Public record
Software health reportschema 0.26.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-22 05:43 UTC

gofiber / template

🧬 Template engine middleware for Fiber

GoMIT★ 313 stars⑂ 61 forkssince Feb 2020View on GitHub ↗

gofiber/template holds a health index of 89 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Vitality (95/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (55/100). It was last updated 1 day ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

89
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

89
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 75 is calibrated to 89 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

FiberOrganization
879 followers34 public repossince Jan 2020

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
Gogithub.com/gofiber/template/v2v2.1.0-2200 days ago
Gogithub.com/gofiber/template/ace/v3v3.0.6-722 days ago
Gogithub.com/gofiber/template/jet/v3v3.0.6-722 days ago
Gogithub.com/gofiber/template/pug/v3v3.0.7-822 days ago
Gogithub.com/gofiber/template/html/v3v3.0.6-722 days ago
Gogithub.com/gofiber/template/slim/v3v3.0.7-822 days ago
Gogithub.com/gofiber/template/amber/v3v3.0.6-722 days ago
Gogithub.com/gofiber/template/django/v4v4.0.7-822 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

95Exceptional · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 1 days ago
27/36Commit cadence39/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume235 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year235
human_commit_share0.54
days_since_last_push1
active_weeks_last_year39

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases100 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 20 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~3.1 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count100
latest_release_taghtml/v3.0.6
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release20
mean_days_between_releases3.1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

55Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
40.5/60Stars313 stars
14.8/25Forks61 forks
3.9/15Watchers6 watchers
Inputs used
forks61
stars313
watchers6
growth_stateorganic
growth_factor_pct100
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

73Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
9.9/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 56% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth30 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 22 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled30
top_contributor_share0.558
How it's scored
35/42Issue resolution83% of issues closed
26/30PR acceptance358/413 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 0/5 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs358
open_issues17
closed_issues85
prs_merged_7d
prs_decided_7d
prs_merged_30d
prs_decided_30d
issue_closed_ratio0.833
closed_unmerged_prs55
first_time_authors_30d
first_time_prs_merged_30d
first_time_prs_decided_30d
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domainverified-domain status not read for this organization
21.2/25Owner reach879 followers of gofiber
23.2/25Track record34 public repos, account ~6 yr old
Inputs used
followers879
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified
owner_logingofiber
public_repos34
account_age_days2,379
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable8 package(s) on go
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 22 days ago
20/20Version history8 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesgithub.com/gofiber/template/v2, github.com/gofiber/template/ace/v3, github.com/gofiber/template/jet/v3, github.com/gofiber/template/pug/v3, github.com/gofiber/template/html/v3, github.com/gofiber/template/slim/v3, github.com/gofiber/template/amber/v3, github.com/gofiber/template/django/v4
ecosystemsgo
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish22

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

80Excellent · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows22 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config.golangci.yml
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests13 out of 13 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://docs.gofiber.io/guide/templates
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics4 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsmiddleware, fiber, template-engine, template
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://docs.gofiber.io/guide/templates
docs_sitehttps://docs.gofiber.io/guide/templates
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

70Good · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
4.5/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests13 out of 13 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 0/5 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 22 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packagingno data
1.5/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 3
5/5SASTSAST tool is run on all commits
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate6.3
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages21
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 21 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

73Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history46 of 54 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.852
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrapMakefile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config.golangci.yml
11/11Static type checkingGo (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environmentlockfile
4/10Demonstrated agent practice2 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8Automated maintenance34 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesgo.sum
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_filesMakefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0.02
toolchain_manifestsace/go.mod, amber/go.mod, django/go.mod, go.mod, handlebars/go.mod, html/go.mod, jet/go.mod, mustache/go.mod, pug/go.mod, slim/go.mod
dependency_bot_commit_share0.34
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeGo (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes0/19 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageGo
largest_source_bytes16,990
source_files_sampled19
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

313GitHub stars
30contributors
235commits, last 12 months
1days since last push
100releases
1bus factor
17open issues
Gopackage ecosystems

More detail

Star and fork history 313 ★ / 61 ⇿
313Stars
61Forks
91Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

01252503753136142020-022023-042026-06
Major 1Minor 1Patch 0

Each point covers 6 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.3 / 10
6.3aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-22 05:43 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
6Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10CI-Tests13 out of 13 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/5 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 22 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
3Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 3
10SASTSAST tool is run on all commits
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 30
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Gogithub.com/yosssi/acev0.0.5ace/go.mod
Gogithub.com/gofiber/template/v2v2.1.0ace/go.mod
Gogithub.com/stretchr/testifyv1.11.1ace/go.mod
Gogithub.com/eknkc/amberv0.0.0-20171010120322-cdade1c07385amber/go.mod
Gogithub.com/gofiber/template/v2v2.1.0amber/go.mod
Gogithub.com/stretchr/testifyv1.11.1amber/go.mod
Gogithub.com/flosch/pongo2/v6v6.1.0django/go.mod
Gogithub.com/gofiber/template/v2v2.1.0django/go.mod
Gogithub.com/stretchr/testifyv1.11.1django/go.mod
Gogithub.com/gofiber/utils/v2v2.0.2go.mod
Gogithub.com/gofiber/template/v2v2.1.0handlebars/go.mod
Gogithub.com/mailgun/raymond/v2v2.0.48handlebars/go.mod
Gogithub.com/stretchr/testifyv1.11.1handlebars/go.mod
Gogithub.com/gofiber/template/v2v2.1.0html/go.mod
Gogithub.com/stretchr/testifyv1.11.1html/go.mod
Gogithub.com/CloudyKit/jet/v6v6.3.2jet/go.mod
Gogithub.com/gofiber/template/v2v2.1.0jet/go.mod
Gogithub.com/stretchr/testifyv1.11.1jet/go.mod
Gogithub.com/cbroglie/mustachev1.4.0mustache/go.mod
Gogithub.com/gofiber/template/v2v2.1.0mustache/go.mod
Gogithub.com/stretchr/testifyv1.11.1mustache/go.mod
Gogithub.com/valyala/bytebufferpoolv1.0.0mustache/go.mod
Gogithub.com/Joker/hppv1.0.0pug/go.mod
Gogithub.com/Joker/jadev1.1.3pug/go.mod
Gogithub.com/gofiber/template/v2v2.1.0pug/go.mod
Gogithub.com/stretchr/testifyv1.11.1pug/go.mod
Gogithub.com/gofiber/template/v2v2.1.0slim/go.mod
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-slimv0.0.4slim/go.mod
Gogithub.com/stretchr/testifyv1.11.1slim/go.mod
Gogithub.com/valyala/bytebufferpoolv1.0.0slim/go.mod
All dependencies 21

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 13 direct and 8 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Gogithub.com/cbroglie/mustachev1.4.0direct
Gogithub.com/cloudykit/jet/v6v6.3.2direct
Gogithub.com/eknkc/amberv0.0.0-20171010120322-cdade1c07385direct
Gogithub.com/flosch/pongo2/v6v6.1.0direct
Gogithub.com/gofiber/utils/v2v2.0.2direct
Gogithub.com/gofiber/utils/v2v2.2.0direct
Gogithub.com/joker/hppv1.0.0direct
Gogithub.com/joker/jadev1.1.3direct
Gogithub.com/mailgun/raymond/v2v2.0.48direct
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-slimv0.0.4direct
Gogithub.com/stretchr/testifyv1.11.1direct
Gogithub.com/valyala/bytebufferpoolv1.0.0direct
Gogithub.com/yosssi/acev0.0.5direct
Gogithub.com/cloudykit/fastprinterv0.0.0-20200109182630-33d98a066a53indirect
Gogithub.com/davecgh/go-spewv1.1.1indirect
Gogithub.com/google/uuidv1.6.0indirect
Gogithub.com/pmezard/go-difflibv1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/sirupsen/logrusv1.9.4indirect
Gogolang.org/x/netv0.57.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/sysv0.47.0indirect
Gogopkg.in/yaml.v3v3.0.1indirect
Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 21 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.26.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsGo.