Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-18 13:52 UTC

gpuweb / types

TypeScript type definitions for WebGPU https://gpuweb.github.io/types/

JavaScriptBSD-3-Clause★ 241 stars⑂ 42 forkssince Apr 2019View on GitHub ↗

gpuweb/types holds a health index of 73 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Sustainability & Governance (68/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (50/100). It was last updated 30 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

73
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

73
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 64 is calibrated to 73 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

gpuwebOrganization
453 followers11 public repossince Feb 2017

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
npm@webgpu/types0.1.7229,246,85211830 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

63Moderate · 21% of overall
How it's scored
28.8/36Push recencylast push 30 days ago
5.5/36Commit cadence8/52 weeks with commits
11.3/18Commit volume17 commits in the last year
5/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained5 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 5
Inputs used
commits_last_year17
human_commit_share0.97
days_since_last_push30
active_weeks_last_year8
How it's scored
16.2/27Ships releases100 version tags (no GitHub releases)
36/36Release recencylatest release 30 days ago
19.8/27Release cadencea release every ~46.4 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count100
latest_release_tagv0.1.72
releases_from_tagsyes
days_since_latest_release30
mean_days_between_releases46.4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

65Good · 17% of overall
How it's scored
38.6/60Stars241 stars
13.4/25Forks42 forks
5.3/15Watchers10 watchers
Inputs used
forks42
stars241
watchers10
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (BSD-3-Clause)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
80/80Monthly downloads29,246,852 downloads/month across npm
0/20Registry dependentsnot reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packages@webgpu/types
dependents
ecosystemsnpm
total_downloads
monthly_downloads29,246,852
unverified_packages_excluded
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

68Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
7.7/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 66% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth29 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 25 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled29
top_contributor_share0.659
How it's scored
28.6/42Issue resolution68% of issues closed
27.5/30PR acceptance143/156 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
7.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 15/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5
Inputs used
merged_prs143
open_issues15
closed_issues32
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio0.681
closed_unmerged_prs13
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domain
19.1/25Owner reach453 followers of gpuweb
19.9/25Track record11 public repos, account ~9 yr old
Inputs used
followers453
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_logingpuweb
public_repos11
account_age_days3,511

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on npm
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 30 days ago
20/20Version history118 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packages@webgpu/types
ecosystemsnpm
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish30

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

63Moderate · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows1 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
14/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests12 out of 17 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 7
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://www.npmjs.com/package/@webgpu/types
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics2 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicswebgpu, typescript
has_wikino
homepagehttps://www.npmjs.com/package/@webgpu/types
docs_sitehttps://www.npmjs.com/package/@webgpu/types
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

61Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
6/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
1.8/2.5CI-Tests12 out of 17 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 7
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
3.8/7.5Code-ReviewFound 15/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 25 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
3.8/7.5Maintained5 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 5
0/5Packagingno data
2/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 4
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities14 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate5.1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories15
affected_packages6
assessed_packages99
unassessed_packages6
affected_by_severityhigh 5, low 1
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 99 resolved dependencies against OSV. 6 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

50Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
26.9/40Legible commit history49 of 97 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.505
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checkingtests/ts4.6/tsconfig.json, tests/ts4.7/tsconfig.json, tests/ts4.9/tsconfig.json, tests/ts5.2/tsconfig.json, tests/ts5.8/tsconfig.json, tests/ts5.9/tsconfig.json, tests/tsconfig.json, tsdoc-src/tsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environmentlockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8Automated maintenance3 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
4/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 4
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespackage-lock.json
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configstests/ts4.6/tsconfig.json, tests/ts4.7/tsconfig.json, tests/ts4.9/tsconfig.json, tests/ts5.2/tsconfig.json, tests/ts5.8/tsconfig.json, tests/ts5.9/tsconfig.json, tests/tsconfig.json, tsdoc-src/tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share0.03
How it's scored
27/45Type-checkable codeJavaScript with type-check config (tests/ts4.6/tsconfig.json, tests/ts4.7/tsconfig.json, tests/ts4.9/tsconfig.json, tests/ts5.2/tsconfig.json, tests/ts5.8/tsconfig.json, tests/ts5.9/tsconfig.json, tests/tsconfig.json, tsdoc-src/tsconfig.json)
55/55Manageable file sizes0/4 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageJavaScript
largest_source_bytes3,556
source_files_sampled4
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

241GitHub stars
29contributors
17commits, last 12 months
30days since last push
100releases
1bus factor
15open issues
npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 42 ⇿
0Stars
42Forks
99Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

010203040504222019-092023-022026-07
Major 0Minor 1Patch 98

Each point covers 7 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.1 / 10
5.1aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-18 13:51 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
8Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
7CI-Tests12 out of 17 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 7
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
5Code-ReviewFound 15/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5
10Contributorsproject has 25 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
5Maintained5 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 5
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
4Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 4
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities14 existing vulnerabilities detected
All dependencies 105

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 0 direct and 105 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npm@tootallnate/once1.1.2indirect
npm@types/dom-webcodecs0.1.3indirect
npm@types/dom-webcodecs0.1.4indirect
npm@types/dom-webcodecs0.1.5indirect
npmabab2.0.5indirect
npmacorn7.4.1indirect
npmacorn8.7.0indirect
npmacorn-globals6.0.0indirect
npmacorn-walk7.2.0indirect
npmagent-base6.0.2indirect
npmansi-regex5.0.1indirect
npmansi-sequence-parser1.1.0indirect
npmansi-styles4.3.0indirect
npmasynckit0.4.0indirect
npmbalanced-match1.0.2indirect
npmbrace-expansion2.0.1indirect
npmbrowser-process-hrtime1.0.0indirect
npmcliui7.0.4indirect
npmcolor-convert2.0.1indirect
npmcolor-name1.1.4indirect
npmcombined-stream1.0.8indirect
npmcssom0.3.8indirect
npmcssom0.4.4indirect
npmcssstyle2.3.0indirect
npmdata-urls2.0.0indirect
npmdebug4.3.3indirect
npmdecimal.js10.3.1indirect
npmdeep-is0.1.4indirect
npmdelayed-stream1.0.0indirect
npmdomexception2.0.1indirect
npmemoji-regex8.0.0indirect
npmescalade3.1.1indirect
npmescodegen2.0.0indirect
npmesprima4.0.1indirect
npmestraverse5.3.0indirect
npmesutils2.0.3indirect
npmfast-levenshtein2.0.6indirect
npmform-data3.0.1indirect
npmget-caller-file2.0.5indirect
npmhtml-encoding-sniffer2.0.1indirect
npmhttp-proxy-agent4.0.1indirect
npmhttps-proxy-agent5.0.0indirect
npmiconv-lite0.4.24indirect
npmis-fullwidth-code-point3.0.0indirect
npmis-potential-custom-element-name1.0.1indirect
npmjsdom16.7.0indirect
npmjsonc-parser3.2.0indirect
npmlevn0.3.0indirect
npmlodash4.17.21indirect
npmlunr2.3.9indirect
npmmarked4.3.0indirect
npmmime-db1.51.0indirect
npmmime-types2.1.34indirect
npmminimatch7.4.6indirect
npmms2.1.2indirect
npmnwsapi2.2.0indirect
npmoptionator0.8.3indirect
npmparse56.0.1indirect
npmprelude-ls1.1.2indirect
npmprettier2.4.1indirect
npmpsl1.8.0indirect
npmpunycode2.1.1indirect
npmquerystringify2.2.0indirect
npmrequire-directory2.1.1indirect
npmrequires-port1.0.0indirect
npmsafer-buffer2.1.2indirect
npmsaxes5.0.1indirect
npmshiki0.14.2indirect
npmsource-map0.6.1indirect
npmstring-width4.2.3indirect
npmstrip-ansi6.0.1indirect
npmsymbol-tree3.2.4indirect
npmtough-cookie4.1.3indirect
npmtr462.1.0indirect
npmtype-check0.3.2indirect
npmtypedoc0.23.28indirect
npmtypescript4.2.4indirect
npmtypescript4.6.4indirect
npmtypescript~4.6.0indirect
npmtypescript~4.7.0indirect
npmtypescript~4.9.0indirect
npmtypescript~5.2.0indirect
npmtypescript~5.8.0indirect
npmtypescript~5.9.0indirect
npmuniversalify0.2.0indirect
npmurl-parse1.5.10indirect
npmvscode-oniguruma1.7.0indirect
npmvscode-textmate8.0.0indirect
npmw3c-hr-time1.0.2indirect
npmw3c-xmlserializer2.0.0indirect
npmwebidl-conversions5.0.0indirect
npmwebidl-conversions6.1.0indirect
npmwebidl224.2.0indirect
npmwebidl2ts1.0.4indirect
npmwhatwg-encoding1.0.5indirect
npmwhatwg-mimetype2.3.0indirect
npmwhatwg-url8.7.0indirect
npmword-wrap1.2.5indirect
npmwrap-ansi7.0.0indirect
npmws7.5.10indirect
npmxml-name-validator3.0.0indirect
npmxmlchars2.2.0indirect
npmy18n5.0.8indirect
npmyargs16.2.0indirect
npmyargs-parser20.2.9indirect
Dependency advisories 6

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 99 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 6 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 6 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
brace-expansion2.0.1indirecthigh55.0.9
form-data3.0.1indirecthigh24.0.6
lodash4.17.21indirecthigh34.18.0
minimatch7.4.6indirecthigh310.2.3
ws7.5.10indirecthigh18.21.0
@tootallnate/once1.1.2indirectlow13.0.1

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsnpm.