Public record
Software health reportschema 0.27.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-30 14:21 UTC

gildas / bitbucket-cli

Bitbucket CLI

GoMIT★ 55 stars⑂ 16 forkssince Dec 2023View on GitHub ↗
KindCommand-line toolhow this is determined

gildas/bitbucket-cli holds a health index of 73 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Vitality (83/100) and lowest on Engineering Quality (56/100). It was last updated 10 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

73
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

73
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 64 is calibrated to 73 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Gildas CherruelPersonal account
37 followers96 public repossince Feb 2009GENESYS

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
Gogithub.com/gildas/bitbucket-cliv0.18.4-3410 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

83Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
28.8/36Push recencylast push 10 days ago
20.8/36Commit cadence30/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume388 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained30 commit(s) and 24 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year388
human_commit_share0.99
days_since_last_push10
active_weeks_last_year30
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases28 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 10 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~18.6 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count28
latest_release_tagv0.18.4
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release10
mean_days_between_releases18.6

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

60Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
28.1/60Stars55 stars
9.8/25Forks16 forks
0/15Watchers1 watchers
Inputs used
forks16
stars55
watchers1
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

85Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

61Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0.4/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 98% of commits
9.5/13.5Contributor breadth7 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled7
top_contributor_share0.981
How it's scored
40.9/42Issue resolution97% of issues closed
20/30PR acceptance30/45 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 0/7 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs30
open_issues2
closed_issues74
prs_merged_7d
prs_decided_7d
prs_merged_30d
prs_decided_30d
issue_closed_ratio0.974
closed_unmerged_prs15
first_time_authors_30d
first_time_prs_merged_30d
first_time_prs_decided_30d
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backingpersonal (user) account
0/20Verified domainnot applicable to user accounts
11.4/25Owner reach37 followers of gildas
25/25Track record96 public repos, account ~17 yr old
Inputs used
followers37
owner_typeUser
is_verified
owner_logingildas
public_repos96
account_age_days6,368
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on go
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 10 days ago
20/20Version history34 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesgithub.com/gildas/bitbucket-cli
ecosystemsgo
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish10

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

56Moderate · 19% of overall
How it's scored
0/24CI workflows
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config.golangci.yaml
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests2 out of 2 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_cino
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

50Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics3 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsbitbucket, cli, command-line
has_wikino
homepage
docs_site
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

59Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
3.8/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests2 out of 2 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 0/7 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
0/10Dangerous-Workflowno data
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained30 commit(s) and 24 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesno data
5/5SASTSAST tool is run on all commits
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5Token-Permissionsno data
6.8/7.5Vulnerabilities1 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated14
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive4
scorecard_aggregate4.9
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories1
affected_packages1
assessed_packages90
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severityunknown 1
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 90 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

68Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
37.2/40Legible commit history69 of 99 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.697
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrapMakefile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config.golangci.yaml
11/11Static type checkingGo (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environmentlockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenanceno automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesno data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesgo.sum
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_filesMakefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsgo.mod
dependency_bot_commit_share0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeGo (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes0/232 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageGo
largest_source_bytes24,278
source_files_sampled232
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

55GitHub stars
7contributors
388commits, last 12 months
10days since last push
28releases
1bus factor
2open issues
Gopackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 16 ⇿
0Stars
16Forks
22Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

04812161612024-092025-082026-07
Major 0Minor 8Patch 14

Each point covers 2 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.9 / 10
4.9aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-30 14:21 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
5Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10CI-Tests2 out of 2 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/7 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 24 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
n/aPinned-Dependenciesno dependencies found
10SASTSAST tool is run on all commits
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
9Vulnerabilities1 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 18
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Gogithub.com/briandowns/spinnerv1.23.2go.mod
Gogithub.com/gildas/go-cachev0.2.2go.mod
Gogithub.com/gildas/go-corev0.6.4go.mod
Gogithub.com/gildas/go-errorsv0.4.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/gildas/go-flagsv0.5.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/gildas/go-loggerv1.9.8go.mod
Gogithub.com/gildas/go-requestv0.9.20go.mod
Gogithub.com/go-git/go-git/v5v5.19.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/google/uuidv1.6.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/joho/godotenvv1.5.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/kataras/tablewriterv0.0.0-20180708051242-e063d29b7c23go.mod
Gogithub.com/schollz/progressbar/v3v3.19.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/spf13/cobrav1.10.2go.mod
Gogithub.com/spf13/viperv1.21.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/stretchr/testifyv1.11.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/zalando/go-keyringv0.2.8go.mod
Gogopkg.in/ini.v1v1.67.3go.mod
Gogopkg.in/yaml.v3v3.0.1go.mod
All dependencies 90

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 18 direct and 72 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Gogithub.com/briandowns/spinnerv1.23.2direct
Gogithub.com/gildas/go-cachev0.2.2direct
Gogithub.com/gildas/go-corev0.6.4direct
Gogithub.com/gildas/go-errorsv0.4.0direct
Gogithub.com/gildas/go-flagsv0.5.0direct
Gogithub.com/gildas/go-loggerv1.9.8direct
Gogithub.com/gildas/go-requestv0.9.20direct
Gogithub.com/go-git/go-git/v5v5.19.1direct
Gogithub.com/google/uuidv1.6.0direct
Gogithub.com/joho/godotenvv1.5.1direct
Gogithub.com/kataras/tablewriterv0.0.0-20180708051242-e063d29b7c23direct
Gogithub.com/schollz/progressbar/v3v3.19.1direct
Gogithub.com/spf13/cobrav1.10.2direct
Gogithub.com/spf13/viperv1.21.0direct
Gogithub.com/stretchr/testifyv1.11.1direct
Gogithub.com/zalando/go-keyringv0.2.8direct
Gogopkg.in/ini.v1v1.67.3direct
Gogopkg.in/yaml.v3v3.0.1direct
Gocloud.google.com/gov0.123.0indirect
Gocloud.google.com/go/authv0.22.0indirect
Gocloud.google.com/go/auth/oauth2adaptv0.2.8indirect
Gocloud.google.com/go/compute/metadatav0.9.0indirect
Gocloud.google.com/go/loggingv1.19.0indirect
Gocloud.google.com/go/longrunningv1.2.0indirect
Godario.cat/mergov1.0.2indirect
Gogithub.com/cespare/xxhash/v2v2.3.0indirect
Gogithub.com/clipperhouse/uax29/v2v2.7.0indirect
Gogithub.com/cloudflare/circlv1.6.4indirect
Gogithub.com/cyphar/filepath-securejoinv0.7.0indirect
Gogithub.com/danieljoos/wincredv1.2.3indirect
Gogithub.com/davecgh/go-spewv1.1.2-0.20180830191138-d8f796af33ccindirect
Gogithub.com/emirpasic/godsv1.18.1indirect
Gogithub.com/fatih/colorv1.19.0indirect
Gogithub.com/felixge/httpsnoopv1.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/fsnotify/fsnotifyv1.10.1indirect
Gogithub.com/go-git/gcfgv1.5.1-0.20230307220236-3a3c6141e376indirect
Gogithub.com/go-git/go-billy/v5v5.9.0indirect
Gogithub.com/go-logr/logrv1.4.3indirect
Gogithub.com/go-logr/stdrv1.2.2indirect
Gogithub.com/go-viper/mapstructure/v2v2.5.0indirect
Gogithub.com/godbus/dbus/v5v5.2.2indirect
Gogithub.com/golang/groupcachev0.0.0-20241129210726-2c02b8208cf8indirect
Gogithub.com/google/s2a-gov0.1.9indirect
Gogithub.com/googleapis/enterprise-certificate-proxyv0.3.18indirect
Gogithub.com/googleapis/gax-go/v2v2.23.0indirect
Gogithub.com/inconshreveable/mousetrapv1.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/jbenet/go-contextv0.0.0-20150711004518-d14ea06fba99indirect
Gogithub.com/kevinburke/ssh_configv1.6.0indirect
Gogithub.com/klauspost/cpuid/v2v2.4.0indirect
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-colorablev0.1.15indirect
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-isattyv0.0.23indirect
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-runewidthv0.0.24indirect
Gogithub.com/microsoft/go-winiov0.6.2indirect
Gogithub.com/mitchellh/colorstringv0.0.0-20190213212951-d06e56a500dbindirect
Gogithub.com/pelletier/go-toml/v2v2.4.3indirect
Gogithub.com/pjbgf/sha1cdv0.6.0indirect
Gogithub.com/pmezard/go-difflibv1.0.1-0.20181226105442-5d4384ee4fb2indirect
Gogithub.com/protonmail/go-cryptov1.4.1indirect
Gogithub.com/rivo/unisegv0.4.7indirect
Gogithub.com/sagikazarmark/locaferov0.12.0indirect
Gogithub.com/sergi/go-diffv1.4.0indirect
Gogithub.com/skeema/knownhostsv1.3.2indirect
Gogithub.com/spf13/aferov1.15.0indirect
Gogithub.com/spf13/castv1.10.0indirect
Gogithub.com/spf13/pflagv1.0.10indirect
Gogithub.com/subosito/gotenvv1.6.0indirect
Gogithub.com/xanzy/ssh-agentv0.3.3indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/auto/sdkv1.2.1indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/contrib/instrumentation/google.golang.org/grpc/otelgrpcv0.69.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/contrib/instrumentation/net/http/otelhttpv0.69.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otelv1.44.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/metricv1.44.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/tracev1.44.0indirect
Gogo.yaml.in/yaml/v3v3.0.4indirect
Gogolang.org/x/cryptov0.54.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/expv0.0.0-20260718201538-764159d718efindirect
Gogolang.org/x/netv0.57.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/oauth2v0.36.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/syncv0.22.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/sysv0.47.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/termv0.45.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/textv0.40.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/timev0.15.0indirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/apiv0.289.0indirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/genprotov0.0.0-20260715232425-e75dac1f907dindirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/genproto/googleapis/apiv0.0.0-20260715232425-e75dac1f907dindirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/genproto/googleapis/rpcv0.0.0-20260715232425-e75dac1f907dindirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/grpcv1.82.1indirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/protobufv1.36.11indirect
Gogopkg.in/warnings.v0v0.1.2indirect
Dependency advisories 1

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 90 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 1 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
golang.org/x/cryptov0.54.0indirectunknown1

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.27.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsGo.