Public record
Software health reportschema 0.12.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-17 18:50 UTC

holos-aafc / Holos

Open source version of the core algorithms used by the Holos model

C#Custom license★ 29 stars⑂ 26 forkssince Feb 2022View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryhow this is determined

holos-aafc/Holos holds a health index of 69 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Vitality (90/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (24/100). It was last updated today. 3 contributors account for most of its recent work.

69
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

69
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 62 is calibrated to 69 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

AAFC HolosOrganization
14 followers5 public repossince Dec 2021

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
NuGetAAFC.Holos.Content4.0.20260717.1643-3610 days agoholosaafcagricultureghg
NuGetAAFC.Holos.Core4.0.20260717.1643-3610 days agoholosaafcagricultureghg
NuGetAAFC.Holos.Infrastructure4.0.20260717.1643-3610 days agoholosaafcagricultureghg

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

90Excellent · 21% of overall

Development activity

90Excellent
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
26.3/36Commit cadence — 38/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 170 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year170
human_commit_share—
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year38

Release discipline

90Excellent
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 100 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 0 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~2.4 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count100
latest_release_tage36eed5b
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release0
mean_days_between_releases2.4

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

60Moderate · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

38Weak
How it's scored
23.5/60Stars — 29 stars
11.7/25Forks — 26 forks
3.3/15Watchers — 5 watchers
Inputs used
forks26
stars29
watchers5
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

79Good
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
16.9/22.5License — license file present, not a recognized license
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges—
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

70Good
How it's scored
56.2/80Total downloads — 258,811 downloads all-time across nuget
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesAAFC.Holos.Content, AAFC.Holos.Core, AAFC.Holos.Infrastructure
dependents—
ecosystemsnuget
total_downloads258,811
monthly_downloads—
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

72Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

66Good
How it's scored
36/54Bus factor — 3 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
13.6/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 39% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 16 contributors
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
bus_factor3
contributors_sampled16
top_contributor_share0.394

Issue & PR responsiveness

63Moderate
How it's scored
27.3/42Issue resolution — 65% of issues closed
27.9/30PR acceptance — 189/203 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 1/21 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs189
open_issues66
closed_issues122
prs_merged_7d—
prs_decided_7d—
prs_merged_30d—
prs_decided_30d—
issue_closed_ratio0.649
closed_unmerged_prs14
first_time_authors_30d—
first_time_prs_merged_30d—
first_time_prs_decided_30d—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

67Good
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain — verified-domain status not read for this organization
8.5/25Owner reach — 14 followers of holos-aafc
14.9/25Track record — 5 public repos, account ~4 yr old
Inputs used
followers14
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified—
owner_loginholos-aafc
public_repos5
account_age_days1,682
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 3 package(s) on nuget
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 0 days ago
20/20Version history — 361 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesAAFC.Holos.Content, AAFC.Holos.Core, AAFC.Holos.Infrastructure
ecosystemsnuget
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish0

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

44Weak · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

40Weak
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 5 workflow(s)
0/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
16/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 7 out of 8 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsno
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

50Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikiyes
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

45Weak · 16% of overall

Security posture

45Weak
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
2/2.5CI-Tests — 7 out of 8 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 1/21 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0.8/2.5Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.2/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
4.5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate4.5
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Packaging. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

24At Risk · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

1Critical
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit history — no data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share—
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

13Critical
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
0/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — C# (statically typed)
0/10Reproducible environment
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no data
0/8Automated maintenance — no data
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsno
lockfiles—
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share—
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice, Automated maintenance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Code legibility for models

99Exceptional
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — C# (statically typed)
54.3/55Manageable file sizes — 13/993 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageC#
largest_source_bytes687,564
source_files_sampled993
oversized_source_files13

Key facts

29GitHub stars
16contributors
170commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
100releases
3bus factor
66open issues
NuGetpackage ecosystems

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.5 / 10
4.5aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-17 18:49 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
8CI-Tests7 out of 8 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 1/21 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
3Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
9Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
9Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 62
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
NuGetCommonServiceLocator2.0.7H.CLI.Test/H.CLI.Test.csproj
NuGetCsvHelper33.1.0H.CLI.Test/H.CLI.Test.csproj
NuGetMoq4.20.71H.CLI.Test/H.CLI.Test.csproj
NuGetMSTest.TestAdapter3.5.2H.CLI.Test/H.CLI.Test.csproj
NuGetMSTest.TestFramework3.5.2H.CLI.Test/H.CLI.Test.csproj
NuGetPrism.Wpf7.2.0.1422H.CLI.Test/H.CLI.Test.csproj
NuGetSystem.Memory4.6.3H.CLI.Test/H.CLI.Test.csproj
NuGetSystem.Runtime.CompilerServices.Unsafe6.0.0H.CLI.Test/H.CLI.Test.csproj
NuGetSystem.Threading.Tasks.Extensions4.5.4H.CLI.Test/H.CLI.Test.csproj
NuGetCommonServiceLocator2.0.7H.CLI/H.CLI.csproj
NuGetCsvHelper33.1.0H.CLI/H.CLI.csproj
NuGetMoq4.20.71H.CLI/H.CLI.csproj
NuGetPrism.Wpf7.2.0.1422H.CLI/H.CLI.csproj
NuGetSystem.Memory4.6.3H.CLI/H.CLI.csproj
NuGetSystem.Runtime.CompilerServices.Unsafe6.0.0H.CLI/H.CLI.csproj
NuGetSystem.Threading.Tasks.Extensions4.5.4H.CLI/H.CLI.csproj
NuGetCsvHelper33.1.0H.Content/H.Content.csproj
NuGetNETStandard.Library2.0.3H.Content/H.Content.csproj
NuGetNuGet.Build.Tasks.Pack6.11.0H.Content/H.Content.csproj
NuGetPrism.Core7.2.0.1422H.Content/H.Content.csproj
NuGetSystem.Memory4.6.3H.Content/H.Content.csproj
NuGetCommonServiceLocator2.0.7H.Core.Test/H.Core.Test.csproj
NuGetCsvHelper33.1.0H.Core.Test/H.Core.Test.csproj
NuGetMoq4.20.71H.Core.Test/H.Core.Test.csproj
NuGetMSTest.TestAdapter3.5.2H.Core.Test/H.Core.Test.csproj
NuGetMSTest.TestFramework3.5.2H.Core.Test/H.Core.Test.csproj
NuGetPrism.Wpf7.2.0.1422H.Core.Test/H.Core.Test.csproj
NuGetSystem.Memory4.6.3H.Core.Test/H.Core.Test.csproj
NuGetSystem.Runtime.CompilerServices.Unsafe6.0.0H.Core.Test/H.Core.Test.csproj
NuGetSystem.Threading.Tasks.Extensions4.5.4H.Core.Test/H.Core.Test.csproj
NuGetCommonServiceLocator2.0.7H.Core/H.Core.csproj
NuGetCsvHelper33.1.0H.Core/H.Core.csproj
NuGetNETStandard.Library2.0.3H.Core/H.Core.csproj
NuGetNewtonsoft.Json13.0.3H.Core/H.Core.csproj
NuGetNuGet.Build.Tasks.Pack6.11.0H.Core/H.Core.csproj
NuGetPrism.Wpf7.2.0.1422H.Core/H.Core.csproj
NuGetSystem.Configuration.ConfigurationManager8.0.0H.Core/H.Core.csproj
NuGetSystem.Memory4.6.3H.Core/H.Core.csproj
NuGetSystem.Runtime.Caching9.0.4H.Core/H.Core.csproj
NuGetSystem.Runtime.CompilerServices.Unsafe6.0.0H.Core/H.Core.csproj
NuGetCsvHelper33.1.0H.Infrastructure.Test/H.Infrastructure.Test.csproj
NuGetMSTest.TestAdapter3.5.2H.Infrastructure.Test/H.Infrastructure.Test.csproj
NuGetMSTest.TestFramework3.5.2H.Infrastructure.Test/H.Infrastructure.Test.csproj
NuGetSharpKml.Core6.1.0H.Infrastructure.Test/H.Infrastructure.Test.csproj
NuGetSystem.Memory4.6.3H.Infrastructure.Test/H.Infrastructure.Test.csproj
NuGetCommonServiceLocator2.0.7H.Infrastructure/H.Infrastructure.csproj
NuGetCsvHelper33.1.0H.Infrastructure/H.Infrastructure.csproj
NuGetNETStandard.Library2.0.3H.Infrastructure/H.Infrastructure.csproj
NuGetNuGet.Build.Tasks.Pack6.11.0H.Infrastructure/H.Infrastructure.csproj
NuGetPrism.Wpf7.2.0.1422H.Infrastructure/H.Infrastructure.csproj
NuGetSharpKml.Core6.1.0H.Infrastructure/H.Infrastructure.csproj
NuGetSystem.Memory4.6.3H.Infrastructure/H.Infrastructure.csproj
NuGetCommonServiceLocator2.0.7H.Integration/H.Integration.csproj
NuGetCsvHelper33.1.0H.Integration/H.Integration.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Office.Interop.Excel15.0.4795.1001H.Integration/H.Integration.csproj
NuGetMoq4.20.71H.Integration/H.Integration.csproj
NuGetMSTest.TestAdapter3.5.2H.Integration/H.Integration.csproj
NuGetMSTest.TestFramework3.5.2H.Integration/H.Integration.csproj
NuGetPrism.Wpf7.2.0.1422H.Integration/H.Integration.csproj
NuGetSystem.Memory4.6.3H.Integration/H.Integration.csproj
NuGetSystem.Runtime.CompilerServices.Unsafe6.0.0H.Integration/H.Integration.csproj
NuGetSystem.Threading.Tasks.Extensions4.5.4H.Integration/H.Integration.csproj
All dependencies 17

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 17 direct and 0 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
NuGetCommonServiceLocator2.0.7direct
NuGetCsvHelper33.1.0direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Office.Interop.Excel15.0.4795.1001direct
NuGetMoq4.20.71direct
NuGetMSTest.TestAdapter3.5.2direct
NuGetMSTest.TestFramework3.5.2direct
NuGetNETStandard.Library2.0.3direct
NuGetNewtonsoft.Json13.0.3direct
NuGetNuGet.Build.Tasks.Pack6.11.0direct
NuGetPrism.Core7.2.0.1422direct
NuGetPrism.Wpf7.2.0.1422direct
NuGetSharpKml.Core6.1.0direct
NuGetSystem.Configuration.ConfigurationManager8.0.0direct
NuGetSystem.Memory4.6.3direct
NuGetSystem.Runtime.Caching9.0.4direct
NuGetSystem.Runtime.CompilerServices.Unsafe6.0.0direct
NuGetSystem.Threading.Tasks.Extensions4.5.4direct
Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with holos-aafc/Holos. Read them side by side →

95catalyst-cooperative/pudlThe Public Utility Data Liberation Project provides analysis-ready energy system data to climate advocates, researchers, policymakers, and journalists.Exceptional89LiteFarmOrg/LiteFarmThe world’s first community-led, not-for-profit, digital platform joining farmers and scientists together for participatory assessment of social, environmental and economic outputs of farming systems. Excellent78Project-AgML/AgMLAgML is a centralized framework for agricultural machine learning. AgML provides access to public agricultural datasets for common agricultural deep learning tasks, with standard benchmarks and pretrained models, as well the ability to generate synthetic data and annotations.Good65FarmBot/farmbot-jsJavascript wrapper for FarmBot's authentication and RPC instructionsGood50iyulab/formulabTypeScript library of 174 research-backed industrial engineering formulas across 14 domains — quality, metallurgy, logistics, safety, machining, and more — with zero dependencies.Moderate45andrewschristison/pondlogPlace-aware nature data for developers. 8 data sources, 7 MCP servers, 1000-crop garden planner, CLI.Weak

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.12.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — NuGet.