Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-11 19:56 UTC

hashicorp / terraform-docs-agents

Content for Terraform's agents documentation.

MDXMPL-2.0★ 8 stars⑂ 14 forkssince Feb 2022archivedView on GitHub ↗

hashicorp/terraform-docs-agents holds a health index of 19 out of 100, placing it in the Critical band. It scores highest on Sustainability & Governance (77/100) and lowest on Vitality (28/100). The repository is archived, so no further maintenance is expected.

overall / 100

Critical

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 50 is calibrated to 50 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

HashiCorpOrganization · verified domain

10,855 followers943 public repossince May 2011

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

28At Risk · 21% of overall

Development activity

1Critical

Abandonment alert

Work has arrived and nobody has attended to it

archived on GitHub by its maintainersOverall rating: Critical ceiling

Silence alone is never the finding — a small, finished library may need no commits for years. This alert requires both: no human commit for a long time, and obligations the project is visibly not discharging. Automated commits do not count as maintenance.

How abandonment is assessed

How it's scored

0/36	Push recency — last push 372 days ago
0/36	Commit cadence — 0/52 weeks with commits
0/18	Commit volume — 0 commits in the last year
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — project is archived

Inputs used

commits_last_year	0
human_commit_share	0.98
days_since_last_push	372
active_weeks_last_year	0

Release discipline

68Good

How it's scored

27/27	Ships releases — 48 releases published
7.2/36	Release recency — latest release 513 days ago
27/27	Release cadence — a release every ~9.1 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data

Inputs used

releases_count	48
latest_release_tag	v1.22.0
releases_from_tags	no
days_since_latest_release	513
mean_days_between_releases	9.1

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

50Moderate · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

30At Risk

How it's scored

13.7/60	Stars — 8 stars
9.3/25	Forks — 14 forks
7.2/15	Watchers — 21 watchers

Inputs used

forks	14
stars	8
watchers	21
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

72Good

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (MPL-2.0)
0/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
6.3/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	0
has_contributing	no
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	yes
readme_badge_services	—
has_pull_request_template	yes

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

77Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

76Good

How it's scored

36/54	Bus factor — 3 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
17/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 24% of commits
13.5/13.5	Contributor breadth — 29 contributors
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

bus_factor	3
contributors_sampled	29
top_contributor_share	0.244

Issue & PR responsiveness

54Moderate

How it's scored

14/42	Issue resolution — 33% of issues closed
25.3/30	PR acceptance — 113/134 decided PRs merged
0/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
7.5/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 17/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5

Inputs used

merged_prs	113
open_issues	6
closed_issues	3
prs_merged_7d	0
prs_decided_7d	0
prs_merged_30d	0
prs_decided_30d	0
issue_closed_ratio	0.333
closed_unmerged_prs	21
first_time_authors_30d	0
first_time_prs_merged_30d	0
first_time_prs_decided_30d	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

100Exceptional

How it's scored

30/30	Ownership backing — organization-owned
20/20	Verified domain
25/25	Owner reach — 10,855 followers of hashicorp
25/25	Track record — 943 public repos, account ~15 yr old

Inputs used

followers	10,855
owner_type	Organization
is_verified	yes
owner_login	hashicorp
public_repos	943
account_age_days	5,612

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

40Weak · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

24At Risk

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 2 workflow(s)
0/24	Tests present
0/16	Linter config
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4	.editorconfig
0/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 0 out of 29 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	no
has_editorconfig	no
has_linter_config	no
has_precommit_config	no

Documentation

65Good

How it's scored

30/30	README
0/25	Documentation directory
15/15	Documentation / homepage site — terraform-docs-agents.vercel.app
10/10	Repository description
0/10	Topics
10/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	—
has_wiki	yes
homepage	terraform-docs-agents.vercel.app
docs_site	terraform-docs-agents.vercel.app
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	no
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

55Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

44Weak

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
4.5/7.5	Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
0/2.5	CI-Tests — 0 out of 29 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
3.8/7.5	Code-Review — Found 17/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5
2.5/2.5	Contributors — project has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
10/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5	License — license file detected
0/7.5	Maintained — project is archived
0/5	Packaging — no data
5/5	Pinned-Dependencies — all dependencies are pinned
0/5	SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
5/5	Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5	Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 56 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	16
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	2
scorecard_aggregate	4.4

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional

How it's scored

35/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40	No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	57
affected_packages	14
assessed_packages	203
unassessed_packages	0
affected_by_severity	critical 2, high 7, moderate 4, low 1
direct_affected_packages	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 203 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

37Weak · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

55Moderate

How it's scored

0/45	Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
15/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) — llms.txt served by the project website (https://docs.docker.com/llms.txt)
40/40	Legible commit history — 96 of 98 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	yes
llms_txt_url	https://docs.docker.com/llms.txt
legible_history_share	0.98
agent_instruction_files	—
agent_instruction_max_bytes	—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

38Weak

How it's scored

18/18	One-command bootstrap — Makefile, website/Makefile
0/22	Automated tests
0/11	Lint / format config
0/11	Static type checking
10/10	Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10	Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8	Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — all dependencies are pinned

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	no
lockfiles	package-lock.json
has_dockerfile	no
typed_language	no
bootstrap_files	Makefile, website/Makefile
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	no
typecheck_configs	—
agent_commit_share	0
toolchain_manifests	—
dependency_bot_commit_share	0

Code legibility for models

1Critical

How it's scored

0/45	Type-checkable code — MDX without a type-check config
0/55	Manageable file sizes — no source files detected

Inputs used

primary_language	MDX
largest_source_bytes	—
source_files_sampled	0
oversized_source_files	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Manageable file sizes. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

8GitHub stars

29contributors

0commits, last 12 months

372days since last push

48releases

3bus factor

6open issues

npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
Could not fetch npm package 'terraform-docs-agents-docs-preview' from its registry

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 14 ⇿

0Stars

14Forks

44Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Major 0Minor 18Patch 26

Each point covers 3 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.4 / 10

4.4aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-11 19:55 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
6	Branch-Protection	branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
0	CI-Tests	0 out of 29 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
5	Code-Review	Found 17/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5
10	Contributors	project has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
10	Dangerous-Workflow	no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0	Dependency-Update-Tool	no update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
10	License	license file detected
0	Maintained	project is archived
n/a	Packaging	packaging workflow not detected
10	Pinned-Dependencies	all dependencies are pinned
0	SAST	SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
10	Security-Policy	security policy file detected
n/a	Signed-Releases	no releases found
0	Token-Permissions	detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0	Vulnerabilities	56 existing vulnerabilities detected

All dependencies 203

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 0 direct and 203 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
npm	@babel/code-frame	`7.18.6`	indirect
npm	@babel/core	`7.12.9`	indirect
npm	@babel/generator	`7.21.3`	indirect
npm	@babel/helper-environment-visitor	`7.18.9`	indirect
npm	@babel/helper-function-name	`7.21.0`	indirect
npm	@babel/helper-hoist-variables	`7.18.6`	indirect
npm	@babel/helper-module-imports	`7.18.6`	indirect
npm	@babel/helper-module-transforms	`7.21.2`	indirect
npm	@babel/helper-plugin-utils	`7.10.4`	indirect
npm	@babel/helper-plugin-utils	`7.20.2`	indirect
npm	@babel/helper-simple-access	`7.20.2`	indirect
npm	@babel/helper-split-export-declaration	`7.18.6`	indirect
npm	@babel/helper-string-parser	`7.19.4`	indirect
npm	@babel/helper-validator-identifier	`7.19.1`	indirect
npm	@babel/helpers	`7.21.0`	indirect
npm	@babel/highlight	`7.18.6`	indirect
npm	@babel/parser	`7.21.3`	indirect
npm	@babel/plugin-proposal-object-rest-spread	`7.12.1`	indirect
npm	@babel/plugin-syntax-jsx	`7.12.1`	indirect
npm	@babel/plugin-syntax-object-rest-spread	`7.8.3`	indirect
npm	@babel/plugin-transform-parameters	`7.21.3`	indirect
npm	@babel/template	`7.20.7`	indirect
npm	@babel/traverse	`7.21.3`	indirect
npm	@babel/types	`7.21.3`	indirect
npm	@hashicorp/platform-content-conformance	`0.0.12`	indirect
npm	@jridgewell/gen-mapping	`0.3.2`	indirect
npm	@jridgewell/resolve-uri	`3.1.0`	indirect
npm	@jridgewell/set-array	`1.1.2`	indirect
npm	@jridgewell/sourcemap-codec	`1.4.14`	indirect
npm	@jridgewell/trace-mapping	`0.3.17`	indirect
npm	@mdx-js/util	`1.6.22`	indirect
npm	@next/env	`14.2.1`	indirect
npm	@next/swc-darwin-arm64	`14.2.1`	indirect
npm	@next/swc-darwin-x64	`14.2.1`	indirect
npm	@next/swc-linux-arm64-gnu	`14.2.1`	indirect
npm	@next/swc-linux-arm64-musl	`14.2.1`	indirect
npm	@next/swc-linux-x64-gnu	`14.2.1`	indirect
npm	@next/swc-linux-x64-musl	`14.2.1`	indirect
npm	@next/swc-win32-arm64-msvc	`14.2.1`	indirect
npm	@next/swc-win32-ia32-msvc	`14.2.1`	indirect
npm	@next/swc-win32-x64-msvc	`14.2.1`	indirect
npm	@nodelib/fs.scandir	`2.1.5`	indirect
npm	@nodelib/fs.stat	`2.0.5`	indirect
npm	@nodelib/fs.walk	`1.2.8`	indirect
npm	@swc/counter	`0.1.3`	indirect
npm	@swc/helpers	`0.5.5`	indirect
npm	@types/mdast	`3.0.11`	indirect
npm	@types/supports-color	`8.1.1`	indirect
npm	@types/unist	`2.0.6`	indirect
npm	ansi-regex	`5.0.1`	indirect
npm	ansi-regex	`6.0.1`	indirect
npm	ansi-styles	`3.2.1`	indirect
npm	ansi-styles	`4.3.0`	indirect
npm	bail	`1.0.5`	indirect
npm	bail	`2.0.2`	indirect
npm	braces	`3.0.2`	indirect
npm	busboy	`1.6.0`	indirect
npm	caniuse-lite	`1.0.30001616`	indirect
npm	ccount	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	chalk	`2.4.2`	indirect
npm	character-entities	`1.2.4`	indirect
npm	character-entities-html4	`1.1.4`	indirect
npm	character-entities-legacy	`1.1.4`	indirect
npm	character-reference-invalid	`1.1.4`	indirect
npm	client-only	`0.0.1`	indirect
npm	cliui	`8.0.1`	indirect
npm	collapse-white-space	`1.0.6`	indirect
npm	color-convert	`1.9.3`	indirect
npm	color-convert	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	color-name	`1.1.3`	indirect
npm	color-name	`1.1.4`	indirect
npm	convert-source-map	`1.9.0`	indirect
npm	debug	`4.3.4`	indirect
npm	dir-glob	`3.0.1`	indirect
npm	eastasianwidth	`0.2.0`	indirect
npm	emoji-regex	`8.0.0`	indirect
npm	emoji-regex	`9.2.2`	indirect
npm	escalade	`3.1.1`	indirect
npm	escape-string-regexp	`1.0.5`	indirect
npm	extend	`3.0.2`	indirect
npm	fast-glob	`3.2.12`	indirect
npm	fastq	`1.15.0`	indirect
npm	fill-range	`7.0.1`	indirect
npm	find-up	`6.3.0`	indirect
npm	flat	`5.0.2`	indirect
npm	function-bind	`1.1.1`	indirect
npm	gensync	`1.0.0-beta.2`	indirect
npm	get-caller-file	`2.0.5`	indirect
npm	glob-parent	`5.1.2`	indirect
npm	globals	`11.12.0`	indirect
npm	globby	`13.1.3`	indirect
npm	graceful-fs	`4.2.11`	indirect
npm	has	`1.0.3`	indirect
npm	has-flag	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	ignore	`5.2.4`	indirect
npm	inherits	`2.0.4`	indirect
npm	is-alphabetical	`1.0.4`	indirect
npm	is-alphanumeric	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	is-alphanumerical	`1.0.4`	indirect
npm	is-buffer	`2.0.5`	indirect
npm	is-core-module	`2.11.0`	indirect
npm	is-decimal	`1.0.4`	indirect
npm	is-extglob	`2.1.1`	indirect
npm	is-fullwidth-code-point	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	is-glob	`4.0.3`	indirect
npm	is-hexadecimal	`1.0.4`	indirect
npm	is-number	`7.0.0`	indirect
npm	is-plain-obj	`2.1.0`	indirect
npm	is-plain-obj	`4.1.0`	indirect
