Public record
Software health reportschema 0.31.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-11 03:57 UTC

hyvor / laravel-playwright

Laravel and Playwright E2E Testing

PHP · TypeScriptMIT★ 36 stars⑂ 6 forkssince May 2023archivedView on GitHub ↗

hyvor/laravel-playwright holds a health index of 19 out of 100, placing it in the Critical band. It scores highest on Sustainability & Governance (59/100) and lowest on Security (39/100). The repository is archived, so no further maintenance is expected.

19
overall / 100
Critical

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

19
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 49 is calibrated to 48 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

HYVOROrganization
31 followers38 public repossince Aug 2019

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
Packagisthyvor/laravel-playwright2.0.23,6759516 days agotestinglaravele2eplaywright
npm@hyvor/laravel-playwright2.0.21,8465516 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

46Weak · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 0 days ago
0/36Commit cadence0/52 weeks with commits
0/18Commit volume0 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintainedproject is archived
Inputs used
commits_last_year0
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year0
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases9 releases published
7.2/36Release recencylatest release 516 days ago
19.8/27Release cadencea release every ~78.4 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count9
latest_release_tag2.0.2
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release516
mean_days_between_releases78.4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

42Weak · 17% of overall
How it's scored
25/60Stars36 stars
5.8/25Forks6 forks
1.7/15Watchers3 watchers
Inputs used
forks6
stars36
watchers3
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
47.5/80Monthly downloads3,675 downloads/month across packagist
0/20Registry dependents0 packages depend on it
Inputs used
packageshyvor/laravel-playwright
dependents0
ecosystemspackagist
total_downloads25,022
monthly_downloads3,675
unverified_packages_excluded@hyvor/laravel-playwright

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

59Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0.7/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 97% of commits
2.7/13.5Contributor breadth2 contributors
6/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled2
top_contributor_share0.971
How it's scored
31.5/42Issue resolution75% of issues closed
30/30PR acceptance9/9 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 0/15 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs9
open_issues1
closed_issues3
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio0.75
closed_unmerged_prs0
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domainverified-domain status not read for this organization
10.8/25Owner reach31 followers of hyvor
23.6/25Track record38 public repos, account ~7 yr old
Inputs used
followers31
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified
owner_loginhyvor
public_repos38
account_age_days2,562
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable2 package(s) on npm, packagist
14/35Publish recencylatest publish 516 days ago
20/20Version history9 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packageshyvor/laravel-playwright, @hyvor/laravel-playwright
ecosystemsnpm, packagist
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish516

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

58Moderate · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows2 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter configphpstan.neon
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests0 out of 7 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

50Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics
has_wikiyes
homepage
docs_site
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

39Weak · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Tests0 out of 7 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 0/15 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
1.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
0/7.5Maintainedproject is archived
0/5Packagingno data
1/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 2
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities73 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate2.4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriesno indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages88
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the npm:@hyvor/laravel-playwright@2.0.2 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 88 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

46Weak · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
14.1/40Legible commit history9 of 34 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.265
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format configphpstan.neon
11/11Static type checkingplaywright/tsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environmentDockerfile, lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 34
0/8Automated maintenanceno automated dependency updates observed
2/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 2
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilescomposer.lock, package-lock.json
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configsplaywright/tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
27/45Type-checkable codePHP with type-check config (playwright/tsconfig.json)
55/55Manageable file sizes0/26 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePHP
largest_source_bytes6,109
source_files_sampled26
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

36GitHub stars
2contributors
0commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
9releases
1bus factor
1open issues
npm, Packagistpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 6 ⇿
0Stars
6Forks
7Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

123456612024-072025-072026-07
Major 0Minor 0Patch 3

Each point covers 2 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 2.4 / 10
2.4aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-11 03:57 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0CI-Tests0 out of 7 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/15 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
6Contributorsproject has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
0Maintainedproject is archived
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
2Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 2
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities73 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 1
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
npmvite-plugin-dts^4.5.0playwright/package.json
All dependencies 144

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 1 direct and 143 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npmvite-plugin-dts4.5.0direct
npm@babel/helper-string-parser7.25.9indirect
npm@babel/helper-validator-identifier7.25.9indirect
npm@babel/parser7.26.5indirect
npm@babel/types7.26.5indirect
npm@esbuild/aix-ppc640.24.2indirect
npm@esbuild/android-arm0.24.2indirect
npm@esbuild/android-arm640.24.2indirect
npm@esbuild/android-x640.24.2indirect
npm@esbuild/darwin-arm640.24.2indirect
npm@esbuild/darwin-x640.24.2indirect
npm@esbuild/freebsd-arm640.24.2indirect
npm@esbuild/freebsd-x640.24.2indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-arm0.24.2indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-arm640.24.2indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-ia320.24.2indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-loong640.24.2indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-mips64el0.24.2indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-ppc640.24.2indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-riscv640.24.2indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-s390x0.24.2indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-x640.24.2indirect
npm@esbuild/netbsd-arm640.24.2indirect
npm@esbuild/netbsd-x640.24.2indirect
npm@esbuild/openbsd-arm640.24.2indirect
npm@esbuild/openbsd-x640.24.2indirect
npm@esbuild/sunos-x640.24.2indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-arm640.24.2indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-ia320.24.2indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-x640.24.2indirect
npm@jridgewell/sourcemap-codec1.5.0indirect
npm@microsoft/api-extractor7.49.1indirect
npm@microsoft/api-extractor-model7.30.2indirect
npm@microsoft/tsdoc0.15.1indirect
npm@microsoft/tsdoc-config0.17.1indirect
npm@playwright/test1.49.1indirect
npm@rollup/pluginutils5.1.4indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-android-arm-eabi4.30.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-android-arm644.30.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-darwin-arm644.30.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-darwin-x644.30.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-freebsd-arm644.30.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-freebsd-x644.30.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-arm-gnueabihf4.30.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-arm-musleabihf4.30.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-arm64-gnu4.30.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-arm64-musl4.30.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-loongarch64-gnu4.30.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-powerpc64le-gnu4.30.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-riscv64-gnu4.30.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-s390x-gnu4.30.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-x64-gnu4.30.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-x64-musl4.30.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-win32-arm64-msvc4.30.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-win32-ia32-msvc4.30.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-win32-x64-msvc4.30.1indirect
npm@rushstack/node-core-library5.10.2indirect
npm@rushstack/rig-package0.5.3indirect
npm@rushstack/terminal0.14.5indirect
npm@rushstack/ts-command-line4.23.3indirect
npm@types/argparse1.0.38indirect
npm@types/estree1.0.6indirect
npm@types/node22.10.5indirect
npm@volar/language-core2.4.11indirect
npm@volar/source-map2.4.11indirect
npm@volar/typescript2.4.11indirect
npm@vue/compiler-core3.5.13indirect
npm@vue/compiler-dom3.5.13indirect
npm@vue/compiler-vue22.7.16indirect
npm@vue/language-core2.2.0indirect
npm@vue/shared3.5.13indirect
npmacorn8.14.0indirect
npmajv8.12.0indirect
npmajv8.13.0indirect
npmajv-draft-041.0.0indirect
npmajv-formats3.0.1indirect
npmalien-signals0.4.14indirect
npmargparse1.0.10indirect
npmbalanced-match1.0.2indirect
npmbrace-expansion1.1.11indirect
npmbrace-expansion2.0.1indirect
npmcompare-versions6.1.1indirect
npmconcat-map0.0.1indirect
npmconfbox0.1.8indirect
npmde-indent1.0.2indirect
npmdebug4.4.0indirect
npmentities4.5.0indirect
npmesbuild0.24.2indirect
npmestree-walker2.0.2indirect
npmfast-deep-equal3.1.3indirect
npmfs-extra7.0.1indirect
npmfsevents2.3.2indirect
npmfsevents2.3.3indirect
npmfunction-bind1.1.2indirect
npmgraceful-fs4.2.11indirect
npmhas-flag4.0.0indirect
npmhasown2.0.2indirect
npmhe1.2.0indirect
npmimport-lazy4.0.0indirect
npmis-core-module2.16.1indirect
npmjju1.4.0indirect
npmjson-schema-traverse1.0.0indirect
npmjsonfile4.0.0indirect
npmkolorist1.8.0indirect
npmlocal-pkg0.5.1indirect
npmlodash4.17.21indirect
npmlru-cache6.0.0indirect
npmmagic-string0.30.17indirect
npmminimatch3.0.8indirect
npmminimatch9.0.5indirect
npmmlly1.7.3indirect
npmms2.1.3indirect
npmmuggle-string0.4.1indirect
npmnanoid3.3.8indirect
npmpath-browserify1.0.1indirect
npmpath-parse1.0.7indirect
npmpathe1.1.2indirect
npmpicocolors1.1.1indirect
npmpicomatch4.0.2indirect
npmpkg-types1.3.0indirect
npmplaywright1.49.1indirect
npmplaywright-core1.49.1indirect
npmpostcss8.4.49indirect
npmpunycode2.3.1indirect
npmrequire-from-string2.0.2indirect
npmresolve1.22.10indirect
npmrollup4.30.1indirect
npmsemver7.5.4indirect
npmsource-map0.6.1indirect
npmsource-map-js1.2.1indirect
npmsprintf-js1.0.3indirect
npmstring-argv0.3.2indirect
npmstrip-json-comments3.1.1indirect
npmsupports-color8.1.1indirect
npmsupports-preserve-symlinks-flag1.0.0indirect
npmtypescript5.6.3indirect
npmtypescript5.7.2indirect
npmufo1.5.4indirect
npmundici-types6.20.0indirect
npmuniversalify0.1.2indirect
npmuri-js4.4.1indirect
npmvite6.0.7indirect
npmvscode-uri3.0.8indirect
npmyallist4.0.0indirect
Dependency advisories 0

Installing npm:@hyvor/laravel-playwright@2.0.2 pulls in 88 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.31.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsPackagist, npm.