Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-08 21:59 UTC

gladiaio / num2words2

Modules to convert numbers to words. 42 --> forty-two

Rust · PythonCustom license★ 8 stars⑂ 2 forkssince Jan 2026forkView on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryCommand-line toolhow this is determined

gladiaio/num2words2 holds a health index of 86 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Sustainability & Governance (92/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (26/100). It was last updated 1 day ago. 7 contributors account for most of its recent work.

86
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

86
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 72 is calibrated to 86 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

GladiaOrganization · verified domain
99 followers22 public repossince Oct 2021

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
PyPInum2words2points to another repo — not scored1.0.2013,4302073 days agonumberwordnumberswordsconvertconversioni18nlocalisationlocalizationinternationalisationinternationalizationrust
crates.ionum2words2-core0.1.32,00643 days agocardinali18nnum2wordsnumberspellouttext-processinginternationalization

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

80Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 1 days ago
5.5/36Commit cadence — 8/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 150 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — no data
Inputs used
commits_last_year150
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push1
active_weeks_last_year8

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 18 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 73 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~9.6 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count18
latest_release_tagv1.0.20
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release73
mean_days_between_releases9.6

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

26At Risk · 17% of overall
How it's scored
13.7/60Stars — 8 stars
0/25Forks — 2 forks
0/15Watchers — 1 watchers
Inputs used
forks2
stars8
watchers1
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
0/22.5README
16.9/22.5License — license file present, not a recognized license
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeno
has_licenseno
readme_badges8
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicescoveralls.io, github.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
44/80Monthly downloads — 2,006 downloads/month across crates
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesnum2words2-core
dependents—
ecosystemscrates
total_downloads6,019
monthly_downloads2,006
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

92Excellent · 23% of overall
How it's scored
51.3/54Bus factor — 7 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
18/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 20% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 100 contributors
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — no data
Inputs used
bus_factor7
contributors_sampled100
top_contributor_share0.199
How it's scored
42/42Issue resolution — 100% of issues closed
28.5/30PR acceptance — 117/123 decided PRs merged
13/13Newcomer PR acceptance — 1/1 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — no data
Inputs used
merged_prs117
open_issues0
closed_issues140
prs_merged_7d2
prs_decided_7d5
prs_merged_30d13
prs_decided_30d16
issue_closed_ratio1
closed_unmerged_prs6
first_time_authors_30d1
first_time_prs_merged_30d1
first_time_prs_decided_30d1
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
20/20Verified domain
14.4/25Owner reach — 99 followers of gladiaio
19.9/25Track record — 22 public repos, account ~4 yr old
Inputs used
followers99
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedyes
owner_logingladiaio
public_repos22
account_age_days1,821
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on crates
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 3 days ago
12/20Version history — 4 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesnum2words2-core
ecosystemscrates
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish3

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

75Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 10 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — .flake8, pyproject.toml ([tool.black], [tool.isort]), tox.ini
9.6/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — no data
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configyes

Documentation

50Moderate
How it's scored
0/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://docs.rs/num2words2-core
0/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikiyes
homepage—
docs_sitehttps://docs.rs/num2words2-core
has_readmeno
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionno

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

76Good · 16% of overall
How it's scored
0/30Security policy (SECURITY.md)
25/25Dependabot config
25/25Dependency lockfiles — Cargo.lock
20/20CodeQL workflow
Inputs used
sourcefile_signals
lockfilesCargo.lock
manifestspyproject.toml, rust/Cargo.toml, tests/requirements-test.txt
has_codeql_workflowyes
has_security_policyno
has_dependabot_configyes

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages96
unassessed_packages17
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 96 resolved dependencies against OSV. 17 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

77Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 98 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.98
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — Makefile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — .flake8, pyproject.toml ([tool.black], [tool.isort]), tox.ini
11/11Static type checking — num2words2/py.typed
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile
10/10Demonstrated agent practice — 69 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
5/8Automated maintenance — dependency automation configured, none observed in the sampled commits
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesCargo.lock
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_filesMakefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configsnum2words2/py.typed
agent_commit_share0.69
toolchain_manifestsrust/Cargo.toml, rust/num2words2-core/Cargo.toml, rust/num2words2-py/Cargo.toml
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — Rust (statically typed)
50/55Manageable file sizes — 35/388 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageRust
largest_source_bytes165,142
source_files_sampled388
oversized_source_files35

Key facts

8GitHub stars
100contributors
150commits, last 12 months
1days since last push
18releases
7bus factor
0open issues
crates.io, PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • Community profile unavailable
  • pypi package 'num2words2' points at a different repository (https://github.com/jqueguiner/num2words2.git); excluded from ecosystem scoring
  • Could not fetch crates package 'num2words2-py' from its registry
  • Could not fetch pypi package 'num2words2-rust' from its registry
  • OpenSSF Scorecard timed out after 240s; skipping Scorecard checks

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 2 ⇿
0Stars
2Forks
18Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

111222212026-052026-072026-09
Major 0Minor 0Patch 18
Direct dependencies 10
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
crates.ionum-bigint0.4rust/num2words2-core/Cargo.toml
crates.ionum-traits0.2rust/num2words2-core/Cargo.toml
crates.ionum-integer0.1rust/num2words2-core/Cargo.toml
crates.iobigdecimal0.4rust/num2words2-core/Cargo.toml
crates.ionum2words2-core—rust/num2words2-py/Cargo.toml
crates.ionum-bigint0.4rust/num2words2-py/Cargo.toml
crates.iobigdecimal0.4rust/num2words2-py/Cargo.toml
crates.ioregex1rust/num2words2-py/Cargo.toml
crates.iopyo30.29rust/num2words2-py/Cargo.toml
crates.iolingua1.8rust/num2words2-py/Cargo.toml
All dependencies 113

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 14 direct and 99 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
crates.iobigdecimal—direct
crates.iobigdecimal0.4.10direct
crates.iolingua—direct
crates.iolingua1.8.0direct
crates.ionum-bigint—direct
crates.ionum-bigint0.4.8direct
crates.ionum-integer—direct
crates.ionum-integer0.1.46direct
crates.ionum-traits—direct
crates.ionum-traits0.2.19direct
crates.iopyo3—direct
crates.iopyo30.29.2direct
crates.ioregex—direct
crates.ioregex1.13.1direct
crates.ioaho-corasick1.1.4indirect
crates.ioautocfg1.5.1indirect
crates.iobitflags2.13.1indirect
crates.iobumpalo3.20.3indirect
crates.iocfg-if1.0.4indirect
crates.iocounter0.7.1indirect
crates.iocrossbeam-deque0.8.7indirect
crates.iocrossbeam-epoch0.9.20indirect
crates.iocrossbeam-utils0.8.22indirect
crates.iodashmap6.2.1indirect
crates.ioeither1.16.0indirect
crates.iofastrand2.4.1indirect
crates.iofst0.4.7indirect
crates.iofutures-core0.3.32indirect
crates.iofutures-task0.3.32indirect
crates.iofutures-util0.3.32indirect
crates.iogetrandom0.3.4indirect
crates.iohashbrown0.14.5indirect
crates.ioheck0.5.0indirect
crates.ioinclude_dir0.7.4indirect
crates.ioinclude_dir_macros0.7.4indirect
crates.ioitertools0.14.0indirect
crates.iojs-sys0.3.103indirect
crates.iolibc0.2.186indirect
crates.iolibm0.2.16indirect
crates.iolingua-bokmal-language-model1.3.0indirect
crates.iolingua-bulgarian-language-model1.3.0indirect
crates.iolingua-croatian-language-model1.3.0indirect
crates.iolingua-czech-language-model1.3.0indirect
crates.iolingua-danish-language-model1.3.0indirect
crates.iolingua-dutch-language-model1.3.0indirect
crates.iolingua-english-language-model1.3.0indirect
crates.iolingua-estonian-language-model1.3.0indirect
crates.iolingua-finnish-language-model1.3.0indirect
crates.iolingua-french-language-model1.3.0indirect
crates.iolingua-german-language-model1.3.0indirect
crates.iolingua-hungarian-language-model1.3.0indirect
crates.iolingua-icelandic-language-model1.3.0indirect
crates.iolingua-italian-language-model1.3.0indirect
crates.iolingua-latvian-language-model1.3.0indirect
crates.iolingua-lithuanian-language-model1.3.0indirect
crates.iolingua-polish-language-model1.3.0indirect
crates.iolingua-portuguese-language-model1.3.0indirect
crates.iolingua-russian-language-model1.3.0indirect
crates.iolingua-slovak-language-model1.3.0indirect
crates.iolingua-spanish-language-model1.3.0indirect
crates.iolingua-swedish-language-model1.3.0indirect
crates.iolingua-turkish-language-model1.3.0indirect
crates.iolingua-ukrainian-language-model1.3.0indirect
crates.iolingua-vietnamese-language-model1.3.0indirect
crates.iolock_api0.4.14indirect
crates.iomaplit1.0.2indirect
crates.iomemchr2.8.3indirect
crates.ioonce_cell1.21.4indirect
crates.ioparking_lot_core0.9.12indirect
crates.iopin-project-lite0.2.17indirect
crates.ioportable-atomic1.13.1indirect
crates.ioproc-macro21.0.106indirect
crates.iopyo3-build-config0.29.2indirect
crates.iopyo3-ffi0.29.2indirect
crates.iopyo3-macros0.29.2indirect
crates.iopyo3-macros-backend0.29.2indirect
crates.ioquote1.0.46indirect
crates.ior-efi5.3.0indirect
crates.iorayon1.12.0indirect
crates.iorayon-core1.13.0indirect
crates.ioredox_syscall0.5.18indirect
crates.ioregex-automata0.4.16indirect
crates.ioregex-syntax0.8.11indirect
crates.iorustversion1.0.23indirect
crates.ioscopeguard1.2.0indirect
crates.ioserde1.0.228indirect
crates.ioserde-wasm-bindgen0.6.5indirect
crates.ioserde_core1.0.228indirect
crates.ioserde_derive1.0.228indirect
crates.ioslab0.4.12indirect
crates.iosmallvec1.15.2indirect
crates.iostrum0.27.2indirect
crates.iostrum_macros0.27.2indirect
crates.iosyn2.0.119indirect
crates.iotarget-lexicon0.13.5indirect
crates.iounicode-ident1.0.24indirect
crates.iowasip21.0.4+wasi-0.2.12indirect
crates.iowasm-bindgen0.2.126indirect
crates.iowasm-bindgen-macro0.2.126indirect
crates.iowasm-bindgen-macro-support0.2.126indirect
crates.iowasm-bindgen-shared0.2.126indirect
crates.iowindows-link0.2.1indirect
crates.iowit-bindgen0.57.1indirect
PyPIcoverage—indirect
PyPIdelegator-py—indirect
PyPIflake8—indirect
PyPIflake8-copyright—indirect
PyPIisort—indirect
PyPImaturin—indirect
PyPIpep8—indirect
PyPIpytest—indirect
PyPIpytest-cov—indirect
PyPItox—indirect
Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 96 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 17 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — PyPI, crates.io.