Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-28 01:16 UTC

git-ecosystem / git-credential-manager

Secure, cross-platform Git credential storage with authentication to GitHub, Azure Repos, and other popular Git hosting services.

C#Custom license★ 9,229 stars⑂ 2,898 forkssince Nov 2018View on GitHub ↗
KindCommand-line toolhow this is determined
#git#credential#github#azure-repos#azure-devops#authentication#aad#bitbucket#cross-platform#gitlab

git-ecosystem/git-credential-manager holds a health index of 87 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Community & Adoption (90/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (46/100). It was last updated 3 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

87
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

87
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 73 is calibrated to 87 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Git EcosystemOrganization
8,889 followers4 public repossince Apr 2020

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
NuGetgit-credential-manager2.9.1-2044 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

88Excellent · 21% of overall

Development activity

91Excellent
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 3 days ago
27/36Commit cadence — 39/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 313 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year313
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push3
active_weeks_last_year39

Release discipline

83Excellent
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 58 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 44 days ago
19.8/27Release cadence — a release every ~82.4 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count58
latest_release_tagv2.9.1
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release44
mean_days_between_releases82.4

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

90Excellent · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

99Exceptional
How it's scored
60/60Stars — 9,229 stars
25/25Forks — 2,898 forks
14/15Watchers — 337 watchers
Inputs used
forks2,898
stars9,229
watchers337
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

79Good
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
16.9/22.5License — license file present, not a recognized license
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

67Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

40Weak
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
7.7/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 66% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 80 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 15 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled80
top_contributor_share0.657

Issue & PR responsiveness

68Good
How it's scored
35.2/42Issue resolution — 84% of issues closed
22.2/30PR acceptance — 701/946 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — 0/5 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
10.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 5/7 approved changesets -- score normalized to 7
Inputs used
merged_prs701
open_issues143
closed_issues740
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d1
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d5
issue_closed_ratio0.838
closed_unmerged_prs245
first_time_authors_30d5
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d5

Ownership & stewardship

72Good
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
25/25Owner reach — 8,889 followers of git-ecosystem
17.1/25Track record — 4 public repos, account ~6 yr old
Inputs used
followers8,889
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_logingit-ecosystem
public_repos4
account_age_days2,312

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on nuget
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 44 days ago
20/20Version history — 20 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesgit-credential-manager
ecosystemsnuget
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish44

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

56Moderate · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

44Weak
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 5 workflow(s)
0/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 5 out of 5 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsno
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

75Good
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 10 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsgit, credential, github, azure-repos, azure-devops, authentication, aad, bitbucket, cross-platform, gitlab
has_wikino
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

73Good · 16% of overall

Security posture

66Good
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
3/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 5 out of 5 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
5.2/7.5Code-Review — Found 5/7 approved changesets -- score normalized to 7
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 15 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.2/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
0.5/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 1
5/5SAST — SAST tool is run on all commits
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate6.6
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages89
unassessed_packages19
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 89 resolved dependencies against OSV. 19 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

46Weak · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

40Weak
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 99 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.99
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

30At Risk
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrap — build/dntool/Dntool.Distribution.csproj, build/linux/Linux.Distribution.csproj, build/macos/Mac.Distribution.csproj (toolchain convention, no task runner)
0/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — C# (statically typed)
0/10Reproducible environment
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
5/8Automated maintenance — dependency automation configured, none observed in the sampled commits
1/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 1
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsno
lockfiles—
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsbuild/dntool/Dntool.Distribution.csproj, build/linux/Linux.Distribution.csproj, build/macos/Mac.Distribution.csproj, build/msbuild/MSBuildTasks.csproj, build/windows/Windows.Distribution.csproj, src/Atlassian.Bitbucket.Tests/Atlassian.Bitbucket.Tests.csproj, src/Atlassian.Bitbucket/Atlassian.Bitbucket.csproj, src/Core.Tests/Core.Tests.csproj, src/Core/Core.csproj, src/GitHub.Tests/GitHub.Tests.csproj, src/GitHub/GitHub.csproj, src/GitLab.Tests/GitLab.Tests.csproj, src/GitLab/GitLab.csproj, src/Microsoft.AzureRepos.Tests/Microsoft.AzureRepos.Tests.csproj, src/Microsoft.AzureRepos/Microsoft.AzureRepos.csproj, src/TestInfrastructure/TestInfrastructure.csproj, src/git-credential-manager/git-credential-manager.csproj
dependency_bot_commit_share0

Code legibility for models

100Exceptional
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — C# (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/405 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageC#
largest_source_bytes57,367
source_files_sampled405
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

9,229GitHub stars
80contributors
313commits, last 12 months
3days since last push
58releases
1bus factor
143open issues
—package ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 2,898 ⇿
0Stars
2,898Forks
7Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Only the most recent history is shown — this repository exceeds the collection window, so the earliest history is not captured.

1,5002,0002,5003,0002,898112025-022025-112026-08
Major 0Minor 3Patch 4

Each point covers 2 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.6 / 10
6.6aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-28 01:15 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
4Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10CI-Tests5 out of 5 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
7Code-ReviewFound 5/7 approved changesets -- score normalized to 7
10Contributorsproject has 15 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
9Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
1Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 1
10SASTSAST tool is run on all commits
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 37
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
NuGetMicrosoft.Build.Framework—build/msbuild/MSBuildTasks.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Build.Utilities.Core—build/msbuild/MSBuildTasks.csproj
NuGetTools.InnoSetup—build/windows/Windows.Distribution.csproj
NuGetcoverlet.collector—src/Atlassian.Bitbucket.Tests/Atlassian.Bitbucket.Tests.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk—src/Atlassian.Bitbucket.Tests/Atlassian.Bitbucket.Tests.csproj
NuGetReportGenerator—src/Atlassian.Bitbucket.Tests/Atlassian.Bitbucket.Tests.csproj
NuGetxunit.runner.visualstudio—src/Atlassian.Bitbucket.Tests/Atlassian.Bitbucket.Tests.csproj
NuGetcoverlet.collector—src/Core.Tests/Core.Tests.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk—src/Core.Tests/Core.Tests.csproj
NuGetReportGenerator—src/Core.Tests/Core.Tests.csproj
NuGetSpectre.Console.Testing—src/Core.Tests/Core.Tests.csproj
NuGetxunit.runner.visualstudio—src/Core.Tests/Core.Tests.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Identity.Client—src/Core/Core.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Identity.Client.Broker—src/Core/Core.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Identity.Client.Extensions.Msal—src/Core/Core.csproj
NuGetSpectre.Console—src/Core/Core.csproj
NuGetSystem.CommandLine—src/Core/Core.csproj
NuGetAvalonia—src/Core/Core.csproj
NuGetAvalonia.Desktop—src/Core/Core.csproj
NuGetAvalonia.Themes.Fluent—src/Core/Core.csproj
NuGetcoverlet.collector—src/GitHub.Tests/GitHub.Tests.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk—src/GitHub.Tests/GitHub.Tests.csproj
NuGetReportGenerator—src/GitHub.Tests/GitHub.Tests.csproj
NuGetxunit.runner.visualstudio—src/GitHub.Tests/GitHub.Tests.csproj
NuGetcoverlet.collector—src/GitLab.Tests/GitLab.Tests.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk—src/GitLab.Tests/GitLab.Tests.csproj
NuGetReportGenerator—src/GitLab.Tests/GitLab.Tests.csproj
NuGetxunit.runner.visualstudio—src/GitLab.Tests/GitLab.Tests.csproj
NuGetcoverlet.collector—src/Microsoft.AzureRepos.Tests/Microsoft.AzureRepos.Tests.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk—src/Microsoft.AzureRepos.Tests/Microsoft.AzureRepos.Tests.csproj
NuGetReportGenerator—src/Microsoft.AzureRepos.Tests/Microsoft.AzureRepos.Tests.csproj
NuGetxunit.runner.visualstudio—src/Microsoft.AzureRepos.Tests/Microsoft.AzureRepos.Tests.csproj
NuGetMoq—src/TestInfrastructure/TestInfrastructure.csproj
NuGetReportGenerator—src/TestInfrastructure/TestInfrastructure.csproj
NuGetSpectre.Console.Testing—src/TestInfrastructure/TestInfrastructure.csproj
NuGetxunit—src/TestInfrastructure/TestInfrastructure.csproj
NuGetXunit.SkippableFact—src/TestInfrastructure/TestInfrastructure.csproj
All dependencies 108

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 35 direct and 73 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
NuGetAvalonia—direct
NuGetAvalonia11.1.3direct
NuGetAvalonia.Desktop—direct
NuGetAvalonia.Desktop11.1.3direct
NuGetAvalonia.Themes.Fluent—direct
NuGetAvalonia.Themes.Fluent11.1.3direct
NuGetcoverlet.collector—direct
NuGetcoverlet.collector6.0.2direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Build.Framework—direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Build.Framework16.0.461direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Build.Utilities.Core—direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Build.Utilities.Core16.0.461direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Identity.Client—direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Identity.Client4.84.2direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Identity.Client.Broker—direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Identity.Client.Extensions.Msal—direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Identity.Client.Extensions.Msal4.84.2direct
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk—direct
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk17.11.1direct
NuGetMoq—direct
NuGetMoq4.20.72direct
NuGetReportGenerator—direct
NuGetReportGenerator5.3.10direct
NuGetSpectre.Console—direct
NuGetSpectre.Console.Testing—direct
NuGetSystem.CommandLine—direct
NuGetSystem.CommandLine2.0.0-beta4.22272.1direct
NuGetTools.InnoSetup—direct
NuGetTools.InnoSetup6.3.1direct
NuGetxunit—direct
NuGetxunit2.9.2direct
NuGetxunit.runner.visualstudio—direct
NuGetxunit.runner.visualstudio2.8.2direct
NuGetXunit.SkippableFact—direct
NuGetXunit.SkippableFact1.4.13direct
NuGetAvalonia.Angle.Windows.Natives2.1.22045.20230930indirect
NuGetAvalonia.BuildServices0.0.29indirect
NuGetAvalonia.Controls.ColorPicker11.1.3indirect
NuGetAvalonia.Controls.DataGrid11.1.3indirect
NuGetAvalonia.Diagnostics11.1.3indirect
NuGetAvalonia.FreeDesktop11.1.3indirect
NuGetAvalonia.Native11.1.3indirect
NuGetAvalonia.Remote.Protocol11.1.3indirect
NuGetAvalonia.Skia11.1.3indirect
NuGetAvalonia.Themes.Simple11.1.3indirect
NuGetAvalonia.Win3211.1.3indirect
NuGetAvalonia.X1111.1.3indirect
NuGetCastle.Core5.1.1indirect
NuGetHarfBuzzSharp7.3.0.2indirect
NuGetHarfBuzzSharp.NativeAssets.Linux7.3.0.2indirect
NuGetHarfBuzzSharp.NativeAssets.macOS7.3.0.2indirect
NuGetHarfBuzzSharp.NativeAssets.WebAssembly7.3.0.2indirect
NuGetHarfBuzzSharp.NativeAssets.Win327.3.0.2indirect
NuGetMicroCom.Runtime0.11.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.App.Runtime.linux-arm10.0.11indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.App.Runtime.linux-arm6410.0.11indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.App.Runtime.linux-x6410.0.11indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.App.Runtime.osx-arm6410.0.11indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.App.Runtime.osx-x6410.0.11indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.App.Runtime.win-arm6410.0.11indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.App.Runtime.win-x6410.0.11indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.App.Runtime.win-x8610.0.11indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Bcl.AsyncInterfaces8.0.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeCoverage17.11.1indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.IdentityModel.Abstractions8.14.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.NETCore.App.Host.linux-arm10.0.11indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.NETCore.App.Host.linux-arm6410.0.11indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.NETCore.App.Host.osx-arm6410.0.11indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.NETCore.App.Host.osx-x6410.0.11indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.NETCore.App.Host.win-arm6410.0.11indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.NETCore.App.Host.win-x6410.0.11indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.NETCore.App.Host.win-x8610.0.11indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.NETCore.App.Runtime.linux-arm10.0.11indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.NETCore.App.Runtime.linux-arm6410.0.11indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.NETCore.App.Runtime.linux-x6410.0.11indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.NETCore.App.Runtime.osx-arm6410.0.11indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.NETCore.App.Runtime.osx-x6410.0.11indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.NETCore.App.Runtime.win-arm6410.0.11indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.NETCore.App.Runtime.win-x6410.0.11indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.NETCore.App.Runtime.win-x8610.0.11indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.NETFramework.ReferenceAssemblies1.0.3indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.NETFramework.ReferenceAssemblies.net4721.0.3indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.TestPlatform.ObjectModel17.11.1indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.TestPlatform.TestHost17.11.1indirect
NuGetNewtonsoft.Json13.0.1indirect
NuGetSkiaSharp2.88.8indirect
NuGetSkiaSharp.NativeAssets.Linux2.88.8indirect
NuGetSkiaSharp.NativeAssets.macOS2.88.8indirect
NuGetSkiaSharp.NativeAssets.WebAssembly2.88.8indirect
NuGetSkiaSharp.NativeAssets.Win322.88.8indirect
NuGetSystem.Buffers4.5.1indirect
NuGetSystem.Diagnostics.EventLog6.0.0indirect
NuGetSystem.Memory4.5.5indirect
NuGetSystem.Numerics.Vectors4.5.0indirect
NuGetSystem.Runtime.CompilerServices.Unsafe6.0.0indirect
NuGetSystem.Security.Cryptography.ProtectedData4.5.0indirect
NuGetSystem.Text.Encodings.Web8.0.0indirect
NuGetSystem.Text.Json8.0.5indirect
NuGetSystem.Threading.Tasks.Extensions4.5.4indirect
NuGetSystem.ValueTuple4.5.0indirect
NuGetTmds.DBus.Protocol0.21.3indirect
NuGetValidation2.4.18indirect
NuGetxunit.abstractions2.0.3indirect
NuGetxunit.analyzers1.16.0indirect
NuGetxunit.assert2.9.2indirect
NuGetxunit.core2.9.2indirect
NuGetxunit.extensibility.core2.9.2indirect
NuGetxunit.extensibility.execution2.9.2indirect
Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 89 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 19 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with git-ecosystem/git-credential-manager. Read them side by side →

99go-gitea/giteaGit with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CDExceptional90scala-steward-org/scala-steward:robot: A bot that helps you keep your projects up-to-dateExcellent89npm/hosted-git-infoProvides metadata and conversions from repository urls for Github, Bitbucket and GitlabExcellent94tektoncd/pipelines-as-codePipelines-as-Code for TektonExceptional92danger/danger🚫 Stop saying "you forgot to …" in code review (in Ruby)Excellent91gabrie30/ghorgQuickly clone or backup massive amounts of org/users repositories into one directory - Supports GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, and more 🐇🥚Excellent

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — NuGet.