Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-08 17:46 UTC

gradium-ai / gemm

RustMIT★ 0 stars⑂ 0 forkssince Aug 2026forkView on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryhow this is determined

gradium-ai/gemm holds a health index of 41 out of 100, placing it in the Weak band. It scores highest on Vitality (61/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (26/100). It was last updated 2 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

41
overall / 100
Weak

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

41
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 44 is calibrated to 41 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

GradiumOrganization
84 followers13 public repossince Aug 2025

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
crates.ioxn-gemm0.20.21,99622 days agolinear-algebra
crates.ioxn-gemm-c320.20.21,99822 days agolinear-algebra
crates.ioxn-gemm-c640.20.21,99722 days agolinear-algebra
crates.ioxn-gemm-f160.20.21,99722 days agolinear-algebra
crates.ioxn-gemm-f320.20.22,00022 days agolinear-algebra
crates.ioxn-gemm-f640.20.21,99822 days agolinear-algebra
crates.ioxn-gemm-common0.20.22,00722 days agolinear-algebra

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

61Moderate · 21% of overall

Development activity

53Moderate
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 2 days ago
4.8/36Commit cadence — 7/52 weeks with commits
12.4/18Commit volume — 23 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — project was created within the last 90 days. Please review its contents carefully
Inputs used
commits_last_year23
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push2
active_weeks_last_year7

Release discipline

72Good
How it's scored
16.2/27Ships releases — 1 version tags (no GitHub releases)
36/36Release recency — latest release 31 days ago
12.6/27Release cadence — cadence unknown (single release)
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count1
latest_release_tagv0.20.0
releases_from_tagsyes
days_since_latest_release31
mean_days_between_releases—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

26At Risk · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

1Critical
How it's scored
0/60Stars — 0 stars
0/25Forks — 0 forks
0/15Watchers — 0 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars0
watchers0
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

25At Risk
How it's scored
0/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeno
has_licenseno
readme_badges0
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

69Good
How it's scored
55.3/80Monthly downloads — 13,993 downloads/month across crates
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesxn-gemm, xn-gemm-c32, xn-gemm-c64, xn-gemm-f16, xn-gemm-f32, xn-gemm-f64, xn-gemm-common
dependents—
ecosystemscrates
total_downloads41,977
monthly_downloads13,993
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

60Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

30At Risk
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
10.8/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 52% of commits
6.8/13.5Contributor breadth — 5 contributors
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled5
top_contributor_share0.519

Issue & PR responsiveness

77Good
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolution — no issues or no data
30/30PR acceptance — 9/9 decided PRs merged
13/13Newcomer PR acceptance — 1/1 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
1.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 3/18 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
Inputs used
merged_prs9
open_issues0
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d4
prs_decided_7d4
prs_merged_30d6
prs_decided_30d6
issue_closed_ratio—
closed_unmerged_prs0
first_time_authors_30d1
first_time_prs_merged_30d1
first_time_prs_decided_30d1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

54Moderate
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
13.9/25Owner reach — 84 followers of gradium-ai
10.6/25Track record — 13 public repos, account ~1 yr old
Inputs used
followers84
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_logingradium-ai
public_repos13
account_age_days406

Package maintenance

92Excellent
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 7 package(s) on crates
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 2 days ago
12/20Version history — 2 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesxn-gemm, xn-gemm-c32, xn-gemm-c64, xn-gemm-f16, xn-gemm-f32, xn-gemm-f64, xn-gemm-common
ecosystemscrates
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish2

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

32At Risk · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

36Weak
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 2 workflow(s)
0/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
12/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 5 out of 8 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsno
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

25At Risk
How it's scored
0/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://docs.rs/xn-gemm
0/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikiyes
homepage—
docs_sitehttps://docs.rs/xn-gemm
has_readmeno
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionno

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

33At Risk · 16% of overall

Security posture

33At Risk
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
1.5/2.5CI-Tests — 5 out of 8 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 6
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0.8/7.5Code-Review — Found 3/18 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
0.8/2.5Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
0/7.5Maintained — project was created within the last 90 days. Please review its contents carefully
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate3.3
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

43Weak · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

24At Risk
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
24/40Legible commit history — 45 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.45
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

37Weak
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — justfile
0/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — Rust (statically typed)
0/10Reproducible environment
8/10Demonstrated agent practice — 4 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsno
lockfiles—
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_filesjustfile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0.04
toolchain_manifestsCargo.toml, gemm-c32/Cargo.toml, gemm-c64/Cargo.toml, gemm-common/Cargo.toml, gemm-f16/Cargo.toml, gemm-f32/Cargo.toml, gemm-f64/Cargo.toml, gemm/Cargo.toml
dependency_bot_commit_share0

Code legibility for models

96Exceptional
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — Rust (statically typed)
51.1/55Manageable file sizes — 2/28 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageRust
largest_source_bytes79,122
source_files_sampled28
oversized_source_files2

Key facts

0GitHub stars
5contributors
23commits, last 12 months
2days since last push
1releases
1bus factor
0open issues
crates.iopackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Community profile unavailable
  • GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 3.3 / 10
3.3aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-10-08 17:46 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
6CI-Tests5 out of 8 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 6
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
1Code-ReviewFound 3/18 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
3Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
0Maintainedproject was created within the last 90 days. Please review its contents carefully
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 62
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
crates.ioraw-cpuid—gemm-c32/Cargo.toml
crates.ioseq-macro—gemm-c32/Cargo.toml
crates.iodyn-stack—gemm-c32/Cargo.toml
crates.ionum-traits—gemm-c32/Cargo.toml
crates.ionum-complex—gemm-c32/Cargo.toml
crates.iopaste—gemm-c32/Cargo.toml
crates.iogemm-common0.20.2gemm-c32/Cargo.toml
crates.ioraw-cpuid—gemm-c64/Cargo.toml
crates.ioseq-macro—gemm-c64/Cargo.toml
crates.iodyn-stack—gemm-c64/Cargo.toml
crates.ionum-traits—gemm-c64/Cargo.toml
crates.ionum-complex—gemm-c64/Cargo.toml
crates.iopaste—gemm-c64/Cargo.toml
crates.iogemm-common0.20.2gemm-c64/Cargo.toml
crates.ioraw-cpuid—gemm-common/Cargo.toml
crates.ioseq-macro—gemm-common/Cargo.toml
crates.ioonce_cell—gemm-common/Cargo.toml
crates.iodyn-stack—gemm-common/Cargo.toml
crates.ionum-traits—gemm-common/Cargo.toml
crates.ionum-complex—gemm-common/Cargo.toml
crates.iohalf—gemm-common/Cargo.toml
crates.iorayon—gemm-common/Cargo.toml
crates.iopaste—gemm-common/Cargo.toml
crates.iopulp0.22.0gemm-common/Cargo.toml
crates.iobytemuck1.14gemm-common/Cargo.toml
crates.iolibm0.2.11gemm-common/Cargo.toml
crates.ioraw-cpuid—gemm-f16/Cargo.toml
crates.ioseq-macro—gemm-f16/Cargo.toml
crates.iodyn-stack—gemm-f16/Cargo.toml
crates.ionum-traits—gemm-f16/Cargo.toml
crates.ionum-complex—gemm-f16/Cargo.toml
crates.iopaste—gemm-f16/Cargo.toml
crates.iorayon—gemm-f16/Cargo.toml
crates.iogemm-common0.20.2gemm-f16/Cargo.toml
crates.iogemm-f320.20.2gemm-f16/Cargo.toml
crates.iohalf—gemm-f16/Cargo.toml
crates.ioraw-cpuid—gemm-f32/Cargo.toml
crates.ioseq-macro—gemm-f32/Cargo.toml
crates.iodyn-stack—gemm-f32/Cargo.toml
crates.ionum-traits—gemm-f32/Cargo.toml
crates.ionum-complex—gemm-f32/Cargo.toml
crates.iopaste—gemm-f32/Cargo.toml
crates.iogemm-common0.20.2gemm-f32/Cargo.toml
crates.ioraw-cpuid—gemm-f64/Cargo.toml
crates.ioseq-macro—gemm-f64/Cargo.toml
crates.iodyn-stack—gemm-f64/Cargo.toml
crates.ionum-traits—gemm-f64/Cargo.toml
crates.ionum-complex—gemm-f64/Cargo.toml
crates.iopaste—gemm-f64/Cargo.toml
crates.iogemm-common0.20.2gemm-f64/Cargo.toml
crates.ioraw-cpuid—gemm/Cargo.toml
crates.ioseq-macro—gemm/Cargo.toml
crates.iodyn-stack—gemm/Cargo.toml
crates.ionum-traits—gemm/Cargo.toml
crates.ionum-complex—gemm/Cargo.toml
crates.iopaste—gemm/Cargo.toml
crates.iogemm-common0.20.2gemm/Cargo.toml
crates.iogemm-f320.20.2gemm/Cargo.toml
crates.iogemm-f640.20.2gemm/Cargo.toml
crates.iogemm-c320.20.2gemm/Cargo.toml
crates.iogemm-c640.20.2gemm/Cargo.toml
crates.iogemm-f160.20.2gemm/Cargo.toml
All dependencies not collected

The resolved dependency set could not be collected for this report: GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with gradium-ai/gemm. Read them side by side →

91smartcorelib/smartcoreA comprehensive library for machine learning and numerical computing. Apply Machine Learning with Rust leveraging first principles. Excellent88microsoft/qdk-ecExcellent88ashvardanian/NumKongSIMD-accelerated distances, dot products, matrix ops, geospatial & geometric kernels for 16 numeric types — from 6-bit floats to 64-bit complex — across x86, Arm, RISC-V, and WASM, with bindings for Python, Rust, C, C++, Swift, JS, and Go 📐Excellent87martinjrobins/diffsolODE solver library in RustExcellent83cpmech/russellRust Scientific Library. ODE, DAE, and PDE solvers. Special functions (Bessel, Elliptic, Beta, Gamma, Erf). Linear algebra. Sparse solvers. Probability distributions. Tensor calculus. Numerical continuation.Excellent78jkitchin/feralFeral is a pure-Rust sparse symmetric indefinite linear solver with certified inertia counts for use in interior-point optimization algorithms.Good

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — crates.io.