Public recordAt Risk
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-16 13:41 UTC
godotengine / godot
Godot Engine – Multi-platform 2D and 3D game engine
godotengine/godot holds a health index of 34 out of 100, placing it in the At Risk band. It scores highest on Vitality (96/100) and lowest on Security (44/100). It was last updated today. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.
34
overall / 100Software health index
Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.
34
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
Score profile
Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.
The weighted overall 82 is calibrated to 95 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02). High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy applies a 50% multiplier to weighted overall health and gives it an At Risk ceiling of 34.
Ownership
Godot EngineOrganization · verified domain
12,503 followers70 public repossince Jan 2014
This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.
Metrics by category
Vitality
Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?
96
Development activity
100Exceptional
How it's scored
| 36/36 | Push recency — last push 0 days ago |
| 36/36 | Commit cadence — 52/52 weeks with commits |
| 18/18 | Commit volume — 8,895 commits in the last year |
| 10/10 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 13 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10 |
Inputs used
| commits_last_year | 8,895 |
| human_commit_share | 1 |
| days_since_last_push | 0 |
| active_weeks_last_year | 52 |
Release discipline
90Excellent
How it's scored
| 27/27 | Ships releases — 73 releases published |
| 36/36 | Release recency — latest release 24 days ago |
| 27/27 | Release cadence — a release every ~33.7 days |
| 0/10 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases. |
Inputs used
| releases_count | 73 |
| latest_release_tag | 3.6.3-stable |
| releases_from_tags | no |
| days_since_latest_release | 24 |
| mean_days_between_releases | 33.7 |
Community & Adoption
Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?
96
Popularity & adoption
100Exceptional
How it's scored
| 60/60 | Stars — 117,272 stars |
| 25/25 | Forks — 26,766 forks |
| 15/15 | Watchers — 1,546 watchers |
Inputs used
| forks | 26,766 |
| stars | 117,272 |
| watchers | 1,546 |
| growth_state | unverified |
| growth_factor_pct | 100 |
| growth_unverified_reason | no_history |
Community health
92Excellent
How it's scored
| 22.5/22.5 | README |
| 22.5/22.5 | License — recognized license (MIT) |
| 18/18 | CONTRIBUTING guide |
| 13.5/13.5 | Code of conduct |
| 0/7.2 | Issue template |
| 6.3/6.3 | PR template |
Inputs used
| has_readme | yes |
| has_license | yes |
| readme_badges | 0 |
| has_contributing | yes |
| has_issue_template | no |
| has_code_of_conduct | yes |
| readme_badge_services | — |
| has_pull_request_template | yes |
Sustainability & Governance
Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?
77
Maintainer resilience (bus factor)
62Moderate
How it's scored
| 25.2/54 | Bus factor — 2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits |
| 12.8/22.5 | Commit distribution — top contributor authored 43% of commits |
| 13.5/13.5 | Contributor breadth — 100 contributors |
| 10/10 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 46 contributing companies or organizations |
Inputs used
| bus_factor | 2 |
| contributors_sampled | 100 |
| top_contributor_share | 0.429 |
How it's scored
| 33.1/42 | Issue resolution — 79% of issues closed |
| 24.7/30 | PR acceptance — 43,723/53,147 decided PRs merged |
| 0/13 | Newcomer PR acceptance — 0/6 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d |
| 15/15 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — all changesets reviewed |
Inputs used
| merged_prs | 43,723 |
| open_issues | 13,475 |
| closed_issues | 50,249 |
| prs_merged_7d | 31 |
| prs_decided_7d | 50 |
| prs_merged_30d | 31 |
| prs_decided_30d | 50 |
| issue_closed_ratio | 0.789 |
| closed_unmerged_prs | 9,424 |
| first_time_authors_30d | 4 |
| first_time_prs_merged_30d | 0 |
| first_time_prs_decided_30d | 6 |
Ownership & stewardship
100Exceptional
How it's scored
| 30/30 | Ownership backing — organization-owned |
| 20/20 | Verified domain |
| 25/25 | Owner reach — 12,503 followers of godotengine |
| 25/25 | Track record — 70 public repos, account ~12 yr old |
Inputs used
| followers | 12,503 |
| owner_type | Organization |
| is_verified | yes |
| owner_login | godotengine |
| public_repos | 70 |
| account_age_days | 4,637 |
Engineering Quality
Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?