npm	is-whitespace-character	`1.0.4`	indirect
npm	is-word-character	`1.0.4`	indirect
npm	js-tokens	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	jsesc	`2.5.2`	indirect
npm	json5	`2.2.3`	indirect
npm	locate-path	`7.2.0`	indirect
npm	lodash	`4.17.21`	indirect
npm	longest-streak	`2.0.4`	indirect
npm	loose-envify	`1.4.0`	indirect
npm	markdown-escapes	`1.0.4`	indirect
npm	markdown-table	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	mdast-util-compact	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	mdast-util-to-string	`3.1.1`	indirect
npm	merge2	`1.4.1`	indirect
npm	micromatch	`4.0.5`	indirect
npm	ms	`2.1.2`	indirect
npm	nanoid	`3.3.7`	indirect
npm	next	`14.2.1`	indirect
npm	p-limit	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	p-locate	`6.0.0`	indirect
npm	parse-entities	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	path-exists	`5.0.0`	indirect
npm	path-parse	`1.0.7`	indirect
npm	path-type	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	picocolors	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	picomatch	`2.3.1`	indirect
npm	postcss	`8.4.31`	indirect
npm	queue-microtask	`1.2.3`	indirect
npm	react	`18.3.1`	indirect
npm	react-dom	`18.3.1`	indirect
npm	remark	`12.0.1`	indirect
npm	remark-mdx	`1.6.22`	indirect
npm	remark-parse	`8.0.3`	indirect
npm	remark-stringify	`8.1.1`	indirect
npm	repeat-string	`1.6.1`	indirect
npm	require-directory	`2.1.1`	indirect
npm	resolve	`1.22.1`	indirect
npm	reusify	`1.0.4`	indirect
npm	run-parallel	`1.2.0`	indirect
npm	scheduler	`0.23.2`	indirect
npm	semver	`5.7.1`	indirect
npm	slash	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	source-map	`0.5.7`	indirect
npm	source-map-js	`1.2.0`	indirect
npm	state-toggle	`1.0.3`	indirect
npm	streamsearch	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	string-width	`4.2.3`	indirect
npm	string-width	`5.1.2`	indirect
npm	stringify-entities	`3.1.0`	indirect
npm	strip-ansi	`6.0.1`	indirect
npm	strip-ansi	`7.0.1`	indirect
npm	styled-jsx	`5.1.1`	indirect
npm	supports-color	`5.5.0`	indirect
npm	supports-color	`9.3.1`	indirect
npm	supports-preserve-symlinks-flag	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	to-fast-properties	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	to-regex-range	`5.0.1`	indirect
npm	trim	`0.0.1`	indirect
npm	trim-trailing-lines	`1.1.4`	indirect
npm	trough	`1.0.5`	indirect
npm	trough	`2.1.0`	indirect
npm	tslib	`2.6.2`	indirect
npm	unherit	`1.1.3`	indirect
npm	unified	`10.1.2`	indirect
npm	unified	`9.2.0`	indirect
npm	unified	`9.2.2`	indirect
npm	unified-lint-rule	`2.1.1`	indirect
npm	unist-util-is	`4.1.0`	indirect
npm	unist-util-is	`5.2.1`	indirect
npm	unist-util-remove-position	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	unist-util-stringify-position	`2.0.3`	indirect
npm	unist-util-stringify-position	`3.0.3`	indirect
npm	unist-util-visit	`2.0.3`	indirect
npm	unist-util-visit	`4.1.2`	indirect
npm	unist-util-visit-parents	`3.1.1`	indirect
npm	unist-util-visit-parents	`5.1.3`	indirect
npm	vfile	`4.2.1`	indirect
npm	vfile	`5.3.7`	indirect
npm	vfile-location	`3.2.0`	indirect
npm	vfile-matter	`4.0.1`	indirect
npm	vfile-message	`2.0.4`	indirect
npm	vfile-message	`3.1.4`	indirect
npm	vfile-reporter	`7.0.5`	indirect
npm	vfile-reporter-json	`3.3.0`	indirect
npm	vfile-sort	`3.0.1`	indirect
npm	vfile-statistics	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	wrap-ansi	`7.0.0`	indirect
npm	xtend	`4.0.2`	indirect
npm	y18n	`5.0.8`	indirect
npm	yaml	`2.4.2`	indirect
npm	yargs	`17.7.1`	indirect
npm	yargs-parser	`21.1.1`	indirect
npm	yocto-queue	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	zod	`3.21.4`	indirect

Dependency advisories 14

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 203 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 14 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

Package	Version	Relation	Severity	Advisories	Fixed in
@babel/traverse	`7.21.3`	indirect	critical	1	`8.0.0-alpha.4`
next	`14.2.1`	indirect	critical	35	`16.3.3`
braces	`3.0.2`	indirect	high	1	`3.0.3`
lodash	`4.17.21`	indirect	high	3	`4.18.0`
nanoid	`3.3.7`	indirect	high	4	`5.1.16`
picomatch	`2.3.1`	indirect	high	2	`4.0.4`
postcss	`8.4.31`	indirect	high	4	`8.5.23`
semver	`5.7.1`	indirect	high	1	`7.5.2`
trim	`0.0.1`	indirect	high	1	`0.0.3`
@babel/helpers	`7.21.0`	indirect	moderate	1	`8.0.0-alpha.17`
micromatch	`4.0.5`	indirect	moderate	1	`4.0.8`
yaml	`2.4.2`	indirect	moderate	1	`2.8.3`
zod	`3.21.4`	indirect	moderate	1	`3.22.3`
@babel/core	`7.12.9`	indirect	low	1	`8.0.0-rc.6`

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records