Public recordAt Risk
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-17 06:26 UTC
goto1134 / structurizr-d2-exporter
Export structurizr views to D2 diagrams
goto1134/structurizr-d2-exporter holds a health index of 31 out of 100, placing it in the At Risk band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (74/100) and lowest on Vitality (26/100). It was last updated 324 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.
31
overall / 100Software health index
Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.
31
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
Score profile
Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.
The weighted overall 51 is calibrated to 51 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).
Ownership
Andrei EfanovPersonal account
19 followers77 public repossince Nov 2014JetBrains
This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.
Metrics by category
Vitality
Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?
26
Development activity
4Critical
Abandonment alert
Work has arrived and nobody has attended to it
no human commit in 561 daysautomated commits excludedpull requests left unansweredreleases stalledOpenSSF Scorecard reports it unmaintainedOverall rating: At Risk ceiling
Silence alone is never the finding — a small, finished library may need no commits for years. This alert requires both: no human commit for a long time, and obligations the project is visibly not discharging. Automated commits do not count as maintenance.
How abandonment is assessedHow it's scored
| 3.6/36 | Push recency — last push 324 days ago |
| 0/36 | Commit cadence — 0/52 weeks with commits |
| 0/18 | Commit volume — 0 commits in the last year |
| 0/10 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0 |
Inputs used
| commits_last_year | 0 |
| human_commit_share | 0.14 |
| days_since_last_push | 324 |
| active_weeks_last_year | 0 |
Release discipline
60Moderate
How it's scored
| 27/27 | Ships releases — 12 releases published |
| 7.2/36 | Release recency — latest release 561 days ago |
| 19.8/27 | Release cadence — a release every ~86.9 days |
| 0/10 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data |
Inputs used
| releases_count | 12 |
| latest_release_tag | v1.6.0 |
| releases_from_tags | no |
| days_since_latest_release | 561 |
| mean_days_between_releases | 86.9 |
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.
Community & Adoption
Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?
45
Popularity & adoption
24At Risk
How it's scored
| 21.4/60 | Stars — 22 stars |
| 2.5/25 | Forks — 3 forks |
| 0/15 | Watchers — 1 watchers |
Inputs used
| forks | 3 |
| stars | 22 |
| watchers | 1 |
| growth_state | unverified |
| growth_factor_pct | 100 |
| growth_unverified_reason | no_history |
Community health
70Good
How it's scored
| 22.5/22.5 | README |
| 22.5/22.5 | License — recognized license (Apache-2.0) |
| 18/18 | CONTRIBUTING guide |
| 0/13.5 | Code of conduct |
| 0/7.2 | Issue template |
| 0/6.3 | PR template |
Inputs used
| has_readme | yes |
| has_license | yes |
| readme_badges | 4 |
| has_contributing | yes |
| has_issue_template | no |
| has_code_of_conduct | no |
| readme_badge_services | api.securityscorecards.dev, github.com, shields.io, www.bestpractices.dev |
| has_pull_request_template | no |
Sustainability & Governance
Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?
43
Maintainer resilience (bus factor)
17Critical
How it's scored
| 9/54 | Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits |
| 0.8/22.5 | Commit distribution — top contributor authored 96% of commits |
| 4.1/13.5 | Contributor breadth — 3 contributors |
| 3/10 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3 |
Inputs used
| bus_factor | 1 |
| contributors_sampled | 3 |
| top_contributor_share | 0.964 |
Issue & PR responsiveness
61Moderate
How it's scored
| 31.5/42 | Issue resolution — 75% of issues closed |
| 21.2/30 | PR acceptance — 148/209 decided PRs merged |
| 0/13 | Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d |
| 0/15 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/6 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0 |
Inputs used
| merged_prs | 148 |
| open_issues | 1 |
| closed_issues | 3 |
| prs_merged_7d | 0 |
| prs_decided_7d | 0 |
| prs_merged_30d | 0 |
| prs_decided_30d | 0 |
| issue_closed_ratio | 0.75 |
| closed_unmerged_prs | 61 |
| first_time_authors_30d | 0 |
| first_time_prs_merged_30d | 0 |
| first_time_prs_decided_30d | 0 |
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
Ownership & stewardship
56Moderate
How it's scored
| 10/30 | Ownership backing — personal (user) account |
| 0/20 | Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts |
| 9.4/25 | Owner reach — 19 followers of goto1134 |
| 25/25 | Track record — 77 public repos, account ~11 yr old |
Inputs used
| followers | 19 |
| owner_type | User |
| is_verified | — |
| owner_login | goto1134 |
| public_repos | 77 |
| account_age_days | 4,333 |
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.
Engineering Quality
Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?
74
Engineering practices
74Good
How it's scored
| 24/24 | CI workflows — 5 workflow(s) |
| 24/24 | Tests present |
| 16/16 | Linter config |
| 9.6/9.6 | Pre-commit hooks |
| 0/6.4 | .editorconfig |
| 0/20 | OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 0 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0 |
Inputs used
| has_ci | yes |
| has_tests | yes |
| has_editorconfig | no |
| has_linter_config | yes |
| has_precommit_config | yes |
Documentation
75Good
How it's scored
| 30/30 | README |
| 0/25 | Documentation directory |
| 15/15 | Documentation / homepage site — https://docs.structurizr.com/cli/export |
| 10/10 | Repository description |
| 10/10 | Topics — 2 topics |
| 10/10 | Wiki |
Inputs used
| topics | d2, structurizr |
| has_wiki | yes |
| homepage | https://docs.structurizr.com/cli/export |
| docs_site | https://docs.structurizr.com/cli/export |
| has_readme | yes |
| has_docs_dir | no |
| has_description | yes |
Security
Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?
73
Security posture
66Good
How it's scored
| 6.8/7.5 | Binary-Artifacts — binaries present in source code |
| 0/7.5 | Branch-Protection — no data |
| 0/2.5 | CI-Tests — 0 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0 |
| 0.5/2.5 | CII-Best-Practices — badge detected: InProgress |
| 0/7.5 | Code-Review — Found 0/6 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0 |
| 0.8/2.5 | Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3 |
| 10/10 | Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected |
| 7.5/7.5 | Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected |
| 0/5 | Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed |
| 2.5/2.5 | License — license file detected |
| 0/7.5 | Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0 |
| 0/5 | Packaging — no data |
| 5/5 | Pinned-Dependencies — all dependencies are pinned |
| 3.5/5 | SAST — SAST tool detected but not run on all commits |
| 5/5 | Security-Policy — security policy file detected |
| 0/7.5 | Signed-Releases — no data |
| 6.8/7.5 | Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions |
| 7.5/7.5 | Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected |
Inputs used
| source | openssf_scorecard |
| checks_evaluated | 15 |
| scorecard_version | v5.5.0 |
| checks_inconclusive | 3 |
| scorecard_aggregate | 6.6 |
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.
Dependency advisories
100Exceptional
How it's scored
| 35/35 | Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory |
| 0/25 | Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope |
| 0/40 | No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date |
Inputs used
| source | osv |
| advisories | 24 |
| affected_packages | 10 |
| assessed_packages | 93 |
| unassessed_packages | 2 |
| affected_by_severity | high 7, moderate 3 |
| direct_affected_packages | 0 |
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 93 resolved dependencies against OSV. 2 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.
AI Readiness
How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.
49
Agent context & guidance
1Critical
How it's scored
| 0/45 | Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules |
| 0/15 | Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) |
| 0/40 | Legible commit history — no data |
Inputs used
| has_llms_txt | no |
| llms_txt_url | — |
| legible_history_share | — |
| agent_instruction_files | — |
| agent_instruction_max_bytes | — |
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.
Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)
64Moderate
How it's scored
| 12.6/18 | One-command bootstrap — lib/build.gradle.kts (toolchain convention, no task runner) |
| 22/22 | Automated tests |
| 11/11 | Lint / format config |
| 0/11 | Static type checking |
| 0/10 | Reproducible environment |
| 0/10 | Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100 |
| 8/8 | Automated maintenance — 86 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates |
| 10/10 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — all dependencies are pinned |
Inputs used
| has_nix | no |
| has_tests | yes |
| lockfiles | — |
| has_dockerfile | no |
| typed_language | no |
| bootstrap_files | — |
| has_devcontainer | no |
| has_linter_config | yes |
| typecheck_configs | — |
| agent_commit_share | 0 |
| toolchain_manifests | lib/build.gradle.kts |
| dependency_bot_commit_share | 0.86 |
Code legibility for models
55Moderate
How it's scored
| 0/45 | Type-checkable code — D2 without a type-check config |
| 55/55 | Manageable file sizes — 0/15 source files over 60KB |
Inputs used
| primary_language | D2 |
| largest_source_bytes | 13,713 |
| source_files_sampled | 15 |
| oversized_source_files | 0 |
Machine-readable interfaces
100Exceptional
How it's scored
| 0/40 | API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software |
| 0/20 | MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software |
| 40/40 | Runnable examples — examples |
Inputs used
| example_dirs | examples |
| has_mcp_signal | no |
| api_schema_files | — |
| interfaces_expected_of | — |
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.
Key facts
22GitHub stars
3contributors
0commits, last 12 months
324days since last push
12releases
1bus factor
1open issues
Mavenpackage ecosystems
Data collection warnings
- Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
More detail
Star and fork history 0 ★ / 3 ⇿
0Stars
3Forks
When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.
OpenSSF Scorecard 6.6 / 10
6.6aggregate
Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).
| 9 | Binary-Artifacts | binaries present in source code |
| n/a | Branch-Protection | internal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md |
| 0 | CI-Tests | 0 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0 |
| 2 | CII-Best-Practices | badge detected: InProgress |
| 0 | Code-Review | Found 0/6 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0 |
| 3 | Contributors | project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3 |
| 10 | Dangerous-Workflow | no dangerous workflow patterns detected |
| 10 | Dependency-Update-Tool | update tool detected |
| 0 | Fuzzing | project is not fuzzed |
| 10 | License | license file detected |
| 0 | Maintained | 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0 |
| n/a | Packaging | packaging workflow not detected |
| 10 | Pinned-Dependencies | all dependencies are pinned |
| 7 | SAST | SAST tool detected but not run on all commits |
| 10 | Security-Policy | security policy file detected |
| n/a | Signed-Releases | no releases found |
| 9 | Token-Permissions | detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions |
| 10 | Vulnerabilities | 0 existing vulnerabilities detected |
All dependencies 95
Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 0 direct and 95 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.
| Registry | Package | Version | Relation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Maven | com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-annotations | 2.12.7 | indirect |
| Maven | com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-annotations | 2.18.1 | indirect |
| Maven | com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-core | 2.12.7 | indirect |
| Maven | com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-core | 2.18.1 | indirect |
| Maven | com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-databind | 2.12.7.1 | indirect |
| Maven | com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-databind | 2.18.1 | indirect |
| Maven | com.fasterxml.jackson.dataformat:jackson-dataformat-xml | 2.12.7 | indirect |
| Maven | com.fasterxml.jackson.module:jackson-module-jaxb-annotations | 2.12.7 | indirect |
| Maven | com.fasterxml.jackson.module:jackson-module-kotlin | 2.12.7 | indirect |
| Maven | com.fasterxml.jackson:jackson-bom | 2.12.7 | indirect |
| Maven | com.fasterxml.jackson:jackson-bom | 2.18.1 | indirect |
| Maven | com.fasterxml.woodstox:woodstox-core | 6.2.4 | indirect |
| Maven | com.github.javaparser:javaparser-core | 3.26.2 | indirect |
| Maven | com.github.javaparser:javaparser-symbol-solver-core | 3.26.2 | indirect |
| Maven | com.google.code.findbugs:jsr305 | 3.0.2 | indirect |
| Maven | com.google.errorprone:error_prone_annotations | 2.28.0 | indirect |
| Maven | com.google.guava:failureaccess | 1.0.2 | indirect |
| Maven | com.google.guava:guava | 33.3.0-jre | indirect |
| Maven | com.google.guava:listenablefuture | 9999.0-empty-to-avoid-conflict-with-guava | indirect |
| Maven | com.soywiz.korlibs.korte:korte-jvm | 4.0.10 | indirect |
| Maven | com.structurizr:structurizr-client | 3.2.1 | indirect |
| Maven | com.structurizr:structurizr-component | 3.2.1 | indirect |
| Maven | com.structurizr:structurizr-core | 3.2.1 | indirect |
| Maven | com.structurizr:structurizr-dsl | 3.2.1 | indirect |
| Maven | com.structurizr:structurizr-export | 3.2.1 | indirect |
| Maven | com.structurizr:structurizr-import | 3.2.1 | indirect |
| Maven | commons-logging:commons-logging | 1.3.4 | indirect |
| Maven | jakarta.activation:jakarta.activation-api | 1.2.1 | indirect |
| Maven | jakarta.xml.bind:jakarta.xml.bind-api | 2.3.2 | indirect |
| Maven | javax.activation:javax.activation-api | 1.2.0 | indirect |
| Maven | javax.xml.bind:jaxb-api | 2.4.0-b180830.0359 | indirect |
| Maven | org.apache.bcel:bcel | 6.10.0 | indirect |
| Maven | org.apache.commons:commons-lang3 | 3.14.0 | indirect |
| Maven | org.apache.httpcomponents.client5:httpclient5 | 5.4.1 | indirect |
| Maven | org.apache.httpcomponents.core5:httpcore5 | 5.3.1 | indirect |
| Maven | org.apache.httpcomponents.core5:httpcore5-h2 | 5.3.1 | indirect |
| Maven | org.apiguardian:apiguardian-api | 1.1.2 | indirect |
| Maven | org.checkerframework:checker-qual | 3.43.0 | indirect |
| Maven | org.codehaus.woodstox:stax2-api | 4.2.1 | indirect |
| Maven | org.freemarker:freemarker | 2.3.32 | indirect |
| Maven | org.javassist:javassist | 3.30.2-GA | indirect |
| Maven | org.jetbrains.dokka:analysis-kotlin-descriptors | 2.0.0 | indirect |
| Maven | org.jetbrains.dokka:analysis-markdown | 2.0.0 | indirect |
| Maven | org.jetbrains.dokka:dokka-base | 2.0.0 | indirect |
| Maven | org.jetbrains.dokka:dokka-core | 2.0.0 | indirect |
| Maven | org.jetbrains.dokka:javadoc-plugin | 2.0.0 | indirect |
| Maven | org.jetbrains.dokka:kotlin-as-java-plugin | 2.0.0 | indirect |
| Maven | org.jetbrains.dokka:templating-plugin | 2.0.0 | indirect |
| Maven | org.jetbrains.intellij.deps:trove4j | 1.0.20200330 | indirect |
| Maven | org.jetbrains.kotlin:kotlin-build-common | 2.1.10 | indirect |
| Maven | org.jetbrains.kotlin:kotlin-build-tools-api | 2.1.10 | indirect |
| Maven | org.jetbrains.kotlin:kotlin-build-tools-impl | 2.1.10 | indirect |
| Maven | org.jetbrains.kotlin:kotlin-compiler-embeddable | 2.1.10 | indirect |
| Maven | org.jetbrains.kotlin:kotlin-compiler-runner | 2.1.10 | indirect |
| Maven | org.jetbrains.kotlin:kotlin-daemon-client | 2.1.10 | indirect |
| Maven | org.jetbrains.kotlin:kotlin-daemon-embeddable | 2.1.10 | indirect |
| Maven | org.jetbrains.kotlin:kotlin-klib-commonizer-embeddable | 2.1.10 | indirect |
| Maven | org.jetbrains.kotlin:kotlin-reflect | 1.6.10 | indirect |
| Maven | org.jetbrains.kotlin:kotlin-reflect | 2.0.20 | indirect |
| Maven | org.jetbrains.kotlin:kotlin-script-runtime | 2.1.10 | indirect |
| Maven | org.jetbrains.kotlin:kotlin-scripting-common | 2.1.10 | indirect |
| Maven | org.jetbrains.kotlin:kotlin-scripting-compiler-embeddable | 2.1.10 | indirect |
| Maven | org.jetbrains.kotlin:kotlin-scripting-compiler-impl-embeddable | 2.1.10 | indirect |
| Maven | org.jetbrains.kotlin:kotlin-scripting-jvm | 2.1.10 | indirect |
| Maven | org.jetbrains.kotlin:kotlin-stdlib | 2.0.20 | indirect |
| Maven | org.jetbrains.kotlin:kotlin-stdlib | 2.1.10 | indirect |
| Maven | org.jetbrains.kotlin:kotlin-stdlib-common | 2.0.20 | indirect |
| Maven | org.jetbrains.kotlin:kotlin-stdlib-jdk7 | 1.9.0 | indirect |
| Maven | org.jetbrains.kotlin:kotlin-stdlib-jdk7 | 2.1.10 | indirect |
| Maven | org.jetbrains.kotlin:kotlin-stdlib-jdk8 | — | indirect |
| Maven | org.jetbrains.kotlin:kotlin-stdlib-jdk8 | 1.9.0 | indirect |
| Maven | org.jetbrains.kotlin:kotlin-stdlib-jdk8 | 2.1.10 | indirect |
| Maven | org.jetbrains.kotlin:kotlin-test | 2.1.10 | indirect |
| Maven | org.jetbrains.kotlin:kotlin-test-junit5 | — | indirect |
| Maven | org.jetbrains.kotlin:kotlin-test-junit5 | 2.1.10 | indirect |
| Maven | org.jetbrains.kotlinx:kotlinx-coroutines-bom | 1.7.3 | indirect |
| Maven | org.jetbrains.kotlinx:kotlinx-coroutines-core | 1.7.3 | indirect |
| Maven | org.jetbrains.kotlinx:kotlinx-coroutines-core-jvm | 1.6.4 | indirect |
| Maven | org.jetbrains.kotlinx:kotlinx-coroutines-core-jvm | 1.7.3 | indirect |
| Maven | org.jetbrains.kotlinx:kotlinx-html-jvm | 0.9.1 | indirect |
| Maven | org.jetbrains:annotations | 13.0 | indirect |
| Maven | org.jetbrains:annotations | 23.0.0 | indirect |
| Maven | org.jetbrains:markdown | 0.7.3 | indirect |
| Maven | org.jetbrains:markdown-jvm | 0.7.3 | indirect |
| Maven | org.jsoup:jsoup | 1.16.1 | indirect |
| Maven | org.junit.jupiter:junit-jupiter | 5.11.4 | indirect |
| Maven | org.junit.jupiter:junit-jupiter-api | 5.11.4 | indirect |
| Maven | org.junit.jupiter:junit-jupiter-engine | 5.11.4 | indirect |
| Maven | org.junit.jupiter:junit-jupiter-params | 5.11.4 | indirect |
| Maven | org.junit.platform:junit-platform-commons | 1.11.4 | indirect |
| Maven | org.junit.platform:junit-platform-engine | 1.11.4 | indirect |
| Maven | org.junit.platform:junit-platform-launcher | 1.11.4 | indirect |
| Maven | org.junit:junit-bom | 5.11.4 | indirect |
| Maven | org.opentest4j:opentest4j | 1.3.0 | indirect |
| Maven | org.slf4j:slf4j-api | 1.7.36 | indirect |
Dependency advisories 10
This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 93 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 10 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 2 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.
| Package | Version | Relation | Severity | Advisories | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-core | 2.12.7 | indirect | high | 3 | 3.1.4 |
| com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-core | 2.18.1 | indirect | high | 2 | 3.1.4 |
| com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-databind | 2.12.7.1 | indirect | high | 5 | 3.1.4 |
| com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-databind | 2.18.1 | indirect | high | 7 | 3.2.1 |
| org.apache.httpcomponents.client5:httpclient5 | 5.4.1 | indirect | high | 2 | 5.6.3 |
| org.apache.httpcomponents.core5:httpcore5 | 5.3.1 | indirect | high | 1 | 5.5-beta2 |
| org.apache.httpcomponents.core5:httpcore5-h2 | 5.3.1 | indirect | high | 1 | 5.5-beta2 |
| com.fasterxml.woodstox:woodstox-core | 6.2.4 | indirect | moderate | 1 | 6.4.0 |
| org.apache.commons:commons-lang3 | 3.14.0 | indirect | moderate | 1 | 3.18.0 |
| org.jsoup:jsoup | 1.16.1 | indirect | moderate | 1 | 1.23.1 |
An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.
Raw JSON report machine-readable
Feedback
Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.
Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.
Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.
How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics.