Public record
Software health reportschema 0.11.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-16 15:20 UTC

iiif-commons / parser

IIIF Presentation 2 + 3 parser

TypeScriptMIT★ 19 stars⑂ 4 forkssince Jan 2022View on GitHub ↗

iiif-commons/parser holds a health index of 59 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (72/100) and lowest on Security (35/100). It was last updated 2 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

59
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

59
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 56 is calibrated to 59 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

IIIF CommonsOrganization
38 followers52 public repossince Jul 2016

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
npm@iiif/parser2.2.1414,852432 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

62Moderate · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 2 days ago
8.3/36Commit cadence12/52 weeks with commits
14.6/18Commit volume41 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained12 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year41
human_commit_share
days_since_last_push2
active_weeks_last_year12
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases1 releases published
7.2/36Release recencylatest release 403 days ago
12.6/27Release cadencecadence unknown (single release)
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count1
latest_release_tagv2.2.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release403
mean_days_between_releases
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

47Weak · 17% of overall
How it's scored
20.4/60Stars19 stars
4/25Forks4 forks
4.7/15Watchers8 watchers
Inputs used
forks4
stars19
watchers8
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
55.6/80Monthly downloads14,852 downloads/month across npm
0/20Registry dependentsnot reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packages@iiif/parser
dependents
ecosystemsnpm
total_downloads
monthly_downloads14,852
unverified_packages_excluded
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

60Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
1/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 95% of commits
5.4/13.5Contributor breadth4 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 6 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled4
top_contributor_share0.954
How it's scored
14.7/42Issue resolution35% of issues closed
27.1/30PR acceptance37/41 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 2/23 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs37
open_issues13
closed_issues7
prs_merged_7d
prs_decided_7d
prs_merged_30d
prs_decided_30d
issue_closed_ratio0.35
closed_unmerged_prs4
first_time_authors_30d
first_time_prs_merged_30d
first_time_prs_decided_30d
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domainverified-domain status not read for this organization
11.4/25Owner reach38 followers of IIIF-Commons
24.6/25Track record52 public repos, account ~10 yr old
Inputs used
followers38
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified
owner_loginIIIF-Commons
public_repos52
account_age_days3,653
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on npm
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 2 days ago
20/20Version history43 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packages@iiif/parser
ecosystemsnpm
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish2

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

72Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows2 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
16/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests4 out of 5 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

85Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics1 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicshacktoberfest
has_wikiyes
homepage
docs_site
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

35Weak · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
2/2.5CI-Tests4 out of 5 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 2/23 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 6 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained12 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities36 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate3.5
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

51Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit historyno data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checkingtsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environmentlockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno data
0/8Automated maintenanceno data
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespnpm-lock.yaml
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configstsconfig.json
agent_commit_share
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice, Automated maintenance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeTypeScript (statically typed)
54.3/55Manageable file sizes1/77 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageTypeScript
largest_source_bytes78,930
source_files_sampled77
oversized_source_files1
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP servernot applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examplescookbook
Inputs used
example_dirscookbook
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files
interfaces_expected_of
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

19GitHub stars
4contributors
41commits, last 12 months
2days since last push
1releases
1bus factor
13open issues
npmpackage ecosystems

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 3.5 / 10
3.5aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-16 15:20 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
8CI-Tests4 out of 5 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 2/23 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 6 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained12 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities36 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 4
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
npm@iiif/presentation-2^1.0.4package.json
npm@iiif/presentation-3^2.2.2package.json
npm@iiif/presentation-3-normalized^0.9.7package.json
npm@types/geojson^7946.0.10package.json
All dependencies 174

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 4 direct and 170 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npm@iiif/presentation-21.0.4direct
npm@iiif/presentation-32.2.2direct
npm@iiif/presentation-3-normalized0.9.7direct
npm@types/geojson7946.0.14direct
npm@babel/generator7.28.0indirect
npm@babel/helper-string-parser7.27.1indirect
npm@babel/helper-validator-identifier7.27.1indirect
npm@babel/parser7.28.0indirect
npm@babel/types7.28.2indirect
npm@emnapi/core1.4.5indirect
npm@emnapi/runtime1.4.5indirect
npm@emnapi/wasi-threads1.0.4indirect
npm@esbuild/aix-ppc640.20.2indirect
npm@esbuild/android-arm0.20.2indirect
npm@esbuild/android-arm640.20.2indirect
npm@esbuild/android-x640.20.2indirect
npm@esbuild/darwin-arm640.20.2indirect
npm@esbuild/darwin-x640.20.2indirect
npm@esbuild/freebsd-arm640.20.2indirect
npm@esbuild/freebsd-x640.20.2indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-arm0.20.2indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-arm640.20.2indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-ia320.20.2indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-loong640.20.2indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-mips64el0.20.2indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-ppc640.20.2indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-riscv640.20.2indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-s390x0.20.2indirect
npm@esbuild/linux-x640.20.2indirect
npm@esbuild/netbsd-x640.20.2indirect
npm@esbuild/openbsd-x640.20.2indirect
npm@esbuild/sunos-x640.20.2indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-arm640.20.2indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-ia320.20.2indirect
npm@esbuild/win32-x640.20.2indirect
npm@happy-dom/global-registrator16.3.0indirect
npm@hyperion-framework/validator1.1.0indirect
npm@jridgewell/gen-mapping0.3.13indirect
npm@jridgewell/resolve-uri3.1.2indirect
npm@jridgewell/sourcemap-codec1.5.0indirect
npm@jridgewell/trace-mapping0.3.30indirect
npm@napi-rs/wasm-runtime1.0.3indirect
npm@oxc-project/runtime0.81.0indirect
npm@oxc-project/types0.81.0indirect
npm@quansync/fs0.1.4indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-android-arm641.0.0-beta.32indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-darwin-arm641.0.0-beta.32indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-darwin-x641.0.0-beta.32indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-freebsd-x641.0.0-beta.32indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-arm-gnueabihf1.0.0-beta.32indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-arm64-gnu1.0.0-beta.32indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-arm64-musl1.0.0-beta.32indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-x64-gnu1.0.0-beta.32indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-x64-musl1.0.0-beta.32indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-openharmony-arm641.0.0-beta.32indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-wasm32-wasi1.0.0-beta.32indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-win32-arm64-msvc1.0.0-beta.32indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-win32-ia32-msvc1.0.0-beta.32indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-win32-x64-msvc1.0.0-beta.32indirect
npm@rolldown/pluginutils1.0.0-beta.32indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-android-arm-eabi4.14.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-android-arm644.14.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-darwin-arm644.14.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-darwin-x644.14.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-arm-gnueabihf4.14.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-arm64-gnu4.14.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-arm64-musl4.14.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-powerpc64le-gnu4.14.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-riscv64-gnu4.14.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-s390x-gnu4.14.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-x64-gnu4.14.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-linux-x64-musl4.14.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-win32-arm64-msvc4.14.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-win32-ia32-msvc4.14.1indirect
npm@rollup/rollup-win32-x64-msvc4.14.1indirect
npm@tybys/wasm-util0.10.0indirect
npm@types/estree1.0.5indirect
npm@types/node18.19.31indirect
npm@vitest/expect2.1.8indirect
npm@vitest/mocker2.1.8indirect
npm@vitest/pretty-format2.1.8indirect
npm@vitest/runner2.1.8indirect
npm@vitest/snapshot2.1.8indirect
npm@vitest/spy2.1.8indirect
npm@vitest/utils2.1.8indirect
npmajv6.12.2indirect
npmansis4.1.0indirect
npmassertion-error2.0.1indirect
npmast-kit2.1.2indirect
npmbalanced-match1.0.2indirect
npmbirpc2.5.0indirect
npmbrace-expansion2.0.1indirect
npmcac6.7.14indirect
npmchai5.1.2indirect
npmcheck-error2.1.1indirect
npmchokidar4.0.3indirect
npmdebug4.4.0indirect
npmdebug4.4.1indirect
npmdeep-eql5.0.2indirect
npmdefu6.1.4indirect
npmdiff8.0.2indirect
npmdts-resolver2.1.1indirect
npmempathic2.0.0indirect
npmes-module-lexer1.6.0indirect
npmesbuild0.20.2indirect
npmestree-walker3.0.3indirect
npmexpect-type1.1.0indirect
npmfast-deep-equal3.1.3indirect
npmfast-json-stable-stringify2.1.0indirect
npmfdir6.4.6indirect
npmfs.realpath1.0.0indirect
npmfsevents2.3.3indirect
npmget-tsconfig4.10.1indirect
npmglob8.1.0indirect
npmhappy-dom16.3.0indirect
npmhookable5.5.3indirect
npmignore-walk5.0.1indirect
npminflight1.0.6indirect
npminherits2.0.4indirect
npmjiti2.5.1indirect
npmjsesc3.1.0indirect
npmjson-schema-traverse0.4.1indirect
npmloupe3.1.2indirect
npmmagic-string0.30.17indirect
npmminimatch5.1.6indirect
npmmri1.2.0indirect
npmms2.1.3indirect
npmnanoid3.3.7indirect
npmnpm-bundled2.0.1indirect
npmnpm-normalize-package-bin2.0.0indirect
npmnpm-packlist5.1.3indirect
npmonce1.4.0indirect
npmpathe1.1.2indirect
npmpathe2.0.3indirect
npmpathval2.0.0indirect
npmpicocolors1.0.0indirect
npmpicomatch4.0.3indirect
npmpostcss8.4.38indirect
npmprettier3.2.5indirect
npmpublint0.2.7indirect
npmpunycode2.3.1indirect
npmquansync0.2.10indirect
npmreaddirp4.1.2indirect
npmresolve-pkg-maps1.0.0indirect
npmrolldown1.0.0-beta.32indirect
npmrolldown-plugin-dts0.15.6indirect
npmrollup4.14.1indirect
npmsade1.8.1indirect
npmsemver7.7.2indirect
npmsiginfo2.0.0indirect
npmsource-map-js1.2.0indirect
npmstackback0.0.2indirect
npmstd-env3.8.0indirect
npmtinybench2.9.0indirect
npmtinyexec0.3.2indirect
npmtinyexec1.0.1indirect
npmtinyglobby0.2.14indirect
npmtinypool1.0.2indirect
npmtinyrainbow1.2.0indirect
npmtinyspy3.0.2indirect
npmtree-kill1.2.2indirect
npmtsdown0.14.1indirect
npmtslib2.6.2indirect
npmtypescript5.4.4indirect
npmunconfig7.3.2indirect
npmundici-types5.26.5indirect
npmuri-js4.4.1indirect
npmvite5.2.8indirect
npmvite-node2.1.8indirect
npmvitest2.1.8indirect
npmwebidl-conversions7.0.0indirect
npmwhatwg-mimetype3.0.0indirect
npmwhy-is-node-running2.3.0indirect
npmwrappy1.0.2indirect
Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.11.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsnpm.