Public record
Software health reportschema 0.15.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-19 20:18 UTC

hostinger / api-mcp-server

TypeScript · JavaScriptMIT★ 127 stars⑂ 52 forkssince Apr 2025View on GitHub ↗
KindMCP serverLibraryNetwork servicehow this is determined
#ai#api#claude#cursor#hostinger#mcp#gemini-cli-extension

hostinger/api-mcp-server holds a health index of 75 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Vitality (92/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (28/100). It was last updated 3 days ago. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

75
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

75
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 65 is calibrated to 75 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Hostinger InternationalOrganization
580 followers117 public repossince Oct 2012

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
npmhostinger-api-mcp1.8.0189,6041023 days agohostingermcpserverrestapi

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

92Excellent · 21% of overall

Development activity

87Excellent
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 3 days ago
22.8/36Commit cadence — 33/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 99 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year99
human_commit_share—
days_since_last_push3
active_weeks_last_year33

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 100 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 3 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~0.3 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count100
latest_release_tagv1.8.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release3
mean_days_between_releases0.3
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

61Moderate · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

53Moderate
How it's scored
34.1/60Stars — 127 stars
14.2/25Forks — 52 forks
4.3/15Watchers — 7 watchers
Inputs used
forks52
stars127
watchers7
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

50Moderate
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges—
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

88Excellent
How it's scored
70.4/80Monthly downloads — 189,604 downloads/month across npm
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packageshostinger-api-mcp
dependents—
ecosystemsnpm
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads189,604
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

72Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

52Moderate
How it's scored
25.2/54Bus factor — 2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
13.5/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 40% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 13 contributors
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
bus_factor2
contributors_sampled13
top_contributor_share0.402

Issue & PR responsiveness

50Moderate
How it's scored
27/42Issue resolution — 64% of issues closed
16.7/30PR acceptance — 20/36 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs20
open_issues5
closed_issues9
prs_merged_7d—
prs_decided_7d—
prs_merged_30d—
prs_decided_30d—
issue_closed_ratio0.643
closed_unmerged_prs16
first_time_authors_30d—
first_time_prs_merged_30d—
first_time_prs_decided_30d—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

94Exceptional
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain — verified-domain status not read for this organization
19.9/25Owner reach — 580 followers of hostinger
25/25Track record — 117 public repos, account ~13 yr old
Inputs used
followers580
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified—
owner_loginhostinger
public_repos117
account_age_days5,017
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on npm
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 3 days ago
20/20Version history — 102 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packageshostinger-api-mcp
ecosystemsnpm
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish3

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

40Weak · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

30At Risk
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 1 workflow(s)
0/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — no data
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsno
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.

Documentation

55Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://developers.hostinger.com
0/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 7 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsai, api, claude, cursor, hostinger, mcp, gemini-cli-extension
has_wikino
homepagehttps://developers.hostinger.com
docs_sitehttps://developers.hostinger.com
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionno

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

62Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

62Moderate
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
3.8/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
0/2.5CI-Tests — no data
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
0.5/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 1
0/5SAST — no SAST tool detected
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
6.8/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate6.2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): CI-Tests, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

28At Risk · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

1Critical
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit history — no data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share—
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

27At Risk
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
0/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — tsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no data
0/8Automated maintenance — no data
1/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 1
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsno
lockfilespackage-lock.json
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configstsconfig.json
agent_commit_share—
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice, Automated maintenance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Code legibility for models

94Exceptional
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — TypeScript (statically typed)
49.5/55Manageable file sizes — 5/50 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageTypeScript
largest_source_bytes230,012
source_files_sampled50
oversized_source_files5

Machine-readable interfaces

20At Risk
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)
20/20MCP server
0/40Runnable examples
Inputs used
example_dirs—
has_mcp_signalyes
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_ofnetwork-service

Key facts

127GitHub stars
13contributors
99commits, last 12 months
3days since last push
100releases
2bus factor
5open issues
npmpackage ecosystems

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.2 / 10
6.2aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-19 20:18 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
5Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
n/aCI-Testsno pull request found
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
1Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 1
0SASTno SAST tool detected
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
9Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 7
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
npm@modelcontextprotocol/sdk^1.10.0package.json
npmaxios^1.8.0package.json
npmcors^2.8.5package.json
npmdotenv^17.4.2package.json
npmexpress^5.2.1package.json
npmminimist^1.2.8package.json
npmtus-js-client^4.1.0package.json
All dependencies 162

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 7 direct and 155 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npm@modelcontextprotocol/sdk1.29.0direct
npmaxios1.18.1direct
npmcors2.8.6direct
npmdotenv17.4.2direct
npmexpress5.2.1direct
npmminimist1.2.8direct
npmtus-js-client4.3.1direct
npm@hono/node-server1.19.14indirect
npm@types/body-parser1.19.6indirect
npm@types/connect3.4.38indirect
npm@types/cors2.8.19indirect
npm@types/express5.0.6indirect
npm@types/express-serve-static-core5.1.2indirect
npm@types/http-errors2.0.5indirect
npm@types/minimist1.2.5indirect
npm@types/node26.1.1indirect
npm@types/qs6.15.1indirect
npm@types/range-parser1.2.7indirect
npm@types/send1.2.1indirect
npm@types/serve-static2.2.0indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-aix-ppc647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-darwin-arm647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-darwin-x647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-freebsd-arm647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-freebsd-x647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-linux-arm7.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-linux-arm647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-linux-loong647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-linux-mips64el7.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-linux-ppc647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-linux-riscv647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-linux-s390x7.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-linux-x647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-netbsd-arm647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-netbsd-x647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-openbsd-arm647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-openbsd-x647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-sunos-x647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-win32-arm647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-win32-x647.0.2indirect
npmaccepts2.0.0indirect
npmagent-base6.0.2indirect
npmajv8.20.0indirect
npmajv-formats3.0.1indirect
npmasynckit0.4.0indirect
npmbody-parser2.3.0indirect
npmbuffer-from1.1.2indirect
npmbytes3.1.2indirect
npmcall-bind-apply-helpers1.0.2indirect
npmcall-bound1.0.4indirect
npmcombine-errors3.0.3indirect
npmcombined-stream1.0.8indirect
npmcontent-disposition1.1.0indirect
npmcontent-type1.0.5indirect
npmcontent-type2.0.0indirect
npmcookie0.7.2indirect
npmcookie-signature1.2.2indirect
npmcross-spawn7.0.6indirect
npmcustom-error-instance2.1.1indirect
npmdebug4.4.3indirect
npmdelayed-stream1.0.0indirect
npmdepd2.0.0indirect
npmdunder-proto1.0.1indirect
npmee-first1.1.1indirect
npmencodeurl2.0.0indirect
npmes-define-property1.0.1indirect
npmes-errors1.3.0indirect
npmes-object-atoms1.1.2indirect
npmes-set-tostringtag2.1.0indirect
npmescape-html1.0.3indirect
npmetag1.8.1indirect
npmeventsource3.0.7indirect
npmeventsource-parser3.1.0indirect
npmexpress-rate-limit8.5.2indirect
npmfast-deep-equal3.1.3indirect
npmfast-uri3.1.3indirect
npmfinalhandler2.1.1indirect
npmfollow-redirects1.16.0indirect
npmform-data4.0.6indirect
npmforwarded0.2.0indirect
npmfresh2.0.0indirect
npmfunction-bind1.1.2indirect
npmget-intrinsic1.3.0indirect
npmget-proto1.0.1indirect
npmgopd1.2.0indirect
npmgraceful-fs4.2.11indirect
npmhas-symbols1.1.0indirect
npmhas-tostringtag1.0.2indirect
npmhasown2.0.4indirect
npmhono4.12.30indirect
npmhttp-errors2.0.1indirect
npmhttps-proxy-agent5.0.1indirect
npmiconv-lite0.7.3indirect
npminherits2.0.4indirect
npmip-address10.2.0indirect
npmipaddr.js1.9.1indirect
npmis-promise4.0.0indirect
npmis-stream2.0.1indirect
npmisexe2.0.0indirect
npmjose6.2.3indirect
npmjs-base643.9.1indirect
npmjson-schema-traverse1.0.0indirect
npmjson-schema-typed8.0.2indirect
npmlodash._baseiteratee4.7.0indirect
npmlodash._basetostring4.12.0indirect
npmlodash._baseuniq4.6.0indirect
npmlodash._createset4.0.3indirect
npmlodash._root3.0.1indirect
npmlodash._stringtopath4.8.0indirect
npmlodash.throttle4.1.1indirect
npmlodash.uniqby4.5.0indirect
npmmath-intrinsics1.1.0indirect
npmmedia-typer1.1.0indirect
npmmerge-descriptors2.0.0indirect
npmmime-db1.52.0indirect
npmmime-db1.54.0indirect
npmmime-types2.1.35indirect
npmmime-types3.0.2indirect
npmms2.1.3indirect
npmnegotiator1.0.0indirect
npmobject-assign4.1.1indirect
npmobject-inspect1.13.4indirect
npmon-finished2.4.1indirect
npmonce1.4.0indirect
npmparseurl1.3.3indirect
npmpath-key3.1.1indirect
npmpath-to-regexp8.4.2indirect
npmpkce-challenge5.0.1indirect
npmproper-lockfile4.1.2indirect
npmproxy-addr2.0.7indirect
npmproxy-from-env2.1.0indirect
npmqs6.15.3indirect
npmquerystringify2.2.0indirect
npmrange-parser1.3.0indirect
npmraw-body3.0.2indirect
npmrequire-from-string2.0.2indirect
npmrequires-port1.0.0indirect
npmretry0.12.0indirect
npmrouter2.2.0indirect
npmsafer-buffer2.1.2indirect
npmsend1.2.1indirect
npmserve-static2.2.1indirect
npmsetprototypeof1.2.0indirect
npmshebang-command2.0.0indirect
npmshebang-regex3.0.0indirect
npmside-channel1.1.1indirect
npmside-channel-list1.0.1indirect
npmside-channel-map1.0.1indirect
npmside-channel-weakmap1.0.2indirect
npmsignal-exit3.0.7indirect
npmstatuses2.0.2indirect
npmtoidentifier1.0.1indirect
npmtype-is2.1.0indirect
npmtypescript7.0.2indirect
npmundici-types8.3.0indirect
npmunpipe1.0.0indirect
npmurl-parse1.5.10indirect
npmvary1.1.2indirect
npmwhich2.0.2indirect
npmwrappy1.0.2indirect
npmzod4.4.3indirect
npmzod-to-json-schema3.25.2indirect
Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with hostinger/api-mcp-server. Read them side by side →

99IBM/mcp-context-forgeAn AI Gateway, registry, and proxy that sits in front of any MCP, A2A, or REST/gRPC APIs, exposing a unified endpoint with centralized discovery, guardrails and management. Optimizes Agent & Tool calling, and supports plugins.Exceptional98googleapis/mcp-toolboxMCP Toolbox for Databases is an open source MCP server for databases.Exceptional97langgenius/difyBuild Agentic workflows, RAG pipelines, with rich AI model and tool support on one collaborative workspace. Deploy on cloud, VPC, or self-hosted, so teams move from prototype to production without rebuilding the stack.Exceptional96yamadashy/repomix📦 Repomix is a powerful tool that packs your entire repository into a single, AI-friendly file. Perfect for when you need to feed your codebase to Large Language Models (LLMs) or other AI tools like Claude, ChatGPT, DeepSeek, Perplexity, Gemini, Gemma, Llama, Grok, and more.Exceptional96mudler/LocalAILocalAI is the open-source AI engine. Run any model - LLMs, vision, voice, image, video - on any hardware. No GPU required.Exceptional96vercel/aiThe AI Toolkit for TypeScript. From the creators of Next.js, the AI SDK is a free open-source library for building AI-powered applications and agents Exceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.15.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — npm.