Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-20 05:51 UTC

ibexa / graphql

PHPCustom license★ 4 stars⑂ 1 forksince Mar 2021View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryCommand-line toolhow this is determined

ibexa/graphql holds a health index of 86 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Sustainability & Governance (85/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (48/100). It was last updated 6 days ago. 5 contributors account for most of its recent work.

86
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

86
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 72 is calibrated to 86 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

IbexaOrganization
42 followers100 public repossince May 2020

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
Packagistibexa/graphqlv5.0.1052,52411260 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

82Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 6 days ago
9.7/36Commit cadence — 14/52 weeks with commits
13.8/18Commit volume — 33 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 20 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year33
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push6
active_weeks_last_year14

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 100 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 60 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~28.1 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count100
latest_release_tagv5.0.10
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release60
mean_days_between_releases28.1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

48Weak · 17% of overall
How it's scored
7.7/60Stars — 4 stars
0/25Forks — 1 forks
5.8/15Watchers — 12 watchers
Inputs used
forks1
stars4
watchers12
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
16.9/22.5License — license file present, not a recognized license
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateyes
How it's scored
62.9/80Monthly downloads — 52,524 downloads/month across packagist
6.9/20Registry dependents — 10 packages depend on it
Inputs used
packagesibexa/graphql
dependents10
ecosystemspackagist
total_downloads1,011,294
monthly_downloads52,524
unverified_packages_excluded—

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

85Excellent · 23% of overall
How it's scored
45.9/54Bus factor — 5 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
19.4/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 14% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 33 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 9 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor5
contributors_sampled33
top_contributor_share0.136
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolution — no issues or no data
29.2/30PR acceptance — 110/113 decided PRs merged
13/13Newcomer PR acceptance — 1/1 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
9/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 18/27 approved changesets -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
merged_prs110
open_issues0
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d2
prs_decided_7d2
prs_merged_30d7
prs_decided_30d7
issue_closed_ratio—
closed_unmerged_prs3
first_time_authors_30d1
first_time_prs_merged_30d1
first_time_prs_decided_30d1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
11.7/25Owner reach — 42 followers of ibexa
25/25Track record — 100 public repos, account ~6 yr old
Inputs used
followers42
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginibexa
public_repos100
account_age_days2,345

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on packagist
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 60 days ago
20/20Version history — 112 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesibexa/graphql
ecosystemspackagist
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish60

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

80Excellent · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 6 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — .php-cs-fixer.php, phpstan.neon
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 19 out of 19 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
0/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 2 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsibexa-bundle, ibexa-product
has_wikiyes
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionno

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

60Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
2.2/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 19 out of 19 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
4.5/7.5Code-Review — Found 18/27 approved changesets -- score normalized to 6
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 9 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.2/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 20 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
4.5/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 9
4.5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate6
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

48Weak · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
15/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) — llms.txt served by the project website (https://doc.ibexa.co/llms.txt)
21.3/40Legible commit history — 40 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtyes
llms_txt_urlhttps://doc.ibexa.co/llms.txt
legible_history_share0.4
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — .php-cs-fixer.php, phpstan.neon
0/11Static type checking
0/10Reproducible environment
2/10Demonstrated agent practice — 1 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles—
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0.01
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable code — PHP without a type-check config
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/172 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePHP
largest_source_bytes12,842
source_files_sampled172
oversized_source_files0
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examples — examples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

4GitHub stars
33contributors
33commits, last 12 months
6days since last push
100releases
5bus factor
0open issues
Packagistpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • No resolved dependencies carried a version and a supported ecosystem

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.0 / 10
6.0aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-10-20 05:50 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
3Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10CI-Tests19 out of 19 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
6Code-ReviewFound 18/27 approved changesets -- score normalized to 6
10Contributorsproject has 9 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
9Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained20 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
9SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 9
9Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 15
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Packagisterusev/parsedown^1.7composer.json
Packagistibexa/admin-ui~6.0.x-devcomposer.json
Packagistibexa/core~6.0.x-devcomposer.json
Packagistibexa/fieldtype-richtext~6.0.x-devcomposer.json
Packagistibexa/rest~6.0.x-devcomposer.json
Packagistlexik/jwt-authentication-bundle^3.2composer.json
Packagistoverblog/graphql-bundle^1.6.0composer.json
Packagistsymfony/config^8.1composer.json
Packagistsymfony/console^8.1composer.json
Packagistsymfony/dependency-injection^8.1composer.json
Packagistsymfony/filesystem^8.1composer.json
Packagistsymfony/http-foundation^8.1composer.json
Packagistsymfony/http-kernel^8.1composer.json
Packagistsymfony/serializer^8.1composer.json
Packagistsymfony/yaml^8.1composer.json
All dependencies 36

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 15 direct and 21 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Packagisterusev/parsedown—direct
Packagistibexa/admin-ui—direct
Packagistibexa/core—direct
Packagistibexa/fieldtype-richtext—direct
Packagistibexa/rest—direct
Packagistlexik/jwt-authentication-bundle—direct
Packagistoverblog/graphql-bundle—direct
Packagistsymfony/config—direct
Packagistsymfony/console—direct
Packagistsymfony/dependency-injection—direct
Packagistsymfony/filesystem—direct
Packagistsymfony/http-foundation—direct
Packagistsymfony/http-kernel—direct
Packagistsymfony/serializer—direct
Packagistsymfony/yaml—direct
Packagistext-dom—indirect
Packagistibexa/code-style—indirect
Packagistibexa/content-forms—indirect
Packagistibexa/design-engine—indirect
Packagistibexa/design-system-twig—indirect
Packagistibexa/doctrine-migrations—indirect
Packagistibexa/doctrine-schema—indirect
Packagistibexa/http-cache—indirect
Packagistibexa/notifications—indirect
Packagistibexa/phpstan—indirect
Packagistibexa/rector—indirect
Packagistibexa/search—indirect
Packagistibexa/twig-components—indirect
Packagistibexa/user—indirect
Packagistmikey179/vfsstream—indirect
Packagistphp—indirect
Packagistphpspec/phpspec—indirect
Packagistphpstan/phpstan—indirect
Packagistphpstan/phpstan-phpunit—indirect
Packagistphpstan/phpstan-symfony—indirect
Packagistphpunit/phpunit—indirect
Dependency advisories not assessed

Advisory matching could not run for this report: No resolved dependencies carried a version and a supported ecosystem

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Packagist.