95
Engineering practices
98Exceptional
How it's scored
| 24/24 | CI workflows — 9 workflow(s) |
| 24/24 | Tests present |
| 16/16 | Linter config — pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff]) |
| 9.6/9.6 | Pre-commit hooks |
| 6.4/6.4 | .editorconfig |
| 18/20 | OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 18 out of 19 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9 |
Inputs used
| has_ci | yes |
| has_tests | yes |
| has_editorconfig | yes |
| has_linter_config | yes |
| has_precommit_config | yes |
Documentation
90Excellent
How it's scored
| 30/30 | README |
| 25/25 | Documentation directory |
| 15/15 | Documentation / homepage site — https://godotengine.org |
| 10/10 | Repository description |
| 10/10 | Topics — 7 topics |
| 0/10 | Wiki |
Inputs used
| topics | game-engine, godot, godotengine, open-source, multi-platform, gamedev, game-development |
| has_wiki | no |
| homepage | https://godotengine.org |
| docs_site | https://godotengine.org |
| has_readme | yes |
| has_docs_dir | yes |
| has_description | yes |
Security
Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?
44
Security posture
30At Risk
Jurisdiction risk alert
High-risk jurisdiction exposure detected
1 top contributor profilesRussia
Based on self-published public profile locations. This governance signal does not determine nationality, citizenship, intent, sanctions status, or individual trustworthiness.
How jurisdiction exposure is assessedHow it's scored
| 6/7.5 | Binary-Artifacts — binaries present in source code |
| 0/7.5 | Branch-Protection — no data |
| 2.2/2.5 | CI-Tests — 18 out of 19 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9 |
| 0.5/2.5 | CII-Best-Practices — badge detected: InProgress |
| 7.5/7.5 | Code-Review — all changesets reviewed |
| 2.5/2.5 | Contributors — project has 46 contributing companies or organizations |
| 10/10 | Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected |
| 7.5/7.5 | Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected |
| 0/5 | Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed |
| 2.5/2.5 | License — license file detected |
| 7.5/7.5 | Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 13 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10 |
| 0/5 | Packaging — no data |
| 0/5 | Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0 |
| 0/5 | SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0 |
| 5/5 | Security-Policy — security policy file detected |
| 0/7.5 | Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases. |
| 0/7.5 | Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions |
| 4.5/7.5 | Vulnerabilities — 4 existing vulnerabilities detected |
Inputs used
| source | openssf_scorecard |
| checks_evaluated | 16 |
| scorecard_version | v5.5.0 |
| checks_inconclusive | 2 |
| scorecard_aggregate | 6 |
| high_risk_jurisdiction_cap | 34 |
| high_risk_jurisdiction_multiplier | 50 |
| security_posture_after_multiplier | 30 |
| security_posture_before_jurisdiction | 60 |
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Packaging. Remaining weights renormalized. High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy applies a 50% multiplier and gives Security posture an At risk ceiling of 34.
Dependency advisories
100Exceptional
How it's scored
| 35/35 | Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory |
| 0/25 | Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope |
| 0/40 | No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date |
Inputs used
| source | osv |
| advisories | 0 |
| affected_packages | 0 |
| assessed_packages | 168 |
| unassessed_packages | 0 |
| affected_by_severity | none |
| direct_affected_packages | 0 |
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 168 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.
AI Readiness
How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.
63
Agent context & guidance
34At Risk
How it's scored
| 0/45 | Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules |
| 0/15 | Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) |
| 33.6/40 | Legible commit history — 63 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body) |
Inputs used
| has_llms_txt | no |
| llms_txt_url | — |
| legible_history_share | 0.63 |
| agent_instruction_files | — |
| agent_instruction_max_bytes | — |
How it's scored
| 18/18 | One-command bootstrap — doc/Makefile |
| 22/22 | Automated tests |
| 11/11 | Lint / format config — pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff]) |
| 11/11 | Static type checking — C++ (statically typed) |
| 10/10 | Reproducible environment — lockfile |
| 0/10 | Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100 |
| 0/8 | Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed |
| 0/10 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0 |
Inputs used
| has_nix | no |
| has_tests | yes |
| lockfiles | package-lock.json |
| has_dockerfile | no |
| typed_language | yes |
| bootstrap_files | doc/Makefile |
| has_devcontainer | no |
| has_linter_config | yes |
| typecheck_configs | — |
| agent_commit_share | 0 |
| toolchain_manifests | modules/mono/editor/Godot.NET.Sdk/Godot.NET.Sdk/Godot.NET.Sdk.csproj, modules/mono/editor/Godot.NET.Sdk/Godot.SourceGenerators.Sample/Godot.SourceGenerators.Sample.csproj, modules/mono/editor/Godot.NET.Sdk/Godot.SourceGenerators.Tests/Godot.SourceGenerators.Tests.csproj, modules/mono/editor/Godot.NET.Sdk/Godot.SourceGenerators/Godot.SourceGenerators.csproj, modules/mono/editor/GodotTools/GodotTools.BuildLogger/GodotTools.BuildLogger.csproj, modules/mono/editor/GodotTools/GodotTools.Core/GodotTools.Core.csproj, modules/mono/editor/GodotTools/GodotTools.IdeMessaging.CLI/GodotTools.IdeMessaging.CLI.csproj, modules/mono/editor/GodotTools/GodotTools.IdeMessaging/GodotTools.IdeMessaging.csproj, modules/mono/editor/GodotTools/GodotTools.OpenVisualStudio/GodotTools.OpenVisualStudio.csproj, modules/mono/editor/GodotTools/GodotTools.ProjectEditor/GodotTools.ProjectEditor.csproj, modules/mono/editor/GodotTools/GodotTools.Shared/GodotTools.Shared.csproj, modules/mono/editor/GodotTools/GodotTools/GodotTools.csproj, modules/mono/glue/GodotSharp/Godot.SourceGenerators.Internal/Godot.SourceGenerators.Internal.csproj, modules/mono/glue/GodotSharp/GodotPlugins/GodotPlugins.csproj, modules/mono/glue/GodotSharp/GodotSharp/GodotSharp.csproj, modules/mono/glue/GodotSharp/GodotSharpEditor/GodotSharpEditor.csproj, platform/android/java/app/assetPackInstallTime/build.gradle, platform/android/java/app/build.gradle, platform/android/java/build.gradle, platform/android/java/editor/build.gradle, platform/android/java/editor/macrobenchmark/build.gradle, platform/android/java/lib/build.gradle, platform/android/java/nativeSrcsConfigs/build.gradle |
| dependency_bot_commit_share | 0 |
Code legibility for models
97Exceptional
How it's scored
| 45/45 | Type-checkable code — C++ (statically typed) |
| 51.6/55 | Manageable file sizes — 543/8,798 source files over 60KB |
Inputs used
| primary_language | C++ |
| largest_source_bytes | 7,245,869 |
| source_files_sampled | 8,798 |
| oversized_source_files | 543 |
Key facts
117,272GitHub stars
100contributors
8,895commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
73releases
2bus factor
13,475open issues
PyPIpackage ecosystems
Data collection warnings
- Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
- First-time contributor figures cover 12 of 35 authors (cap 12)
More detail
Star and fork history 0 ★ / 26,766 ⇿
0Stars
26,766Forks
3Releases
When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.
Only the most recent history is shown — this repository exceeds the collection window, so the earliest history is not captured.
Major 0Minor 0Patch 0
OpenSSF Scorecard 6.0 / 10
6.0aggregate
Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).
| 8 | Binary-Artifacts | binaries present in source code |
| n/a | Branch-Protection | internal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md |
| 9 | CI-Tests | 18 out of 19 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9 |
| 2 | CII-Best-Practices | badge detected: InProgress |
| 10 | Code-Review | all changesets reviewed |
| 10 | Contributors | project has 46 contributing companies or organizations |
| 10 | Dangerous-Workflow | no dangerous workflow patterns detected |
| 10 | Dependency-Update-Tool | update tool detected |
| 0 | Fuzzing | project is not fuzzed |
| 10 | License | license file detected |
| 10 | Maintained | 30 commit(s) and 13 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10 |
| n/a | Packaging | packaging workflow not detected |
| 0 | Pinned-Dependencies | dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0 |
| 0 | SAST | SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0 |
| 10 | Security-Policy | security policy file detected |
| 0 | Signed-Releases | Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases. |
| 0 | Token-Permissions | detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions |
| 6 | Vulnerabilities | 4 existing vulnerabilities detected |
All dependencies 168
Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 0 direct and 168 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.
| Registry | Package | Version | Relation |
|---|---|---|---|
| npm | @babel/helper-string-parser | 7.29.7 | indirect |
| npm | @babel/helper-validator-identifier | 7.29.7 | indirect |
| npm | @babel/parser | 7.29.8 | indirect |
| npm | @babel/types | 7.29.8 | indirect |
| npm | @eslint-community/eslint-utils | 4.10.1 | indirect |
| npm | @eslint-community/regexpp | 4.12.2 | indirect |
| npm | @eslint/config-array | 0.21.2 | indirect |
| npm | @eslint/config-helpers | 0.4.2 | indirect |
| npm | @eslint/core | 0.17.0 | indirect |
| npm | @eslint/eslintrc | 3.3.7 | indirect |
| npm | @eslint/js | 9.39.5 | indirect |
| npm | @eslint/object-schema | 2.1.7 | indirect |
| npm | @eslint/plugin-kit | 0.4.1 | indirect |
| npm | @html-eslint/eslint-plugin | 0.27.0 | indirect |
| npm | @html-eslint/parser | 0.27.0 | indirect |
| npm | @humanfs/core | 0.19.2 | indirect |
| npm | @humanfs/node | 0.16.8 | indirect |
| npm | @humanfs/types | 0.15.0 | indirect |
| npm | @humanwhocodes/module-importer | 1.0.1 | indirect |
| npm | @humanwhocodes/retry | 0.4.3 | indirect |
| npm | @jsdoc/salty | 0.2.12 | indirect |
| npm | @stylistic/eslint-plugin | 2.13.0 | indirect |
| npm | @types/estree | 1.0.9 | indirect |
| npm | @types/json-schema | 7.0.15 | indirect |
| npm | @types/linkify-it | 5.0.0 | indirect |
| npm | @types/markdown-it | 14.2.0 | indirect |
| npm | @types/mdurl | 2.0.0 | indirect |
| npm | @typescript-eslint/project-service | 8.70.0 | indirect |
| npm | @typescript-eslint/scope-manager | 8.70.0 | indirect |
| npm | @typescript-eslint/tsconfig-utils | 8.70.0 | indirect |
| npm | @typescript-eslint/types | 8.70.0 | indirect |
| npm | @typescript-eslint/typescript-estree | 8.70.0 | indirect |
| npm | @typescript-eslint/utils | 8.70.0 | indirect |
| npm | @typescript-eslint/visitor-keys | 8.70.0 | indirect |
| npm | acorn | 8.18.0 | indirect |
| npm | acorn-jsx | 5.3.2 | indirect |
| npm | ajv | 6.15.0 | indirect |
| npm | ansi-styles | 4.3.0 | indirect |
| npm | argparse | 2.0.1 | indirect |
| npm | balanced-match | 1.0.2 | indirect |
| npm | balanced-match | 4.0.4 | indirect |
| npm | bluebird | 3.7.2 | indirect |
| npm | brace-expansion | 1.1.18 | indirect |
| npm | brace-expansion | 5.0.9 | indirect |
| npm | callsites | 3.1.0 | indirect |
| npm | catharsis | 0.9.0 | indirect |
| npm | chalk | 4.1.2 | indirect |
| npm | color-convert | 2.0.1 | indirect |
| npm | color-name | 1.1.4 | indirect |
| npm | concat-map | 0.0.1 | indirect |
| npm | cross-spawn | 7.0.6 | indirect |
| npm | debug | 4.4.3 | indirect |
| npm | deep-is | 0.1.4 | indirect |
| npm | dom-serializer | 2.0.0 | indirect |
| npm | domelementtype | 2.3.0 | indirect |
| npm | domhandler | 5.0.3 | indirect |
| npm | domutils | 3.2.2 | indirect |
| npm | entities | 4.5.0 | indirect |
| npm | entities | 7.0.1 | indirect |
| npm | es-html-parser | 0.0.9 | indirect |
| npm | escape-string-regexp | 2.0.0 | indirect |
| npm | escape-string-regexp | 4.0.0 | indirect |
| npm | eslint | 9.39.5 | indirect |
| npm | eslint-plugin-html | 8.2.0 | indirect |
| npm | eslint-scope | 8.4.0 | indirect |
| npm | eslint-visitor-keys | 3.4.3 | indirect |
| npm | eslint-visitor-keys | 4.2.1 | indirect |
| npm | eslint-visitor-keys | 5.0.1 | indirect |
| npm | espree | 10.4.0 | indirect |
| npm | esquery | 1.7.0 | indirect |
| npm | esrecurse | 4.3.0 | indirect |
| npm | estraverse | 5.3.0 | indirect |
| npm | esutils | 2.0.3 | indirect |
| npm | fast-deep-equal | 3.1.3 | indirect |
| npm | fast-json-stable-stringify | 2.1.0 | indirect |
| npm | fast-levenshtein | 2.0.6 | indirect |
| npm | fdir | 6.5.0 | indirect |
| npm | file-entry-cache | 8.0.0 | indirect |
| npm | find-up | 5.0.0 | indirect |
| npm | flat-cache | 4.0.1 | indirect |
| npm | flatted | 3.4.4 | indirect |
| npm | glob-parent | 6.0.2 | indirect |
| npm | globals | 14.0.0 | indirect |
| npm | globals | 15.15.0 | indirect |
| npm | graceful-fs | 4.2.11 | indirect |
| npm | has-flag | 4.0.0 | indirect |
| npm | htmlparser2 | 10.1.0 | indirect |
| npm | ignore | 5.3.2 | indirect |
| npm | import-fresh | 3.3.1 | indirect |
| npm | imurmurhash | 0.1.4 | indirect |
| npm | is-extglob | 2.1.1 | indirect |
| npm | is-glob | 4.0.3 | indirect |
| npm | isexe | 2.0.0 | indirect |
| npm | js-yaml | 4.3.2 | indirect |
| npm | js2xmlparser | 4.0.2 | indirect |
| npm | jsdoc | 4.0.5 | indirect |
| npm | json-buffer | 3.0.1 | indirect |
| npm | json-schema-traverse | 0.4.1 | indirect |
| npm | json-stable-stringify-without-jsonify | 1.0.1 | indirect |
| npm | keyv | 4.5.4 | indirect |
| npm | klaw | 3.0.0 | indirect |
| npm | levn | 0.4.1 | indirect |
| npm | linkify-it | 5.0.2 | indirect |
| npm | locate-path | 6.0.0 | indirect |
| npm | lodash | 4.18.1 | indirect |
| npm | lodash.merge | 4.6.2 | indirect |
| npm | markdown-it | 14.3.1 | indirect |
| npm | markdown-it-anchor | 8.6.7 | indirect |
| npm | marked | 4.3.0 | indirect |
| npm | mdurl | 2.1.0 | indirect |
| npm | minimatch | 10.2.6 | indirect |
| npm | minimatch | 3.1.5 | indirect |
| npm | mkdirp | 1.0.4 | indirect |
| npm | ms | 2.1.3 | indirect |
| npm | natural-compare | 1.4.0 | indirect |
| npm | optionator | 0.9.4 | indirect |
| npm | p-limit | 3.1.0 | indirect |
| npm | p-locate | 5.0.0 | indirect |
| npm | parent-module | 1.0.1 | indirect |
| npm | path-exists | 4.0.0 | indirect |
| npm | path-key | 3.1.1 | indirect |
| npm | picomatch | 4.0.7 | indirect |
| npm | prelude-ls | 1.2.1 | indirect |
| npm | punycode | 2.3.1 | indirect |
| npm | punycode.js | 2.3.1 | indirect |
| npm | requizzle | 0.2.4 | indirect |
| npm | resolve-from | 4.0.0 | indirect |
| npm | semver | 7.8.5 | indirect |
| npm | shebang-command | 2.0.0 | indirect |
| npm | shebang-regex | 3.0.0 | indirect |
| npm | strip-json-comments | 3.1.1 | indirect |
| npm | supports-color | 7.2.0 | indirect |
| npm | tinyglobby | 0.2.17 | indirect |
| npm | ts-api-utils | 2.5.0 | indirect |
| npm | type-check | 0.4.0 | indirect |
| npm | typescript | 6.0.3 | indirect |
| npm | uc.micro | 2.1.0 | indirect |
| npm | underscore | 1.13.8 | indirect |
| npm | uri-js | 4.4.1 | indirect |
| npm | which | 2.0.2 | indirect |
| npm | word-wrap | 1.2.5 | indirect |
| npm | xmlcreate | 2.0.4 | indirect |
| npm | yocto-queue | 0.1.0 | indirect |
| NuGet | coverlet.collector | 6.0.4 | indirect |
| NuGet | EnvDTE | 17.8.37221 | indirect |
| NuGet | JetBrains.Annotations | 2019.1.3.0 | indirect |
| NuGet | JetBrains.Rider.PathLocator | 1.0.12 | indirect |
| NuGet | Microsoft.Build | 15.1.548 | indirect |
| NuGet | Microsoft.Build.Framework | 15.1.548 | indirect |
| NuGet | Microsoft.Build.Locator | 1.2.6 | indirect |
| NuGet | Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.Analyzers | 3.3.4 | indirect |
| NuGet | Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp | 4.11.0 | indirect |
| NuGet | Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp | 4.8.0 | indirect |
| NuGet | Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Analyzer.Testing.XUnit | 1.1.2 | indirect |
| NuGet | Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.CodeFix.Testing | 1.1.2 | indirect |
| NuGet | Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.CodeFix.Testing.XUnit | 1.1.2 | indirect |
| NuGet | Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.SourceGenerators.Testing.XUnit | 1.1.2 | indirect |
| NuGet | Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Workspaces | 3.11.0 | indirect |
| NuGet | Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.Workspaces | 4.8.0 | indirect |
| NuGet | Microsoft.NET.Test.Sdk | 18.0.0 | indirect |
| NuGet | Microsoft.NETFramework.ReferenceAssemblies | 1.0.0 | indirect |
| NuGet | Microsoft.VisualStudio.SolutionPersistence | 1.0.52 | indirect |
| NuGet | Newtonsoft.Json | 13.0.1 | indirect |
| NuGet | NuGet.Frameworks | 6.12.1 | indirect |
| NuGet | ReflectionAnalyzers | 0.1.22-dev | indirect |
| NuGet | System.Security.Cryptography.Pkcs | 9.0.10 | indirect |
| NuGet | xunit | 2.9.3 | indirect |
| NuGet | xunit.runner.visualstudio | 3.1.5 | indirect |
Dependency advisories 0
This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 168 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.
No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.
An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.
Raw JSON report machine-readable
Feedback
Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.
Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.
Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.
How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics.