Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-07 05:28 UTC

grafana / pyroscope-dotnet

Dotnet profiler

C++ · CApache-2.0★ 38 stars⑂ 13 forkssince Nov 2022View on GitHub ↗
KindNetwork servicehow this is determined

grafana/pyroscope-dotnet holds a health index of 90 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Vitality (96/100) and lowest on Engineering Quality (52/100). It was last updated today. 5 contributors account for most of its recent work.

90
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

90
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 76 is calibrated to 90 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Grafana LabsOrganization · verified domain
7,296 followers589 public repossince Apr 2014

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
NuGetPyroscope.OpenTelemetry0.5.1-568 days agografanaopentelemetryprofilespyroscope
NuGetPyroscope.OpenTracing0.5.1-668 days agografanaopentracingprofilespyroscope
NuGetPyroscope1.5.0-420 days agografanaprofilespyroscope

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

96Exceptional · 21% of overall

Development activity

100Exceptional
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 0 days ago
36/36Commit cadence52/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume1,402 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year1,402
human_commit_share0.84
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year52
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases58 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 59 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~9.7 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count58
latest_release_tagpyroscope-1.4.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release59
mean_days_between_releases9.7

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

53Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
25.4/60Stars38 stars
9/25Forks13 forks
4.3/15Watchers7 watchers
Inputs used
forks13
stars38
watchers7
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
0/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (Apache-2.0)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeno
has_licenseyes
readme_badges
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
75.2/80Total downloads17,238,225 downloads all-time across nuget
0/20Registry dependentsnot reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesPyroscope.OpenTelemetry, Pyroscope.OpenTracing, Pyroscope
dependents
ecosystemsnuget
total_downloads17,238,225
monthly_downloads
unverified_packages_excluded
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

91Excellent · 23% of overall
How it's scored
45.9/54Bus factor5 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
17.1/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 24% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth93 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 9 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor5
contributors_sampled93
top_contributor_share0.242
How it's scored
29.7/42Issue resolution71% of issues closed
21.6/30PR acceptance251/348 decided PRs merged
13/13Newcomer PR acceptance1/1 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
15/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Reviewall changesets reviewed
Inputs used
merged_prs251
open_issues19
closed_issues46
prs_merged_7d1
prs_decided_7d1
prs_merged_30d11
prs_decided_30d15
issue_closed_ratio0.708
closed_unmerged_prs97
first_time_authors_30d1
first_time_prs_merged_30d1
first_time_prs_decided_30d1
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
20/20Verified domain
25/25Owner reach7,296 followers of grafana
25/25Track record589 public repos, account ~12 yr old
Inputs used
followers7,296
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedyes
owner_logingrafana
public_repos589
account_age_days4,536

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable3 package(s) on nuget
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 0 days ago
20/20Version history42 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesPyroscope.OpenTelemetry, Pyroscope.OpenTracing, Pyroscope
ecosystemsnuget
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish0

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

52Moderate · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows6 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests7 out of 7 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

20At Risk
How it's scored
0/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics
has_wikiyes
homepage
docs_site
has_readmeno
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

83Excellent · 16% of overall
How it's scored
6.8/7.5Binary-Artifactsbinaries present in source code
3.8/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests7 out of 7 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
7.5/7.5Code-Reviewall changesets reviewed
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 9 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packagingpackaging workflow detected
3/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 6
5/5SASTSAST tool is run on all commits
5/5Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
6.8/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated18
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive0
scorecard_aggregate7.9

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages19
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 19 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

77Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructionsCLAUDE.md, integration-test/CLAUDE.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history78 of 84 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.929
agent_instruction_filesCLAUDE.md, integration-test/CLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes2,995
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrapIntegrationTest/Makefile, Makefile, integration-test/Makefile
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checkingC++ (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environmentdevcontainer, lockfile
10/10Demonstrated agent practice14 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
0/8Automated maintenanceno automated dependency updates observed
6/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesgo.sum
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_filesIntegrationTest/Makefile, Makefile, integration-test/Makefile
has_devcontaineryes
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0.14
toolchain_manifestsIntegrationTest/Rideshare.csproj, Pyroscope/Pyroscope.OpenTelemetry.Tests/Pyroscope.OpenTelemetry.Tests.csproj, Pyroscope/Pyroscope.OpenTelemetry/Pyroscope.OpenTelemetry.csproj, Pyroscope/Pyroscope.OpenTracing.Tests/Pyroscope.OpenTracing.Tests.csproj, Pyroscope/Pyroscope.OpenTracing/Pyroscope.OpenTracing.csproj, Pyroscope/Pyroscope/Pyroscope.csproj, integration-test/go.mod, profiler/build/TinyGet/TinyGet.Tests/TinyGet.Tests.csproj, profiler/build/TinyGet/TinyGet/TinyGet.csproj, shared/samples/Datadog.AutoInstrumentation.ManagedLoader.Demo/DefAD.Asm1/Datadog.AutoInstrumentation.ManagedLoader.Demo.Driver.DefAD.Asm1.csproj, shared/samples/Datadog.AutoInstrumentation.ManagedLoader.Demo/Driver/Datadog.AutoInstrumentation.ManagedLoader.Demo.Driver.csproj, shared/samples/Datadog.DynamicDiagnosticSourceBindings.Demo/LateLoadDS.NetFx/Datadog.DynamicDiagnosticSourceBindings.Demo.LateLoadDS.NetFx.csproj, shared/samples/Datadog.DynamicDiagnosticSourceBindings.Demo/LoadUnloadPlugin.NetCore31/Datadog.DynamicDiagnosticSourceBindings.Demo.LoadUnloadPlugin.NetCore31.csproj, shared/samples/Datadog.DynamicDiagnosticSourceBindings.Demo/Simple.NetCore31/Datadog.DynamicDiagnosticSourceBindings.Demo.Simple.NetCore31.csproj, shared/samples/Datadog.DynamicDiagnosticSourceBindings.Demo/Simple.NetFx45/Datadog.DynamicDiagnosticSourceBindings.Demo.Simple.NetFx45.csproj, shared/samples/Datadog.Logging.Demo/EmitterAndComposerApp/Datadog.Logging.Demo.EmitterAndComposerApp.csproj, shared/samples/Datadog.Logging.Demo/EmitterLib/Datadog.Logging.Demo.EmitterLib.csproj
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeC++ (statically typed)
52.9/55Manageable file sizes32/841 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageC++
largest_source_bytes1,313,203
source_files_sampled841
oversized_source_files32
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)
0/20MCP server
40/40Runnable examplessamples
Inputs used
example_dirssamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files
interfaces_expected_ofnetwork-service

Key facts

38GitHub stars
93contributors
1,402commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
58releases
5bus factor
19open issues
Go, NuGetpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • Could not fetch nuget package 'rideshare' from its registry

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 13 ⇿
0Stars
13Forks
57Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

03581013151312023-012024-112026-08
Major 0Minor 1Patch 2

Each point covers 4 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 7.9 / 10
7.9aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-07 05:27 UTC

9Binary-Artifactsbinaries present in source code
5Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10CI-Tests7 out of 7 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
10Code-Reviewall changesets reviewed
10Contributorsproject has 9 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
6Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 6
10SASTSAST tool is run on all commits
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
9Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 8
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk18.6.0Pyroscope/Pyroscope.OpenTelemetry.Tests/Pyroscope.OpenTelemetry.Tests.csproj
NuGetNUnit4.2.2Pyroscope/Pyroscope.OpenTelemetry.Tests/Pyroscope.OpenTelemetry.Tests.csproj
NuGetNUnit3TestAdapter4.6.0Pyroscope/Pyroscope.OpenTelemetry.Tests/Pyroscope.OpenTelemetry.Tests.csproj
NuGetOpenTelemetry1.16.0Pyroscope/Pyroscope.OpenTelemetry/Pyroscope.OpenTelemetry.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk18.6.0Pyroscope/Pyroscope.OpenTracing.Tests/Pyroscope.OpenTracing.Tests.csproj
NuGetNUnit4.2.2Pyroscope/Pyroscope.OpenTracing.Tests/Pyroscope.OpenTracing.Tests.csproj
NuGetNUnit3TestAdapter4.6.0Pyroscope/Pyroscope.OpenTracing.Tests/Pyroscope.OpenTracing.Tests.csproj
NuGetOpenTracing0.12.1Pyroscope/Pyroscope.OpenTracing/Pyroscope.OpenTracing.csproj
All dependencies 19

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 6 direct and 13 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk18.6.0direct
NuGetNUnit2.6.3direct
NuGetNUnit4.2.2direct
NuGetNUnit3TestAdapter4.6.0direct
NuGetOpenTelemetry1.16.0direct
NuGetOpenTracing0.12.1direct
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNet.WebApi.Client5.1.1indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNet.WebApi.Core5.1.1indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.AspNet.WebApi.SelfHost5.1.1indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Bcl1.1.6indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Bcl.Build1.0.13indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.CodeAnalysis.CSharp.CodeStyle3.8.0indirect
NuGetMicrosoft.Net.Http2.2.18indirect
NuGetMoq4.2.1402.2112indirect
NuGetNewtonsoft.Json13.0.1indirect
NuGetSystem.Buffers4.5.1indirect
NuGetSystem.Diagnostics.DiagnosticSource5.0.1indirect
NuGetSystem.Memory4.5.4indirect
NuGetSystem.Runtime.CompilerServices.Unsafe5.0.0indirect
Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 19 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsNuGet.