Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-23 02:14 UTC

hot-glue-for-rails / hot-glue

Rapid scaffold builder for Turbo-Rails and Hotwire. Get the tutorial now at:

Ruby · HTMLCustom license★ 240 stars⑂ 5 forkssince Feb 2021View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryNetwork servicehow this is determined

hot-glue-for-rails/hot-glue holds a health index of 60 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Vitality (84/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (34/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

60
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

60
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 57 is calibrated to 60 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Hot GlueOrganization
0 followers25 public repossince Mar 2023

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
RubyGemshot-glue0.7.8-1100 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

84Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
12.5/36Commit cadence — 18/52 weeks with commits
15.9/18Commit volume — 58 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 11 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year58
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year18

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 95 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 0 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~28.1 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count95
latest_release_tagv0.7.8
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release0
mean_days_between_releases28.1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

50Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
38.6/60Stars — 240 stars
5/25Forks — 5 forks
2.7/15Watchers — 4 watchers
Inputs used
forks5
stars240
watchers4
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
16.9/22.5License — license file present, not a recognized license
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
52.2/80Total downloads — 104,883 downloads all-time across rubygems
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packageshot-glue
dependents—
ecosystemsrubygems
total_downloads104,883
monthly_downloads—
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

53Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 100% of commits
2.7/13.5Contributor breadth — 2 contributors
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled2
top_contributor_share0.999
How it's scored
35/42Issue resolution — 83% of issues closed
25/30PR acceptance — 201/241 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs201
open_issues1
closed_issues5
prs_merged_7d2
prs_decided_7d2
prs_merged_30d2
prs_decided_30d2
issue_closed_ratio0.833
closed_unmerged_prs40
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
0/25Owner reach — 0 followers of hot-glue-for-rails
17.3/25Track record — 25 public repos, account ~3 yr old
Inputs used
followers0
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginhot-glue-for-rails
public_repos25
account_age_days1,269

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on rubygems
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 0 days ago
20/20Version history — 110 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packageshot-glue
ecosystemsrubygems
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish0

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

60Moderate · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 1 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
2/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 1 out of 7 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 1
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://school.jfbcodes.com/8188
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 5 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsrails, rails6, turbo-rails, turbo, rails7
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://school.jfbcodes.com/8188
docs_sitehttps://school.jfbcodes.com/8188
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

34At Risk · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
0.2/2.5CI-Tests — 1 out of 7 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 1
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5Contributors — project has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.2/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 11 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 79 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated15
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive3
scorecard_aggregate3.2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
5.3/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — 4 affected: puma 5.6.5 (critical 9.8), devise 4.8.1 (moderate 6.1), rails 7.0.4 (moderate 6.1), +1 more
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
25.8/40No advisories left outstanding — 3 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 1,100 days ago
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories80
affected_packages19
assessed_packages85
unassessed_packages22
affected_by_severitycritical 2, high 11, moderate 5, low 1
direct_affected_packages4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 85 resolved dependencies against OSV. 22 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

34At Risk · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
24/40Legible commit history — 45 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.45
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
2/10Demonstrated agent practice — 1 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesGemfile.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0.01
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable code — Ruby without a type-check config
54.3/55Manageable file sizes — 2/149 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageRuby
largest_source_bytes77,906
source_files_sampled149
oversized_source_files2

Key facts

240GitHub stars
2contributors
58commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
95releases
1bus factor
1open issues
RubyGemspackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 5 ⇿
0Stars
5Forks
67Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

12345512021-052023-062025-07
Major 0Minor 3Patch 55

Each point covers 4 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 3.2 / 10
3.2aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-23 02:14 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
1CI-Tests1 out of 7 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 1
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
9Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained11 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities79 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 32
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
RubyGemssqlite3—Gemfile
RubyGemsbyebug—Gemfile
RubyGemssimplecov-rcov—Gemfile
RubyGemsrake—Gemfile
RubyGemsrspec-rails—Gemfile
RubyGemsfactory_bot_rails—Gemfile
RubyGemsffaker—Gemfile
RubyGemscapybara—Gemfile
RubyGemsselenium-webdriver4.11.0Gemfile
RubyGemssprockets-rails—Gemfile
RubyGemsimportmap-rails—Gemfile
RubyGemsstimulus-rails—Gemfile
RubyGemsturbo-rails—Gemfile
RubyGemspuma~> 5.0Gemfile
RubyGemsdevise—Gemfile
RubyGemspg~> 1.5Gemfile
RubyGemsrails~> 7.0.3dummy/Gemfile
RubyGemssprockets-rails—dummy/Gemfile
RubyGemsimportmap-rails—dummy/Gemfile
RubyGemsstimulus-rails—dummy/Gemfile
RubyGemsturbo-rails—dummy/Gemfile
RubyGemssqlite3~> 1.4dummy/Gemfile
RubyGemspuma~> 5.0dummy/Gemfile
RubyGemsjbuilder—dummy/Gemfile
RubyGemsdevise—dummy/Gemfile
RubyGemstzinfo-data—dummy/Gemfile
RubyGemsbootsnap—dummy/Gemfile
RubyGemsrake—dummy/Gemfile
RubyGemsredis~> 4.0dummy/Gemfile
RubyGemshot-glue—dummy/Gemfile
RubyGemsimage_processing~> 1.12dummy/Gemfile
RubyGemspg~> 1.5dummy/Gemfile
All dependencies 107

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 38 direct and 69 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
RubyGemsbootsnap—direct
RubyGemsbyebug—direct
RubyGemsbyebug11.1.3direct
RubyGemscapybara—direct
RubyGemscapybara3.38.0direct
RubyGemsdevise—direct
RubyGemsdevise4.8.1direct
RubyGemsfactory_bot_rails—direct
RubyGemsfactory_bot_rails6.2.0direct
RubyGemsffaker—direct
RubyGemsffaker2.21.0direct
RubyGemshot-glue—direct
RubyGemsimage_processing—direct
RubyGemsimportmap-rails—direct
RubyGemsimportmap-rails1.1.5direct
RubyGemsjbuilder—direct
RubyGemspg—direct
RubyGemspg1.5.3direct
RubyGemspuma—direct
RubyGemspuma5.6.5direct
RubyGemsrails—direct
RubyGemsrails7.0.4direct
RubyGemsrake—direct
RubyGemsrake13.0.6direct
RubyGemsredis—direct
RubyGemsrspec-rails—direct
RubyGemsrspec-rails6.0.1direct
RubyGemsselenium-webdriver—direct
RubyGemsselenium-webdriver4.11.0direct
RubyGemssimplecov-rcov0.3.1direct
RubyGemssprockets-rails—direct
RubyGemssprockets-rails3.4.2direct
RubyGemssqlite3—direct
RubyGemssqlite31.5.3direct
RubyGemsstimulus-rails—direct
RubyGemsstimulus-rails1.1.1direct
RubyGemsturbo-rails—direct
RubyGemsturbo-rails1.3.2direct
RubyGemsactioncable7.0.4indirect
RubyGemsactionmailbox7.0.4indirect
RubyGemsactionmailer7.0.4indirect
RubyGemsactionpack7.0.4indirect
RubyGemsactiontext7.0.4indirect
RubyGemsactionview7.0.4indirect
RubyGemsactivejob7.0.4indirect
RubyGemsactivemodel7.0.4indirect
RubyGemsactiverecord7.0.4indirect
RubyGemsactivestorage7.0.4indirect
RubyGemsactivesupport7.0.4indirect
RubyGemsaddressable2.8.1indirect
RubyGemsbase640.3.0indirect
RubyGemsbcrypt3.1.18indirect
RubyGemsbuilder3.2.4indirect
RubyGemsconcurrent-ruby1.1.10indirect
RubyGemscrass1.0.6indirect
RubyGemsdate3.5.1indirect
RubyGemsdiff-lcs1.5.0indirect
RubyGemsdocile1.4.0indirect
RubyGemserubi1.11.0indirect
RubyGemsfactory_bot6.2.1indirect
RubyGemsglobalid1.0.0indirect
RubyGemsi18n1.12.0indirect
RubyGemslogger1.7.0indirect
RubyGemsloofah2.19.0indirect
RubyGemsmail2.9.1indirect
RubyGemsmarcel1.2.1indirect
RubyGemsmatrix0.4.2indirect
RubyGemsmethod_source1.0.0indirect
RubyGemsmini_mime1.1.2indirect
RubyGemsmini_portile22.8.4indirect
RubyGemsminitest5.16.3indirect
RubyGemsnet-imap0.6.6indirect
RubyGemsnet-pop0.1.2indirect
RubyGemsnet-protocol0.2.2indirect
RubyGemsnet-smtp0.5.1indirect
RubyGemsnio4r2.5.8indirect
RubyGemsnokogiri1.13.9indirect
RubyGemsorm_adapter0.5.0indirect
RubyGemspublic_suffix5.0.0indirect
RubyGemsracc1.6.0indirect
RubyGemsrack2.2.24indirect
RubyGemsrack-test2.0.2indirect
RubyGemsrails-dom-testing2.0.3indirect
RubyGemsrails-html-sanitizer1.4.3indirect
RubyGemsrailties7.0.4indirect
RubyGemsregexp_parser2.6.0indirect
RubyGemsresponders3.0.1indirect
RubyGemsrexml3.2.6indirect
RubyGemsrspec-core3.12.0indirect
RubyGemsrspec-expectations3.12.0indirect
RubyGemsrspec-mocks3.12.0indirect
RubyGemsrspec-support3.12.0indirect
RubyGemsrubyzip2.3.2indirect
RubyGemssimplecov0.22.0indirect
RubyGemssimplecov-html0.12.3indirect
RubyGemssimplecov_json_formatter0.1.4indirect
RubyGemssprockets4.1.1indirect
RubyGemsthor1.2.1indirect
RubyGemstimeout0.6.1indirect
RubyGemstzinfo2.0.5indirect
RubyGemswarden1.2.9indirect
RubyGemsweb-console—indirect
RubyGemswebsocket1.2.9indirect
RubyGemswebsocket-driver0.8.2indirect
RubyGemswebsocket-extensions0.1.5indirect
RubyGemsxpath3.2.0indirect
RubyGemszeitwerk2.6.6indirect
Dependency advisories 19

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 85 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 19 carry known advisories, of which 4 are direct. 22 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
puma5.6.5directcritical58.0.2
activestorage7.0.4indirectcritical88.1.3.1
actionmailer7.0.4indirecthigh17.2.1.1
actionpack7.0.4indirecthigh98.0.0.1
actiontext7.0.4indirecthigh27.2.1.1
activerecord7.0.4indirecthigh38.0.2.1
activesupport7.0.4indirecthigh68.1.2.1
addressable2.8.1indirecthigh12.9.0
concurrent-ruby1.1.10indirecthigh31.3.7
loofah2.19.0indirecthigh42.25.2
nokogiri1.13.9indirecthigh191.19.4
rails-html-sanitizer1.4.3indirecthigh51.7.1
rexml3.2.6indirecthigh63.3.9
devise4.8.1directmoderate25.0.4
rails7.0.4directmoderate17.1.3.1
sqlite31.5.3directmoderate12.9.5
actionview7.0.4indirectmoderate28.1.2.1
bcrypt3.1.18indirectmoderate13.1.22
globalid1.0.0indirectlow11.0.1

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — RubyGems.