Public record
Software health reportschema 0.31.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-04 22:16 UTC

godotengine / godot

Godot Engine – Multi-platform 2D and 3D game engine

C++MIT★ 115,135 stars⑂ 26,235 forkssince Jan 2014View on GitHub ↗
KindMobile applicationDesktop applicationhow this is determined

godotengine/godot holds a health index of 34 out of 100, placing it in the At Risk band. It scores highest on Vitality (96/100) and lowest on Security (42/100). It was last updated today. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

34
overall / 100
At Risk

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

34
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 82 is calibrated to 95 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02). High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy applies a 50% multiplier to weighted overall health and gives it an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Ownership

Godot EngineOrganization
12,210 followers71 public repossince Jan 2014

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

96Exceptional · 21% of overall

Development activity

100Exceptional
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 0 days ago
36/36Commit cadence52/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume8,563 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained30 commit(s) and 17 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year8,563
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year52
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases71 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 21 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~33.5 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count71
latest_release_tag4.7.1-stable
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release21
mean_days_between_releases33.5

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

96Exceptional · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

100Exceptional
How it's scored
60/60Stars115,135 stars
25/25Forks26,235 forks
15/15Watchers1,539 watchers
Inputs used
forks26,235
stars115,135
watchers1,539
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

92Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateyes

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

78Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
25.2/54Bus factor2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
12.7/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 43% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth100 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 46 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor2
contributors_sampled100
top_contributor_share0.434
How it's scored
33.1/42Issue resolution79% of issues closed
24.7/30PR acceptance43,203/52,392 decided PRs merged
3.2/13Newcomer PR acceptance1/4 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
15/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Reviewall changesets reviewed
Inputs used
merged_prs43,203
open_issues13,351
closed_issues49,840
prs_merged_7d34
prs_decided_7d50
prs_merged_30d36
prs_decided_30d52
issue_closed_ratio0.789
closed_unmerged_prs9,189
first_time_authors_30d4
first_time_prs_merged_30d1
first_time_prs_decided_30d4
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domainverified-domain status not read for this organization
25/25Owner reach12,210 followers of godotengine
25/25Track record71 public repos, account ~12 yr old
Inputs used
followers12,210
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified
owner_logingodotengine
public_repos71
account_age_days4,595
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

95Exceptional · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows8 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config
9.6/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
18/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests23 out of 25 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configyes

Documentation

90Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://godotengine.org
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics7 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsgame-engine, godot, godotengine, open-source, multi-platform, gamedev, game-development
has_wikino
homepagehttps://godotengine.org
docs_sitehttps://godotengine.org
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

42Weak · 16% of overall
How it's scored
6/7.5Binary-Artifactsbinaries present in source code
0/7.5Branch-Protectionno data
2.2/2.5CI-Tests23 out of 25 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
0.5/2.5CII-Best-Practicesbadge detected: InProgress
7.5/7.5Code-Reviewall changesets reviewed
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 46 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained30 commit(s) and 17 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
5/5Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities28 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate5.5
high_risk_jurisdiction_cap34
high_risk_jurisdiction_multiplier50
security_posture_after_multiplier28
security_posture_before_jurisdiction55
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Packaging. Remaining weights renormalized. High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy applies a 50% multiplier and gives Security posture an At risk ceiling of 34.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories34
affected_packages14
assessed_packages173
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitycritical 1, high 10, moderate 3
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 173 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

63Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
35.2/40Legible commit history66 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.66
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrapdoc/Makefile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checkingC++ (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environmentlockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenanceno automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespackage-lock.json
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_filesdoc/Makefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsmodules/mono/editor/Godot.NET.Sdk/Godot.NET.Sdk/Godot.NET.Sdk.csproj, modules/mono/editor/Godot.NET.Sdk/Godot.SourceGenerators.Sample/Godot.SourceGenerators.Sample.csproj, modules/mono/editor/Godot.NET.Sdk/Godot.SourceGenerators.Tests/Godot.SourceGenerators.Tests.csproj, modules/mono/editor/Godot.NET.Sdk/Godot.SourceGenerators/Godot.SourceGenerators.csproj, modules/mono/editor/GodotTools/GodotTools.BuildLogger/GodotTools.BuildLogger.csproj, modules/mono/editor/GodotTools/GodotTools.Core/GodotTools.Core.csproj, modules/mono/editor/GodotTools/GodotTools.IdeMessaging.CLI/GodotTools.IdeMessaging.CLI.csproj, modules/mono/editor/GodotTools/GodotTools.IdeMessaging/GodotTools.IdeMessaging.csproj, modules/mono/editor/GodotTools/GodotTools.OpenVisualStudio/GodotTools.OpenVisualStudio.csproj, modules/mono/editor/GodotTools/GodotTools.ProjectEditor/GodotTools.ProjectEditor.csproj, modules/mono/editor/GodotTools/GodotTools.Shared/GodotTools.Shared.csproj, modules/mono/editor/GodotTools/GodotTools/GodotTools.csproj, modules/mono/glue/GodotSharp/Godot.SourceGenerators.Internal/Godot.SourceGenerators.Internal.csproj, modules/mono/glue/GodotSharp/GodotPlugins/GodotPlugins.csproj, modules/mono/glue/GodotSharp/GodotSharp/GodotSharp.csproj, modules/mono/glue/GodotSharp/GodotSharpEditor/GodotSharpEditor.csproj, platform/android/java/app/assetPackInstallTime/build.gradle, platform/android/java/app/build.gradle, platform/android/java/build.gradle, platform/android/java/editor/build.gradle, platform/android/java/lib/build.gradle, platform/android/java/nativeSrcsConfigs/build.gradle
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeC++ (statically typed)
51.6/55Manageable file sizes539/8,678 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageC++
largest_source_bytes7,245,869
source_files_sampled8,678
oversized_source_files539

