Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-27 19:52 UTC

huggingface / tokenizers

💥 Fast State-of-the-Art Tokenizers optimized for Research and Production

Rust · PythonApache-2.0★ 11,000 stars⑂ 1,179 forkssince Nov 2019View on GitHub ↗

#nlp #natural-language-processing #natural-language-understanding #language-model #transformers #bert #gpt

huggingface/tokenizers holds a health index of 95 out of 100, placing it in the Exceptional band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (93/100) and lowest on Security (74/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Exceptional

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 82 is calibrated to 95 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Hugging FaceOrganization · verified domain

67,571 followers467 public repossince Feb 2017

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish	Tags
crates.io	tokenizers	0.23.1	3,827,540	40	122 days ago	bpe huggingface nlp tokenizer wordpiece

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

83Excellent · 21% of overall

Development activity

83Excellent

How it's scored

36/36	Push recency — last push 0 days ago
18.7/36	Commit cadence — 27/52 weeks with commits
18/18	Commit volume — 125 commits in the last year
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 21 commit(s) and 4 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

commits_last_year	125
human_commit_share	0.83
days_since_last_push	0
active_weeks_last_year	27

Release discipline

82Excellent

How it's scored

27/27	Ships releases — 100 releases published
27/36	Release recency — latest release 122 days ago
19.8/27	Release cadence — a release every ~58.7 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data

Inputs used

releases_count	100
latest_release_tag	v0.23.1
releases_from_tags	no
days_since_latest_release	122
mean_days_between_releases	58.7

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

88Excellent · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

96Exceptional

How it's scored

60/60	Stars — 11,000 stars
25/25	Forks — 1,179 forks
11.5/15	Watchers — 120 watchers

Inputs used

forks	1,179
stars	11,000
watchers	120
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

70Good

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (Apache-2.0)
18/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
0/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	2
has_contributing	yes
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	no
readme_badge_services	github.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_template	no

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

100Exceptional

How it's scored

80/80	Monthly downloads — 3,827,540 downloads/month across crates
0/20	Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem

Inputs used

packages	tokenizers
dependents	—
ecosystems	crates
total_downloads	28,917,100
monthly_downloads	3,827,540
unverified_packages_excluded	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

75Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

43Weak

How it's scored

9/54	Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
10.4/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 54% of commits
13.5/13.5	Contributor breadth — 98 contributors
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 19 contributing companies or organizations

Inputs used

bus_factor	1
contributors_sampled	98
top_contributor_share	0.539

Issue & PR responsiveness

67Good

How it's scored

37.6/42	Issue resolution — 90% of issues closed
21.6/30	PR acceptance — 764/1,063 decided PRs merged
0/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — 0/2 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
7.5/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 14/27 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5

Inputs used

merged_prs	764
open_issues	120
closed_issues	1,033
prs_merged_7d	11
prs_decided_7d	42
prs_merged_30d	25
prs_decided_30d	60
issue_closed_ratio	0.896
closed_unmerged_prs	299
first_time_authors_30d	2
first_time_prs_merged_30d	0
first_time_prs_decided_30d	2

Ownership & stewardship

100Exceptional

How it's scored

30/30	Ownership backing — organization-owned
20/20	Verified domain
25/25	Owner reach — 67,571 followers of huggingface
25/25	Track record — 467 public repos, account ~9 yr old

Inputs used

followers	67,571
owner_type	Organization
is_verified	yes
owner_login	huggingface
public_repos	467
account_age_days	3,483

Package maintenance

100Exceptional

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on crates
35/35	Publish recency — latest publish 122 days ago
20/20	Version history — 40 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	tokenizers
ecosystems	crates
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	122

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

93Exceptional · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

88Excellent

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 18 workflow(s)
24/24	Tests present
16/16	Linter config — rustfmt.toml
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4	.editorconfig
18/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 28 out of 29 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	yes
has_editorconfig	yes
has_linter_config	yes
has_precommit_config	no

Documentation

100Exceptional

How it's scored

30/30	README
25/25	Documentation directory
15/15	Documentation / homepage site — https://huggingface.co/docs/tokenizers
10/10	Repository description
10/10	Topics — 7 topics
10/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	nlp, natural-language-processing, natural-language-understanding, language-model, transformers, bert, gpt
has_wiki	yes
homepage	https://huggingface.co/docs/tokenizers
docs_site	https://huggingface.co/docs/tokenizers
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	yes
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

74Good · 16% of overall

Security posture

67Good

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5	Branch-Protection — no data
2.2/2.5	CI-Tests — 28 out of 29 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
3.8/7.5	Code-Review — Found 14/27 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5
2.5/2.5	Contributors — project has 19 contributing companies or organizations
10/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5	License — license file detected
7.5/7.5	Maintained — 21 commit(s) and 4 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5	Packaging — packaging workflow detected
4.5/5	Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 9
0/5	SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5	Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5	Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	16
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	2
scorecard_aggregate	6.7

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional

How it's scored

35/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40	No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	0
affected_packages	0
assessed_packages	109
unassessed_packages	49
affected_by_severity	none
direct_affected_packages	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 109 resolved dependencies against OSV. 49 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

80Excellent · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

40Weak

How it's scored

0/45	Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40	Legible commit history — 80 of 83 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	no
llms_txt_url	—
legible_history_share	0.964
agent_instruction_files	—
agent_instruction_max_bytes	—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

97Exceptional

How it's scored

18/18	One-command bootstrap — bindings/node/Makefile, bindings/python/Makefile, docs/Makefile, tokenizers/Makefile
22/22	Automated tests
11/11	Lint / format config — rustfmt.toml
11/11	Static type checking — bindings/node/tsconfig.json, bindings/python/py_src/tokenizers/py.typed
10/10	Reproducible environment — lockfile
8/10	Demonstrated agent practice — 4 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8	Automated maintenance — 14 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
9/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 9

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	yes
lockfiles	yarn.lock
has_dockerfile	no
typed_language	yes
bootstrap_files	bindings/node/Makefile, bindings/python/Makefile, docs/Makefile, tokenizers/Makefile
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	yes
typecheck_configs	bindings/node/tsconfig.json, bindings/python/py_src/tokenizers/py.typed
agent_commit_share	0.04
toolchain_manifests	bindings/node/Cargo.toml, bindings/python/Cargo.toml, bindings/python/tools/stub-gen/Cargo.toml, tokenizers/Cargo.toml
dependency_bot_commit_share	0.14

Code legibility for models

98Exceptional

How it's scored

45/45	Type-checkable code — Rust (statically typed)
53/55	Manageable file sizes — 7/192 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	Rust
largest_source_bytes	2,226,448
source_files_sampled	192
oversized_source_files	7

Machine-readable interfaces

100Exceptional

How it's scored

0/40	API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20	MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40	Runnable examples — examples

Inputs used

example_dirs	examples
has_mcp_signal	no
api_schema_files	—
interfaces_expected_of	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

11,000GitHub stars

98contributors

125commits, last 12 months

0days since last push

100releases

1bus factor

120open issues

crates.iopackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 1,179 ⇿

0Stars

1,179Forks

73Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Only the most recent history is shown — this repository exceeds the collection window, so the earliest history is not captured.

Major 0Minor 8Patch 19

Each point covers 6 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.7 / 10

6.7aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-27 19:51 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
n/a	Branch-Protection	internal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
9	CI-Tests	28 out of 29 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
5	Code-Review	Found 14/27 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5
10	Contributors	project has 19 contributing companies or organizations
10	Dangerous-Workflow	no dangerous workflow patterns detected
10	Dependency-Update-Tool	update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
10	License	license file detected
10	Maintained	21 commit(s) and 4 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10	Packaging	packaging workflow detected
9	Pinned-Dependencies	dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 9
0	SAST	SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0	Security-Policy	security policy file not detected
n/a	Signed-Releases	no releases found
0	Token-Permissions	detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10	Vulnerabilities	0 existing vulnerabilities detected

Direct dependencies 28

Registry	Package	Version constraint	Manifest
crates.io	rand	`0.9`	tokenizers/Cargo.toml
crates.io	onig	`6.5.1`	tokenizers/Cargo.toml
crates.io	regex	`1.10`	tokenizers/Cargo.toml
crates.io	regex-syntax	`0.8`	tokenizers/Cargo.toml
crates.io	rayon	`1.10`	tokenizers/Cargo.toml
crates.io	rayon-cond	`0.4`	tokenizers/Cargo.toml
crates.io	serde	`1.0`	tokenizers/Cargo.toml
crates.io	serde_json	`1.0`	tokenizers/Cargo.toml
crates.io	unicode-normalization-alignments	`0.1`	tokenizers/Cargo.toml
crates.io	unicode_categories	`0.1`	tokenizers/Cargo.toml
crates.io	unicode-segmentation	`1.11`	tokenizers/Cargo.toml
crates.io	indicatif	`0.18`	tokenizers/Cargo.toml
crates.io	itertools	`0.14`	tokenizers/Cargo.toml
crates.io	log	`0.4`	tokenizers/Cargo.toml
crates.io	derive_builder	`0.20`	tokenizers/Cargo.toml
crates.io	spm_precompiled	`0.1.3`	tokenizers/Cargo.toml
crates.io	hf-hub	`0.4.1`	tokenizers/Cargo.toml
crates.io	daachorse	`3.0.0`	tokenizers/Cargo.toml
crates.io	paste	`1.0.14`	tokenizers/Cargo.toml
crates.io	macro_rules_attribute	`0.2.0`	tokenizers/Cargo.toml
crates.io	thiserror	`2`	tokenizers/Cargo.toml
crates.io	fancy-regex	`0.17`	tokenizers/Cargo.toml
crates.io	getrandom	`0.3`	tokenizers/Cargo.toml
crates.io	esaxx-rs	`0.1.10`	tokenizers/Cargo.toml
crates.io	monostate	`0.1.12`	tokenizers/Cargo.toml
crates.io	ahash	`0.8.11`	tokenizers/Cargo.toml
crates.io	dary_heap	`0.3.6`	tokenizers/Cargo.toml
crates.io	compact_str	`0.9`	tokenizers/Cargo.toml

All dependencies 158

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 28 direct and 130 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
crates.io	ahash	`—`	direct
crates.io	compact_str	`—`	direct
crates.io	daachorse	`—`	direct
crates.io	dary_heap	`—`	direct
crates.io	derive_builder	`—`	direct
crates.io	esaxx-rs	`—`	direct
crates.io	fancy-regex	`—`	direct
crates.io	getrandom	`—`	direct
crates.io	hf-hub	`—`	direct
crates.io	indicatif	`—`	direct
crates.io	itertools	`—`	direct
crates.io	log	`—`	direct
crates.io	macro_rules_attribute	`—`	direct
crates.io	monostate	`—`	direct
crates.io	onig	`—`	direct
crates.io	paste	`—`	direct
crates.io	rand	`—`	direct
crates.io	rayon	`—`	direct
crates.io	rayon-cond	`—`	direct
crates.io	regex	`—`	direct
crates.io	regex-syntax	`—`	direct
crates.io	serde	`—`	direct
crates.io	serde_json	`—`	direct
crates.io	spm_precompiled	`—`	direct
crates.io	thiserror	`—`	direct
crates.io	unicode-normalization-alignments	`—`	direct
crates.io	unicode-segmentation	`—`	direct
crates.io	unicode_categories	`—`	direct
crates.io	assert_approx_eq	`—`	indirect
crates.io	criterion	`—`	indirect
crates.io	env_logger	`—`	indirect
crates.io	libc	`—`	indirect
crates.io	napi	`—`	indirect
crates.io	napi-build	`—`	indirect
crates.io	napi-derive	`—`	indirect
crates.io	ndarray	`—`	indirect
crates.io	numpy	`—`	indirect
crates.io	once_cell	`—`	indirect
crates.io	pyo3	`—`	indirect
crates.io	pyo3-async-runtimes	`—`	indirect
crates.io	pyo3-build-config	`—`	indirect
crates.io	pyo3-ffi	`—`	indirect
crates.io	pyo3-introspection	`—`	indirect
crates.io	tempfile	`—`	indirect
crates.io	tokio	`—`	indirect
crates.io	tracing	`—`	indirect
crates.io	tracing-subscriber	`—`	indirect
npm	@inquirer/ansi	`2.0.5`	indirect
npm	@inquirer/checkbox	`5.1.4`	indirect
npm	@inquirer/confirm	`6.0.12`	indirect
npm	@inquirer/core	`11.1.9`	indirect
npm	@inquirer/editor	`5.1.1`	indirect
npm	@inquirer/expand	`5.0.13`	indirect
npm	@inquirer/external-editor	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	@inquirer/figures	`2.0.5`	indirect
npm	@inquirer/input	`5.0.12`	indirect
npm	@inquirer/number	`4.0.12`	indirect
npm	@inquirer/password	`5.0.12`	indirect
npm	@inquirer/prompts	`8.4.2`	indirect
npm	@inquirer/rawlist	`5.2.8`	indirect
npm	@inquirer/search	`4.1.8`	indirect
npm	@inquirer/select	`5.1.4`	indirect
npm	@inquirer/type	`4.0.5`	indirect
npm	@napi-rs/cli	`3.6.2`	indirect
npm	@napi-rs/cross-toolchain	`1.0.3`	indirect
npm	@napi-rs/lzma	`1.4.5`	indirect
npm	@napi-rs/lzma-android-arm-eabi	`1.4.5`	indirect
npm	@napi-rs/lzma-android-arm64	`1.4.5`	indirect
npm	@napi-rs/lzma-darwin-arm64	`1.4.5`	indirect
npm	@napi-rs/lzma-darwin-x64	`1.4.5`	indirect
npm	@napi-rs/lzma-freebsd-x64	`1.4.5`	indirect
npm	@napi-rs/lzma-linux-arm-gnueabihf	`1.4.5`	indirect
npm	@napi-rs/lzma-linux-arm64-gnu	`1.4.5`	indirect
npm	@napi-rs/lzma-linux-arm64-musl	`1.4.5`	indirect
npm	@napi-rs/lzma-linux-ppc64-gnu	`1.4.5`	indirect
npm	@napi-rs/lzma-linux-riscv64-gnu	`1.4.5`	indirect
npm	@napi-rs/lzma-linux-s390x-gnu	`1.4.5`	indirect
npm	@napi-rs/lzma-linux-x64-gnu	`1.4.5`	indirect
npm	@napi-rs/lzma-linux-x64-musl	`1.4.5`	indirect
npm	@napi-rs/lzma-wasm32-wasi	`1.4.5`	indirect
npm	@napi-rs/lzma-win32-arm64-msvc	`1.4.5`	indirect
npm	@napi-rs/lzma-win32-ia32-msvc	`1.4.5`	indirect
npm	@napi-rs/lzma-win32-x64-msvc	`1.4.5`	indirect
npm	@napi-rs/tar	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	@napi-rs/tar-android-arm-eabi	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	@napi-rs/tar-android-arm64	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	@napi-rs/tar-darwin-arm64	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	@napi-rs/tar-darwin-x64	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	@napi-rs/tar-freebsd-x64	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	@napi-rs/tar-linux-arm-gnueabihf	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	@napi-rs/tar-linux-arm64-gnu	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	@napi-rs/tar-linux-arm64-musl	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	@napi-rs/tar-linux-ppc64-gnu	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	@napi-rs/tar-linux-s390x-gnu	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	@napi-rs/tar-linux-x64-gnu	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	@napi-rs/tar-linux-x64-musl	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	@napi-rs/tar-wasm32-wasi	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	@napi-rs/tar-win32-arm64-msvc	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	@napi-rs/tar-win32-ia32-msvc	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	@napi-rs/tar-win32-x64-msvc	`1.1.0`	indirect
npm	@napi-rs/wasm-runtime	`1.1.4`	indirect
npm	@napi-rs/wasm-tools	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	@napi-rs/wasm-tools-android-arm-eabi	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	@napi-rs/wasm-tools-android-arm64	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	@napi-rs/wasm-tools-darwin-arm64	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	@napi-rs/wasm-tools-darwin-x64	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	@napi-rs/wasm-tools-freebsd-x64	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	@napi-rs/wasm-tools-linux-arm64-gnu	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	@napi-rs/wasm-tools-linux-arm64-musl	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	@napi-rs/wasm-tools-linux-x64-gnu	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	@napi-rs/wasm-tools-linux-x64-musl	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	@napi-rs/wasm-tools-wasm32-wasi	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	@napi-rs/wasm-tools-win32-arm64-msvc	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	@napi-rs/wasm-tools-win32-ia32-msvc	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	@napi-rs/wasm-tools-win32-x64-msvc	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	@octokit/auth-token	`6.0.0`	indirect
npm	@octokit/core	`7.0.6`	indirect
npm	@octokit/endpoint	`11.0.3`	indirect
npm	@octokit/graphql	`9.0.3`	indirect
npm	@octokit/openapi-types	`27.0.0`	indirect
npm	@octokit/plugin-paginate-rest	`14.0.0`	indirect
npm	@octokit/plugin-request-log	`6.0.0`	indirect
npm	@octokit/plugin-rest-endpoint-methods	`17.0.0`	indirect
npm	@octokit/request	`10.0.8`	indirect
npm	@octokit/request-error	`7.1.0`	indirect
npm	@octokit/rest	`22.0.1`	indirect
npm	@octokit/types	`16.0.0`	indirect
npm	@taplo/cli	`0.5.2`	indirect
npm	@tybys/wasm-util	`0.10.1`	indirect
npm	argparse	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	before-after-hook	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	chardet	`2.1.1`	indirect
npm	cli-width	`4.1.0`	indirect
npm	clipanion	`4.0.0-rc.4`	indirect
npm	colorette	`2.0.20`	indirect
npm	debug	`4.4.3`	indirect
npm	emnapi	`1.10.0`	indirect
npm	es-toolkit	`1.46.0`	indirect
npm	fast-content-type-parse	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	fast-string-truncated-width	`3.0.3`	indirect
npm	fast-string-width	`3.0.2`	indirect
npm	fast-wrap-ansi	`0.2.0`	indirect
npm	iconv-lite	`0.7.2`	indirect
npm	js-yaml	`4.3.1`	indirect
npm	json-with-bigint	`3.5.8`	indirect
npm	ms	`2.1.3`	indirect
npm	mute-stream	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	obug	`2.1.1`	indirect
npm	prettier	`2.8.8`	indirect
npm	safer-buffer	`2.1.2`	indirect
npm	semver	`7.7.4`	indirect
npm	signal-exit	`4.1.0`	indirect
npm	tslib	`2.8.1`	indirect
npm	typanion	`3.14.0`	indirect
npm	typescript	`5.4.3`	indirect
npm	universal-user-agent	`7.0.3`	indirect
PyPI	huggingface-hub	`—`	indirect
PyPI	maturin	`—`	indirect

Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 109 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 49 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — crates.io.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records