Public record
Software health reportschema 0.31.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-04 22:04 UTC

golang / go

The Go programming language

GoBSD-3-Clause★ 135,598 stars⑂ 19,244 forkssince Aug 2014View on GitHub ↗

golang/go holds a health index of 86 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Community & Adoption (96/100) and lowest on Security (47/100). It was last updated today. 9 contributors account for most of its recent work.

86
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

86
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 72 is calibrated to 86 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

GoOrganization
12,456 followers61 public repossince May 2013

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

60Moderate · 21% of overall

Development activity

100Exceptional
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 0 days ago
36/36Commit cadence52/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume3,271 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained30 commit(s) and 5 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year3,271
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year52
How it's scored
0/27Ships releasesno releases published
0/36Release recencyno releases
0/27Release cadenceno releases
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

96Exceptional · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

100Exceptional
How it's scored
60/60Stars135,598 stars
25/25Forks19,244 forks
15/15Watchers3,357 watchers
Inputs used
forks19,244
stars135,598
watchers3,357
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

92Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (BSD-3-Clause)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateyes

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

83Excellent · 23% of overall
How it's scored
54/54Bus factor9 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
19.3/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 14% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth100 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 33 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor9
contributors_sampled100
top_contributor_share0.141
How it's scored
36.4/42Issue resolution87% of issues closed
0/30PR acceptance1/4,763 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance0/14 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
13.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 29/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 9
Inputs used
merged_prs1
open_issues9,703
closed_issues62,980
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d8
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d55
issue_closed_ratio0.867
closed_unmerged_prs4,762
first_time_authors_30d12
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d14
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domainverified-domain status not read for this organization
25/25Owner reach12,456 followers of golang
25/25Track record61 public repos, account ~13 yr old
Inputs used
followers12,456
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified
owner_logingolang
public_repos61
account_age_days4,843
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

70Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
0/24CI workflows
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config.eslintrc.json
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Testsno data
Inputs used
has_cino
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.

Documentation

100Exceptional
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://go.dev
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics4 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsprogramming-language, language, go, golang
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://go.dev
docs_sitehttps://go.dev
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

47Weak · 16% of overall
How it's scored
0/7.5Binary-Artifactsbinaries present in source code
0/7.5Branch-Protectionno data
0/2.5CI-Testsno data
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
6.8/7.5Code-ReviewFound 29/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 9
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 33 contributing companies or organizations
0/10Dangerous-Workflowno data
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
5/5Fuzzingproject is fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained30 commit(s) and 5 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packagingno data
2/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 4
0/5SASTno SAST tool detected
5/5Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsno data
0/7.5Vulnerabilities28 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated12
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive6
scorecard_aggregate4.8
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, CI-Tests, Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
5/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories4 affected: golang.org/x/crypto 0.0.0-20210503195802-e9a32991a82e (critical 10.0), golang.org/x/net 0.0.0-20210510120150-4163338589ed (high 7.5), golang.org/x/sys 0.0.0-20210511113859-b0526f3d8744 (moderate 5.3), +1 more
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
25.5/40No advisories left outstanding3 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 1,629 days ago
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories84
affected_packages5
assessed_packages53
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitycritical 1, high 2, moderate 1, unknown 1
direct_affected_packages4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 53 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

72Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history99 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.99
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstraplib/fips140/Makefile, src/cmd/vendor/golang.org/x/arch/arm/armasm/Makefile, src/cmd/vendor/golang.org/x/arch/s390x/s390xasm/Makefile, src/cmd/vendor/golang.org/x/arch/x86/x86asm/Makefile, src/go/doc/Makefile, src/runtime/Makefile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config.eslintrc.json
11/11Static type checkingsrc/cmd/vendor/golang.org/x/telemetry/tsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environmentDockerfile, lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenanceno automated dependency updates observed
4/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 4
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesgo.sum, package-lock.json
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_fileslib/fips140/Makefile, src/cmd/vendor/golang.org/x/arch/arm/armasm/Makefile, src/cmd/vendor/golang.org/x/arch/s390x/s390xasm/Makefile, src/cmd/vendor/golang.org/x/arch/x86/x86asm/Makefile, src/go/doc/Makefile, src/runtime/Makefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configssrc/cmd/vendor/golang.org/x/telemetry/tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsmisc/go.mod, src/cmd/compile/internal/ssa/_gen/go.mod, src/cmd/go.mod, src/cmd/objdump/testdata/testfilenum/go.mod, src/cmd/vet/testdata/stdversion/go.mod, src/crypto/internal/cryptotest/wycheproof/_schema/go.mod, src/crypto/internal/cryptotest/x509limbo/_schema/go.mod, src/crypto/internal/fips140/aes/_asm/ctr/go.mod, src/crypto/internal/fips140/aes/_asm/standard/go.mod, src/crypto/internal/fips140/aes/gcm/_asm/gcm/go.mod, src/crypto/internal/fips140/bigmod/_asm/go.mod, src/crypto/internal/fips140/edwards25519/field/_asm/go.mod, src/crypto/internal/fips140/nistec/_asm/go.mod, src/crypto/internal/fips140/sha256/_asm/go.mod, src/crypto/internal/fips140/sha3/_asm/go.mod, src/crypto/internal/fips140/sha512/_asm/go.mod, src/crypto/internal/fips140test/_browserbridge/go.mod, src/crypto/md5/_asm/go.mod, src/crypto/sha1/_asm/go.mod, src/debug/buildinfo/testdata/go117/go.mod, src/go.mod, src/runtime/_mkmalloc/go.mod, src/simd/archsimd/_gen/go.mod
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeGo (statically typed)
54.1/55Manageable file sizes167/10,653 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageGo
largest_source_bytes3,972,028
source_files_sampled10,653
oversized_source_files167
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP servernot applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examplesexamples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files
interfaces_expected_of
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

135,598GitHub stars
100contributors
3,271commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
0releases
9bus factor
9,703open issues
Gopackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • First-time contributor figures cover 12 of 32 authors (cap 12)

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 19,244 ⇿
0Stars
19,244Forks

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Only the most recent history is shown — this repository exceeds the collection window, so the earliest history is not captured.

18,00018,25018,50018,75019,00019,25019,244432025-122026-042026-08
OpenSSF Scorecard 4.8 / 10
4.8aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-04 22:03 UTC

0Binary-Artifactsbinaries present in source code
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
n/aCI-Testsno pull request found
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
9Code-ReviewFound 29/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 9
10Contributorsproject has 33 contributing companies or organizations
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
10Fuzzingproject is fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 5 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
4Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 4
0SASTno SAST tool detected
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
0Vulnerabilities28 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 11
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Gogolang.org/x/cryptov0.54.1-0.20260714033321-10b54ffa51b1src/go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/netv0.57.1-0.20260720200444-a02ddfa7eacbsrc/go.mod
Gogithub.com/google/pprofv0.0.0-20260507013755-92041b743c96src/cmd/go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/archv0.29.0src/cmd/go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/buildv0.0.0-20260715183034-a43f90886f2esrc/cmd/go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/modv0.38.0src/cmd/go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/syncv0.22.0src/cmd/go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/sysv0.47.0src/cmd/go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/telemetryv0.0.0-20260716142750-dad6939de390src/cmd/go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/termv0.45.0src/cmd/go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/toolsv0.48.1-0.20260722200531-749de1fc71edsrc/cmd/go.mod
All dependencies 53

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 36 direct and 17 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Gogithub.com/google/pprof0.0.0-20210506205249-923b5ab0fc1adirect
Gogithub.com/google/pprof0.0.0-20260507013755-92041b743c96direct
Gogolang.org/x/arch0.0.0-20210502124803-cbf565b21d1edirect
Gogolang.org/x/arch0.29.0direct
Gogolang.org/x/archv0.26.0direct
Gogolang.org/x/build0.0.0-20260715183034-a43f90886f2edirect
Gogolang.org/x/crypto0.0.0-20210503195802-e9a32991a82edirect
Gogolang.org/x/crypto0.54.1-0.20260714033321-10b54ffa51b1direct
Gogolang.org/x/mod0.14.0direct
Gogolang.org/x/mod0.38.0direct
Gogolang.org/x/mod0.4.3-0.20210608190319-0f08993efd8adirect
Gogolang.org/x/modv0.19.0direct
Gogolang.org/x/modv0.20.0direct
Gogolang.org/x/modv0.29.0direct
Gogolang.org/x/modv0.33.0direct
Gogolang.org/x/net0.0.0-20210510120150-4163338589eddirect
Gogolang.org/x/net0.57.1-0.20260720200444-a02ddfa7eacbdirect
Gogolang.org/x/sync0.22.0direct
Gogolang.org/x/syncv0.17.0direct
Gogolang.org/x/syncv0.19.0direct
Gogolang.org/x/syncv0.7.0direct
Gogolang.org/x/syncv0.8.0direct
Gogolang.org/x/sys0.0.0-20210511113859-b0526f3d8744direct
Gogolang.org/x/sys0.47.0direct
Gogolang.org/x/telemetry0.0.0-20260716142750-dad6939de390direct
Gogolang.org/x/term0.0.0-20210503060354-a79de5458b56direct
Gogolang.org/x/term0.45.0direct
Gogolang.org/x/tools0.1.2-0.20210519160823-49064d2332f9direct
Gogolang.org/x/tools0.16.1direct
Gogolang.org/x/tools0.48.1-0.20260722200531-749de1fc71eddirect
Gogolang.org/x/toolsv0.23.0direct
Gogolang.org/x/toolsv0.24.0direct
Gogolang.org/x/toolsv0.27.0direct
Gogolang.org/x/toolsv0.33.0direct
Gogolang.org/x/toolsv0.38.0direct
Gogolang.org/x/toolsv0.42.0direct
Godario.cat/mergov1.0.2indirect
Gogithub.com/atombender/go-jsonschemav0.24.1indirect
Gogithub.com/c2sp/wycheproofv0.0.0-20260625212325-ee7b4f7e6119indirect
Gogithub.com/goccy/go-yamlv1.19.2indirect
Gogithub.com/google/go-cmpv0.7.0indirect
Gogithub.com/ianlancetaylor/demangle0.0.0-20200824232613-28f6c0f3b639indirect
Gogithub.com/ianlancetaylor/demangle0.0.0-20250417193237-f615e6bd150bindirect
Gogithub.com/mitchellh/go-wordwrapv1.0.1indirect
Gogithub.com/mmcloughlin/avo0.2.0indirect
Gogithub.com/mmcloughlin/avov0.6.0indirect
Gogithub.com/sanity-io/litterv1.5.8indirect
Gogithub.com/sosodev/durationv1.4.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/text0.3.7-0.20210503195748-5c7c50ebbd4findirect
Gogolang.org/x/text0.40.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/xerrors0.0.0-20200804184101-5ec99f83aff1indirect
Gogopkg.in/yaml.v3v3.0.1indirect
Gorsc.io/markdown0.0.0-20240306144322-0bf8f97ee8efindirect
Dependency advisories 5

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 53 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 5 carry known advisories, of which 4 are direct.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
golang.org/x/crypto0.0.0-20210503195802-e9a32991a82edirectcritical433.4.0
golang.org/x/net0.0.0-20210510120150-4163338589eddirecthigh3212.0.2
golang.org/x/text0.3.7-0.20210503195748-5c7c50ebbd4findirecthigh50.39.0
golang.org/x/sys0.0.0-20210511113859-b0526f3d8744directmoderate31.18.2
golang.org/x/crypto0.54.1-0.20260714033321-10b54ffa51b1directunknown1

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.31.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics.