Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-22 19:37 UTC

gottscj / Hangfire.Mongo

Mongo DB support for Hangfire

C#MIT★ 281 stars⑂ 88 forkssince Nov 2014View on GitHub ↗
KindNetwork servicehow this is determined

gottscj/Hangfire.Mongo holds a health index of 65 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Vitality (77/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (45/100). It was last updated today. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

65
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

65
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 60 is calibrated to 65 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Jonas GottschauPersonal account
12 followers18 public repossince Jun 2015Shure

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
NuGetHangfire.Mongopoints to another repo — not scored1.16.3-990 days agohangfireaspnetowinmongodbcosmosdbdocumentdbazureawsatlaslong-runningbackgroundfire-and-forgetdelayedrecurringtasksjobsschedulerthreadingqueues

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

77Good · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
7.6/36Commit cadence — 11/52 weeks with commits
12.2/18Commit volume — 22 commits in the last year
5/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 4 commit(s) and 3 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 5
Inputs used
commits_last_year22
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year11

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 97 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 0 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~27.5 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count97
latest_release_tag1.16.3
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release0
mean_days_between_releases27.5
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

56Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
39.7/60Stars — 281 stars
16.2/25Forks — 88 forks
4.7/15Watchers — 8 watchers
Inputs used
forks88
stars281
watchers8
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges3
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesgithub.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

64Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
25.2/54Bus factor — 2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
12.8/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 43% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 30 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 7 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor2
contributors_sampled30
top_contributor_share0.433
How it's scored
42/42Issue resolution — 100% of issues closed
27/30PR acceptance — 230/256 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
3/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 6/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2
Inputs used
merged_prs230
open_issues0
closed_issues207
prs_merged_7d2
prs_decided_7d2
prs_merged_30d2
prs_decided_30d2
issue_closed_ratio1
closed_unmerged_prs26
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
8/25Owner reach — 12 followers of gottscj
21.3/25Track record — 18 public repos, account ~11 yr old
Inputs used
followers12
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_logingottscj
public_repos18
account_age_days4,113
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

48Weak · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 2 workflow(s)
0/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
16/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 22 out of 26 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsno
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

50Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikiyes
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

54Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
6.8/7.5Binary-Artifacts — binaries present in source code
6/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2/2.5CI-Tests — 22 out of 26 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
1.5/7.5Code-Review — Found 6/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 7 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
3.8/7.5Maintained — 4 commit(s) and 3 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 5
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate5.6
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
9.3/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — 4 affected: MongoDB.Driver 2.11.0 (high 7.2), Newtonsoft.Json 12.0.3 (high 7.5), jQuery 3.4.1 (moderate 6.9), +1 more
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
23.7/40No advisories left outstanding — 4 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 2,336 days ago
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories7
affected_packages5
assessed_packages46
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severityhigh 3, moderate 2
direct_affected_packages4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 46 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

45Weak · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 78 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.78
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrap — src/Hangfire.Mongo.Sample.ASPNetCore/Hangfire.Mongo.Sample.ASPNetCore.csproj, src/Hangfire.Mongo.Sample.CosmosDB/Hangfire.Mongo.Sample.CosmosDB.csproj, src/Hangfire.Mongo.Sample.NETCore/Hangfire.Mongo.Sample.NETCore.csproj (toolchain convention, no task runner)
0/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — C# (statically typed)
0/10Reproducible environment
4/10Demonstrated agent practice — 2 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsno
lockfiles—
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0.02
toolchain_manifestssrc/Hangfire.Mongo.Sample.ASPNetCore/Hangfire.Mongo.Sample.ASPNetCore.csproj, src/Hangfire.Mongo.Sample.CosmosDB/Hangfire.Mongo.Sample.CosmosDB.csproj, src/Hangfire.Mongo.Sample.NETCore/Hangfire.Mongo.Sample.NETCore.csproj, src/Hangfire.Mongo.Tests/Hangfire.Mongo.Tests.csproj, src/Hangfire.Mongo/Hangfire.Mongo.csproj
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — C# (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/172 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageC#
largest_source_bytes53,029
source_files_sampled172
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

281GitHub stars
30contributors
22commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
97releases
2bus factor
0open issues
—package ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • nuget package 'Hangfire.Mongo' points at a different repository (https://github.com/sergeyzwezdin/Hangfire.Mongo); excluded from ecosystem scoring
  • Could not fetch nuget package 'Hangfire.Mongo.Tests' from its registry
  • Could not fetch nuget package 'Hangfire.Mongo.Sample.NETCore' from its registry

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 88 ⇿
0Stars
88Forks
90Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

0204060801008622015-022020-092026-04
Major 0Minor 11Patch 79

Each point covers 11 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.6 / 10
5.6aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-22 19:36 UTC

9Binary-Artifactsbinaries present in source code
8Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
8CI-Tests22 out of 26 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
2Code-ReviewFound 6/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2
10Contributorsproject has 7 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
5Maintained4 commit(s) and 3 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 5
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 30
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
NuGetbootstrap5.3.8src/Hangfire.Mongo.Sample.ASPNetCore/Hangfire.Mongo.Sample.ASPNetCore.csproj
NuGetHangfire.AspNetCore1.8.25src/Hangfire.Mongo.Sample.ASPNetCore/Hangfire.Mongo.Sample.ASPNetCore.csproj
NuGetHangfire.Core1.8.25src/Hangfire.Mongo.Sample.ASPNetCore/Hangfire.Mongo.Sample.ASPNetCore.csproj
NuGetjquery3.7.1src/Hangfire.Mongo.Sample.ASPNetCore/Hangfire.Mongo.Sample.ASPNetCore.csproj
NuGetMongoDB.Driver3.12.0src/Hangfire.Mongo.Sample.ASPNetCore/Hangfire.Mongo.Sample.ASPNetCore.csproj
NuGetNewtonsoft.Json13.0.4src/Hangfire.Mongo.Sample.ASPNetCore/Hangfire.Mongo.Sample.ASPNetCore.csproj
NuGetSharpCompress0.50.4src/Hangfire.Mongo.Sample.ASPNetCore/Hangfire.Mongo.Sample.ASPNetCore.csproj
NuGetTestcontainers.MongoDb4.15.0src/Hangfire.Mongo.Sample.ASPNetCore/Hangfire.Mongo.Sample.ASPNetCore.csproj
NuGetbootstrap5.3.8src/Hangfire.Mongo.Sample.CosmosDB/Hangfire.Mongo.Sample.CosmosDB.csproj
NuGetHangfire.AspNetCore1.8.25src/Hangfire.Mongo.Sample.CosmosDB/Hangfire.Mongo.Sample.CosmosDB.csproj
NuGetHangfire.Core1.8.25src/Hangfire.Mongo.Sample.CosmosDB/Hangfire.Mongo.Sample.CosmosDB.csproj
NuGetjquery3.7.1src/Hangfire.Mongo.Sample.CosmosDB/Hangfire.Mongo.Sample.CosmosDB.csproj
NuGetMongoDB.Driver3.12.0src/Hangfire.Mongo.Sample.CosmosDB/Hangfire.Mongo.Sample.CosmosDB.csproj
NuGetNewtonsoft.Json13.0.4src/Hangfire.Mongo.Sample.CosmosDB/Hangfire.Mongo.Sample.CosmosDB.csproj
NuGetSharpCompress0.50.4src/Hangfire.Mongo.Sample.CosmosDB/Hangfire.Mongo.Sample.CosmosDB.csproj
NuGetHangfire.Core1.8.25src/Hangfire.Mongo.Sample.NETCore/Hangfire.Mongo.Sample.NETCore.csproj
NuGetMongoDB.Driver3.12.0src/Hangfire.Mongo.Sample.NETCore/Hangfire.Mongo.Sample.NETCore.csproj
NuGetNewtonsoft.Json13.0.4src/Hangfire.Mongo.Sample.NETCore/Hangfire.Mongo.Sample.NETCore.csproj
NuGetSharpCompress0.50.4src/Hangfire.Mongo.Sample.NETCore/Hangfire.Mongo.Sample.NETCore.csproj
NuGetTestcontainers.MongoDb4.15.0src/Hangfire.Mongo.Sample.NETCore/Hangfire.Mongo.Sample.NETCore.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk18.10.1src/Hangfire.Mongo.Tests/Hangfire.Mongo.Tests.csproj
NuGetNSubstitute6.2.0src/Hangfire.Mongo.Tests/Hangfire.Mongo.Tests.csproj
NuGetSharpCompress0.50.4src/Hangfire.Mongo.Tests/Hangfire.Mongo.Tests.csproj
NuGetNewtonsoft.Json13.0.4src/Hangfire.Mongo.Tests/Hangfire.Mongo.Tests.csproj
NuGetTestcontainers.MongoDb4.15.0src/Hangfire.Mongo.Tests/Hangfire.Mongo.Tests.csproj
NuGetTestcontainers.Xunit4.15.0src/Hangfire.Mongo.Tests/Hangfire.Mongo.Tests.csproj
NuGetxunit.runner.visualstudio4.0.0src/Hangfire.Mongo.Tests/Hangfire.Mongo.Tests.csproj
NuGetxunit2.9.3src/Hangfire.Mongo.Tests/Hangfire.Mongo.Tests.csproj
NuGetHangfire.Core1.8.25src/Hangfire.Mongo/Hangfire.Mongo.csproj
NuGetMongoDB.Driver3.12.0src/Hangfire.Mongo/Hangfire.Mongo.csproj
All dependencies 46

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 19 direct and 27 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
NuGetbootstrap4.4.1direct
NuGetbootstrap5.3.8direct
NuGetHangfire.AspNetCore1.8.25direct
NuGetHangfire.Core1.7.12direct
NuGetHangfire.Core1.8.25direct
NuGetjQuery3.4.1direct
NuGetjQuery3.7.1direct
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk18.10.1direct
NuGetMongoDB.Driver2.11.0direct
NuGetMongoDB.Driver3.12.0direct
NuGetNewtonsoft.Json12.0.3direct
NuGetNewtonsoft.Json13.0.4direct
NuGetNSubstitute6.2.0direct
NuGetSharpCompress0.26.0direct
NuGetSharpCompress0.50.4direct
NuGetTestcontainers.MongoDb4.15.0direct
NuGetTestcontainers.Xunit4.15.0direct
NuGetxunit2.9.3direct
NuGetxunit.runner.visualstudio4.0.0direct
NuGetAntlr3.5.0.2indirect
NuGetCrc32C.NET1.0.5.0indirect
NuGetDnsClient1.3.2indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNet.Identity.Core2.2.3indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNet.Mvc5.2.7indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNet.Razor3.2.7indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNet.Web.Optimization1.1.3indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNet.WebPages3.2.7indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Owin4.1.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Owin.Host.SystemWeb4.1.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Web.Infrastructure1.0.0.0indirect
NuGetMongoDB.Bson2.11.0indirect
NuGetMongoDB.Driver.Core2.11.0indirect
NuGetMongoDB.Libmongocrypt1.0.0indirect
NuGetOwin1.0indirect
NuGetpopper.js1.16.1indirect
NuGetSnappy.NET1.1.1.8indirect
NuGetSystem.Buffers4.5.1indirect
NuGetSystem.Memory4.5.4indirect
NuGetSystem.Net.Http4.3.4indirect
NuGetSystem.Runtime.CompilerServices.Unsafe4.7.1indirect
NuGetSystem.Runtime.InteropServices.RuntimeInformation4.3.0indirect
NuGetSystem.Security.Cryptography.Algorithms4.3.1indirect
NuGetSystem.Security.Cryptography.Encoding4.3.0indirect
NuGetSystem.Security.Cryptography.Primitives4.3.0indirect
NuGetSystem.Security.Cryptography.X509Certificates4.3.2indirect
NuGetWebGrease1.6.0indirect
Dependency advisories 5

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 46 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 5 carry known advisories, of which 4 are direct.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
MongoDB.Driver2.11.0directhigh12.19.0
Newtonsoft.Json12.0.3directhigh113.0.1
Microsoft.Owin4.1.0indirecthigh26.0.5
jQuery3.4.1directmoderate14.4.0
SharpCompress0.26.0directmoderate20.48.0

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — NuGet.