Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-15 14:34 UTC

gkinsman / AlmostServiceBus

A test-friendly Azure Service Bus emulator

C#MIT★ 24 stars⑂ 8 forkssince Apr 2026View on GitHub ↗
KindCommand-line toolNetwork serviceWeb interfacehow this is determined

gkinsman/AlmostServiceBus holds a health index of 73 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Vitality (77/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (44/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

73
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

73
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 64 is calibrated to 73 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

George KinsmanPersonal account
37 followers91 public repossince Sep 2009Elaway

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
NuGetAlmostServiceBus0.6.0-173 days agoservicebusemulatortestingamqpalmostservicebus
NuGetAlmostServiceBus.Tool0.6.0-123 days agoservicebusemulatortestingamqpalmostservicebus

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

77Good · 21% of overall

Development activity

70Good
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
5.5/36Commit cadence — 8/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 279 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year279
human_commit_share0.7
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year8

Release discipline

88Excellent
How it's scored
16.2/27Ships releases — 20 version tags (no GitHub releases)
36/36Release recency — latest release 3 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~16.8 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count20
latest_release_tagv0.6.0
releases_from_tagsyes
days_since_latest_release3
mean_days_between_releases16.8
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

44Weak · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

29At Risk
How it's scored
22.1/60Stars — 24 stars
7/25Forks — 8 forks
0/15Watchers — 2 watchers
Inputs used
forks8
stars24
watchers2
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

50Moderate
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

59Moderate
How it's scored
47/80Total downloads — 33,115 downloads all-time across nuget
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesAlmostServiceBus, AlmostServiceBus.Tool
dependents—
ecosystemsnuget
total_downloads33,115
monthly_downloads—
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

58Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

29At Risk
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
3/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 87% of commits
6.8/13.5Contributor breadth — 5 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled5
top_contributor_share0.867

Issue & PR responsiveness

58Moderate
How it's scored
21/42Issue resolution — 50% of issues closed
22.6/30PR acceptance — 88/117 decided PRs merged
13/13Newcomer PR acceptance — 5/5 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
1.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 4/27 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
Inputs used
merged_prs88
open_issues1
closed_issues1
prs_merged_7d21
prs_decided_7d21
prs_merged_30d21
prs_decided_30d21
issue_closed_ratio0.5
closed_unmerged_prs29
first_time_authors_30d3
first_time_prs_merged_30d5
first_time_prs_decided_30d5

Ownership & stewardship

58Moderate
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
11.4/25Owner reach — 37 followers of gkinsman
25/25Track record — 91 public repos, account ~16 yr old
Inputs used
followers37
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_logingkinsman
public_repos91
account_age_days6,201
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 2 package(s) on nuget
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 3 days ago
20/20Version history — 17 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesAlmostServiceBus, AlmostServiceBus.Tool
ecosystemsnuget
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish3

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

62Moderate · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

60Moderate
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 1 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — no data
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.

Documentation

65Good
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikino
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

74Good · 16% of overall

Security posture

67Good
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
3/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
0/2.5CI-Tests — no data
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0.8/7.5Code-Review — Found 4/27 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
0.5/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 1
0/5SAST — no data
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
6.8/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
6.8/7.5Vulnerabilities — 1 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated15
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive3
scorecard_aggregate6.7
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): CI-Tests, SAST, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages164
unassessed_packages1
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 164 resolved dependencies against OSV. 1 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

76Good · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

85Excellent
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — CLAUDE.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 58 of 70 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.829
agent_instruction_filesCLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes11,711

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

75Good
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrap — samples/OrderFlowDemo/OrderFlowDemo.AppHost/OrderFlowDemo.AppHost.csproj, samples/OrderFlowDemo/OrderFlowDemo.Contracts/OrderFlowDemo.Contracts.csproj, samples/OrderFlowDemo/OrderFlowDemo.FulfillmentWorker/OrderFlowDemo.FulfillmentWorker.csproj (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — samples/OrderFlowDemo/OrderFlowDemo.OrderApi/ClientApp/tsconfig.json, src/AlmostServiceBus.Dashboard/tsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile
10/10Demonstrated agent practice — 41 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8Automated maintenance — 30 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
1/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 1
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespackage-lock.json
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configssamples/OrderFlowDemo/OrderFlowDemo.OrderApi/ClientApp/tsconfig.json, src/AlmostServiceBus.Dashboard/tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share0.41
toolchain_manifestssamples/OrderFlowDemo/OrderFlowDemo.AppHost/OrderFlowDemo.AppHost.csproj, samples/OrderFlowDemo/OrderFlowDemo.Contracts/OrderFlowDemo.Contracts.csproj, samples/OrderFlowDemo/OrderFlowDemo.FulfillmentWorker/OrderFlowDemo.FulfillmentWorker.csproj, samples/OrderFlowDemo/OrderFlowDemo.OrderApi/OrderFlowDemo.OrderApi.csproj, samples/OrderFlowDemo/OrderFlowDemo.ServiceDefaults/OrderFlowDemo.ServiceDefaults.csproj, src/AlmostServiceBus.Aspire.Hosting/AlmostServiceBus.Aspire.Hosting.csproj, src/AlmostServiceBus.Core/AlmostServiceBus.Core.csproj, src/AlmostServiceBus.Host/AlmostServiceBus.Host.csproj, src/AlmostServiceBus.TestHost/AlmostServiceBus.TestHost.csproj, tests/AlmostServiceBus.Conformance.Tests/AlmostServiceBus.Conformance.Tests.csproj, tests/AlmostServiceBus.MassTransit.Tests/AlmostServiceBus.MassTransit.Tests.csproj, tests/AlmostServiceBus.SdkIntegration.Tests/AlmostServiceBus.SdkIntegration.Tests.csproj, tests/AlmostServiceBus.SdkLive.Tests/AlmostServiceBus.SdkLive.Tests.csproj, tests/AlmostServiceBus.Tests/AlmostServiceBus.Tests.csproj, tests/client-sdk-smoke/java/pom.xml, tests/ms-emulator-comparison/LockRenewalComparison/LockRenewalComparison.csproj
dependency_bot_commit_share0.3

Code legibility for models

100Exceptional
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — C# (statically typed)
54.6/55Manageable file sizes — 1/149 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageC#
largest_source_bytes73,029
source_files_sampled149
oversized_source_files1

Machine-readable interfaces

40Weak
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)
0/20MCP server
40/40Runnable examples — samples
Inputs used
example_dirssamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_ofnetwork-service

Key facts

24GitHub stars
5contributors
279commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
20releases
1bus factor
1open issues
—package ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 8 ⇿
0Stars
8Forks
11Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

02468822026-042026-062026-09
Major 0Minor 5Patch 6
OpenSSF Scorecard 6.7 / 10
6.7aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-15 14:34 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
4Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
n/aCI-Testsinternal error: internal error: Client.Repositories.ListCheckRunsForRef: error during graphqlHandler.setupCheckRuns: Something went wrong while executing your query on 2026-09-15T14:34:38Z. Please include `9F30:3EB66B:1D9F8E:1CBB33:6AA9577C` when reporting this issue.
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
1Code-ReviewFound 4/27 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
10Contributorsproject has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
1Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 1
n/aSASTinternal error: internal error: Client.Checks.ListCheckRunsForRef: error during graphqlHandler.setupCheckRuns: Something went wrong while executing your query on 2026-09-15T14:34:38Z. Please include `9F30:3EB66B:1D9F8E:1CBB33:6AA9577C` when reporting this issue.
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
9Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
9Vulnerabilities1 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 5
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
NuGetAspire.Hosting13.5.3src/AlmostServiceBus.Aspire.Hosting/AlmostServiceBus.Aspire.Hosting.csproj
NuGetAMQPNetLite2.5.4src/AlmostServiceBus.Core/AlmostServiceBus.Core.csproj
npmlucide-vue-next^1.0.0src/AlmostServiceBus.Dashboard/package.json
npmvue^3.5.13src/AlmostServiceBus.Dashboard/package.json
NuGetVite.AspNetCore2.4.1src/AlmostServiceBus.Host/AlmostServiceBus.Host.csproj
All dependencies 165