Key facts

115,135GitHub stars
100contributors
8,563commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
71releases
2bus factor
13,351open issues
PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • First-time contributor figures cover 12 of 35 authors (cap 12)

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 26,235 ⇿
0Stars
26,235Forks
2Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Only the most recent history is shown — this repository exceeds the collection window, so the earliest history is not captured.

25,00025,25025,50025,75026,00026,25026,235242026-052026-072026-08
Major 0Minor 0Patch 0
OpenSSF Scorecard 5.5 / 10
5.5aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-04 22:14 UTC

8Binary-Artifactsbinaries present in source code
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
9CI-Tests23 out of 25 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
2CII-Best-Practicesbadge detected: InProgress
10Code-Reviewall changesets reviewed
10Contributorsproject has 46 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 17 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities28 existing vulnerabilities detected
All dependencies 173

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 0 direct and 173 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npm@babel/parser7.24.5indirect
npm@eslint-community/eslint-utils4.4.0indirect
npm@eslint-community/regexpp4.12.1indirect
npm@eslint/config-array0.19.1indirect
npm@eslint/core0.9.1indirect
npm@eslint/eslintrc3.2.0indirect
npm@eslint/js9.15.0indirect
npm@eslint/object-schema2.1.5indirect
npm@eslint/plugin-kit0.2.4indirect
npm@html-eslint/eslint-plugin0.27.0indirect
npm@html-eslint/parser0.27.0indirect
npm@humanfs/core0.19.1indirect
npm@humanfs/node0.16.6indirect
npm@humanwhocodes/module-importer1.0.1indirect
npm@humanwhocodes/retry0.3.1indirect
npm@humanwhocodes/retry0.4.1indirect
npm@jsdoc/salty0.2.8indirect
npm@nodelib/fs.scandir2.1.5indirect
npm@nodelib/fs.stat2.0.5indirect
npm@nodelib/fs.walk1.2.8indirect
npm@stylistic/eslint-plugin2.9.0indirect
npm@types/estree1.0.6indirect
npm@types/json-schema7.0.15indirect
npm@types/linkify-it5.0.0indirect
npm@types/markdown-it14.1.1indirect
npm@types/mdurl2.0.0indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/scope-manager8.11.0indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/types8.11.0indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/typescript-estree8.11.0indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/utils8.11.0indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/visitor-keys8.11.0indirect
npmacorn8.14.0indirect
npmacorn-jsx5.3.2indirect
npmajv6.12.6indirect
npmansi-styles4.3.0indirect
npmargparse2.0.1indirect
npmbalanced-match1.0.2indirect
npmbluebird3.7.2indirect
npmbrace-expansion1.1.11indirect
npmbrace-expansion2.0.1indirect
npmbraces3.0.3indirect
npmcallsites3.1.0indirect
npmcatharsis0.9.0indirect
npmchalk4.1.2indirect
npmcolor-convert2.0.1indirect
npmcolor-name1.1.4indirect
npmconcat-map0.0.1indirect
npmcross-spawn7.0.6indirect
npmdebug4.3.4indirect
npmdeep-is0.1.4indirect
npmdom-serializer2.0.0indirect
npmdomelementtype2.3.0indirect
npmdomhandler5.0.3indirect
npmdomutils3.1.0indirect
npmentities4.5.0indirect
npmes-html-parser0.0.9indirect
npmescape-string-regexp2.0.0indirect
npmescape-string-regexp4.0.0indirect
npmeslint9.15.0indirect
npmeslint-plugin-html8.1.1indirect
npmeslint-scope8.2.0indirect
npmeslint-visitor-keys3.4.3indirect
npmeslint-visitor-keys4.2.0indirect
npmespree10.3.0indirect
npmesquery1.5.0indirect
npmesrecurse4.3.0indirect
npmestraverse5.3.0indirect
npmesutils2.0.3indirect
npmfast-deep-equal3.1.3indirect
npmfast-glob3.3.2indirect
npmfast-json-stable-stringify2.1.0indirect
npmfast-levenshtein2.0.6indirect
npmfastq1.17.1indirect
npmfile-entry-cache8.0.0indirect
npmfill-range7.1.1indirect
npmfind-up5.0.0indirect
npmflat-cache4.0.1indirect
npmflatted3.3.1indirect
npmglob-parent5.1.2indirect
npmglob-parent6.0.2indirect
npmglobals14.0.0indirect
npmglobals15.9.0indirect
npmgraceful-fs4.2.11indirect
npmhas-flag4.0.0indirect
