Public record
Software health reportschema 0.15.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-20 07:41 UTC

hashicorp / terraform-docs-agents

Content for Terraform's agents documentation.

MDXMPL-2.0★ 8 stars⑂ 14 forkssince Feb 2022archivedView on GitHub ↗

hashicorp/terraform-docs-agents holds a health index of 19 out of 100, placing it in the Critical band. It scores highest on Sustainability & Governance (80/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (22/100). The repository is archived, so no further maintenance is expected.

19
overall / 100
Critical

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

19
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 49 is calibrated to 48 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

HashiCorpOrganization
10,684 followers941 public repossince May 2011

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

30At Risk · 21% of overall
How it's scored
3.6/36Push recencylast push 318 days ago
0/36Commit cadence0/52 weeks with commits
0/18Commit volume0 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintainedproject is archived
Inputs used
commits_last_year0
human_commit_share
days_since_last_push318
active_weeks_last_year0
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases48 releases published
7.2/36Release recencylatest release 460 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~9.1 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count48
latest_release_tagv1.22.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release460
mean_days_between_releases9.1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

50Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
13.7/60Stars8 stars
9.3/25Forks14 forks
7.2/15Watchers21 watchers
Inputs used
forks14
stars8
watchers21
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MPL-2.0)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateyes

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

80Excellent · 23% of overall
How it's scored
43.2/54Bus factor4 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
17.1/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 24% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth31 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
bus_factor4
contributors_sampled31
top_contributor_share0.24
How it's scored
14/42Issue resolution33% of issues closed
25.3/30PR acceptance113/134 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
7.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 17/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5
Inputs used
merged_prs113
open_issues6
closed_issues3
prs_merged_7d
prs_decided_7d
prs_merged_30d
prs_decided_30d
issue_closed_ratio0.333
closed_unmerged_prs21
first_time_authors_30d
first_time_prs_merged_30d
first_time_prs_decided_30d
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domainverified-domain status not read for this organization
25/25Owner reach10,684 followers of hashicorp
25/25Track record941 public repos, account ~15 yr old
Inputs used
followers10,684
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified
owner_loginhashicorp
public_repos941
account_age_days5,559
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

40Weak · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows2 workflow(s)
0/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests0 out of 29 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsno
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage siteterraform-docs-agents.vercel.app
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics
has_wikiyes
homepageterraform-docs-agents.vercel.app
docs_siteterraform-docs-agents.vercel.app
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

44Weak · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
4.5/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
0/2.5CI-Tests0 out of 29 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
3.8/7.5Code-ReviewFound 17/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
0/7.5Maintainedproject is archived
0/5Packagingno data
5/5Pinned-Dependenciesall dependencies are pinned
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
5/5Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities41 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate4.4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

22At Risk · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit historyno data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrapMakefile, website/Makefile
0/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environmentlockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno data
0/8Automated maintenanceno data
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesall dependencies are pinned
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsno
lockfilespackage-lock.json
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_filesMakefile, website/Makefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice, Automated maintenance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable codeMDX without a type-check config
0/55Manageable file sizesno source files detected
Inputs used
primary_languageMDX
largest_source_bytes
source_files_sampled0
oversized_source_files0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Manageable file sizes. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

8GitHub stars
31contributors
0commits, last 12 months
318days since last push
48releases
4bus factor
6open issues
npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Could not fetch npm package 'terraform-docs-agents-docs-preview' from its registry

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.4 / 10
4.4aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-20 07:41 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
6Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
0CI-Tests0 out of 29 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
5Code-ReviewFound 17/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5
10Contributorsproject has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
0Maintainedproject is archived
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
10Pinned-Dependenciesall dependencies are pinned
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities41 existing vulnerabilities detected
All dependencies 203

