirect
PyPI	webcolors	`25.10.0`	indirect
PyPI	webencodings	`0.5.1`	indirect
PyPI	webencodings	`0.6.1`	indirect
PyPI	websocket-client	`1.9.0`	indirect
PyPI	websocket-client	`1.9.2`	indirect
PyPI	werkzeug	`3.1.8`	indirect
PyPI	wrapt	`2.4.0`	indirect
PyPI	xopen	`2.0.2`	indirect
PyPI	xopen	`2.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	yarl	`1.22.0`	indirect
PyPI	zipp	`3.23.1`	indirect
PyPI	zipp	`4.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	zlib-ng	`1.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	zopfli	`0.4.3`	indirect

Dependency advisories 11

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 271 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 11 carry known advisories, of which 4 are direct.

Package	Version	Relation	Severity	Advisories	Fixed in
pillow	`11.3.0`	direct	critical	36	`12.3.0`
black	`25.11.0`	indirect	critical	3	`26.3.1`
click	`8.1.8`	direct	high	1	`8.3.3`
orjson	`3.11.5`	direct	high	1	`3.11.6`
urllib3	`1.26.20`	indirect	high	10	`2.7.0`
vcrpy	`7.0.0`	indirect	high	1	`8.2.1`
requests	`2.32.5`	direct	moderate	2	`2.33.0`
bleach	`6.2.0`	indirect	moderate	2	`6.4.0`
jupyter-server	`2.18.2`	indirect	moderate	2	`2.20.0`
pytest	`8.4.2`	indirect	moderate	2	`9.0.3`
setuptools	`82.0.1`	indirect	moderate	2	`83.0.0`

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — PyPI.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records