Public record
Software health reportschema 0.12.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-17 23:07 UTC

goldziher / uncomment

Blazingly fast CLI to remove comments from code using tree-sitter grammers

RustMIT★ 52 stars⑂ 10 forkssince Mar 2025View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryCommand-line toolhow this is determined

goldziher/uncomment holds a health index of 75 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Vitality (88/100) and lowest on Security (49/100). It was last updated 3 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

75
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

75
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 65 is calibrated to 75 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Na'aman HirschfeldPersonal account
494 followers79 public repossince Aug 2017Xberg.io

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

88Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 3 days ago
22.8/36Commit cadence33/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume165 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained30 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year165
human_commit_share
days_since_last_push3
active_weeks_last_year33
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases37 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 5 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~23.4 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count37
latest_release_tagv3.4.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release5
mean_days_between_releases23.4

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

50Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
27.7/60Stars52 stars
8/25Forks10 forks
0/15Watchers1 watchers
Inputs used
forks10
stars52
watchers1
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
35.7/80Monthly downloads476 downloads/month across crates, npm, pypi
0/20Registry dependentsnot reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesuncomment, uncomment-cli, uncomment
dependents
ecosystemscrates, npm, pypi
total_downloads11,096
monthly_downloads476
unverified_packages_excluded
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

66Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
5.9/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 74% of commits
9.5/13.5Contributor breadth7 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 11 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled7
top_contributor_share0.739
How it's scored
42/42Issue resolution100% of issues closed
23.7/30PR acceptance64/81 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 0/22 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs64
open_issues0
closed_issues19
prs_merged_7d
prs_decided_7d
prs_merged_30d
prs_decided_30d
issue_closed_ratio1
closed_unmerged_prs17
first_time_authors_30d
first_time_prs_merged_30d
first_time_prs_decided_30d
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backingpersonal (user) account
0/20Verified domainnot applicable to user accounts
19.4/25Owner reach494 followers of Goldziher
25/25Track record79 public repos, account ~8 yr old
Inputs used
followers494
owner_typeUser
is_verified
owner_loginGoldziher
public_repos79
account_age_days3,269
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable3 package(s) on crates, npm, pypi
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 5 days ago
20/20Version history39 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesuncomment, uncomment-cli, uncomment
ecosystemscrates, npm, pypi
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish5

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

67Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows4 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests4 out of 4 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://docs.rs/uncomment
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics5 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsai, cli, comments, python, rust
has_wikino
homepage
docs_sitehttps://docs.rs/uncomment
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

49Weak · 16% of overall
How it's scored
6.8/7.5Binary-Artifactsbinaries present in source code
0/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests4 out of 4 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 0/22 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 11 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained30 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated18
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive0
scorecard_aggregate4.9

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

60Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit historyno data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrapTaskfile.yaml
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checkingRust (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environmentDockerfile, lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno data
5/8Automated maintenancedependency automation configured, none observed in the sampled commits
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesCargo.lock
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_filesTaskfile.yaml
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeRust (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes0/55 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageRust
largest_source_bytes51,268
source_files_sampled55
oversized_source_files0
How it's scored
40/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)fixtures/languages/test.proto
0/20MCP servernot applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examplesexamples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_filesfixtures/languages/test.proto
interfaces_expected_of
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

52GitHub stars
7contributors
165commits, last 12 months
3days since last push
37releases
1bus factor
0open issues
crates.io, npm, PyPIpackage ecosystems

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.9 / 10
4.9aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-17 23:07 UTC

9Binary-Artifactsbinaries present in source code
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
10CI-Tests4 out of 4 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/22 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 11 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 22
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
crates.ioahash0.8Cargo.toml
crates.ioanstream1.0Cargo.toml
crates.ioanyhow1.0.103Cargo.toml
crates.ioclap4.6Cargo.toml
crates.iodirs6.0Cargo.toml
crates.ioglob0.3.3Cargo.toml
crates.ioignore0.4.28Cargo.toml
crates.ioindicatif0.18Cargo.toml
crates.iomemchr2Cargo.toml
crates.ionum_cpus1.17Cargo.toml
crates.ioonce_cell1.21.4Cargo.toml
crates.ioowo-colors4Cargo.toml
crates.iorayon1.12.0Cargo.toml
crates.iosaphyr0.0.11Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde1.0Cargo.toml
crates.iotoml1.1.2Cargo.toml
crates.iotree-sitter0.26.10Cargo.toml
crates.iotree-sitter-language-pack1.12.5Cargo.toml
crates.iowalkdir2.5Cargo.toml
npmadm-zip^0.6.0npm-package/package.json
npmtar^6.0.0npm-package/package.json
PyPIcertifi>=2024.7.4pip-package/pyproject.toml
All dependencies 216

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 22 direct and 194 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
crates.ioahash0.8.12direct
crates.ioanstream1.0.0direct
crates.ioanyhow1.0.103direct
crates.ioclap4.6.1direct
crates.iodirs6.0.0direct
crates.ioglob0.3.3direct
crates.ioignore0.4.28direct
crates.ioindicatif0.18.6direct
crates.iomemchr2.8.3direct
crates.ionum_cpus1.17.0direct
crates.ioonce_cell1.21.4direct
crates.ioowo-colors4.3.0direct
crates.iorayon1.12.0direct
crates.iosaphyr0.0.11direct
crates.ioserde1.0.228direct
crates.iotoml1.1.2+spec-1.1.0direct
crates.iotree-sitter0.26.11direct
crates.iotree-sitter-language-pack1.12.5direct
crates.iowalkdir2.5.0direct
npmadm-zip^0.6.0direct
npmtar^6.0.0direct
PyPIcertifidirect
crates.ioadler22.0.1indirect
crates.ioaho-corasick1.1.4indirect
crates.ioanstyle1.0.14indirect
crates.ioanstyle-parse1.0.0indirect
crates.ioanstyle-query1.1.5indirect
crates.ioanstyle-wincon3.0.11indirect
crates.ioarraydeque0.5.1indirect
crates.ioautocfg1.5.1indirect
crates.iobase640.22.1indirect
crates.iobitflags2.13.0indirect
crates.ioblock-buffer0.12.1indirect
crates.iobstr1.12.3indirect
crates.iobumpalo3.20.3indirect
crates.iobyteorder1.5.0indirect
crates.iobytes1.12.1indirect
crates.iocc1.2.66indirect
crates.iocesu81.1.0indirect
crates.iocfg-if1.0.4indirect
crates.ioclap_builder4.6.0indirect
crates.ioclap_derive4.6.1indirect
crates.ioclap_lex1.1.0indirect
crates.iocolorchoice1.0.5indirect
crates.iocombine4.6.7indirect
crates.ioconsole0.16.4indirect
crates.ioconst-oid0.10.2indirect
crates.ioconst-random0.1.18indirect
crates.ioconst-random-macro0.1.16indirect
crates.iocore-foundation0.10.1indirect
crates.iocore-foundation-sys0.8.7indirect
crates.iocpufeatures0.3.0indirect
crates.iocrc32fast1.5.0indirect
crates.iocrossbeam-deque0.8.7indirect
crates.iocrossbeam-epoch0.9.20indirect
crates.iocrossbeam-utils0.8.22indirect
crates.iocrunchy0.2.4indirect
crates.iocrypto-common0.2.2indirect
crates.iodiff0.1.13indirect
crates.iodigest0.11.3indirect
crates.iodirs-sys0.5.0indirect
crates.ioeither1.16.0indirect
crates.ioencode_unicode1.0.0indirect
crates.ioencoding_rs0.8.35indirect
crates.ioequivalent1.0.2indirect
crates.ioerrno0.3.14indirect
crates.iofastrand2.4.1indirect
crates.iofd-lock4.0.4indirect
crates.iofiletime0.2.29indirect
crates.iofind-msvc-tools0.1.9indirect
crates.ioflate21.1.9indirect
crates.iofoldhash0.2.0indirect
crates.iofutures-core0.3.32indirect
crates.iofutures-task0.3.32indirect
crates.iofutures-util0.3.32indirect
crates.iogetrandom0.2.17indirect
crates.iogetrandom0.3.4indirect
crates.iogetrandom0.4.3indirect
crates.ioglobset0.4.18indirect
crates.iohashbrown0.17.1indirect
crates.iohashlink0.12.1indirect
crates.ioheck0.5.0indirect
crates.iohermit-abi0.5.2indirect
crates.iohttp1.4.2indirect
crates.iohttparse1.10.1indirect
crates.iohybrid-array0.4.13indirect
crates.ioindexmap2.14.0indirect
crates.iois_terminal_polyfill1.70.2indirect
crates.ioitoa1.0.18indirect
crates.iojni0.21.1indirect
crates.iojni-sys0.3.1indirect
crates.iojni-sys0.4.1indirect
crates.iojni-sys-macros0.4.1indirect
crates.iojobserver0.1.35indirect
crates.iojs-sys0.3.103indirect
crates.iolibc0.2.186indirect
crates.iolibloading0.9.0indirect
crates.iolibredox0.1.18indirect
crates.iolinux-raw-sys0.12.1indirect
crates.iolog0.4.33indirect
crates.iominiz_oxide0.8.9indirect
crates.ionum-traits0.2.19indirect
crates.ioonce_cell_polyfill1.70.2indirect
crates.ioopenssl-probe0.2.1indirect
crates.iooption-ext0.2.0indirect
crates.ioordered-float5.3.0indirect
crates.iopercent-encoding2.3.2indirect
crates.iopin-project-lite0.2.17indirect
crates.iopkg-config0.3.33indirect
crates.ioportable-atomic1.13.1indirect
crates.iopretty_assertions1.4.1indirect
crates.ioproc-macro21.0.106indirect
crates.ioquote1.0.46indirect
crates.ior-efi5.3.0indirect
crates.ior-efi6.0.0indirect
crates.iorayon-core1.13.0indirect
crates.ioredox_users0.5.2indirect
crates.ioregex1.12.4indirect
crates.ioregex-automata0.4.15indirect
crates.ioregex-syntax0.8.11indirect
crates.ioring0.17.14indirect
crates.iorustix1.1.4indirect
crates.iorustls0.23.41indirect
crates.iorustls-native-certs0.8.4indirect
crates.iorustls-pki-types1.15.0indirect
crates.iorustls-platform-verifier0.6.2indirect
crates.iorustls-platform-verifier-android0.1.1indirect
crates.iorustls-webpki0.103.13indirect
crates.iorustversion1.0.23indirect
crates.iosame-file1.0.6indirect
crates.iosaphyr-parser0.0.11indirect
crates.ioschannel0.1.29indirect
crates.iosecurity-framework3.7.0indirect
crates.iosecurity-framework-sys2.17.0indirect
crates.ioserde_core1.0.228indirect
crates.ioserde_derive1.0.228indirect
crates.ioserde_json1.0.150indirect
crates.ioserde_spanned1.1.1indirect
crates.iosha20.11.0indirect
crates.ioshlex2.0.1indirect
crates.iosimd-adler320.3.9indirect
crates.ioslab0.4.12indirect
crates.iosocks0.3.4indirect
crates.iostreaming-iterator0.1.9indirect
crates.iostrsim0.11.1indirect
crates.iosubtle2.6.1indirect
crates.iosyn2.0.118indirect
crates.iotar0.4.46indirect
crates.iotempfile3.27.0indirect
crates.ioterminal_size0.4.4indirect
crates.iothiserror1.0.69indirect
crates.iothiserror2.0.18indirect
crates.iothiserror-impl1.0.69indirect
crates.iothiserror-impl2.0.18indirect
crates.iotiny-keccak2.0.2indirect
crates.iotoml_datetime1.1.1+spec-1.1.0indirect
crates.iotoml_parser1.1.2+spec-1.1.0indirect
crates.iotoml_writer1.1.1+spec-1.1.0indirect
crates.iotree-sitter-language0.1.7indirect
crates.iotypenum1.20.1indirect
crates.iounicode-ident1.0.24indirect
crates.iounicode-width0.2.2indirect
crates.iounit-prefix0.5.2indirect
crates.iountrusted0.9.0indirect
crates.ioureq3.3.0indirect
crates.ioureq-proto0.6.0indirect
crates.ioutf8-zero0.8.1indirect
crates.ioutf8parse0.2.2indirect
crates.ioversion_check0.9.5indirect
crates.iowasi0.11.1+wasi-snapshot-preview1indirect
crates.iowasip21.0.4+wasi-0.2.12indirect
crates.iowasm-bindgen0.2.126indirect
crates.iowasm-bindgen-macro0.2.126indirect
crates.iowasm-bindgen-macro-support0.2.126indirect
crates.iowasm-bindgen-shared0.2.126indirect
crates.ioweb-time1.1.0indirect
crates.iowebpki-root-certs1.0.8indirect
crates.iowebpki-roots1.0.8indirect
crates.iowinapi0.3.9indirect
crates.iowinapi-i686-pc-windows-gnu0.4.0indirect
crates.iowinapi-util0.1.11indirect
crates.iowinapi-x86_64-pc-windows-gnu0.4.0indirect
crates.iowindows-link0.2.1indirect
crates.iowindows-sys0.45.0indirect
crates.iowindows-sys0.52.0indirect
crates.iowindows-sys0.59.0indirect
crates.iowindows-sys0.61.2indirect
crates.iowindows-targets0.42.2indirect
crates.iowindows-targets0.52.6indirect
crates.iowindows_aarch64_gnullvm0.42.2indirect
crates.iowindows_aarch64_gnullvm0.52.6indirect
crates.iowindows_aarch64_msvc0.42.2indirect
crates.iowindows_aarch64_msvc0.52.6indirect
crates.iowindows_i686_gnu0.42.2indirect
crates.iowindows_i686_gnu0.52.6indirect
crates.iowindows_i686_gnullvm0.52.6indirect
crates.iowindows_i686_msvc0.42.2indirect
crates.iowindows_i686_msvc0.52.6indirect
crates.iowindows_x86_64_gnu0.42.2indirect
crates.iowindows_x86_64_gnu0.52.6indirect
crates.iowindows_x86_64_gnullvm0.42.2indirect
crates.iowindows_x86_64_gnullvm0.52.6indirect
crates.iowindows_x86_64_msvc0.42.2indirect
crates.iowindows_x86_64_msvc0.52.6indirect
crates.iowinnow1.0.3indirect
crates.iowit-bindgen0.57.1indirect
crates.ioxattr1.6.1indirect
crates.ioyansi1.0.1indirect
crates.iozerocopy0.8.53indirect
crates.iozerocopy-derive0.8.53indirect
crates.iozeroize1.9.0indirect
crates.iozmij1.0.21indirect
crates.iozstd0.13.3indirect
crates.iozstd-safe7.2.4indirect
crates.iozstd-sys2.0.16+zstd.1.5.7indirect
PyPIsetuptoolsindirect
Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.12.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticscrates.io, npm, PyPI.