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 0 direct and 203 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npm@babel/code-frame7.18.6indirect
npm@babel/core7.12.9indirect
npm@babel/generator7.21.3indirect
npm@babel/helper-environment-visitor7.18.9indirect
npm@babel/helper-function-name7.21.0indirect
npm@babel/helper-hoist-variables7.18.6indirect
npm@babel/helper-module-imports7.18.6indirect
npm@babel/helper-module-transforms7.21.2indirect
npm@babel/helper-plugin-utils7.10.4indirect
npm@babel/helper-plugin-utils7.20.2indirect
npm@babel/helper-simple-access7.20.2indirect
npm@babel/helper-split-export-declaration7.18.6indirect
npm@babel/helper-string-parser7.19.4indirect
npm@babel/helper-validator-identifier7.19.1indirect
npm@babel/helpers7.21.0indirect
npm@babel/highlight7.18.6indirect
npm@babel/parser7.21.3indirect
npm@babel/plugin-proposal-object-rest-spread7.12.1indirect
npm@babel/plugin-syntax-jsx7.12.1indirect
npm@babel/plugin-syntax-object-rest-spread7.8.3indirect
npm@babel/plugin-transform-parameters7.21.3indirect
npm@babel/template7.20.7indirect
npm@babel/traverse7.21.3indirect
npm@babel/types7.21.3indirect
npm@hashicorp/platform-content-conformance0.0.12indirect
npm@jridgewell/gen-mapping0.3.2indirect
npm@jridgewell/resolve-uri3.1.0indirect
npm@jridgewell/set-array1.1.2indirect
npm@jridgewell/sourcemap-codec1.4.14indirect
npm@jridgewell/trace-mapping0.3.17indirect
npm@mdx-js/util1.6.22indirect
npm@next/env14.2.1indirect
npm@next/swc-darwin-arm6414.2.1indirect
npm@next/swc-darwin-x6414.2.1indirect
npm@next/swc-linux-arm64-gnu14.2.1indirect
npm@next/swc-linux-arm64-musl14.2.1indirect
npm@next/swc-linux-x64-gnu14.2.1indirect
npm@next/swc-linux-x64-musl14.2.1indirect
npm@next/swc-win32-arm64-msvc14.2.1indirect
npm@next/swc-win32-ia32-msvc14.2.1indirect
npm@next/swc-win32-x64-msvc14.2.1indirect
npm@nodelib/fs.scandir2.1.5indirect
npm@nodelib/fs.stat2.0.5indirect
npm@nodelib/fs.walk1.2.8indirect
npm@swc/counter0.1.3indirect
npm@swc/helpers0.5.5indirect
npm@types/mdast3.0.11indirect
npm@types/supports-color8.1.1indirect
npm@types/unist2.0.6indirect
npmansi-regex5.0.1indirect
npmansi-regex6.0.1indirect
npmansi-styles3.2.1indirect
npmansi-styles4.3.0indirect
npmbail1.0.5indirect
npmbail2.0.2indirect
npmbraces3.0.2indirect
npmbusboy1.6.0indirect
npmcaniuse-lite1.0.30001616indirect
npmccount1.1.0indirect
npmchalk2.4.2indirect
npmcharacter-entities1.2.4indirect
npmcharacter-entities-html41.1.4indirect
npmcharacter-entities-legacy1.1.4indirect
npmcharacter-reference-invalid1.1.4indirect
npmclient-only0.0.1indirect
npmcliui8.0.1indirect
npmcollapse-white-space1.0.6indirect
npmcolor-convert1.9.3indirect
npmcolor-convert2.0.1indirect
npmcolor-name1.1.3indirect
npmcolor-name1.1.4indirect
npmconvert-source-map1.9.0indirect
npmdebug4.3.4indirect
npmdir-glob3.0.1indirect
npmeastasianwidth0.2.0indirect
npmemoji-regex8.0.0indirect
npmemoji-regex9.2.2indirect
npmescalade3.1.1indirect
npmescape-string-regexp1.0.5indirect
npmextend3.0.2indirect
npmfast-glob3.2.12indirect
npmfastq1.15.0indirect
npmfill-range7.0.1indirect
npmfind-up6.3.0indirect
npmflat5.0.2indirect
npmfunction-bind1.1.1indirect
npmgensync1.0.0-beta.2indirect
npmget-caller-file2.0.5indirect
npmglob-parent5.1.2indirect
npmglobals11.12.0indirect
npmglobby13.1.3indirect
npmgraceful-fs4.2.11indirect
npmhas1.0.3indirect
npmhas-flag3.0.0indirect
npmignore5.2.4indirect
npminherits2.0.4indirect
npmis-alphabetical1.0.4indirect
npmis-alphanumeric1.0.0indirect
npmis-alphanumerical1.0.4indirect
npmis-buffer2.0.5indirect
npmis-core-module2.11.0indirect
npmis-decimal1.0.4indirect
npmis-extglob2.1.1indirect
npmis-fullwidth-code-point3.0.0indirect
npmis-glob4.0.3indirect
npmis-hexadecimal1.0.4indirect
npmis-number7.0.0indirect
npmis-plain-obj2.1.0indirect
npmis-plain-obj4.1.0indirect
npmis-whitespace-character1.0.4indirect
npmis-word-character1.0.4indirect
npmjs-tokens4.0.0indirect
npmjsesc2.5.2indirect
npmjson52.2.3indirect
npmlocate-path7.2.0indirect
npmlodash4.17.21indirect
npmlongest-streak2.0.4indirect
npmloose-envify1.4.0indirect
npmmarkdown-escapes1.0.4indirect
npmmarkdown-table2.0.0indirect
npmmdast-util-compact2.0.1indirect
npmmdast-util-to-string3.1.1indirect
npmmerge21.4.1indirect
npmmicromatch4.0.5indirect
npmms2.1.2indirect
npmnanoid3.3.7indirect
npmnext14.2.1indirect
npmp-limit4.0.0indirect
npmp-locate6.0.0indirect
npmparse-entities2.0.0indirect
npmpath-exists5.0.0indirect
npmpath-parse1.0.7indirect
npmpath-type4.0.0indirect
npmpicocolors1.0.0indirect
npmpicomatch2.3.1indirect
npmpostcss8.4.31indirect
npmqueue-microtask1.2.3indirect
npmreact18.3.1indirect
npmreact-dom18.3.1indirect
npmremark12.0.1indirect
npmremark-mdx1.6.22indirect
npmremark-parse8.0.3indirect
npmremark-stringify8.1.1indirect
npmrepeat-string1.6.1indirect
npmrequire-directory2.1.1indirect
npmresolve1.22.1indirect
npmreusify1.0.4indirect
npmrun-parallel1.2.0indirect
npmscheduler0.23.2indirect
npmsemver5.7.1indirect
npmslash4.0.0indirect
npmsource-map0.5.7indirect
npmsource-map-js1.2.0indirect
npmstate-toggle1.0.3indirect
npmstreamsearch1.1.0indirect
npmstring-width4.2.3indirect
npmstring-width5.1.2indirect
npmstringify-entities3.1.0indirect
npmstrip-ansi6.0.1indirect
npmstrip-ansi7.0.1indirect
npmstyled-jsx5.1.1indirect
npmsupports-color5.5.0indirect
npmsupports-color9.3.1indirect
npmsupports-preserve-symlinks-flag1.0.0indirect
npmto-fast-properties2.0.0indirect
npmto-regex-range5.0.1indirect
npmtrim0.0.1indirect
npmtrim-trailing-lines1.1.4indirect
npmtrough1.0.5indirect
npmtrough2.1.0indirect
npmtslib2.6.2indirect
npmunherit1.1.3indirect
npmunified10.1.2indirect
npmunified9.2.0indirect
npmunified9.2.2indirect
npmunified-lint-rule2.1.1indirect
npmunist-util-is4.1.0indirect
npmunist-util-is5.2.1indirect
npmunist-util-remove-position2.0.1indirect
npmunist-util-stringify-position2.0.3indirect
npmunist-util-stringify-position3.0.3indirect
npmunist-util-visit2.0.3indirect
npmunist-util-visit4.1.2indirect
npmunist-util-visit-parents3.1.1indirect
npmunist-util-visit-parents5.1.3indirect
npmvfile4.2.1indirect
npmvfile5.3.7indirect
npmvfile-location3.2.0indirect
npmvfile-matter4.0.1indirect
npmvfile-message2.0.4indirect
npmvfile-message3.1.4indirect
npmvfile-reporter7.0.5indirect
npmvfile-reporter-json3.3.0indirect
npmvfile-sort3.0.1indirect
npmvfile-statistics2.0.1indirect
npmwrap-ansi7.0.0indirect
npmxtend4.0.2indirect
npmy18n5.0.8indirect
npmyaml2.4.2indirect
npmyargs17.7.1indirect
npmyargs-parser21.1.1indirect
npmyocto-queue1.0.0indirect
npmzod3.21.4indirect
Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.15.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics.