Public record
Software health reportschema 0.29.0 · metrics 2.5.0 · 2026-08-02 19:32 UTC

heygen-com / heygen-cli

Create AI videos from the terminal. Official CLI for the HeyGen video generation API.

GoApache-2.0★ 104 stars⑂ 14 forkssince Mar 2026View on GitHub ↗
KindCommand-line toolTerminal interfacehow this is determined

heygen-com/heygen-cli holds a health index of 83 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (84/100) and lowest on Sustainability & Governance (55/100). It was last updated 1 day ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

83
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

83
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 70 is calibrated to 83 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

HeyGenOrganization
682 followers29 public repossince May 2020

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
Gogithub.com/heygen-com/heygen-cliv0.5.0-12712 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

82Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 1 days ago
12.5/36Commit cadence — 18/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 169 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year169
human_commit_share0.93
days_since_last_push1
active_weeks_last_year18
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 100 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 1 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~1.2 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count100
latest_release_tagv0.5.1-dev.202607312310
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release1
mean_days_between_releases1.2

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

65Good · 17% of overall
How it's scored
32.7/60Stars — 104 stars
9.3/25Forks — 14 forks
0/15Watchers — 1 watchers
Inputs used
forks14
stars104
watchers1
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

92Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (Apache-2.0)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges3
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_servicesgithub.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateyes

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

55Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
6.3/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 72% of commits
6.8/13.5Contributor breadth — 5 contributors
6/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled5
top_contributor_share0.722
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolution — 0% of issues closed
18.3/30PR acceptance — 153/251 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
10.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 23/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 7
Inputs used
merged_prs153
open_issues1
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d5
prs_decided_7d17
prs_merged_30d19
prs_decided_30d55
issue_closed_ratio0
closed_unmerged_prs98
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): newcomer_pr_acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
20.4/25Owner reach — 682 followers of heygen-com
22.8/25Track record — 29 public repos, account ~6 yr old
Inputs used
followers682
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified
owner_loginheygen-com
public_repos29
account_age_days2,270

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on go
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 12 days ago
20/20Version history — 127 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesgithub.com/heygen-com/heygen-cli
ecosystemsgo
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish12

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

84Excellent · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 3 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — .golangci.yml
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
10/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 17 out of 29 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 5
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

100Exceptional
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://developers.heygen.com
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 10 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsagents, ai, api, avatar, cli, golang, heygen, text-to-speech, video, video-translation
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://developers.heygen.com
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

62Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
6/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
1.2/2.5CI-Tests — 17 out of 29 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 5
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
5.2/7.5Code-Review — Found 23/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 7
1.5/2.5Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
0.5/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 1
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
4.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 4 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated18
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive0
scorecard_aggregate6.1
How it's scored
9.5/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — 1 affected: github.com/getkin/kin-openapi v0.137.0 (critical 9.1)
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
40/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory has been public longer than 90 days
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories4
affected_packages3
assessed_packages60
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitycritical 1, unknown 2
direct_affected_packages1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 60 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

83Excellent · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 93 of 93 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
legible_history_share1
agent_instruction_filesAGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes5,577
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — Makefile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — .golangci.yml
11/11Static type checking — Go (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
10/10Demonstrated agent practice — 53 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8Automated maintenance — 6 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
1/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 1
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesgo.sum
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_filesMakefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0.53
toolchain_manifestsgo.mod
dependency_bot_commit_share0.06
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — Go (statically typed)
54.2/55Manageable file sizes — 2/140 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageGo
largest_source_bytes244,664
source_files_sampled140
oversized_source_files2
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)
0/20MCP server
40/40Runnable examples — examples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files

Key facts

104GitHub stars
5contributors
169commits, last 12 months
1days since last push
100releases
1bus factor
1open issues
Gopackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 14 ⇿
0Stars
14Forks
81Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

03581013151422026-042026-062026-07
Major 0Minor 5Patch 14
OpenSSF Scorecard 6.1 / 10
6.1aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-02 19:31 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
8Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
5CI-Tests17 out of 29 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 5
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
7Code-ReviewFound 23/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 7
6Contributorsproject has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
1Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 1
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
6Vulnerabilities4 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 15
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Gogithub.com/getkin/kin-openapiv0.137.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/iancoleman/strcasev0.3.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/jinzhu/inflectionv1.0.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/spf13/cobrav1.10.2go.mod
Gogopkg.in/yaml.v3v3.0.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/BurntSushi/tomlv1.4.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/Masterminds/semver/v3v3.3.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/charmbracelet/bubblesv0.20.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/charmbracelet/bubbleteav1.2.4go.mod
Gogithub.com/charmbracelet/lipglossv1.1.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/creativeprojects/go-selfupdatev1.5.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/google/uuidv1.6.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/posthog/posthog-gov1.11.2go.mod
Gogithub.com/spf13/pflagv1.0.9go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/termv0.43.0go.mod
All dependencies 60

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 15 direct and 45 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Gogithub.com/burntsushi/tomlv1.4.0direct
Gogithub.com/charmbracelet/bubblesv0.20.0direct
Gogithub.com/charmbracelet/bubbleteav1.2.4direct
Gogithub.com/charmbracelet/lipglossv1.1.0direct
Gogithub.com/creativeprojects/go-selfupdatev1.5.0direct
Gogithub.com/getkin/kin-openapiv0.137.0direct
Gogithub.com/google/uuidv1.6.0direct
Gogithub.com/iancoleman/strcasev0.3.0direct
Gogithub.com/jinzhu/inflectionv1.0.0direct
Gogithub.com/masterminds/semver/v3v3.3.1direct
Gogithub.com/posthog/posthog-gov1.11.2direct
Gogithub.com/spf13/cobrav1.10.2direct
Gogithub.com/spf13/pflagv1.0.9direct
Gogolang.org/x/termv0.43.0direct
Gogopkg.in/yaml.v3v3.0.1direct
Gocode.gitea.io/sdk/giteav0.21.0indirect
Gogithub.com/42wim/httpsigv1.2.2indirect
Gogithub.com/aymanbagabas/go-osc52/v2v2.0.1indirect
Gogithub.com/charmbracelet/colorprofilev0.2.3-0.20250311203215-f60798e515dcindirect
Gogithub.com/charmbracelet/x/ansiv0.8.0indirect
Gogithub.com/charmbracelet/x/cellbufv0.0.13-0.20250311204145-2c3ea96c31ddindirect
Gogithub.com/charmbracelet/x/termv0.2.1indirect
Gogithub.com/davidmz/go-pageantv1.0.2indirect
Gogithub.com/erikgeiser/coninputv0.0.0-20211004153227-1c3628e74d0findirect
Gogithub.com/go-fed/httpsigv1.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/go-openapi/jsonpointerv0.21.0indirect
Gogithub.com/go-openapi/swagv0.23.0indirect
Gogithub.com/goccy/go-jsonv0.10.5indirect
Gogithub.com/google/go-github/v30v30.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/google/go-querystringv1.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/go-cleanhttpv0.5.2indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/go-retryablehttpv0.7.7indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/go-versionv1.7.0indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/golang-lru/v2v2.0.7indirect
Gogithub.com/inconshreveable/mousetrapv1.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/josharian/internv1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/lucasb-eyer/go-colorfulv1.2.0indirect
Gogithub.com/mailru/easyjsonv0.7.7indirect
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-isattyv0.0.20indirect
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-localereaderv0.0.1indirect
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-runewidthv0.0.16indirect
Gogithub.com/mohae/deepcopyv0.0.0-20170929034955-c48cc78d4826indirect
Gogithub.com/muesli/ansiv0.0.0-20230316100256-276c6243b2f6indirect
Gogithub.com/muesli/cancelreaderv0.2.2indirect
Gogithub.com/muesli/termenvv0.16.0indirect
Gogithub.com/oasdiff/yamlv0.0.9indirect
Gogithub.com/oasdiff/yaml3v0.0.12indirect
Gogithub.com/perimeterx/marshmallowv1.1.5indirect
Gogithub.com/rivo/unisegv0.4.7indirect
Gogithub.com/santhosh-tekuri/jsonschema/v6v6.0.2indirect
Gogithub.com/ulikunitz/xzv0.5.15indirect
Gogithub.com/woodsbury/decimal128v1.3.0indirect
Gogithub.com/xanzy/go-gitlabv0.115.0indirect
Gogithub.com/xo/terminfov0.0.0-20220910002029-abceb7e1c41eindirect
Gogolang.org/x/cryptov0.52.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/oauth2v0.29.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/syncv0.20.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/sysv0.45.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/textv0.37.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/timev0.11.0indirect
Dependency advisories 3

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 60 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 3 carry known advisories, of which 1 are direct.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
github.com/getkin/kin-openapiv0.137.0directcritical20.144.0
golang.org/x/cryptov0.52.0indirectunknown1
golang.org/x/textv0.37.0indirectunknown10.39.0

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.5.0, schema v0.29.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsGo.