Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-19 17:00 UTC

getyourguide / gaql-cli

CLI and REPL for running Google Ads Query Language (GAQL) queries

PythonApache-2.0★ 31 stars⑂ 2 forkssince Apr 2020View on GitHub ↗
KindCommand-line toolLibraryhow this is determined
#cli#repl#gaql#google-ads#google

getyourguide/gaql-cli holds a health index of 65 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Vitality (78/100) and lowest on Engineering Quality (30/100). It was last updated 18 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

65
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

65
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 60 is calibrated to 65 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

GetYourGuideOrganization · verified domain
160 followers29 public repossince Mar 2013

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
PyPIgaql1.17.03112054 days agogaqlgoogle-adscli

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

78Good · 21% of overall

Development activity

68Good
How it's scored
28.8/36Push recency — last push 18 days ago
15.9/36Commit cadence — 23/52 weeks with commits
16/18Commit volume — 60 commits in the last year
7/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 9 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 7
Inputs used
commits_last_year60
human_commit_share0.56
days_since_last_push18
active_weeks_last_year23

Release discipline

92Excellent
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 8 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 54 days ago
19.8/27Release cadence — a release every ~107.5 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count8
latest_release_tagv1.17.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release54
mean_days_between_releases107.5
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

44Weak · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

34At Risk
How it's scored
24/60Stars — 31 stars
0/25Forks — 2 forks
9.6/15Watchers — 54 watchers
Inputs used
forks2
stars31
watchers54
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

57Moderate
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (Apache-2.0)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges2
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesbadge.fury.io, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateyes

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

42Weak
How it's scored
33.3/80Monthly downloads — 311 downloads/month across pypi
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesgaql
dependents—
ecosystemspypi
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads311
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

76Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

36Weak
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
10.3/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 54% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 11 contributors
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled11
top_contributor_share0.54

Issue & PR responsiveness

90Excellent
How it's scored
42/42Issue resolution — 100% of issues closed
22.6/30PR acceptance — 104/138 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — no data
Inputs used
merged_prs104
open_issues0
closed_issues1
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio1
closed_unmerged_prs34
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance, OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

89Excellent
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
20/20Verified domain
15.9/25Owner reach — 160 followers of getyourguide
22.8/25Track record — 29 public repos, account ~13 yr old
Inputs used
followers160
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedyes
owner_logingetyourguide
public_repos29
account_age_days4,946

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on pypi
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 54 days ago
20/20Version history — 20 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesgaql
ecosystemspypi
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish54

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

30At Risk · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

16Critical
How it's scored
0/24CI workflows
0/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — .flake8
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 1 out of 15 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_cino
has_testsno
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

50Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 5 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicscli, repl, gaql, google-ads, google
has_wikino
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

72Good · 16% of overall

Security posture

65Good
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
4.5/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
0/2.5CI-Tests — 1 out of 15 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — no data
0.8/2.5Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
0/10Dangerous-Workflow — no data
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
5.2/7.5Maintained — 9 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 7
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — no data
5/5SAST — SAST tool is run on all commits
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — no data
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated12
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive6
scorecard_aggregate6.5
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Code-Review, Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — no indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages29
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the pypi:gaql@1.17.0 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 29 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

48Weak · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

40Weak
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 46 of 56 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.821
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

52Moderate
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — Makefile
0/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — .flake8
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8Automated maintenance — 44 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsno
lockfilespoetry.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_filesMakefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0.44
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.

Code legibility for models

53Moderate
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable code — Python without a type-check config
52.6/55Manageable file sizes — 1/23 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePython
largest_source_bytes1,933,279
source_files_sampled23
oversized_source_files1

Key facts

31GitHub stars
11contributors
60commits, last 12 months
18days since last push
8releases
1bus factor
0open issues
PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 2 ⇿
0Stars
2Forks
7Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

111222212022-092024-062026-03
Major 0Minor 6Patch 1

Each point covers 4 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.5 / 10
6.5aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-19 17:00 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
6Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
0CI-Tests1 out of 15 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
n/aCode-ReviewFound no human activity in the last 15 changesets
3Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
7Maintained9 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 7
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
n/aPinned-Dependenciesno dependencies found
10SASTSAST tool is run on all commits
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 6
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
PyPItoml^0.10.1pyproject.toml
PyPIgoogle-ads31.2.0pyproject.toml
PyPIclick^8.0.3pyproject.toml
PyPIprompt_toolkit^3.0.22pyproject.toml
PyPIpygments^2.10.0pyproject.toml
PyPIcertifi2026.6.17pyproject.toml
All dependencies 39

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 6 direct and 33 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
PyPIcertifi2026.6.17direct
PyPIclick8.4.2direct
PyPIgoogle-ads31.2.0direct
PyPIprompt-toolkit3.0.52direct
PyPIpygments2.20.0direct
PyPItoml0.10.2direct
PyPIblack26.5.1indirect
PyPIcachetools5.5.2indirect
PyPIcharset-normalizer3.4.1indirect
PyPIcolorama0.4.6indirect
PyPIflake87.3.0indirect
PyPIgoogle-api-core2.24.2indirect
PyPIgoogle-auth2.38.0indirect
PyPIgoogle-auth-oauthlib1.2.1indirect
PyPIgoogleapis-common-protos1.69.2indirect
PyPIgrpcio1.76.0indirect
PyPIgrpcio-status1.76.0indirect
PyPIidna3.15indirect
PyPImccabe0.7.0indirect
PyPImypy-extensions1.0.0indirect
PyPIoauthlib3.2.2indirect
PyPIpackaging24.2indirect
PyPIpathspec1.0.4indirect
PyPIplatformdirs4.3.6indirect
PyPIproto-plus1.26.1indirect
PyPIprotobuf6.33.5indirect
PyPIpyasn10.6.4indirect
PyPIpyasn1-modules0.4.1indirect
PyPIpycodestyle2.14.0indirect
PyPIpyflakes3.4.0indirect
PyPIpytokens0.4.1indirect
PyPIpyyaml6.0.2indirect
PyPIrequests2.33.0indirect
PyPIrequests-oauthlib2.0.0indirect
PyPIrsa4.9indirect
PyPItomli2.2.1indirect
PyPItyping-extensions4.12.2indirect
PyPIurllib32.7.0indirect
PyPIwcwidth0.2.13indirect
Dependency advisories 0

Installing pypi:gaql@1.17.0 pulls in 29 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with getyourguide/gaql-cli. Read them side by side →

96remix-run/remixThe fully-stacked web frameworkExceptional94invertase/react-native-google-mobile-adsReact Native Google Mobile Ads enables you to monetize your app with AdMob.Exceptional100aws/aws-sam-cliCLI tool to build, test, debug, and deploy Serverless applications using AWS SAMExceptional99quantumlib/CirqPython framework for creating, editing, and running Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) circuits.Exceptional99apache/supersetApache Superset is a Data Visualization and Data Exploration PlatformExceptional98immich-app/immichHigh performance self-hosted photo and video management solution.Exceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — PyPI.