Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-24 01:35 UTC

icha-senpai / note

A privacy-first, self-hosted, fully open source personal knowledge management software, written in typescript and golang.

TypeScript · GoAGPL-3.0★ 0 stars⑂ 0 forkssince Jul 2026forkView on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryDesktop applicationNetwork serviceCommand-line toolhow this is determined

icha-senpai/note holds a health index of 39 out of 100, placing it in the Weak band. It scores highest on Vitality (83/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (12/100). It was last updated 28 days ago. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

39
overall / 100
Weak

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

39
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 43 is calibrated to 39 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

IchaPersonal account
0 followers8 public repossince Jan 2015

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
Gogithub.com/icha-senpai/notev3.7.3+incompatible-92264 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

83Excellent · 21% of overall

Development activity

80Excellent
How it's scored
28.8/36Push recency — last push 28 days ago
33.2/36Commit cadence — 48/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 5,538 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — project was created within the last 90 days. Please review its contents carefully
Inputs used
commits_last_year5,538
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push28
active_weeks_last_year48

Release discipline

88Excellent
How it's scored
16.2/27Ships releases — 100 version tags (no GitHub releases)
36/36Release recency — latest release 59 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~2.5 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count100
latest_release_tagv3.7.4-alpha.2
releases_from_tagsyes
days_since_latest_release59
mean_days_between_releases2.5
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

12Critical · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

1Critical
How it's scored
0/60Stars — 0 stars
0/25Forks — 0 forks
0/15Watchers — 0 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars0
watchers0
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

25At Risk
How it's scored
0/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (AGPL-3.0)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeno
has_licenseno
readme_badges0
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

47Weak · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

60Moderate
How it's scored
25.2/54Bus factor — 2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
11.6/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 48% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 98 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 45 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor2
contributors_sampled98
top_contributor_share0.485

Issue & PR responsiveness

1Critical
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolution — no issues or no data
0/30PR acceptance — no decided pull requests or no data
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs0
open_issues0
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio—
closed_unmerged_prs0
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution, PR acceptance, Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

36Weak
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
0/25Owner reach — 0 followers of icha-senpai
18.9/25Track record — 8 public repos, account ~11 yr old
Inputs used
followers0
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_loginicha-senpai
public_repos8
account_age_days4,256
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on go
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 64 days ago
20/20Version history — 922 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesgithub.com/icha-senpai/note
ecosystemsgo
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish64

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

40Weak · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

50Moderate
How it's scored
0/24CI workflows
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — eslint.config.mjs
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — no data
Inputs used
has_cino
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.

Documentation

25At Risk
How it's scored
0/30README
25/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
0/10Repository description
0/10Topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikino
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeno
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionno

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

15Critical · 16% of overall

Security posture

15Critical
How it's scored
6/7.5Binary-Artifacts — binaries present in source code
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Tests — no data
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 45 contributing companies or organizations
0/10Dangerous-Workflow — no data
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
0/7.5Maintained — project was created within the last 90 days. Please review its contents carefully
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — no SAST tool detected
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — no data
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 63 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated13
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive5
scorecard_aggregate1.5
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): CI-Tests, Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

63Moderate · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

61Moderate
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — AGENTS.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
16/40Legible commit history — 30 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.3
agent_instruction_filesAGENTS.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes11,475

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

67Good
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrap — kernel/go.mod, third_party/forks/go.mod (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — eslint.config.mjs
11/11Static type checking — app/tsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesgo.sum, pnpm-lock.yaml
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configsapp/tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestskernel/go.mod, third_party/forks/go.mod
dependency_bot_commit_share0

Code legibility for models

97Exceptional
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — TypeScript (statically typed)
51.9/55Manageable file sizes — 49/871 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageTypeScript
largest_source_bytes4,271,151
source_files_sampled871
oversized_source_files49

Machine-readable interfaces

20At Risk
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)
20/20MCP server
0/40Runnable examples
Inputs used
example_dirs—
has_mcp_signalyes
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_ofnetwork-service

Key facts

0GitHub stars
98contributors
5,538commits, last 12 months
28days since last push
100releases
2bus factor
0open issues
Go, npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Community profile unavailable
  • Could not fetch npm package 'Scribli' from its registry
  • GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 1.5 / 10
1.5aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-24 01:31 UTC

8Binary-Artifactsbinaries present in source code
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
n/aCI-Testsno pull request found
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 45 contributing companies or organizations
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
0Maintainedproject was created within the last 90 days. Please review its contents carefully
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTno SAST tool detected
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
0Vulnerabilities63 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 77
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
npm@electron/remote^2.1.3app/package.json
npmzxcvbn4.4.2app/package.json
Gogithub.com/ClarkThan/ahocorasickv0.1.2kernel/go.mod
Gogithub.com/ConradIrwin/fontv0.2.2-0.20260202161408-44ae4cf5fb22kernel/go.mod
Gogithub.com/Masterminds/sprig/v3v3.3.0kernel/go.mod
Gogithub.com/PuerkitoBio/goqueryv1.12.0kernel/go.mod
Gogithub.com/araddon/dateparsev0.0.0-20210429162001-6b43995a97dekernel/go.mod
Gogithub.com/asaskevich/EventBusv0.0.0-20200907212545-49d423059eefkernel/go.mod
Gogithub.com/denisbrodbeck/machineidv1.0.1kernel/go.mod
Gogithub.com/dgraph-io/ristrettov0.2.0kernel/go.mod
Gogithub.com/disintegration/imagingv1.6.2kernel/go.mod
Gogithub.com/djherbis/timesv1.6.0kernel/go.mod
Gogithub.com/dop251/gojav0.0.0-20260723142020-b4aef50fa347kernel/go.mod
Gogithub.com/dop251/goja_nodejsv0.0.0-20260212111938-1f56ff5bcf14kernel/go.mod
Gogithub.com/edsrzf/mmap-gov1.2.0kernel/go.mod
Gogithub.com/emersion/go-icalv0.0.0-20250609112844-439c63cef608kernel/go.mod
Gogithub.com/emersion/go-vcardv0.0.0-20260618161152-d854b7e0e2d3kernel/go.mod
Gogithub.com/emersion/go-webdavv0.7.0kernel/go.mod
Gogithub.com/emirpasic/godsv1.18.1kernel/go.mod
Gogithub.com/facette/natsortv0.0.0-20181210072756-2cd4dd1e2dcbkernel/go.mod
Gogithub.com/flopp/go-findfontv0.1.0kernel/go.mod
Gogithub.com/fsnotify/fsnotifyv1.10.1kernel/go.mod
Gogithub.com/gabriel-vasile/mimetypev1.4.15kernel/go.mod
Gogithub.com/gin-contrib/gzipv1.2.6kernel/go.mod
Gogithub.com/gin-contrib/sessionsv1.1.0kernel/go.mod
Gogithub.com/gin-contrib/ssev1.1.1kernel/go.mod
Gogithub.com/gin-gonic/ginv1.12.0kernel/go.mod
Gogithub.com/go-ole/go-olev1.3.0kernel/go.mod
Gogithub.com/goccy/go-jsonv0.10.6kernel/go.mod
Gogithub.com/gofrs/flockv0.13.0kernel/go.mod
Gogithub.com/golang-jwt/jwt/v5v5.3.1kernel/go.mod
Gogithub.com/gonutz/w32/v2v2.12.1kernel/go.mod
Gogithub.com/google/jsonschema-gov0.4.3kernel/go.mod
Gogithub.com/google/uuidv1.6.0kernel/go.mod
Gogithub.com/gorilla/cssv1.0.1kernel/go.mod
Gogithub.com/gorilla/websocketv1.5.3kernel/go.mod
Gogithub.com/icha-senpai/note/third_party/forksv0.0.0kernel/go.mod
Gogithub.com/imroc/req/v3v3.60.0kernel/go.mod
Gogithub.com/jaypipes/ghwv0.25.0kernel/go.mod
Gogithub.com/jinzhu/copierv0.4.0kernel/go.mod
Gogithub.com/json-iterator/gov1.1.12kernel/go.mod
Gogithub.com/kballard/go-shellquotev0.0.0-20180428030007-95032a82bc51kernel/go.mod
Gogithub.com/lxzan/gwsv1.10.1kernel/go.mod
Gogithub.com/microcosm-cc/bluemondayv1.0.27kernel/go.mod
Gogithub.com/mitchellh/go-psv1.0.0kernel/go.mod
Gogithub.com/modelcontextprotocol/go-sdkv1.7.0kernel/go.mod
Gogithub.com/mssola/useragentv1.0.0kernel/go.mod
Gogithub.com/olahol/melodyv1.4.0kernel/go.mod
Gogithub.com/open-spaced-repetition/go-fsrs/v3v3.3.1kernel/go.mod
Gogithub.com/panjf2000/ants/v2v2.12.1kernel/go.mod
Gogithub.com/patrickmn/go-cachev2.1.0+incompatiblekernel/go.mod
Gogithub.com/r3labs/sse/v2v2.10.0kernel/go.mod
Gogithub.com/radovskyb/watcherv1.0.7kernel/go.mod
Gogithub.com/rqlite/sqlv0.0.0-20260224021119-1b2524a41372kernel/go.mod
Gogithub.com/sabhiram/go-gitignorev0.0.0-20210923224102-525f6e181f06kernel/go.mod
Gogithub.com/samber/lov1.53.0kernel/go.mod
Gogithub.com/sashabaranov/go-openaiv1.41.2kernel/go.mod
Gogithub.com/shirou/gopsutil/v4v4.26.6kernel/go.mod
Gogithub.com/smallnest/chanxv1.2.0kernel/go.mod
Gogithub.com/soheilhy/cmuxv0.1.5kernel/go.mod
Gogithub.com/spf13/castv1.10.0kernel/go.mod
Gogithub.com/spf13/cobrav1.10.2kernel/go.mod
Gogithub.com/steambap/captchav1.4.1kernel/go.mod
Gogithub.com/studio-b12/gowebdavv0.13.0kernel/go.mod
Gogithub.com/vanng822/cssv1.0.1kernel/go.mod
Gogithub.com/vmihailenco/msgpack/v5v5.4.1kernel/go.mod
Gogithub.com/xrash/smetricsv0.0.0-20250705151800-55b8f293f342kernel/go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/cryptov0.54.0kernel/go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/imagev0.44.0kernel/go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/modv0.38.0kernel/go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/netv0.57.0kernel/go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/oauth2v0.36.0kernel/go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/syncv0.22.0kernel/go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/sysv0.47.0kernel/go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/textv0.40.0kernel/go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/timev0.15.0kernel/go.mod
Gogopkg.in/yaml.v3v3.0.1kernel/go.mod
All dependencies not collected

The resolved dependency set could not be collected for this report: GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with icha-senpai/note. Read them side by side →

100go-gitea/giteaGit with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CDExceptional100microsoft/onnxruntimeONNX Runtime: cross-platform, high performance ML inferencing and training acceleratorExceptional100hashicorp/consulConsul is a distributed, highly available, and data center aware solution to connect and configure applications across dynamic, distributed infrastructure.Exceptional100apache/airflowApache Airflow - A platform to programmatically author, schedule, and monitor workflowsExceptional100mattermost/mattermostMattermost is an open source platform for secure collaboration across the entire software development lifecycle..Exceptional100authelia/autheliaThe Single Sign-On Multi-Factor portal for web apps. OpenID Certified™ and Post-Quantum Cryptography Ready.Exceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Go.