npmhtmlparser29.1.0indirect
npmignore5.3.2indirect
npmimport-fresh3.3.0indirect
npmimurmurhash0.1.4indirect
npmis-extglob2.1.1indirect
npmis-glob4.0.3indirect
npmis-number7.0.0indirect
npmisexe2.0.0indirect
npmjs-yaml4.1.1indirect
npmjs2xmlparser4.0.2indirect
npmjsdoc4.0.3indirect
npmjson-buffer3.0.1indirect
npmjson-schema-traverse0.4.1indirect
npmjson-stable-stringify-without-jsonify1.0.1indirect
npmkeyv4.5.4indirect
npmklaw3.0.0indirect
npmlevn0.4.1indirect
npmlinkify-it5.0.0indirect
npmlocate-path6.0.0indirect
npmlodash4.17.21indirect
npmlodash.merge4.6.2indirect
npmmarkdown-it14.1.0indirect
npmmarkdown-it-anchor8.6.7indirect
npmmarked4.3.0indirect
npmmdurl2.0.0indirect
npmmerge21.4.1indirect
npmmicromatch4.0.8indirect
npmminimatch3.1.2indirect
npmminimatch9.0.5indirect
npmmkdirp1.0.4indirect
npmms2.1.2indirect
npmnatural-compare1.4.0indirect
npmoptionator0.9.4indirect
npmp-limit3.1.0indirect
npmp-locate5.0.0indirect
npmparent-module1.0.1indirect
npmpath-exists4.0.0indirect
npmpath-key3.1.1indirect
npmpicomatch2.3.1indirect
npmpicomatch4.0.2indirect
npmprelude-ls1.2.1indirect
npmpunycode2.3.1indirect
npmpunycode.js2.3.1indirect
npmqueue-microtask1.2.3indirect
npmrequizzle0.2.4indirect
npmresolve-from4.0.0indirect
npmreusify1.0.4indirect
npmrun-parallel1.2.0indirect
npmsemver7.6.3indirect
npmshebang-command2.0.0indirect
npmshebang-regex3.0.0indirect
npmstrip-json-comments3.1.1indirect
npmsupports-color7.2.0indirect
npmto-regex-range5.0.1indirect
npmts-api-utils1.3.0indirect
npmtype-check0.4.0indirect
npmtypescript5.6.3indirect
npmuc.micro2.1.0indirect
npmunderscore1.13.6indirect
npmuri-js4.4.1indirect
npmwhich2.0.2indirect
npmword-wrap1.2.5indirect
npmxmlcreate2.0.4indirect
npmyocto-queue0.1.0indirect
NuGetcoverlet.collector6.0.4indirect
NuGetEnvDTE17.8.37221indirect
NuGetJetBrains.Annotations2019.1.3.0indirect
NuGetJetBrains.Rider.PathLocator1.0.12indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Build15.1.548indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Build.Framework15.1.548indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Build.Locator1.2.6indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.Analyzers3.3.4indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp4.11.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp4.8.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Analyzer.Testing.XUnit1.1.2indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.CodeFix.Testing1.1.2indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.CodeFix.Testing.XUnit1.1.2indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.SourceGenerators.Testing.XUnit1.1.2indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Workspaces3.11.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Workspaces4.8.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk18.0.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.NETFramework.ReferenceAssemblies1.0.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.VisualStudio.SolutionPersistence1.0.52indirect
NuGetNewtonsoft.Json13.0.1indirect
NuGetNuGet.Frameworks6.12.1indirect
NuGetReflectionAnalyzers0.1.22-devindirect
NuGetSystem.Security.Cryptography.Pkcs9.0.10indirect
NuGetxunit2.9.3indirect
NuGetxunit.runner.visualstudio3.1.5indirect
Dependency advisories 14

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 173 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 14 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
flatted3.3.1indirectcritical23.4.2
brace-expansion1.1.11indirecthigh55.0.9
brace-expansion2.0.1indirecthigh55.0.9
js-yaml4.1.1indirecthigh24.3.0
linkify-it5.0.0indirecthigh25.0.2
lodash4.17.21indirecthigh34.18.0
minimatch3.1.2indirecthigh310.2.3
minimatch9.0.5indirecthigh310.2.3
picomatch2.3.1indirecthigh24.0.4
picomatch4.0.2indirecthigh24.0.4
underscore1.13.6indirecthigh11.13.8
@eslint/plugin-kit0.2.4indirectmoderate10.3.4
ajv6.12.6indirectmoderate18.18.0
markdown-it14.1.0indirectmoderate214.2.0

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.31.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics.