Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-12 23:43 UTC

genmeta / dquic

An IETF quic transport protocol implemented natively using async Rust

RustApache-2.0★ 280 stars⑂ 23 forkssince Jun 2024View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryhow this is determined
#decentralized#infrastructure#network#p2p#quic

genmeta/dquic holds a health index of 91 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Vitality (97/100) and lowest on Security (62/100). It was last updated 2 days ago. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

91
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

91
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 77 is calibrated to 91 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

GenmetaOrganization
20 followers21 public repossince May 2024

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
crates.ioqudp0.7.21,3511615 days agoasyncgrogsosocketudpasynchronousnetwork-programming
crates.iodquic0.7.21,2951215 days agoasynchttp3quicasynchronousnetwork-programming
crates.ioqbase0.6.41,5011615 days agoasynchttp3quicasynchronousnetwork-programming
crates.ioqevent0.6.21,3531215 days agoasynchttp3quicasynchronousnetwork-programming
crates.ioqmacro0.5.11,222489 days agoasynchttp3quicasynchronousnetwork-programming
crates.ioh3-shim0.5.0489148 days agoasynchttp3quicasynchronousnetwork-programming
crates.ioqresolve0.8.11,249815 days agoasynchttp3quicasynchronousnetwork-programming

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

97Exceptional · 21% of overall

Development activity

95Exceptional
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 2 days ago
31.2/36Commit cadence — 45/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 298 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year298
human_commit_share0.95
days_since_last_push2
active_weeks_last_year45

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 21 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 15 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~7 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count21
latest_release_tagv0.7.2
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release15
mean_days_between_releases7
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

68Good · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

54Moderate
How it's scored
39.7/60Stars — 280 stars
11.2/25Forks — 23 forks
3.3/15Watchers — 5 watchers
Inputs used
forks23
stars280
watchers5
growth_stateorganic
growth_factor_pct100

Community health

85Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (Apache-2.0)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges6
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_servicescodecov.io, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateno

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

65Good
How it's scored
52.1/80Monthly downloads — 8,019 downloads/month across crates
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesqudp, dquic, qbase, qevent, qmacro, h3-shim, qresolve
dependents—
ecosystemscrates
total_downloads48,665
monthly_downloads8,019
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

70Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

61Moderate
How it's scored
25.2/54Bus factor — 2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
11.9/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 47% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 12 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
bus_factor2
contributors_sampled12
top_contributor_share0.473

Issue & PR responsiveness

72Good
How it's scored
31.5/42Issue resolution — 75% of issues closed
28.3/30PR acceptance — 685/726 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
3/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 3/11 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2
Inputs used
merged_prs685
open_issues6
closed_issues18
prs_merged_7d1
prs_decided_7d1
prs_merged_30d4
prs_decided_30d4
issue_closed_ratio0.75
closed_unmerged_prs41
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

54Moderate
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
9.5/25Owner reach — 20 followers of genmeta
14.4/25Track record — 21 public repos, account ~2 yr old
Inputs used
followers20
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_logingenmeta
public_repos21
account_age_days844

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 7 package(s) on crates
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 15 days ago
20/20Version history — 16 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesqudp, dquic, qbase, qevent, qmacro, h3-shim, qresolve
ecosystemscrates
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish15

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

86Excellent · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

94Exceptional
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 7 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — .rustfmt.toml
9.6/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 14 out of 14 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configyes

Documentation

75Good
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://docs.rs/qudp
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 5 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsdecentralized, infrastructure, network, p2p, quic
has_wikiyes
homepage—
docs_sitehttps://docs.rs/qudp
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

62Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

62Moderate
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 14 out of 14 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
1.5/7.5Code-Review — Found 3/11 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
2/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate6.2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

72Good · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

40Weak
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 95 of 95 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share1
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

75Good
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrap — Cargo.toml, dquic/Cargo.toml, h3-shim/Cargo.toml (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — .rustfmt.toml
11/11Static type checking — Rust (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8Automated maintenance — 5 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles—
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsCargo.toml, dquic/Cargo.toml, h3-shim/Cargo.toml, qbase/Cargo.toml, qcongestion/Cargo.toml, qconnection/Cargo.toml, qdatagram/Cargo.toml, qevent/Cargo.toml, qinterface/Cargo.toml, qmacro/Cargo.toml, qprotocol/Cargo.toml, qrecovery/Cargo.toml, qresolve/Cargo.toml, qtls/Cargo.toml, qtraversal/Cargo.toml, qudp/Cargo.toml
dependency_bot_commit_share0.05

Code legibility for models

100Exceptional
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — Rust (statically typed)
54.8/55Manageable file sizes — 1/269 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageRust
largest_source_bytes91,075
source_files_sampled269
oversized_source_files1

Machine-readable interfaces

100Exceptional
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examples — examples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

280GitHub stars
12contributors
298commits, last 12 months
2days since last push
21releases
2bus factor
6open issues
crates.iopackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • Star history carried forward from 2026-06-10: GitHub restricted the stargazers API to repository admins, so it can no longer be collected. The repository has 280 stars today.
  • Could not fetch crates package 'qtls' from its registry
  • No resolved dependencies carried a version and a supported ecosystem

More detail

Star and fork history 279 ★ / 23 ⇿
279Stars
23Forks
9Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Star history is shown as collected on 2026-06-10. GitHub restricted the stargazers API to repository administrators in July 2026, so this series can no longer be extended; the current star total above remains live.

05010015020025030027923302024-062025-062026-06
Major 0Minor 5Patch 4

Each point covers 2 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.2 / 10
6.2aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-12 23:42 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
10CI-Tests14 out of 14 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
2Code-ReviewFound 3/11 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2
10Contributorsproject has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
4Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 141
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
crates.ioarc-swap—dquic/Cargo.toml
crates.iodashmap—dquic/Cargo.toml
crates.iofutures—dquic/Cargo.toml
crates.ioqconnection—dquic/Cargo.toml
crates.ioqresolve—dquic/Cargo.toml
crates.iorustls—dquic/Cargo.toml
crates.iothiserror—dquic/Cargo.toml
crates.iotokio—dquic/Cargo.toml
crates.iotokio-util—dquic/Cargo.toml
crates.iotracing—dquic/Cargo.toml
crates.ioh3—h3-shim/Cargo.toml
crates.ioh3-datagram—h3-shim/Cargo.toml
crates.iobytes—h3-shim/Cargo.toml
crates.iofutures—h3-shim/Cargo.toml
crates.iodquic—h3-shim/Cargo.toml
crates.iotokio—h3-shim/Cargo.toml
crates.iobitflags—qbase/Cargo.toml
crates.iobytes—qbase/Cargo.toml
crates.ioderive_more—qbase/Cargo.toml
crates.ioenum_dispatch—qbase/Cargo.toml
crates.iofutures—qbase/Cargo.toml
crates.iogetset—qbase/Cargo.toml
crates.ionom—qbase/Cargo.toml
crates.ioqmacro—qbase/Cargo.toml
crates.iotracing—qbase/Cargo.toml
crates.iorand—qbase/Cargo.toml
crates.iorustls—qbase/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde—qbase/Cargo.toml
crates.iosmallvec—qbase/Cargo.toml
crates.iothiserror—qbase/Cargo.toml
crates.iotokio—qbase/Cargo.toml
crates.iothiserror—qcongestion/Cargo.toml
crates.iotracing—qcongestion/Cargo.toml
crates.ioqbase—qcongestion/Cargo.toml
crates.ioqevent—qcongestion/Cargo.toml
crates.iorand—qcongestion/Cargo.toml
crates.iotokio—qcongestion/Cargo.toml
crates.iobytes—qconnection/Cargo.toml
crates.iodashmap—qconnection/Cargo.toml
crates.ioderive_more—qconnection/Cargo.toml
crates.ioenum_dispatch—qconnection/Cargo.toml
crates.iofutures—qconnection/Cargo.toml
crates.ioqbase—qconnection/Cargo.toml
crates.ioqcongestion—qconnection/Cargo.toml
crates.ioqresolve—qconnection/Cargo.toml
crates.ioqevent—qconnection/Cargo.toml
crates.ioqrecovery—qconnection/Cargo.toml
crates.ioring—qconnection/Cargo.toml
crates.ioqtraversal—qconnection/Cargo.toml
crates.iorustls—qconnection/Cargo.toml
crates.iothiserror—qconnection/Cargo.toml
crates.iotokio—qconnection/Cargo.toml
crates.iotokio-util—qconnection/Cargo.toml
crates.iotracing—qconnection/Cargo.toml
crates.ioqinterface—qconnection/Cargo.toml
crates.iorand—qconnection/Cargo.toml
crates.iox509-parser—qconnection/Cargo.toml
crates.iobytes—qdatagram/Cargo.toml
crates.ioqbase—qdatagram/Cargo.toml
crates.iotokio—qdatagram/Cargo.toml
crates.iotracing—qdatagram/Cargo.toml
crates.iobytes—qevent/Cargo.toml
crates.ioenum_dispatch—qevent/Cargo.toml
crates.ioderive_builder—qevent/Cargo.toml
crates.ioderive_more—qevent/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde—qevent/Cargo.toml
crates.iopin-project-lite—qevent/Cargo.toml
crates.ioqbase—qevent/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_json—qevent/Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde_with—qevent/Cargo.toml
crates.iotokio—qevent/Cargo.toml
crates.iotracing—qevent/Cargo.toml
crates.iobytes—qinterface/Cargo.toml
crates.iodashmap—qinterface/Cargo.toml
crates.ioderive_more—qinterface/Cargo.toml
crates.iofutures—qinterface/Cargo.toml
crates.iohttp—qinterface/Cargo.toml
crates.ionetdev—qinterface/Cargo.toml
crates.ionetwatcher—qinterface/Cargo.toml
crates.ioparking_lot—qinterface/Cargo.toml
crates.ioqbase—qinterface/Cargo.toml
crates.ioqevent—qinterface/Cargo.toml
crates.iorustls—qinterface/Cargo.toml
crates.iotokio—qinterface/Cargo.toml
crates.iotokio-util—qinterface/Cargo.toml
crates.iothiserror—qinterface/Cargo.toml
crates.iotracing—qinterface/Cargo.toml
crates.ioproc-macro21qmacro/Cargo.toml
crates.iosyn3qmacro/Cargo.toml
crates.ioquote1qmacro/Cargo.toml
crates.iobytes—qprotocol/Cargo.toml
crates.ionom—qprotocol/Cargo.toml
crates.iodashmap—qprotocol/Cargo.toml
crates.ioqbase—qprotocol/Cargo.toml
crates.ioqudp—qprotocol/Cargo.toml
crates.iothiserror—qprotocol/Cargo.toml
crates.iotokio—qprotocol/Cargo.toml
crates.iotracing—qprotocol/Cargo.toml
crates.iobytes—qrecovery/Cargo.toml
crates.ioderive_more—qrecovery/Cargo.toml
crates.iofutures—qrecovery/Cargo.toml
crates.ioqbase—qrecovery/Cargo.toml
crates.ioqevent—qrecovery/Cargo.toml
crates.iothiserror—qrecovery/Cargo.toml
crates.iotokio—qrecovery/Cargo.toml
crates.iotracing—qrecovery/Cargo.toml
crates.iodns-lookup4qresolve/Cargo.toml
crates.iofutures—qresolve/Cargo.toml
crates.iotokio—qresolve/Cargo.toml
crates.ioqbase—qresolve/Cargo.toml
crates.iobytes—qtls/Cargo.toml
crates.ioring—qtls/Cargo.toml
crates.ioaws-lc-rs1.12qtls/Cargo.toml
crates.iorustls—qtls/Cargo.toml
crates.iothiserror—qtls/Cargo.toml
crates.iox509-parser—qtls/Cargo.toml
crates.iozeroize1.7qtls/Cargo.toml
crates.iobon—qtraversal/Cargo.toml
crates.iobytes—qtraversal/Cargo.toml
crates.iodashmap—qtraversal/Cargo.toml
crates.iofutures—qtraversal/Cargo.toml
crates.ionom—qtraversal/Cargo.toml
crates.ioqbase—qtraversal/Cargo.toml
crates.ioqresolve—qtraversal/Cargo.toml
crates.ioqevent—qtraversal/Cargo.toml
crates.ioqinterface—qtraversal/Cargo.toml
crates.iorand—qtraversal/Cargo.toml
crates.iosmallvec—qtraversal/Cargo.toml
crates.iosnafu—qtraversal/Cargo.toml
crates.iothiserror—qtraversal/Cargo.toml
crates.iotokio—qtraversal/Cargo.toml
crates.iotokio-util—qtraversal/Cargo.toml
crates.iotracing—qtraversal/Cargo.toml
crates.iobytes—qudp/Cargo.toml
crates.iocfg-if—qudp/Cargo.toml
crates.iolibc0.2qudp/Cargo.toml
crates.ioqbase—qudp/Cargo.toml
crates.iotracing—qudp/Cargo.toml
crates.iosocket2—qudp/Cargo.toml
crates.iotokio—qudp/Cargo.toml
crates.ionix0.31qudp/Cargo.toml
All dependencies 9

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 8 direct and 1 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
crates.ioaws-lc-rs—direct
crates.iodns-lookup—direct
crates.iolibc—direct
crates.ionix—direct
crates.ioproc-macro2—direct
crates.ioquote—direct
crates.iosyn—direct
crates.iozeroize—direct
crates.iowindows-sys—indirect
Dependency advisories not assessed

Advisory matching could not run for this report: No resolved dependencies carried a version and a supported ecosystem

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with genmeta/dquic. Read them side by side →

96cloudflare/pingoraA library for building fast, reliable and evolvable network services.Exceptional95actix/actix-netA collection of lower-level libraries for composable network services.Exceptional94plabayo/ramamodular service framework to move and transform network packetsExceptional98microsoft/oxidizerOxidizer is a platform for Rust service development which bridges the gaps in the crate ecosystem to deliver a turn-key solution to enable the efficient creation of high-scale high-availability and high-performance services in Rust.Exceptional98tokio-rs/tokioA runtime for writing reliable asynchronous applications with Rust. Provides I/O, networking, scheduling, timers, ...Exceptional98actix/actix-webActix Web is a powerful, pragmatic, and extremely fast web framework for Rust.Exceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — crates.io.