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 5 direct and 160 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npmlucide-vue-next1.0.0direct
npmvue3.5.42direct
NuGetAMQPNetLite2.5.4direct
NuGetAspire.Hosting13.5.3direct
NuGetVite.AspNetCore2.4.1direct
Mavencom.azure:azure-messaging-servicebus7.17.20indirect
Mavenorg.codehaus.mojo:exec-maven-plugin3.6.4indirect
Mavenorg.slf4j:slf4j-simple2.0.19indirect
npm@azure/abort-controller1.1.0indirect
npm@azure/abort-controller2.2.0indirect
npm@azure/core-amqp4.5.1indirect
npm@azure/core-auth1.11.0indirect
npm@azure/core-client1.11.1indirect
npm@azure/core-paging1.7.0indirect
npm@azure/core-rest-pipeline1.25.0indirect
npm@azure/core-tracing1.4.0indirect
npm@azure/core-util1.14.0indirect
npm@azure/core-xml1.6.0indirect
npm@azure/logger1.4.0indirect
npm@azure/service-bus7.9.5indirect
npm@babel/helper-string-parser7.29.7indirect
npm@babel/helper-validator-identifier7.29.7indirect
npm@babel/parser7.29.8indirect
npm@babel/types7.29.8indirect
npm@jridgewell/sourcemap-codec1.5.5indirect
npm@kurkle/color0.3.4indirect
npm@nodable/entities3.0.0indirect
npm@oxc-project/types0.149.0indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-android-arm-eabi1.2.8indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-android-arm641.2.8indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-darwin-arm641.2.8indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-darwin-x641.2.8indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-freebsd-x641.2.8indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-arm-gnueabihf1.2.8indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-arm64-gnu1.2.8indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-arm64-musl1.2.8indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-ppc64-gnu1.2.8indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-s390x-gnu1.2.8indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-x64-gnu1.2.8indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-x64-musl1.2.8indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-openharmony-arm641.2.8indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-win32-arm64-msvc1.2.8indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-win32-x64-msvc1.2.8indirect
npm@rolldown/pluginutils1.0.1indirect
npm@types/is-buffer2.0.2indirect
npm@types/node22.20.2indirect
npm@typespec/ts-http-runtime0.3.9indirect
npm@vitejs/plugin-vue6.0.8indirect
npm@vitejs/plugin-vue6.0.9indirect
npm@volar/language-core2.4.28indirect
npm@volar/source-map2.4.28indirect
npm@volar/typescript2.4.28indirect
npm@vue/compiler-core3.5.42indirect
npm@vue/compiler-dom3.5.42indirect
npm@vue/compiler-sfc3.5.42indirect
npm@vue/compiler-ssr3.5.42indirect
npm@vue/language-core3.3.11indirect
npm@vue/reactivity3.5.42indirect
npm@vue/runtime-core3.5.42indirect
npm@vue/runtime-dom3.5.42indirect
npm@vue/server-renderer3.5.42indirect
npm@vue/shared3.5.42indirect
npmagent-base7.1.4indirect
npmalien-signals3.2.1indirect
npmanynum1.0.1indirect
npmavailable-typed-arrays1.0.7indirect
npmbase64-js1.5.1indirect
npmbuffer6.0.3indirect
npmcall-bind1.0.9indirect
npmcall-bind-apply-helpers1.0.2indirect
npmcall-bound1.0.4indirect
npmchart.js4.5.1indirect
npmcsstype3.2.3indirect
npmdebug4.4.3indirect
npmdefine-data-property1.1.4indirect
npmdetect-libc2.1.2indirect
npmdunder-proto1.0.1indirect
npmentities7.0.1indirect
npmes-define-property1.0.1indirect
npmes-errors1.3.0indirect
npmes-object-atoms1.1.2indirect
npmestree-walker2.0.2indirect
npmevents3.3.0indirect
npmfast-xml-builder1.3.1indirect
npmfast-xml-parser5.11.1indirect
npmfdir6.5.0indirect
npmfor-each0.3.5indirect
npmfsevents2.3.3indirect
npmfunction-bind1.1.2indirect
npmgenerator-function2.0.1indirect
npmget-intrinsic1.3.0indirect
npmget-proto1.0.1indirect
npmgopd1.2.0indirect
npmhas-property-descriptors1.0.2indirect
npmhas-symbols1.1.0indirect
npmhas-tostringtag1.0.2indirect
npmhasown2.0.4indirect
npmhttp-proxy-agent7.0.2indirect
npmhttps-proxy-agent7.0.6indirect
npmieee7541.2.1indirect
npminherits2.0.4indirect
npmis-arguments1.2.0indirect
npmis-buffer2.0.5indirect
npmis-callable1.2.7indirect
npmis-generator-function1.1.2indirect
npmis-regex1.2.1indirect
npmis-typed-array1.1.15indirect
npmis-unsafe2.0.2indirect
npmjssha3.3.2indirect
npmlightningcss1.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-android-arm641.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-darwin-arm641.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-darwin-x641.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-freebsd-x641.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm-gnueabihf1.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm64-gnu1.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm64-musl1.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-x64-gnu1.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-x64-musl1.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-win32-arm64-msvc1.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-win32-x64-msvc1.33.0indirect
npmlong5.3.2indirect
npmmagic-string0.30.21indirect
npmmath-intrinsics1.1.0indirect
npmms2.1.3indirect
npmmuggle-string0.4.1indirect
npmnanoid3.3.18indirect
npmpath-browserify1.0.1indirect
npmpath-expression-matcher1.6.2indirect
npmpicocolors1.1.1indirect
npmpicomatch4.0.7indirect
npmpossible-typed-array-names1.1.0indirect
npmpostcss8.5.28indirect
npmprocess0.11.10indirect
npmrhea3.0.5indirect
npmrhea-promise3.0.3indirect
npmrolldown1.2.8indirect
npmsafe-regex-test1.1.0indirect
npmset-function-length1.2.2indirect
npmsource-map-js1.2.1indirect
npmstrnum2.4.2indirect
npmtinyglobby0.2.17indirect
npmtslib2.8.1indirect
npmtypescript6.0.3indirect
npmundici-types6.21.0indirect
npmutil0.12.5indirect
npmvite8.2.2indirect
npmvite8.3.0indirect
npmvscode-uri3.2.0indirect
npmvue-chartjs5.3.4indirect
npmvue-tsc3.3.11indirect
npmwhich-typed-array1.1.22indirect
npmxml-naming0.3.0indirect
NuGetAspire.Hosting.AppHost13.5.3indirect
NuGetAzure.Messaging.ServiceBus7.20.2indirect
NuGetcoverlet.collector10.0.1indirect
NuGetMassTransit.Azure.ServiceBus.Core8.5.10indirect
NuGetMassTransit.Azure.ServiceBus.Core9.1.2indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.TestHost10.0.12indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk18.10.0indirect
NuGetSerilog.AspNetCore10.0.0indirect
NuGetSerilog.Sinks.Seq9.1.0indirect
NuGetxunit2.9.3indirect
NuGetxunit.runner.visualstudio4.0.0indirect
PyPIazure-servicebus—indirect
Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 164 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 1 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with gkinsman/AlmostServiceBus. Read them side by side →

92ministackorg/ministackMinistack: Free, open-source local AWS emulator - 60+ services, Terraform compatible, real databases. Free forever. MIT licensed.Excellent90calvinchengx/fabric-emulatorLocal Microsoft Fabric emulator in one Go binary. Control plane, OneLake, T-SQL warehouse and Spark, verified against unmodified Microsoft tools.Excellent89tekumara/fakesnowRun, mock and test fake Snowflake databases locally.Excellent99App-vNext/PollyPolly is a .NET resilience and transient-fault-handling library that allows developers to express policies such as Retry, Circuit Breaker, Timeout, Bulkhead Isolation, and Fallback in a fluent and thread-safe manner. From version 6.0.1, Polly targets .NET Standard 1.1 and 2.0+.Exceptional98microsoft/vstestVisual Studio Test Platform is the runner and engine that powers test explorer and vstest.console.Exceptional97Azure/durabletaskDurable Task Framework allows users to write long running persistent workflows in C# using the async/await capabilities.Exceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — NuGet.