Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-18 16:45 UTC

gitana / cloudcms-server

Cloud CMS application server module for Node.js / Express. This module provides middleware for virtualized content retrieval, cluster-wide caching and broadcasting, tag processing and much more. It is available to be used in building Node.js-based applications that run against Cloud CMS.

JavaScriptCustom license★ 19 stars⑂ 13 forkssince Apr 2013View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryNetwork servicehow this is determined

gitana/cloudcms-server holds a health index of 26 out of 100, placing it in the At Risk band. It scores highest on Sustainability & Governance (47/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (17/100). It was last updated 31 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

26
overall / 100
At Risk

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

26
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 32 is calibrated to 26 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

7 followers46 public repossince May 2010

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
npmcloudcms-server3.2.3555,64481930 days agowcmwebcloudcmscmscontentjsonrestmobilecontent-managementjavascriptnodejsapijsoncmsbaascachingrenditions

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

19Critical · 21% of overall
How it's scored
18/36Push recencylast push 31 days ago
3.5/36Commit cadence5/52 weeks with commits
8.1/18Commit volume7 commits in the last year
1/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained2 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 1
Inputs used
commits_last_year7
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push31
active_weeks_last_year5
How it's scored
0/27Ships releasesno releases published
0/36Release recencyno releases
0/27Release cadenceno releases
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

44Weak · 17% of overall
How it's scored
20.4/60Stars19 stars
9/25Forks13 forks
5/15Watchers9 watchers
Inputs used
forks13
stars19
watchers9
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
16.9/22.5Licenselicense file present, not a recognized license
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
50/80Monthly downloads5,644 downloads/month across npm
0/20Registry dependentsnot reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagescloudcms-server
dependents
ecosystemsnpm
total_downloads
monthly_downloads5,644
unverified_packages_excluded
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

47Weak · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
4.1/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 82% of commits
6.8/13.5Contributor breadth5 contributors
6/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled5
top_contributor_share0.818
How it's scored
14/42Issue resolution33% of issues closed
0/30PR acceptance0/1 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs0
open_issues2
closed_issues1
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio0.333
closed_unmerged_prs1
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domain
6.5/25Owner reach7 followers of gitana
24.2/25Track record46 public repos, account ~16 yr old
Inputs used
followers7
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_logingitana
public_repos46
account_age_days5,965

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on npm
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 30 days ago
20/20Version history819 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagescloudcms-server
ecosystemsnpm
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish30

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

23At Risk · 19% of overall
How it's scored
0/24CI workflows
0/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Testsno data
Inputs used
has_cino
has_testsno
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.

Documentation

55Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://gitana.io
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics
has_wikino
homepagehttps://gitana.io
docs_sitehttps://gitana.io
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

30At Risk · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Testsno data
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
1.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
0/10Dangerous-Workflowno data
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.2/2.5Licenselicense file detected
0.8/7.5Maintained2 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 1
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesno data
0/5SASTno SAST tool detected
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsno data
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated12
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive6
scorecard_aggregate2.9
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): CI-Tests, Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10.3/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories3 affected: connect-multiparty 2.2.0 (high 7.8), form-data 4.0.5 (high 7.5), aws-sdk 2.1693.0 (low 3.7)
6.6/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories4 affected: multiparty 4.2.3 (high 7.5), undici 5.29.0 (high 7.5), uuid 8.0.0 (high 7.5), +1 more
18.4/40No advisories left outstanding7 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 1,585 days ago
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories21
affected_packages7
assessed_packages427
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severityhigh 5, moderate 1, low 1
direct_affected_packages3
Matched the npm:cloudcms-server@3.2.355 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 427 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

17Critical · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
15/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)llms.txt served by the project website (https://gitana.io/llms.txt)
5.9/40Legible commit history11 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtyes
llms_txt_urlhttps://gitana.io/llms.txt
legible_history_share0.11
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
0/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
0/11Static type checking
0/10Reproducible environment
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenanceno automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesno data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsno
lockfiles
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable codeJavaScript without a type-check config
52.9/55Manageable file sizes4/105 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageJavaScript
largest_source_bytes113,079
source_files_sampled105
oversized_source_files4

Key facts

19GitHub stars
5contributors
7commits, last 12 months
31days since last push
0releases
1bus factor
2open issues
npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 13 ⇿
0Stars
13Forks

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

03581013151322016-042021-062026-08

Each point covers 10 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 2.9 / 10
2.9aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-18 16:45 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
n/aCI-Testsno pull request found
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
6Contributorsproject has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
9Licenselicense file detected
1Maintained2 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 1
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
n/aPinned-Dependenciesno dependencies found
0SASTno SAST tool detected
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 69
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
npm@socket.io/cluster-adapter^0.2.2package.json
npm@socket.io/redis-adapter^8.3.0package.json
npm@socket.io/sticky^1.0.4package.json
npmaccepts^1.3.8package.json
npmagentkeepalive^4.6.0package.json
npmalpaca^1.5.27package.json
npmarchiver^7.0.1package.json
npmasync^3.2.6package.json
npmasync-lock^1.4.1package.json
npmaws-sdk^2.1692.0package.json
npmaxios^1.7.9package.json
npmbasic-auth^2.0.1package.json
npmbody-parser^1.20.3package.json
npmbytes^3.1.2package.json
npmcacheable-lookup^6.1.0package.json
npmcanoe^0.3.3package.json
npmclone^2.1.2package.json
npmconnect-flash^0.1.1package.json
npmconnect-multiparty^2.2.0package.json
npmconnect-redis^8.0.1package.json
npmcookie-parser^1.4.7package.json
npmdebug^4.4.0package.json
npmerrorhandler^1.5.1package.json
npmexpress^4.21.2package.json
npmexpress-session^1.18.1package.json
npmexpress-useragent^1.0.15package.json
npmfast-proxy^2.2.0package.json
npmform-data4.0.5package.json
npmgitana^1.0.330package.json
npmhandlebars^4.7.8package.json
npmhbs^4.2.0package.json
npmhelmet^8.0.0package.json
npmioredis5.4.1package.json
npmjson5^2.2.3package.json
npmjsonwebtoken^9.0.2package.json
npmklaw^4.1.0package.json
npmlru-cache^7.14.0package.json
npmmarked^15.0.4package.json
npmmemored^1.1.1package.json
npmmemorystore^1.6.4package.json
npmmime^2.4.6package.json
npmmoment^2.30.1package.json
npmmorgan^1.10.0package.json
npmobject-hash^3.0.0package.json
npmobject-merge^2.5.1package.json
npmon-headers^1.0.2package.json
npmpassport^0.7.0package.json
npmpassport-google-oauth^2.0.0package.json
npmpassport-local^1.0.0package.json
npmpassport-oauth^1.0.0package.json
npm@node-saml/passport-saml5.1.0package.json
npmrandom-js^2.1.0package.json
npmrecursive-readdir^2.2.3package.json
npmredis^4.7.0package.json
npmredlock4.2.0package.json
npmrequest-param^1.0.1package.json
npmresponse-time^2.3.3package.json
npmsemver^7.6.3package.json
npmserve-favicon^2.5.0package.json
npmsession-file-store^1.5.0package.json
npmsha1^1.1.1package.json
npmsocket.io^4.8.1package.json
npmssl-root-cas^1.3.1package.json
npmstomp-client^0.9.0package.json
npmtargz^1.0.1package.json
npmtemp^0.9.4package.json
npmuuid^11.0.3package.json
npmunderscore^1.13.7package.json
npmwinston^3.17.0package.json
All dependencies 69

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 69 direct and 0 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npm@node-saml/passport-saml5.1.0direct
npm@socket.io/cluster-adapter^0.2.2direct
npm@socket.io/redis-adapter^8.3.0direct
npm@socket.io/sticky^1.0.4direct
npmaccepts^1.3.8direct
npmagentkeepalive^4.6.0direct
npmalpaca^1.5.27direct
npmarchiver^7.0.1direct
npmasync^3.2.6direct
npmasync-lock^1.4.1direct
npmaws-sdk^2.1692.0direct
npmaxios^1.7.9direct
npmbasic-auth^2.0.1direct
npmbody-parser^1.20.3direct
npmbytes^3.1.2direct
npmcacheable-lookup^6.1.0direct
npmcanoe^0.3.3direct
npmclone^2.1.2direct
npmconnect-flash^0.1.1direct
npmconnect-multiparty^2.2.0direct
npmconnect-redis^8.0.1direct
npmcookie-parser^1.4.7direct
npmdebug^4.4.0direct
npmerrorhandler^1.5.1direct
npmexpress^4.21.2direct
npmexpress-session^1.18.1direct
npmexpress-useragent^1.0.15direct
npmfast-proxy^2.2.0direct
npmform-data4.0.5direct
npmgitana^1.0.330direct
npmhandlebars^4.7.8direct
npmhbs^4.2.0direct
npmhelmet^8.0.0direct
npmioredis5.4.1direct
npmjson5^2.2.3direct
npmjsonwebtoken^9.0.2direct
npmklaw^4.1.0direct
npmlru-cache^7.14.0direct
npmmarked^15.0.4direct
npmmemored^1.1.1direct
npmmemorystore^1.6.4direct
npmmime^2.4.6direct
npmmoment^2.30.1direct
npmmorgan^1.10.0direct
npmobject-hash^3.0.0direct
npmobject-merge^2.5.1direct
npmon-headers^1.0.2direct
npmpassport^0.7.0direct
npmpassport-google-oauth^2.0.0direct
npmpassport-local^1.0.0direct
npmpassport-oauth^1.0.0direct
npmrandom-js^2.1.0direct
npmrecursive-readdir^2.2.3direct
npmredis^4.7.0direct
npmredlock4.2.0direct
npmrequest-param^1.0.1direct
npmresponse-time^2.3.3direct
npmsemver^7.6.3direct
npmserve-favicon^2.5.0direct
npmsession-file-store^1.5.0direct
npmsha1^1.1.1direct
npmsocket.io^4.8.1direct
npmssl-root-cas^1.3.1direct
npmstomp-client^0.9.0direct
npmtargz^1.0.1direct
npmtemp^0.9.4direct
npmunderscore^1.13.7direct
npmuuid^11.0.3direct
npmwinston^3.17.0direct
Dependency advisories 7

Installing npm:cloudcms-server@3.2.355 pulls in 427 packages, direct and transitive: 7 carry known advisories, of which 3 are direct dependencies.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
connect-multiparty2.2.0directhigh1
form-data4.0.5directhigh14.0.6
multiparty4.2.3indirecthigh34.3.0
undici5.29.0indirecthigh128.9.0
uuid8.0.0indirecthigh113.0.1
qs6.5.5indirectmoderate26.16.0
aws-sdk2.1693.0directlow1

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsnpm.