Public record
Software health reportschema 0.12.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-17 22:06 UTC

globaleaks / globaleaks-whistleblowing-software

GlobaLeaks is a free and open-source whistleblowing software enabling anyone to easily set up and maintain a secure reporting platform.

Python · TypeScript · HTMLAGPL-3.0★ 1,504 stars⑂ 354 forkssince Aug 2012View on GitHub ↗
KindWeb interfacehow this is determined

globaleaks/globaleaks-whistleblowing-software holds a health index of 93 out of 100, placing it in the Exceptional band. It scores highest on Vitality (100/100) and lowest on Sustainability & Governance (58/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

93
overall / 100
Exceptional

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

93
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 79 is calibrated to 93 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

GLOBALEAKSOrganization
128 followers15 public repossince Mar 2011

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

100Exceptional · 21% of overall

Development activity

100Exceptional
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 0 days ago
36/36Commit cadence52/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume855 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained30 commit(s) and 24 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year855
human_commit_share
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year52

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases78 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 5 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~12.7 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count78
latest_release_tagv5.0.97
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release5
mean_days_between_releases12.7
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

87Excellent · 17% of overall
How it's scored
51.5/60Stars1,504 stars
21.2/25Forks354 forks
10.4/15Watchers74 watchers
Inputs used
forks354
stars1,504
watchers74
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

92Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (AGPL-3.0)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateyes

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

58Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
5.1/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 78% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth55 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 43 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled55
top_contributor_share0.775
How it's scored
33.4/42Issue resolution80% of issues closed
16.1/30PR acceptance204/380 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs204
open_issues611
closed_issues2,378
prs_merged_7d
prs_decided_7d
prs_merged_30d
prs_decided_30d
issue_closed_ratio0.796
closed_unmerged_prs176
first_time_authors_30d
first_time_prs_merged_30d
first_time_prs_decided_30d
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domainverified-domain status not read for this organization
15.2/25Owner reach128 followers of globaleaks
20.8/25Track record15 public repos, account ~15 yr old
Inputs used
followers128
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified
owner_loginglobaleaks
public_repos15
account_age_days5,604
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

84Excellent · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows5 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter configeslint.config.js
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Testsno data
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.

Documentation

90Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://globaleaks.org
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics20 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsdigital-human-rights, anonymity, security, python, twisted, sqlalchemy, tor, libsodium, open-source, privacy, angular, digital-public-goods, accessibility, anticorruption, debian, free-software, typescript, whistleblowing, bootstrap, dompurify
has_wikino
homepagehttps://globaleaks.org
docs_sitehttps://globaleaks.org
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

75Good · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0.8/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
0/2.5CI-Testsno data
2.5/2.5CII-Best-Practicesbadge detected: Gold
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 43 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained30 commit(s) and 24 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packagingno data
5/5Pinned-Dependenciesall dependencies are pinned
5/5SASTSAST tool detected: CodeQL
5/5Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
7.5/7.5Token-PermissionsGitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
4.5/7.5Vulnerabilities4 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated15
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive3
scorecard_aggregate7.5
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): CI-Tests, Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

60Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit historyno data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrapdocumentation/Makefile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format configeslint.config.js
11/11Static type checkingclient/cypress/tsconfig.json, client/tsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environmentDockerfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno data
5/8Automated maintenancedependency automation configured, none observed in the sampled commits
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesall dependencies are pinned
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageno
bootstrap_filesdocumentation/Makefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configsclient/cypress/tsconfig.json, client/tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
27/45Type-checkable codePython with type-check config (client/cypress/tsconfig.json, client/tsconfig.json)
54.9/55Manageable file sizes1/546 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePython
largest_source_bytes63,803
source_files_sampled546
oversized_source_files1

Key facts

1,504GitHub stars
55contributors
855commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
78releases
1bus factor
611open issues
npm, PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Could not fetch pypi package 'globaleaks' from its registry

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 7.5 / 10
7.5aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-17 22:06 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
1Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
n/aCI-Testsno pull request found
10CII-Best-Practicesbadge detected: Gold
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 43 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 24 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
10Pinned-Dependenciesall dependencies are pinned
10SASTSAST tool detected: CodeQL
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
10Token-PermissionsGitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
6Vulnerabilities4 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 49
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
npm@angular/common21.2.18client/package.json
npm@angular/core21.2.18client/package.json
npm@angular/forms21.2.18client/package.json
npm@angular/localize21.2.18client/package.json
npm@angular/platform-browser21.2.18client/package.json
npm@angular/router21.2.18client/package.json
npm@flowjs/flow.js2.14.1client/package.json
npm@flowjs/ngx-flow21.0.0client/package.json
npm@fontsource-variable/inter5.2.8client/package.json
npm@fontsource-variable/noto-sans5.2.10client/package.json
npm@fontsource-variable/noto-sans-arabic5.2.10client/package.json
npm@fontsource-variable/noto-sans-armenian5.2.8client/package.json
npm@fontsource-variable/noto-sans-bengali5.2.11client/package.json
npm@fontsource-variable/noto-sans-ethiopic5.2.7client/package.json
npm@fontsource-variable/noto-sans-georgian5.2.8client/package.json
npm@fontsource-variable/noto-sans-hebrew5.2.8client/package.json
npm@fontsource-variable/noto-sans-hk5.2.10client/package.json
npm@fontsource-variable/noto-sans-jp5.2.10client/package.json
npm@fontsource-variable/noto-sans-khmer5.2.8client/package.json
npm@fontsource-variable/noto-sans-kr5.2.10client/package.json
npm@fontsource-variable/noto-sans-lao5.2.8client/package.json
npm@fontsource-variable/noto-sans-myanmar5.2.1client/package.json
npm@fontsource-variable/noto-sans-sc5.2.10client/package.json
npm@fontsource-variable/noto-sans-tamil5.2.7client/package.json
npm@fontsource-variable/noto-sans-thaana5.2.8client/package.json
npm@fontsource-variable/noto-sans-thai5.2.8client/package.json
npm@fontsource-variable/noto-serif-tibetan5.2.8client/package.json
npm@fortawesome/fontawesome-svg-core7.3.0client/package.json
npm@fortawesome/free-brands-svg-icons7.3.0client/package.json
npm@fortawesome/free-solid-svg-icons7.3.0client/package.json
npm@ng-bootstrap/ng-bootstrap20.0.0client/package.json
npm@ng-idle/core16.0.0client/package.json
npm@ng-idle/keepalive16.0.0client/package.json
npm@ng-select/ng-select21.8.2client/package.json
npm@ngx-translate/core17.0.0client/package.json
npm@ngx-translate/http-loader17.0.0client/package.json
npm@popperjs/core2.11.8client/package.json
npmangularx-qrcode21.0.5client/package.json
npmbootstrap5.3.8client/package.json
npmchart.js4.5.1client/package.json
npmdompurify3.4.12client/package.json
npmlibsodium-wrappers-sumo0.8.4client/package.json
npmmarked18.0.6client/package.json
npmng-multiselect-dropdown1.0.0client/package.json
npmng2-charts10.0.0client/package.json
npmngx-markdown21.3.0client/package.json
npmpdfjs-dist6.1.200client/package.json
npmrequestidlecallback-polyfill1.0.2client/package.json
npmrxjs7.8.2client/package.json
All dependencies 100

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 49 direct and 51 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npm@angular/common21.2.18direct
npm@angular/core21.2.18direct
npm@angular/forms21.2.18direct
npm@angular/localize21.2.18direct
npm@angular/platform-browser21.2.18direct
npm@angular/router21.2.18direct
npm@flowjs/flow.js2.14.1direct
npm@flowjs/ngx-flow21.0.0direct
npm@fontsource-variable/inter5.2.8direct
npm@fontsource-variable/noto-sans5.2.10direct
npm@fontsource-variable/noto-sans-arabic5.2.10direct
npm@fontsource-variable/noto-sans-armenian5.2.8direct
npm@fontsource-variable/noto-sans-bengali5.2.11direct
npm@fontsource-variable/noto-sans-ethiopic5.2.7direct
npm@fontsource-variable/noto-sans-georgian5.2.8direct
npm@fontsource-variable/noto-sans-hebrew5.2.8direct
npm@fontsource-variable/noto-sans-hk5.2.10direct
npm@fontsource-variable/noto-sans-jp5.2.10direct
npm@fontsource-variable/noto-sans-khmer5.2.8direct
npm@fontsource-variable/noto-sans-kr5.2.10direct
npm@fontsource-variable/noto-sans-lao5.2.8direct
npm@fontsource-variable/noto-sans-myanmar5.2.1direct
npm@fontsource-variable/noto-sans-sc5.2.10direct
npm@fontsource-variable/noto-sans-tamil5.2.7direct
npm@fontsource-variable/noto-sans-thaana5.2.8direct
npm@fontsource-variable/noto-sans-thai5.2.8direct
npm@fontsource-variable/noto-serif-tibetan5.2.8direct
npm@fortawesome/fontawesome-svg-core7.3.0direct
npm@fortawesome/free-brands-svg-icons7.3.0direct
npm@fortawesome/free-solid-svg-icons7.3.0direct
npm@ng-bootstrap/ng-bootstrap20.0.0direct
npm@ng-idle/core16.0.0direct
npm@ng-idle/keepalive16.0.0direct
npm@ng-select/ng-select21.8.2direct
npm@ngx-translate/core17.0.0direct
npm@ngx-translate/http-loader17.0.0direct
npm@popperjs/core2.11.8direct
npmangularx-qrcode21.0.5direct
npmbootstrap5.3.8direct
npmchart.js4.5.1direct
npmdompurify3.4.12direct
npmlibsodium-wrappers-sumo0.8.4direct
npmmarked18.0.6direct
npmng-multiselect-dropdown1.0.0direct
npmng2-charts10.0.0direct
npmngx-markdown21.3.0direct
npmpdfjs-dist6.1.200direct
npmrequestidlecallback-polyfill1.0.2direct
npmrxjs7.8.2direct
npm@angular-devkit/architect0.2102.19indirect
npm@angular-devkit/build-angular21.2.19indirect
npm@angular-devkit/core21.2.19indirect
npm@angular/cli21.2.19indirect
npm@angular/compiler21.2.18indirect
npm@angular/compiler-cli21.2.18indirect
npm@cypress/code-coverage4.0.3indirect
npm@cypress/schematic5.0.0indirect
npm@istanbuljs/nyc-config-typescript1.0.2indirect
npm@lodder/grunt-postcss3.1.1indirect
npm@types/flowjs__flow.js2.13.3indirect
npm@types/qrcode1.5.6indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/types8.63.0indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/utils8.63.0indirect
npmangular-eslint21.4.0indirect
npmaxe-core4.12.1indirect
npmcssnano8.0.2indirect
npmcypress15.18.1indirect
npmcypress-axe1.7.0indirect
npmeslint10.7.0indirect
npmgettext-parser9.1.1indirect
npmgrunt1.6.2indirect
npmgrunt-confirm1.0.8indirect
npmgrunt-contrib-clean2.0.1indirect
npmgrunt-contrib-copy1.0.0indirect
npmgrunt-shell4.0.0indirect
npmgrunt-string-replace1.3.3indirect
npmgrunt-webpack8.0.0indirect
npmless4.6.7indirect
npmlighthouse^12.8.2indirect
npmload-grunt-tasks5.1.0indirect
npmnpm-check-updates22.2.9indirect
npmnyc18.0.0indirect
npmpatch-package8.0.1indirect
npmpostcss8.5.17indirect
npmpostcss-rtlcss6.0.0indirect
npmpostinstall-postinstall2.1.0indirect
npmstylelint17.14.0indirect
npmstylelint-config-standard40.0.0indirect
npmsuperagent10.3.0indirect
npmts-node10.9.2indirect
npmtypescript5.9.3indirect
npmtypescript-eslint8.63.0indirect
npmyauzl3.4.0indirect
PyPIfuroindirect
PyPIsetuptoolsindirect
PyPIsphinxindirect
PyPIsphinx-autobuildindirect
PyPIsphinx-copybuttonindirect
PyPIsphinx-intlindirect
PyPIsphinx-sitemapindirect
Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.12.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics.